前交叉韧带重建术中使用缝合带增强的证据不足:至少 1 年随访临床结果的系统回顾

Jaydeep Dhillon, Grace Tanguilig, Carson Keeter, Kyle A. Borque, Wendell M. Heard, Matthew J. Kraeutler
{"title":"前交叉韧带重建术中使用缝合带增强的证据不足:至少 1 年随访临床结果的系统回顾","authors":"Jaydeep Dhillon, Grace Tanguilig, Carson Keeter, Kyle A. Borque, Wendell M. Heard, Matthew J. Kraeutler","doi":"10.1016/j.arthro.2024.01.026","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<h3>Purpose</h3><p>To perform a systematic review of clinical studies to directly compare clinical outcomes of patients undergoing anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) with versus without suture tape (ST) augmentation.</p><h3>Methods</h3><p>A systematic review was performed by searching PubMed, the Cochrane Library, and Embase to identify comparative studies directly comparing outcomes of ACLR with versus without ST augmentation with a minimum follow-up of 12 months. The search terms used were: <em>anterior cruciate ligament suture tape</em>. Patients were evaluated based on graft failure rates, return to sport (RTS), anteroposterior (AP) laxity, and patient-reported outcomes (PROs).</p><h3>Results</h3><p>Five studies (all level III) met inclusion criteria, including a total of 246 patients undergoing ACLR with ST augmentation (SA group) and 282 patients undergoing ACLR without augmentation (Control group). Patient age ranged from 14.9 to 29.7 years. The mean follow-up time ranged from 24.0 to 48.6 months. The average body mass index (BMI) ranged from 25.3 to 26.3 kg/m<sup>2</sup> and the overall percentage of males ranged from 43.4% to 69.0%. Overall, the graft failure rate ranged from 1.0% to 25.0% in the SA group and 8.0% to 20.0% in the Control group. Among the studies that reported RTS rates, the rate ranged from 69.2% to 88.9% in the SA group and 51.5% to 87.5% in the Control group. Among all PROs, 2 studies found a significant difference in the Tegner score favoring the SA group. Otherwise, no significant differences were found between groups in term of PROs. No significant differences in AP laxity were found between groups within any particular study. There was heterogeneity between studies regarding surgical techniques, post-operative rehabilitation protocols, and reported PROs.</p><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>There is insufficient evidence to suggest that patients undergoing ACLR with ST augmentation may experience favorable clinical outcomes compared to ACLR alone.</p>","PeriodicalId":501029,"journal":{"name":"Arthroscopy: The Journal of Arthroscopic & Related Surgery","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Insufficient Evidence for Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Utilizing Suture Tape Augmentation: A Systematic Review of Clinical Outcomes at Minimum 1-Year Follow-Up\",\"authors\":\"Jaydeep Dhillon, Grace Tanguilig, Carson Keeter, Kyle A. Borque, Wendell M. Heard, Matthew J. Kraeutler\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.arthro.2024.01.026\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<h3>Purpose</h3><p>To perform a systematic review of clinical studies to directly compare clinical outcomes of patients undergoing anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) with versus without suture tape (ST) augmentation.</p><h3>Methods</h3><p>A systematic review was performed by searching PubMed, the Cochrane Library, and Embase to identify comparative studies directly comparing outcomes of ACLR with versus without ST augmentation with a minimum follow-up of 12 months. The search terms used were: <em>anterior cruciate ligament suture tape</em>. Patients were evaluated based on graft failure rates, return to sport (RTS), anteroposterior (AP) laxity, and patient-reported outcomes (PROs).</p><h3>Results</h3><p>Five studies (all level III) met inclusion criteria, including a total of 246 patients undergoing ACLR with ST augmentation (SA group) and 282 patients undergoing ACLR without augmentation (Control group). Patient age ranged from 14.9 to 29.7 years. The mean follow-up time ranged from 24.0 to 48.6 months. The average body mass index (BMI) ranged from 25.3 to 26.3 kg/m<sup>2</sup> and the overall percentage of males ranged from 43.4% to 69.0%. Overall, the graft failure rate ranged from 1.0% to 25.0% in the SA group and 8.0% to 20.0% in the Control group. Among the studies that reported RTS rates, the rate ranged from 69.2% to 88.9% in the SA group and 51.5% to 87.5% in the Control group. Among all PROs, 2 studies found a significant difference in the Tegner score favoring the SA group. Otherwise, no significant differences were found between groups in term of PROs. No significant differences in AP laxity were found between groups within any particular study. There was heterogeneity between studies regarding surgical techniques, post-operative rehabilitation protocols, and reported PROs.</p><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>There is insufficient evidence to suggest that patients undergoing ACLR with ST augmentation may experience favorable clinical outcomes compared to ACLR alone.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":501029,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Arthroscopy: The Journal of Arthroscopic & Related Surgery\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-02-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Arthroscopy: The Journal of Arthroscopic & Related Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arthro.2024.01.026\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Arthroscopy: The Journal of Arthroscopic & Related Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arthro.2024.01.026","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的对临床研究进行系统综述,直接比较前交叉韧带重建(ACLR)患者使用缝合带(ST)增强与不使用缝合带(ST)增强的临床疗效。方法通过搜索 PubMed、Cochrane 图书馆和 Embase 进行系统综述,以确定直接比较 ACLR(前交叉韧带重建)患者使用缝合带(ST)增强与不使用缝合带(ST)增强的疗效的比较研究,随访至少 12 个月。搜索关键词为:前交叉韧带缝合带。结果5项研究(均为III级)符合纳入标准,其中包括246名接受前交叉韧带置换术并植入ST增强材料的患者(SA组)和282名接受前交叉韧带置换术但未植入ST增强材料的患者(对照组)。患者年龄从14.9岁到29.7岁不等。平均随访时间为 24.0 至 48.6 个月。平均体重指数(BMI)从 25.3 kg/m2 到 26.3 kg/m2 不等,男性的总体比例从 43.4% 到 69.0% 不等。总体而言,SA 组的移植物失败率为 1.0% 至 25.0%,对照组为 8.0% 至 20.0%。在报告 RTS 发生率的研究中,SA 组的 RTS 发生率为 69.2% 至 88.9%,对照组为 51.5% 至 87.5%。在所有 PROs 中,有 2 项研究发现 SA 组在 Tegner 评分上有显著差异。除此之外,各组间的 PROs 均无明显差异。在任何一项研究中,均未发现各组间在 AP 松弛度方面存在明显差异。在手术技术、术后康复方案和所报告的PROs方面,不同研究之间存在异质性。结论目前还没有足够的证据表明,与单纯前交叉韧带置换术相比,接受前交叉韧带置换术并行ST增强的患者可能会获得更好的临床效果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Insufficient Evidence for Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Utilizing Suture Tape Augmentation: A Systematic Review of Clinical Outcomes at Minimum 1-Year Follow-Up

Purpose

To perform a systematic review of clinical studies to directly compare clinical outcomes of patients undergoing anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) with versus without suture tape (ST) augmentation.

Methods

A systematic review was performed by searching PubMed, the Cochrane Library, and Embase to identify comparative studies directly comparing outcomes of ACLR with versus without ST augmentation with a minimum follow-up of 12 months. The search terms used were: anterior cruciate ligament suture tape. Patients were evaluated based on graft failure rates, return to sport (RTS), anteroposterior (AP) laxity, and patient-reported outcomes (PROs).

Results

Five studies (all level III) met inclusion criteria, including a total of 246 patients undergoing ACLR with ST augmentation (SA group) and 282 patients undergoing ACLR without augmentation (Control group). Patient age ranged from 14.9 to 29.7 years. The mean follow-up time ranged from 24.0 to 48.6 months. The average body mass index (BMI) ranged from 25.3 to 26.3 kg/m2 and the overall percentage of males ranged from 43.4% to 69.0%. Overall, the graft failure rate ranged from 1.0% to 25.0% in the SA group and 8.0% to 20.0% in the Control group. Among the studies that reported RTS rates, the rate ranged from 69.2% to 88.9% in the SA group and 51.5% to 87.5% in the Control group. Among all PROs, 2 studies found a significant difference in the Tegner score favoring the SA group. Otherwise, no significant differences were found between groups in term of PROs. No significant differences in AP laxity were found between groups within any particular study. There was heterogeneity between studies regarding surgical techniques, post-operative rehabilitation protocols, and reported PROs.

Conclusion

There is insufficient evidence to suggest that patients undergoing ACLR with ST augmentation may experience favorable clinical outcomes compared to ACLR alone.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Combined Single Anchor Fixation of Subscapularis and Biceps Pathology Leads to Improved Clinical Outcomes. Knee Posterolateral Corner Reconstruction Shows Low Failure and Complication Rates. Injectable therapeutic peptides-an adjunct to regenerative medicine and sports performance? Long-term, clinical outcome of arthroscopic rotator cuff repair may be improved with concomitant acromioplasty in patients with a Type III acromion. Primary repair of the ACL shows positive mid-term outcomes when properly indicated.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1