颅底脑膜瘤的微创治疗方法。

Carlos Roberto Vargas Gálvez, Omar López Arbolay, Marlon Manuel Ortiz Machín
{"title":"颅底脑膜瘤的微创治疗方法。","authors":"Carlos Roberto Vargas Gálvez,&nbsp;Omar López Arbolay,&nbsp;Marlon Manuel Ortiz Machín","doi":"10.1016/j.neucie.2023.11.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>Skull base meningiomas constitute a complex group of skull base tumors. The endoscopic endonasal approaches (EEA) and endoscopic Keyhole have a minimally invasive philosophy with high effectiveness, safety, and a significant decrease in postoperative morbidity in these tumors.</p></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><p>To describe the results of the use of minimally invasive approaches to skull base meningiomas.</p></div><div><h3>Method</h3><p>A descriptive, retrospective study was carried out in 140 patients at the \"Hermanos Ameijeiras\" Hospital who underwent surgery for cranial base meningiomas using minimally invasive approaches to the cranial base. The degree of tumor resection, tumor recurrence, reinterventions, and complications were evaluated.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>ESA were used in 72.8% of the study, while endoscopic Keyholes were used in 26.4% and combined approaches in 0.7%. In relation to total tumor resection, 91.9% was generally achieved. Overall tumor recurrence and reinterventions were less than 8.5% and 4%, respectively. Complications in ESA were: cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) fistula (2.1%), diabetes insipidus, hydrocephalus, cerebral infarction, surgical site hematoma, worsening of cranial nerves I-IV (1.4%) respectively. While in the Keyhole type approaches: seizures (2.9%), hydrocephalus (1.4%), CSF fistula (1.4%), worsening of Nerves IX-XII (0.7%).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>The following study reaffirms that minimally invasive approaches for skull base meningiomas constitute advanced surgical techniques for these tumors, associated with a low rate of postoperative complications.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":74273,"journal":{"name":"Neurocirugia (English Edition)","volume":"35 3","pages":"Pages 127-135"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Minimally invasive approach for skull base meningiomas\",\"authors\":\"Carlos Roberto Vargas Gálvez,&nbsp;Omar López Arbolay,&nbsp;Marlon Manuel Ortiz Machín\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.neucie.2023.11.002\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>Skull base meningiomas constitute a complex group of skull base tumors. The endoscopic endonasal approaches (EEA) and endoscopic Keyhole have a minimally invasive philosophy with high effectiveness, safety, and a significant decrease in postoperative morbidity in these tumors.</p></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><p>To describe the results of the use of minimally invasive approaches to skull base meningiomas.</p></div><div><h3>Method</h3><p>A descriptive, retrospective study was carried out in 140 patients at the \\\"Hermanos Ameijeiras\\\" Hospital who underwent surgery for cranial base meningiomas using minimally invasive approaches to the cranial base. The degree of tumor resection, tumor recurrence, reinterventions, and complications were evaluated.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>ESA were used in 72.8% of the study, while endoscopic Keyholes were used in 26.4% and combined approaches in 0.7%. In relation to total tumor resection, 91.9% was generally achieved. Overall tumor recurrence and reinterventions were less than 8.5% and 4%, respectively. Complications in ESA were: cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) fistula (2.1%), diabetes insipidus, hydrocephalus, cerebral infarction, surgical site hematoma, worsening of cranial nerves I-IV (1.4%) respectively. While in the Keyhole type approaches: seizures (2.9%), hydrocephalus (1.4%), CSF fistula (1.4%), worsening of Nerves IX-XII (0.7%).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>The following study reaffirms that minimally invasive approaches for skull base meningiomas constitute advanced surgical techniques for these tumors, associated with a low rate of postoperative complications.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":74273,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Neurocirugia (English Edition)\",\"volume\":\"35 3\",\"pages\":\"Pages 127-135\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Neurocirugia (English Edition)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2529849624000078\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neurocirugia (English Edition)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2529849624000078","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

简介颅底脑膜瘤是一类复杂的颅底肿瘤。内窥镜鼻内孔入路(EEA)和内窥镜锁孔入路具有微创理念,对这类肿瘤具有高效、安全的特点,并能显著降低术后发病率:描述使用微创方法治疗颅底脑膜瘤的结果:方法:对 "Hermanos Ameijeiras "医院的140名颅底脑膜瘤患者进行了描述性、回顾性研究。对肿瘤切除程度、肿瘤复发、再次手术和并发症进行了评估:72.8%的研究使用了ESA,26.4%使用了内窥镜锁孔,0.7%使用了联合方法。肿瘤总切除率一般为 91.9%。肿瘤复发率和再次手术率分别低于8.5%和4%。ESA手术的并发症分别为:脑脊液瘘(2.1%)、尿崩症、脑积水、脑梗塞、手术部位血肿、颅神经I-IV恶化(1.4%)。而锁孔式方法:癫痫发作(2.9%)、脑积水(1.4%)、脑脊液瘘(1.4%)、IX-XII 神经恶化(0.7%):以下研究再次证实,颅底脑膜瘤微创手术是治疗此类肿瘤的先进手术技术,术后并发症发生率低。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Minimally invasive approach for skull base meningiomas

Introduction

Skull base meningiomas constitute a complex group of skull base tumors. The endoscopic endonasal approaches (EEA) and endoscopic Keyhole have a minimally invasive philosophy with high effectiveness, safety, and a significant decrease in postoperative morbidity in these tumors.

Objective

To describe the results of the use of minimally invasive approaches to skull base meningiomas.

Method

A descriptive, retrospective study was carried out in 140 patients at the "Hermanos Ameijeiras" Hospital who underwent surgery for cranial base meningiomas using minimally invasive approaches to the cranial base. The degree of tumor resection, tumor recurrence, reinterventions, and complications were evaluated.

Results

ESA were used in 72.8% of the study, while endoscopic Keyholes were used in 26.4% and combined approaches in 0.7%. In relation to total tumor resection, 91.9% was generally achieved. Overall tumor recurrence and reinterventions were less than 8.5% and 4%, respectively. Complications in ESA were: cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) fistula (2.1%), diabetes insipidus, hydrocephalus, cerebral infarction, surgical site hematoma, worsening of cranial nerves I-IV (1.4%) respectively. While in the Keyhole type approaches: seizures (2.9%), hydrocephalus (1.4%), CSF fistula (1.4%), worsening of Nerves IX-XII (0.7%).

Conclusions

The following study reaffirms that minimally invasive approaches for skull base meningiomas constitute advanced surgical techniques for these tumors, associated with a low rate of postoperative complications.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Association of the C-reactive protein/albumin ratio with the prognosis of Aneurysmal Subarachnoid Hemorrhage: A systematic review. Moyamoya disease and moyamoya syndrome: A case series from multicentre private hospitals in Indonesia. Trigeminal neuralgia secondary to minor size lesion, anatomical considerations and pathophysiology. Utility of very high-pressure valves in persistent symptomatic shunt overdrainage. Idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus: A critical analysis of its underrepresentation across Italian medical-scientific societies in the last 5 years.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1