对于夏季特应性皮炎缓解期的儿童来说,用清水洗脸的护肤效果并不比用清洁剂洗脸差:讲卫生运动研究

IF 6.2 2区 医学 Q1 ALLERGY Allergology International Pub Date : 2024-02-02 DOI:10.1016/j.alit.2024.01.007
Yukiko Katoh , Osamu Natsume , Ryuhei Yasuoka , Satoshi Hayano , Eisaku Okada , Yutaka Ito , Akira Sakai , Yoko Monna , Fumitaka Takayanagi , Yusuke Inuzuka , Yuji Sakakura
{"title":"对于夏季特应性皮炎缓解期的儿童来说,用清水洗脸的护肤效果并不比用清洁剂洗脸差:讲卫生运动研究","authors":"Yukiko Katoh ,&nbsp;Osamu Natsume ,&nbsp;Ryuhei Yasuoka ,&nbsp;Satoshi Hayano ,&nbsp;Eisaku Okada ,&nbsp;Yutaka Ito ,&nbsp;Akira Sakai ,&nbsp;Yoko Monna ,&nbsp;Fumitaka Takayanagi ,&nbsp;Yusuke Inuzuka ,&nbsp;Yuji Sakakura","doi":"10.1016/j.alit.2024.01.007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Washing with water is not inferior to washing with soaps and detergents in children with atopic dermatitis (AD) in remission during the fall-winter seasons. We investigated whether this finding varies during summer based on the type of cleanser (soaps and detergents).</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>This evaluator-blinded, pragmatic, randomized, and non-inferiority study enrolled patients with AD whose eczema was controlled following regular steroid ointment application 2 days/week. For 8 ± 4 weeks, participants washed their upper and lower limbs with a cleanser on one side and with water alone on the other. Each participant chose either a weakly alkaline soap or an acidic detergent. The primary outcome was the Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI) score at week 8 ± 4.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The data of 43 of the 47 registered participants were analyzed. The median patient age was 44 (23–99) months; 28 and 15 participants chose weakly alkaline and acidic cleansers, respectively. At week 8 ± 4, EASI scores of the water and cleanser sides were 0.00 (0.00–0.40) and 0.15 (0.00–0.40), respectively (<em>p</em> = 0.74). The difference between both sides was 0.00 (−0.07 to 0.14); the limits of the 95 % confidence interval did not reach the pre-specified non-inferiority margin. No difference was observed in the median Patient-Oriented Eczema Measure score, number of additional steroid ointment applications, and occurrences of skin infections. There were no differences between the cleanser types in any of the results.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>We demonstrated that washing with water was not inferior to that with a cleanser in patients with AD in the maintenance phase during summer, regardless of the type of cleanser.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48861,"journal":{"name":"Allergology International","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":6.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S132389302400008X/pdfft?md5=bbbac75fdd1f53e3708e6efa4ff40775&pid=1-s2.0-S132389302400008X-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Skin care by washing with water is not inferior to washing with a cleanser in children with atopic dermatitis in remission in summer: WASH study\",\"authors\":\"Yukiko Katoh ,&nbsp;Osamu Natsume ,&nbsp;Ryuhei Yasuoka ,&nbsp;Satoshi Hayano ,&nbsp;Eisaku Okada ,&nbsp;Yutaka Ito ,&nbsp;Akira Sakai ,&nbsp;Yoko Monna ,&nbsp;Fumitaka Takayanagi ,&nbsp;Yusuke Inuzuka ,&nbsp;Yuji Sakakura\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.alit.2024.01.007\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Washing with water is not inferior to washing with soaps and detergents in children with atopic dermatitis (AD) in remission during the fall-winter seasons. We investigated whether this finding varies during summer based on the type of cleanser (soaps and detergents).</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>This evaluator-blinded, pragmatic, randomized, and non-inferiority study enrolled patients with AD whose eczema was controlled following regular steroid ointment application 2 days/week. For 8 ± 4 weeks, participants washed their upper and lower limbs with a cleanser on one side and with water alone on the other. Each participant chose either a weakly alkaline soap or an acidic detergent. The primary outcome was the Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI) score at week 8 ± 4.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The data of 43 of the 47 registered participants were analyzed. The median patient age was 44 (23–99) months; 28 and 15 participants chose weakly alkaline and acidic cleansers, respectively. At week 8 ± 4, EASI scores of the water and cleanser sides were 0.00 (0.00–0.40) and 0.15 (0.00–0.40), respectively (<em>p</em> = 0.74). The difference between both sides was 0.00 (−0.07 to 0.14); the limits of the 95 % confidence interval did not reach the pre-specified non-inferiority margin. No difference was observed in the median Patient-Oriented Eczema Measure score, number of additional steroid ointment applications, and occurrences of skin infections. There were no differences between the cleanser types in any of the results.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>We demonstrated that washing with water was not inferior to that with a cleanser in patients with AD in the maintenance phase during summer, regardless of the type of cleanser.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48861,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Allergology International\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-02-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S132389302400008X/pdfft?md5=bbbac75fdd1f53e3708e6efa4ff40775&pid=1-s2.0-S132389302400008X-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Allergology International\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S132389302400008X\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ALLERGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Allergology International","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S132389302400008X","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ALLERGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景对于秋冬季节病情缓解的特应性皮炎(AD)患儿,用清水清洗并不比用肥皂和清洁剂清洗效果差。我们研究了这一结论在夏季是否会因清洁剂(肥皂和清洁剂)的类型而有所不同。方法这项由评估者盲法、实用性、随机和非劣效的研究招募了在每周 2 天定期涂抹类固醇软膏后湿疹得到控制的特应性皮炎患者。在 8 ± 4 周的时间里,参与者一侧用清洁剂清洗上肢和下肢,另一侧只用清水清洗。每位参与者可选择弱碱性肥皂或酸性清洁剂。主要结果是第 8 周 ± 4 时的湿疹面积和严重程度指数 (EASI) 评分。结果分析了 47 名注册参与者中 43 人的数据。患者年龄中位数为 44(23-99)个月;分别有 28 和 15 名参与者选择了弱碱性和酸性清洁剂。第 8 ± 4 周时,水和洁面产品双方的 EASI 分数分别为 0.00(0.00-0.40)和 0.15(0.00-0.40)(p = 0.74)。双方的差异为 0.00(-0.07 至 0.14);95% 置信区间的界限未达到预先指定的非劣效性界限。在 "以患者为导向的湿疹测量"(Patient-Oriented Eczema Measure)的中位数评分、额外使用类固醇药膏的次数以及皮肤感染发生率方面均未观察到差异。结论我们的研究表明,对于处于夏季维持阶段的AD患者来说,无论使用哪种清洁剂,用清水洗脸的效果都不比用清洁剂差。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Skin care by washing with water is not inferior to washing with a cleanser in children with atopic dermatitis in remission in summer: WASH study

Background

Washing with water is not inferior to washing with soaps and detergents in children with atopic dermatitis (AD) in remission during the fall-winter seasons. We investigated whether this finding varies during summer based on the type of cleanser (soaps and detergents).

Methods

This evaluator-blinded, pragmatic, randomized, and non-inferiority study enrolled patients with AD whose eczema was controlled following regular steroid ointment application 2 days/week. For 8 ± 4 weeks, participants washed their upper and lower limbs with a cleanser on one side and with water alone on the other. Each participant chose either a weakly alkaline soap or an acidic detergent. The primary outcome was the Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI) score at week 8 ± 4.

Results

The data of 43 of the 47 registered participants were analyzed. The median patient age was 44 (23–99) months; 28 and 15 participants chose weakly alkaline and acidic cleansers, respectively. At week 8 ± 4, EASI scores of the water and cleanser sides were 0.00 (0.00–0.40) and 0.15 (0.00–0.40), respectively (p = 0.74). The difference between both sides was 0.00 (−0.07 to 0.14); the limits of the 95 % confidence interval did not reach the pre-specified non-inferiority margin. No difference was observed in the median Patient-Oriented Eczema Measure score, number of additional steroid ointment applications, and occurrences of skin infections. There were no differences between the cleanser types in any of the results.

Conclusions

We demonstrated that washing with water was not inferior to that with a cleanser in patients with AD in the maintenance phase during summer, regardless of the type of cleanser.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Allergology International
Allergology International ALLERGY-IMMUNOLOGY
CiteScore
12.60
自引率
5.90%
发文量
96
审稿时长
29 weeks
期刊介绍: Allergology International is the official journal of the Japanese Society of Allergology and publishes original papers dealing with the etiology, diagnosis and treatment of allergic and related diseases. Papers may include the study of methods of controlling allergic reactions, human and animal models of hypersensitivity and other aspects of basic and applied clinical allergy in its broadest sense. The Journal aims to encourage the international exchange of results and encourages authors from all countries to submit papers in the following three categories: Original Articles, Review Articles, and Letters to the Editor.
期刊最新文献
Dupilumab-related eosinophilia in patients with severe asthma: Post-marketing surveillance in Japan. 3D-CT-derived lung volumes and mortality risk in patients with fibrotic hypersensitivity pneumonitis. Quaternary ammoniums activate human dendritic cells and induce a specific T-cell response in vitro. Regulation of the IgE response by T follicular regulatory cells. Skin reaction patterns in cholinergic urticaria.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1