PCL-5 可否作为可能患有复杂创伤后应激障碍的潜在指标?

Laura Josephine Hendrikx , Natasha Biscoe , Dominic Murphy
{"title":"PCL-5 可否作为可能患有复杂创伤后应激障碍的潜在指标?","authors":"Laura Josephine Hendrikx ,&nbsp;Natasha Biscoe ,&nbsp;Dominic Murphy","doi":"10.1016/j.ejtd.2024.100387","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><p>Alongside the recognition of the ICD-11 Complex Posttraumatic Stress Disorder<span> (CPTSD), research has been underway to develop effective assessment measures to identify CPTSD. Given the novelty of the CPTSD diagnosis and associated assessment methods, many services have exhibited caution in incorporating such methods. Yet, there remains a clinical need to identify individuals experiencing CPTSD-like difficulties as it may hold important treatment considerations. This study aims to identify a score on the commonly administered Posttraumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) Checklist for Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders 5th edition (DSM-5) (PCL-5) that may be suggestive of CPTSD-like difficulties.</span></p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Using cross-sectional data from a clinical veteran sample (<em>N</em> = 227), a Receiver Operating Characteristics (ROC) analysis using CPTSD criteria as a benchmark was conducted to identify an PCL-5 cut-off score.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>This study suggests a PCL-5 cut-off score of 51, which had a sensitivity of 78.8 % and a specificity of 77.8 %.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>The potential utility of this score is discussed in terms of suitability as an indicator of potential CPTSD-like difficulties as well as potential service implications. Further research is required to further investigate the feasibility of a PCL-5 score to screen for CPTSD.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":29932,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Trauma & Dissociation","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Can the PCL-5 be used as a potential indicator of probable Complex PTSD?\",\"authors\":\"Laura Josephine Hendrikx ,&nbsp;Natasha Biscoe ,&nbsp;Dominic Murphy\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ejtd.2024.100387\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><p>Alongside the recognition of the ICD-11 Complex Posttraumatic Stress Disorder<span> (CPTSD), research has been underway to develop effective assessment measures to identify CPTSD. Given the novelty of the CPTSD diagnosis and associated assessment methods, many services have exhibited caution in incorporating such methods. Yet, there remains a clinical need to identify individuals experiencing CPTSD-like difficulties as it may hold important treatment considerations. This study aims to identify a score on the commonly administered Posttraumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) Checklist for Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders 5th edition (DSM-5) (PCL-5) that may be suggestive of CPTSD-like difficulties.</span></p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Using cross-sectional data from a clinical veteran sample (<em>N</em> = 227), a Receiver Operating Characteristics (ROC) analysis using CPTSD criteria as a benchmark was conducted to identify an PCL-5 cut-off score.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>This study suggests a PCL-5 cut-off score of 51, which had a sensitivity of 78.8 % and a specificity of 77.8 %.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>The potential utility of this score is discussed in terms of suitability as an indicator of potential CPTSD-like difficulties as well as potential service implications. Further research is required to further investigate the feasibility of a PCL-5 score to screen for CPTSD.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":29932,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European Journal of Trauma & Dissociation\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European Journal of Trauma & Dissociation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2468749924000115\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHIATRY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Trauma & Dissociation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2468749924000115","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的 在确认 ICD-11 复杂创伤后应激障碍(CPTSD)的同时,一直在研究开发有效的评估措施来识别 CPTSD。鉴于 CPTSD 诊断和相关评估方法的新颖性,许多服务机构在采用此类方法时都表现得十分谨慎。然而,临床上仍然需要识别出出现类似 CPTSD 困难的个体,因为这可能是治疗的重要考虑因素。本研究旨在确定创伤后应激障碍(PTSD)诊断与统计手册第 5 版(DSM-5)核对表(PCL-5)中可能提示 CPTSD 类困难的分数。方法利用临床退伍军人样本(N = 227)的横断面数据,以 CPTSD 标准为基准进行受体工作特征(ROC)分析,以确定 PCL-5 临界分数。结果本研究建议 PCL-5 临界值为 51 分,其灵敏度为 78.8%,特异度为 77.8%。结论本研究讨论了该分数的潜在效用,即作为潜在 CPTSD 类困难指标的适用性以及潜在的服务影响。需要进一步研究 PCL-5 评分筛查 CPTSD 的可行性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Can the PCL-5 be used as a potential indicator of probable Complex PTSD?

Purpose

Alongside the recognition of the ICD-11 Complex Posttraumatic Stress Disorder (CPTSD), research has been underway to develop effective assessment measures to identify CPTSD. Given the novelty of the CPTSD diagnosis and associated assessment methods, many services have exhibited caution in incorporating such methods. Yet, there remains a clinical need to identify individuals experiencing CPTSD-like difficulties as it may hold important treatment considerations. This study aims to identify a score on the commonly administered Posttraumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) Checklist for Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders 5th edition (DSM-5) (PCL-5) that may be suggestive of CPTSD-like difficulties.

Methods

Using cross-sectional data from a clinical veteran sample (N = 227), a Receiver Operating Characteristics (ROC) analysis using CPTSD criteria as a benchmark was conducted to identify an PCL-5 cut-off score.

Results

This study suggests a PCL-5 cut-off score of 51, which had a sensitivity of 78.8 % and a specificity of 77.8 %.

Conclusion

The potential utility of this score is discussed in terms of suitability as an indicator of potential CPTSD-like difficulties as well as potential service implications. Further research is required to further investigate the feasibility of a PCL-5 score to screen for CPTSD.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
4.80%
发文量
60
期刊最新文献
The effectiveness of Reconsolidation of Traumatic Memories for Complex PTSD – A pilot quasi-experimental study from a wellness centre in India Adverse childhood experiences and dissociation among Italian public psychology service users Résistance et trauma: introduire l'existence Exploring the interplay between dreams, Early Maladaptive Schemas and demanding parenting style in Malaysia: A qualitative study Parent-Child EMDR therapy for children aged 0–4 years: Protocol, pilot-data, and case study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1