在线便利样本中不同性取向和性别认同的人格特征

IF 2.6 2区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL Journal of Research in Personality Pub Date : 2024-02-01 DOI:10.1016/j.jrp.2024.104466
Eleanor J. Junkins, Kenzhane Pantin, Jaime Derringer
{"title":"在线便利样本中不同性取向和性别认同的人格特征","authors":"Eleanor J. Junkins,&nbsp;Kenzhane Pantin,&nbsp;Jaime Derringer","doi":"10.1016/j.jrp.2024.104466","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Sexual and gender minority participants (SGM) are underrepresented in quantitative psychology research overlooking a growing portion of the population. Previous research reports differences in personality between few categorical designations of gender and sexual orientation. The current study sought to expand the <em>gender similarities hypothesis</em> and characterize the feasibility of recruiting an SGM-diverse sample online. In preregistered analyses of 1,259 participants (73% identifying as SGM), we found that data quality was high, personality differences between groups were small overall (|<em>d</em>|<sub>average</sub> = 0.16; |<em>d</em>|<em><sub>range</sub></em> = 0–0.66), and there was substantial variability between facet-level group differences (|<em>d</em>| ± 0.59). We discuss implications for the attainability of diverse samples, group comparisons, and representativeness.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48406,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Research in Personality","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S009265662400014X/pdfft?md5=ffcaf9db1275ad02382adbc884a59164&pid=1-s2.0-S009265662400014X-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Personality across diverse sexual orientations and gender identities in an online convenience sample\",\"authors\":\"Eleanor J. Junkins,&nbsp;Kenzhane Pantin,&nbsp;Jaime Derringer\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jrp.2024.104466\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Sexual and gender minority participants (SGM) are underrepresented in quantitative psychology research overlooking a growing portion of the population. Previous research reports differences in personality between few categorical designations of gender and sexual orientation. The current study sought to expand the <em>gender similarities hypothesis</em> and characterize the feasibility of recruiting an SGM-diverse sample online. In preregistered analyses of 1,259 participants (73% identifying as SGM), we found that data quality was high, personality differences between groups were small overall (|<em>d</em>|<sub>average</sub> = 0.16; |<em>d</em>|<em><sub>range</sub></em> = 0–0.66), and there was substantial variability between facet-level group differences (|<em>d</em>| ± 0.59). We discuss implications for the attainability of diverse samples, group comparisons, and representativeness.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48406,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Research in Personality\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S009265662400014X/pdfft?md5=ffcaf9db1275ad02382adbc884a59164&pid=1-s2.0-S009265662400014X-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Research in Personality\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S009265662400014X\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Research in Personality","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S009265662400014X","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在定量心理学研究中,性取向和性别少数群体参与者(SGM)的代表性不足,而这一人群的比例却在不断增长。以往的研究报告显示,性别和性取向这两个少数分类之间存在人格差异。目前的研究试图扩展性别相似性假设,并确定在线招募 SGM 多样性样本的可行性。在对 1259 名参与者(73% 识别为 SGM)进行的预先登记分析中,我们发现数据质量很高,组间人格差异总体较小(|d|平均 = 0.16;|d|范围 = 0-0.66),面级组间差异存在很大的变异性(|d| ± 0.59)。我们讨论了多样化样本的可获得性、群体比较和代表性的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Personality across diverse sexual orientations and gender identities in an online convenience sample

Sexual and gender minority participants (SGM) are underrepresented in quantitative psychology research overlooking a growing portion of the population. Previous research reports differences in personality between few categorical designations of gender and sexual orientation. The current study sought to expand the gender similarities hypothesis and characterize the feasibility of recruiting an SGM-diverse sample online. In preregistered analyses of 1,259 participants (73% identifying as SGM), we found that data quality was high, personality differences between groups were small overall (|d|average = 0.16; |d|range = 0–0.66), and there was substantial variability between facet-level group differences (|d| ± 0.59). We discuss implications for the attainability of diverse samples, group comparisons, and representativeness.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.40
自引率
6.10%
发文量
102
审稿时长
67 days
期刊介绍: Emphasizing experimental and descriptive research, the Journal of Research in Personality presents articles that examine important issues in the field of personality and in related fields basic to the understanding of personality. The subject matter includes treatments of genetic, physiological, motivational, learning, perceptual, cognitive, and social processes of both normal and abnormal kinds in human and animal subjects. Features: • Papers that present integrated sets of studies that address significant theoretical issues relating to personality. • Theoretical papers and critical reviews of current experimental and methodological interest. • Single, well-designed studies of an innovative nature. • Brief reports, including replication or null result studies of previously reported findings, or a well-designed studies addressing questions of limited scope.
期刊最新文献
Agentic collective narcissism and communal collective narcissism: Do they predict COVID-19 pandemic-related beliefs and behaviors? Optimism and pessimism were prospectively associated with adaptation during the COVID-19 pandemic Age and gender differences in the value development of Dutch adults in 11 years of longitudinal data An investigation testing the perceptual advantage of Sensory Processing Sensitivity and its associations with the Big Five personality traits Self/observer agreement in personality assessment by observers’ relationship types
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1