银行和投资基金相互关联的金融体系中的冲击放大效应

IF 6.1 2区 经济学 Q1 BUSINESS, FINANCE Journal of Financial Stability Pub Date : 2024-02-03 DOI:10.1016/j.jfs.2024.101234
Matthias Sydow , Aurore Schilte , Giovanni Covi , Marija Deipenbrock , Leonardo Del Vecchio , Pawel Fiedor , Gábor Fukker , Max Gehrend , Régis Gourdel , Alberto Grassi , Björn Hilberg , Michiel Kaijser , Georgios Kaoudis , Luca Mingarelli , Mattia Montagna , Thibaut Piquard , Dilyara Salakhova , Natalia Tente
{"title":"银行和投资基金相互关联的金融体系中的冲击放大效应","authors":"Matthias Sydow ,&nbsp;Aurore Schilte ,&nbsp;Giovanni Covi ,&nbsp;Marija Deipenbrock ,&nbsp;Leonardo Del Vecchio ,&nbsp;Pawel Fiedor ,&nbsp;Gábor Fukker ,&nbsp;Max Gehrend ,&nbsp;Régis Gourdel ,&nbsp;Alberto Grassi ,&nbsp;Björn Hilberg ,&nbsp;Michiel Kaijser ,&nbsp;Georgios Kaoudis ,&nbsp;Luca Mingarelli ,&nbsp;Mattia Montagna ,&nbsp;Thibaut Piquard ,&nbsp;Dilyara Salakhova ,&nbsp;Natalia Tente","doi":"10.1016/j.jfs.2024.101234","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>This paper shows how the combined endogenous reaction of banks and investment funds to an exogenous shock can amplify or dampen losses to the financial system compared to results from single-sector stress testing models. We build a new model of contagion propagation using a very large and granular data set for the euro area. Based on the economic shock caused by the Covid-19 outbreak, we model three sources of exogenous shocks: a default shock, a market shock and a redemption shock. Our contagion mechanism operates through a dual channel of liquidity and solvency risk. Our analysis reveals that adding the fund sector to our model for banks leads to additional losses through fire sales and a further depletion of banks’ capital ratios by around one percentage point. The main driver of additional bank losses are endogenous market losses generated by investment funds’ asset liquidation.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48027,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Financial Stability","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":6.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Shock amplification in an interconnected financial system of banks and investment funds\",\"authors\":\"Matthias Sydow ,&nbsp;Aurore Schilte ,&nbsp;Giovanni Covi ,&nbsp;Marija Deipenbrock ,&nbsp;Leonardo Del Vecchio ,&nbsp;Pawel Fiedor ,&nbsp;Gábor Fukker ,&nbsp;Max Gehrend ,&nbsp;Régis Gourdel ,&nbsp;Alberto Grassi ,&nbsp;Björn Hilberg ,&nbsp;Michiel Kaijser ,&nbsp;Georgios Kaoudis ,&nbsp;Luca Mingarelli ,&nbsp;Mattia Montagna ,&nbsp;Thibaut Piquard ,&nbsp;Dilyara Salakhova ,&nbsp;Natalia Tente\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jfs.2024.101234\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>This paper shows how the combined endogenous reaction of banks and investment funds to an exogenous shock can amplify or dampen losses to the financial system compared to results from single-sector stress testing models. We build a new model of contagion propagation using a very large and granular data set for the euro area. Based on the economic shock caused by the Covid-19 outbreak, we model three sources of exogenous shocks: a default shock, a market shock and a redemption shock. Our contagion mechanism operates through a dual channel of liquidity and solvency risk. Our analysis reveals that adding the fund sector to our model for banks leads to additional losses through fire sales and a further depletion of banks’ capital ratios by around one percentage point. The main driver of additional bank losses are endogenous market losses generated by investment funds’ asset liquidation.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48027,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Financial Stability\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-02-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Financial Stability\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1572308924000196\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"BUSINESS, FINANCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Financial Stability","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1572308924000196","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS, FINANCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

与单一部门压力测试模型的结果相比,本文展示了银行和投资基金对外部冲击的综合内生反应如何扩大或抑制金融体系的损失。我们利用欧元区庞大而精细的数据集建立了一个新的传染传播模型。基于 Covid-19 爆发造成的经济冲击,我们建立了三个外生冲击源模型:违约冲击、市场冲击和赎回冲击。我们的传染机制通过流动性和偿付能力风险的双重渠道运作。我们的分析表明,在我们的银行模型中加入基金部门会导致因火灾销售造成的额外损失,并使银行的资本比率进一步下降约一个百分点。造成银行额外损失的主要原因是投资基金资产清算产生的内生性市场损失。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Shock amplification in an interconnected financial system of banks and investment funds

This paper shows how the combined endogenous reaction of banks and investment funds to an exogenous shock can amplify or dampen losses to the financial system compared to results from single-sector stress testing models. We build a new model of contagion propagation using a very large and granular data set for the euro area. Based on the economic shock caused by the Covid-19 outbreak, we model three sources of exogenous shocks: a default shock, a market shock and a redemption shock. Our contagion mechanism operates through a dual channel of liquidity and solvency risk. Our analysis reveals that adding the fund sector to our model for banks leads to additional losses through fire sales and a further depletion of banks’ capital ratios by around one percentage point. The main driver of additional bank losses are endogenous market losses generated by investment funds’ asset liquidation.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.70
自引率
9.30%
发文量
78
审稿时长
34 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Financial Stability provides an international forum for rigorous theoretical and empirical macro and micro economic and financial analysis of the causes, management, resolution and preventions of financial crises, including banking, securities market, payments and currency crises. The primary focus is on applied research that would be useful in affecting public policy with respect to financial stability. Thus, the Journal seeks to promote interaction among researchers, policy-makers and practitioners to identify potential risks to financial stability and develop means for preventing, mitigating or managing these risks both within and across countries.
期刊最新文献
Capital controls in China: A necessity for macroeconomic stability Editorial Board Independent directors’ connectedness and bank risk-taking Bank runs and media freedom: What you don’t know won’t hurt you? The dynamic effects of debtor bankruptcy on unsecured creditors' stock liquidity
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1