在使用腘绳肌腱自体移植进行前交叉韧带重建后两年和五年进行评估时,NordBord 测试显示膝关节屈肌力量持续不对称

IF 2.2 3区 医学 Q1 REHABILITATION Physical Therapy in Sport Pub Date : 2024-02-01 DOI:10.1016/j.ptsp.2024.01.008
Johan Högberg , Ramana Piussi , Rebecca Simonsson , Mathias Wernbom , Kristian Samuelsson , Roland Thomeé , Eric Hamrin Senorski
{"title":"在使用腘绳肌腱自体移植进行前交叉韧带重建后两年和五年进行评估时,NordBord 测试显示膝关节屈肌力量持续不对称","authors":"Johan Högberg ,&nbsp;Ramana Piussi ,&nbsp;Rebecca Simonsson ,&nbsp;Mathias Wernbom ,&nbsp;Kristian Samuelsson ,&nbsp;Roland Thomeé ,&nbsp;Eric Hamrin Senorski","doi":"10.1016/j.ptsp.2024.01.008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>Comparison of knee flexor strength limb symmetry index (LSI) between the NordBord-test and the Biodex-test, and to determine the relationship between knee flexor strength and function in patients 2 and 5 years after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACL-R) with hamstring tendon (HT) autografts.</p></div><div><h3>Design</h3><p>Observational registry study.</p></div><div><h3>Setting</h3><p>Primary care.</p></div><div><h3>Patients</h3><p>Cross-sectional data from 96 patients (55% women) participating in a rehabilitation-registry after ACL-R with HT autografts.</p></div><div><h3>Main outcome measures</h3><p>Comparison of knee flexor strength symmetry between the Biodex-test and the NordBord-test. Secondly, the relationship between knee flexor strength test and perceived knee function, activity level, and hop performance.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The NordBord-test demonstrated greater strength deficits compared to the Biodex-test with a mean difference of 12.5% ± 15.1% 95 % CI [8.1; 16.9%] at 2 years, and 11.1% ± 11.9% 95 % CI [7.7; 14.6 %] at 5 years after ACL-R. Relative concentric knee flexor strength (Nm/kg) in the Biodex demonstrated significant weak-to-moderate correlations with activity level and hop performance (r = 0.33–0.67) at 2 and 5 years.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>The NordBord-test identified deficits in knee flexor strength LSI not seen with the Biodex-test at 2 and 5 years after ACL-R. No significant correlations were found between the persistent knee flexor strength asymmetry and perceived function, activity level or hop performance.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":49698,"journal":{"name":"Physical Therapy in Sport","volume":"66 ","pages":"Pages 53-60"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1466853X24000208/pdfft?md5=bc61a74425a933395ecf0490ac0931bb&pid=1-s2.0-S1466853X24000208-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The NordBord test reveals persistent knee flexor strength asymmetry when assessed two and five years after ACL reconstruction withhamstring tendon autograft\",\"authors\":\"Johan Högberg ,&nbsp;Ramana Piussi ,&nbsp;Rebecca Simonsson ,&nbsp;Mathias Wernbom ,&nbsp;Kristian Samuelsson ,&nbsp;Roland Thomeé ,&nbsp;Eric Hamrin Senorski\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ptsp.2024.01.008\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>Comparison of knee flexor strength limb symmetry index (LSI) between the NordBord-test and the Biodex-test, and to determine the relationship between knee flexor strength and function in patients 2 and 5 years after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACL-R) with hamstring tendon (HT) autografts.</p></div><div><h3>Design</h3><p>Observational registry study.</p></div><div><h3>Setting</h3><p>Primary care.</p></div><div><h3>Patients</h3><p>Cross-sectional data from 96 patients (55% women) participating in a rehabilitation-registry after ACL-R with HT autografts.</p></div><div><h3>Main outcome measures</h3><p>Comparison of knee flexor strength symmetry between the Biodex-test and the NordBord-test. Secondly, the relationship between knee flexor strength test and perceived knee function, activity level, and hop performance.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The NordBord-test demonstrated greater strength deficits compared to the Biodex-test with a mean difference of 12.5% ± 15.1% 95 % CI [8.1; 16.9%] at 2 years, and 11.1% ± 11.9% 95 % CI [7.7; 14.6 %] at 5 years after ACL-R. Relative concentric knee flexor strength (Nm/kg) in the Biodex demonstrated significant weak-to-moderate correlations with activity level and hop performance (r = 0.33–0.67) at 2 and 5 years.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>The NordBord-test identified deficits in knee flexor strength LSI not seen with the Biodex-test at 2 and 5 years after ACL-R. No significant correlations were found between the persistent knee flexor strength asymmetry and perceived function, activity level or hop performance.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49698,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Physical Therapy in Sport\",\"volume\":\"66 \",\"pages\":\"Pages 53-60\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1466853X24000208/pdfft?md5=bc61a74425a933395ecf0490ac0931bb&pid=1-s2.0-S1466853X24000208-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Physical Therapy in Sport\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1466853X24000208\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"REHABILITATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Physical Therapy in Sport","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1466853X24000208","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的比较 NordBord 测试和 Biodex 测试的膝关节屈肌力量肢体对称性指数(LSI),并确定腘绳肌腱(HT)自体移植前交叉韧带重建(ACL-R)术后 2 年和 5 年患者的膝关节屈肌力量与功能之间的关系。主要结果测量比较 Biodex 测试和 NordBord 测试的膝关节屈肌力量对称性。结果与 Biodex 测试相比,NordBord 测试显示出更大的力量缺陷,前交叉韧带置换术后 2 年的平均差异为 12.5 % ± 15.1 % 95 % CI[8.1; 16.9 %],5 年的平均差异为 11.1 % ± 11.9 % 95 % CI[7.7; 14.6 %]。Biodex测试中的相对同心膝关节屈肌力量(Nm/kg)与活动水平和跳跃表现(r = 0.33-0.67)在2年和5年时呈显著的弱中度相关性。在持续的膝关节屈肌力量不对称与感知功能、活动水平或跳跃表现之间没有发现明显的相关性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The NordBord test reveals persistent knee flexor strength asymmetry when assessed two and five years after ACL reconstruction withhamstring tendon autograft

Objective

Comparison of knee flexor strength limb symmetry index (LSI) between the NordBord-test and the Biodex-test, and to determine the relationship between knee flexor strength and function in patients 2 and 5 years after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACL-R) with hamstring tendon (HT) autografts.

Design

Observational registry study.

Setting

Primary care.

Patients

Cross-sectional data from 96 patients (55% women) participating in a rehabilitation-registry after ACL-R with HT autografts.

Main outcome measures

Comparison of knee flexor strength symmetry between the Biodex-test and the NordBord-test. Secondly, the relationship between knee flexor strength test and perceived knee function, activity level, and hop performance.

Results

The NordBord-test demonstrated greater strength deficits compared to the Biodex-test with a mean difference of 12.5% ± 15.1% 95 % CI [8.1; 16.9%] at 2 years, and 11.1% ± 11.9% 95 % CI [7.7; 14.6 %] at 5 years after ACL-R. Relative concentric knee flexor strength (Nm/kg) in the Biodex demonstrated significant weak-to-moderate correlations with activity level and hop performance (r = 0.33–0.67) at 2 and 5 years.

Conclusion

The NordBord-test identified deficits in knee flexor strength LSI not seen with the Biodex-test at 2 and 5 years after ACL-R. No significant correlations were found between the persistent knee flexor strength asymmetry and perceived function, activity level or hop performance.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Physical Therapy in Sport
Physical Therapy in Sport 医学-康复医学
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
8.30%
发文量
125
审稿时长
39 days
期刊介绍: Physical Therapy in Sport is an international peer-reviewed journal that provides a forum for the publication of research and clinical practice material relevant to the healthcare professions involved in sports and exercise medicine, and rehabilitation. The journal publishes material that is indispensable for day-to-day practice and continuing professional development. Physical Therapy in Sport covers topics dealing with the diagnosis, treatment, and prevention of injuries, as well as more general areas of sports and exercise medicine and related sports science. The journal publishes original research, case studies, reviews, masterclasses, papers on clinical approaches, and book reviews, as well as occasional reports from conferences. Papers are double-blind peer-reviewed by our international advisory board and other international experts, and submissions from a broad range of disciplines are actively encouraged.
期刊最新文献
Season changes in performance of upper limbs and trunk in para swimmers Changes in daily sedentary time, in adolescents with long-standing knee pain, during a management strategy including activity modification: An ancillary analysis of two clinical trials Incidence, severity, and risk factors for injuries in female trail runners – A retrospective cross-sectional study Optimising physiotherapist delivery fidelity of exercise and physical activity advice for achilles tendinopathy: A prospective repeated-measures observational study Progressive resistance training improves single-leg vertical jump after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: Non-randomized controlled trial study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1