"我建议,你决定":学术顾问如何影响社区学院学生的入学和学分决定

IF 2.9 3区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Review of Higher Education Pub Date : 2024-02-01 DOI:10.1353/rhe.0.a919068
Lyle McKinney, Gerald V. Bourdeau, Andrea Backscheider Burridge, Mimi Lee, Melissa Miller-Waters, Yolanda M. Barnes
{"title":"\"我建议,你决定\":学术顾问如何影响社区学院学生的入学和学分决定","authors":"Lyle McKinney, Gerald V. Bourdeau, Andrea Backscheider Burridge, Mimi Lee, Melissa Miller-Waters, Yolanda M. Barnes","doi":"10.1353/rhe.0.a919068","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Academic advising has been described as the second-most important function in the community college (behind only instruction) toward helping students achieve their goals. Using interview data from 78 students and 33 advisors at one of the nation’s largest and most racially diverse community college systems, our qualitative case study examined how academic advisors inform, and directly influence, students’ enrollment decisions. Advisors emphasized their role as supporting and scaffolding student decision-making, but not making decisions for students. Most advisors endorsed a developmental approach focused on building students’ knowledge and capacity to make better decisions about their own academic trajectory. However, some students had conflicting expectations of the advising relationship (e.g., advisors should tell them exactly what to study, which courses and how many to take), which resulted in frustration and desires for highly prescriptive advising.</p>","PeriodicalId":47732,"journal":{"name":"Review of Higher Education","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"\\\"I Advise, You Decide\\\": How Academic Advisors Shape Community College Students' Enrollment and Credit Load Decisions\",\"authors\":\"Lyle McKinney, Gerald V. Bourdeau, Andrea Backscheider Burridge, Mimi Lee, Melissa Miller-Waters, Yolanda M. Barnes\",\"doi\":\"10.1353/rhe.0.a919068\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Academic advising has been described as the second-most important function in the community college (behind only instruction) toward helping students achieve their goals. Using interview data from 78 students and 33 advisors at one of the nation’s largest and most racially diverse community college systems, our qualitative case study examined how academic advisors inform, and directly influence, students’ enrollment decisions. Advisors emphasized their role as supporting and scaffolding student decision-making, but not making decisions for students. Most advisors endorsed a developmental approach focused on building students’ knowledge and capacity to make better decisions about their own academic trajectory. However, some students had conflicting expectations of the advising relationship (e.g., advisors should tell them exactly what to study, which courses and how many to take), which resulted in frustration and desires for highly prescriptive advising.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47732,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Review of Higher Education\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Review of Higher Education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"95\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1353/rhe.0.a919068\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"教育学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Review of Higher Education","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/rhe.0.a919068","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在社区学院中,学术指导被视为帮助学生实现其目标的第二重要职能(仅次于教学)。我们的定性案例研究通过对全美规模最大、种族最多元化的社区学院系统中的 78 名学生和 33 名顾问的访谈数据,考察了学术顾问如何告知并直接影响学生的入学决定。顾问们强调,他们的角色是为学生的决策提供支持和支架,而不是替学生做决定。大多数辅导员都赞同采用发展性方法,注重培养学生的知识和能力,使他们能够更好地决定自己的学业发展轨迹。然而,有些学生对升学指导关系的期望相互矛盾(例如,升学指导应该明确告诉他们应该学习什么、选修哪些课程以及选修多少课程),这导致了他们的挫败感和对高度规范性升学指导的渴望。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
"I Advise, You Decide": How Academic Advisors Shape Community College Students' Enrollment and Credit Load Decisions

Academic advising has been described as the second-most important function in the community college (behind only instruction) toward helping students achieve their goals. Using interview data from 78 students and 33 advisors at one of the nation’s largest and most racially diverse community college systems, our qualitative case study examined how academic advisors inform, and directly influence, students’ enrollment decisions. Advisors emphasized their role as supporting and scaffolding student decision-making, but not making decisions for students. Most advisors endorsed a developmental approach focused on building students’ knowledge and capacity to make better decisions about their own academic trajectory. However, some students had conflicting expectations of the advising relationship (e.g., advisors should tell them exactly what to study, which courses and how many to take), which resulted in frustration and desires for highly prescriptive advising.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Review of Higher Education
Review of Higher Education EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: The official journal of the Association for the Study of Higher Education (ASHE), The Review of Higher Education provides a forum for discussion of issues affecting higher education. The journal advances the study of college and university issues by publishing peer-reviewed articles, essays, reviews, and research findings. Its broad approach emphasizes systematic inquiry and practical implications. Considered one of the leading research journals in the field, The Review keeps scholars, academic leaders, and public policymakers abreast of critical issues facing higher education today.
期刊最新文献
Hoped-For Selves: Using Possible Selves to Explore the Career and College-Going Aspirations for Gang-Involved Latino Boys Tenure Bans: An Exploratory Study of State Legislation Proposing to Eliminate Faculty Tenure, 2012-2022 Black Taxes: African-American Doctoral Students Experiencing Tokenism at a Predominantly White Institution "It's an Old White Boys' Club:" Faculty of Color's Perceptions of Policy Engagement Language and Postsecondary Trajectories: How "Ever-English Learner" Status Predicts College Student Pathways and Outcomes
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1