G8 筛查工具评分对日本 75 岁或以上口腔鳞状细胞癌患者治疗策略决策和疗效的临床影响

IF 0.4 Q4 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery Medicine and Pathology Pub Date : 2024-02-03 DOI:10.1016/j.ajoms.2024.01.011
{"title":"G8 筛查工具评分对日本 75 岁或以上口腔鳞状细胞癌患者治疗策略决策和疗效的临床影响","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.ajoms.2024.01.011","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>Treatment strategy decisions are very difficult in elderly patients with oral squamous carcinoma (OSCC). In this study, the factors that affect treatment strategy decisions and the clinical impact of the G8 screening tool score were retrospectively investigated in elderly OSCC patients.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>The medical records of primary OSCC patients aged 75 years or older were retrospectively reviewed, and 438 patients aged 75 years or older were included in this study. The factors that affect treatment strategy decisions and the clinical impact of the G8 screening tool score were investigated.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Regarding treatment decisions, the elderly OSCC patients with better Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status (ECOG-PS) scores and G8 scores of more than 10.5 were treated with the standard treatment with curative intent. The 5-year overall survival (OS) rates of the patients with G8 scores of &lt;10.5 and ≥10.5 were 43.8 % and 60.3 %, respectively (p &lt; 0.01). The 5-year self-reliant survival (SR) rates of the patients with G8 scores of &lt;10.5 and ≥10.5 were 44.9 % and 59.3 %, respectively (p &lt; 0.01). Multivariate analyses revealed that OS and SR were significantly correlated with poorer ECOG-PS and lower G8 scores (&lt;10.5).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>These results suggest that pre-treatment evaluations based on the ECOG-PS and G8 screening tool may aid treatment decisions for and prognostic evaluations of elderly OSCC patients.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":45034,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery Medicine and Pathology","volume":"36 5","pages":"Pages 678-683"},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The clinical impact of the G8 screening tool score on treatment strategy decisions and outcomes among oral squamous cell carcinoma patients aged 75 years or older in Japan\",\"authors\":\"\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ajoms.2024.01.011\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>Treatment strategy decisions are very difficult in elderly patients with oral squamous carcinoma (OSCC). In this study, the factors that affect treatment strategy decisions and the clinical impact of the G8 screening tool score were retrospectively investigated in elderly OSCC patients.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>The medical records of primary OSCC patients aged 75 years or older were retrospectively reviewed, and 438 patients aged 75 years or older were included in this study. The factors that affect treatment strategy decisions and the clinical impact of the G8 screening tool score were investigated.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Regarding treatment decisions, the elderly OSCC patients with better Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status (ECOG-PS) scores and G8 scores of more than 10.5 were treated with the standard treatment with curative intent. The 5-year overall survival (OS) rates of the patients with G8 scores of &lt;10.5 and ≥10.5 were 43.8 % and 60.3 %, respectively (p &lt; 0.01). The 5-year self-reliant survival (SR) rates of the patients with G8 scores of &lt;10.5 and ≥10.5 were 44.9 % and 59.3 %, respectively (p &lt; 0.01). Multivariate analyses revealed that OS and SR were significantly correlated with poorer ECOG-PS and lower G8 scores (&lt;10.5).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>These results suggest that pre-treatment evaluations based on the ECOG-PS and G8 screening tool may aid treatment decisions for and prognostic evaluations of elderly OSCC patients.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":45034,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery Medicine and Pathology\",\"volume\":\"36 5\",\"pages\":\"Pages 678-683\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-02-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery Medicine and Pathology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2212555824000115\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery Medicine and Pathology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2212555824000115","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的老年口腔鳞状细胞癌(OSCC)患者很难做出治疗策略决定。本研究回顾性调查了影响老年 OSCC 患者治疗策略决定的因素以及 G8 筛查工具评分的临床影响。方法 回顾性审查了 75 岁及以上初诊 OSCC 患者的病历,共纳入 438 名 75 岁及以上患者。结果在治疗决策方面,东部合作肿瘤学组表现状态(ECOG-PS)评分较好、G8评分超过10.5分的老年OSCC患者均接受了标准的根治性治疗。G8评分为<10.5和≥10.5的患者的5年总生存率(OS)分别为43.8%和60.3%(P< 0.01)。G8评分为<10.5和≥10.5的患者的5年自理生存率(SR)分别为44.9%和59.3%(p< 0.01)。多变量分析显示,OS和SR与较差的ECOG-PS和较低的G8评分(<10.5)显著相关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The clinical impact of the G8 screening tool score on treatment strategy decisions and outcomes among oral squamous cell carcinoma patients aged 75 years or older in Japan

Objective

Treatment strategy decisions are very difficult in elderly patients with oral squamous carcinoma (OSCC). In this study, the factors that affect treatment strategy decisions and the clinical impact of the G8 screening tool score were retrospectively investigated in elderly OSCC patients.

Methods

The medical records of primary OSCC patients aged 75 years or older were retrospectively reviewed, and 438 patients aged 75 years or older were included in this study. The factors that affect treatment strategy decisions and the clinical impact of the G8 screening tool score were investigated.

Results

Regarding treatment decisions, the elderly OSCC patients with better Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status (ECOG-PS) scores and G8 scores of more than 10.5 were treated with the standard treatment with curative intent. The 5-year overall survival (OS) rates of the patients with G8 scores of <10.5 and ≥10.5 were 43.8 % and 60.3 %, respectively (p < 0.01). The 5-year self-reliant survival (SR) rates of the patients with G8 scores of <10.5 and ≥10.5 were 44.9 % and 59.3 %, respectively (p < 0.01). Multivariate analyses revealed that OS and SR were significantly correlated with poorer ECOG-PS and lower G8 scores (<10.5).

Conclusions

These results suggest that pre-treatment evaluations based on the ECOG-PS and G8 screening tool may aid treatment decisions for and prognostic evaluations of elderly OSCC patients.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
129
审稿时长
83 days
期刊最新文献
Editorial Board Editorial Board Clinical and diagnostic features of salivary glands disease related to COVID-19 infection: A systematic review of the literature Tube feeding in patients with head and neck cancer undergoing chemoradio-/radio therapy: A systematic review and meta-analysis based on the GRADE approach Tumor budding and complete epithelial mesenchymal transition correlate with late nodal metastasis in early-stage tongue squamous cell carcinoma
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1