普通人群中多动症特质与自述优势之间的关系

IF 4.3 2区 医学 Q1 PSYCHIATRY Comprehensive psychiatry Pub Date : 2024-02-05 DOI:10.1016/j.comppsych.2024.152461
L.M. Schippers , C.U. Greven , M. Hoogman
{"title":"普通人群中多动症特质与自述优势之间的关系","authors":"L.M. Schippers ,&nbsp;C.U. Greven ,&nbsp;M. Hoogman","doi":"10.1016/j.comppsych.2024.152461","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>ADHD research has had a clear focus on symptoms, their negative consequences and the treatment of ADHD. However, previous qualitative research found that people with a diagnosis of ADHD also self-report to experience strengths related to their ADHD. This is one of the first quantitative studies to investigate multiple self-reported strengths in relation to ADHD traits in a general population sample. Therefore, our aim was to investigate the relationship between multiple self-reported strengths with ADHD traits in the general population using quantitative measures.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Our sample consisted of individuals from the general population in the UK, aged 18–60, <em>n</em> = 694. Next to assessing ADHD traits, we collected data on ten instruments investigating strengths that in qualitative research were reported to be related to ADHD. Correlation analysis (primary) was supplemented by factor and network analyses (exploratory).</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>We found positive correlations between ADHD traits and <em>hyperfocus</em>, <em>sensory processing sensitivity</em>, and <em>cognitive flexibility</em>.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>People with more ADHD traits score higher on several strengths, for other strengths we were not able to show a positive correlation in this population-bases sample. Information on strengths may aid people with elevated ADHD traits cope with their condition, and has potential to provide new angles for treatment.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":10554,"journal":{"name":"Comprehensive psychiatry","volume":"130 ","pages":"Article 152461"},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0010440X24000129/pdfft?md5=d90e67dbfe08515c633752049e605eb7&pid=1-s2.0-S0010440X24000129-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Associations between ADHD traits and self-reported strengths in the general population\",\"authors\":\"L.M. Schippers ,&nbsp;C.U. Greven ,&nbsp;M. Hoogman\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.comppsych.2024.152461\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>ADHD research has had a clear focus on symptoms, their negative consequences and the treatment of ADHD. However, previous qualitative research found that people with a diagnosis of ADHD also self-report to experience strengths related to their ADHD. This is one of the first quantitative studies to investigate multiple self-reported strengths in relation to ADHD traits in a general population sample. Therefore, our aim was to investigate the relationship between multiple self-reported strengths with ADHD traits in the general population using quantitative measures.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Our sample consisted of individuals from the general population in the UK, aged 18–60, <em>n</em> = 694. Next to assessing ADHD traits, we collected data on ten instruments investigating strengths that in qualitative research were reported to be related to ADHD. Correlation analysis (primary) was supplemented by factor and network analyses (exploratory).</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>We found positive correlations between ADHD traits and <em>hyperfocus</em>, <em>sensory processing sensitivity</em>, and <em>cognitive flexibility</em>.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>People with more ADHD traits score higher on several strengths, for other strengths we were not able to show a positive correlation in this population-bases sample. Information on strengths may aid people with elevated ADHD traits cope with their condition, and has potential to provide new angles for treatment.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10554,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Comprehensive psychiatry\",\"volume\":\"130 \",\"pages\":\"Article 152461\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-02-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0010440X24000129/pdfft?md5=d90e67dbfe08515c633752049e605eb7&pid=1-s2.0-S0010440X24000129-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Comprehensive psychiatry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0010440X24000129\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHIATRY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Comprehensive psychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0010440X24000129","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景ADHD 的研究主要集中在症状、其负面影响和 ADHD 的治疗上。然而,之前的定性研究发现,被诊断为多动症的人也会自我报告与多动症相关的优势。这是首次在普通人群样本中调查与多动症特征相关的多种自我报告优势的定量研究之一。因此,我们的目的是使用定量测量方法调查普通人群中多种自我报告优势与多动症特质之间的关系。除了评估多动症特质外,我们还收集了十种工具的数据,这些工具调查了定性研究中报道的与多动症相关的优势。结果我们发现多动症特质与过度专注、感觉处理敏感性和认知灵活性之间存在正相关。结论多动症特质较多的人在几项优势上得分较高,而对于其他优势,我们无法在这一人群样本中显示出正相关性。有关特长的信息可能有助于多动症患者应对病情,并有可能为治疗提供新的角度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Associations between ADHD traits and self-reported strengths in the general population

Background

ADHD research has had a clear focus on symptoms, their negative consequences and the treatment of ADHD. However, previous qualitative research found that people with a diagnosis of ADHD also self-report to experience strengths related to their ADHD. This is one of the first quantitative studies to investigate multiple self-reported strengths in relation to ADHD traits in a general population sample. Therefore, our aim was to investigate the relationship between multiple self-reported strengths with ADHD traits in the general population using quantitative measures.

Methods

Our sample consisted of individuals from the general population in the UK, aged 18–60, n = 694. Next to assessing ADHD traits, we collected data on ten instruments investigating strengths that in qualitative research were reported to be related to ADHD. Correlation analysis (primary) was supplemented by factor and network analyses (exploratory).

Results

We found positive correlations between ADHD traits and hyperfocus, sensory processing sensitivity, and cognitive flexibility.

Conclusions

People with more ADHD traits score higher on several strengths, for other strengths we were not able to show a positive correlation in this population-bases sample. Information on strengths may aid people with elevated ADHD traits cope with their condition, and has potential to provide new angles for treatment.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Comprehensive psychiatry
Comprehensive psychiatry 医学-精神病学
CiteScore
12.50
自引率
1.40%
发文量
64
审稿时长
29 days
期刊介绍: "Comprehensive Psychiatry" is an open access, peer-reviewed journal dedicated to the field of psychiatry and mental health. Its primary mission is to share the latest advancements in knowledge to enhance patient care and deepen the understanding of mental illnesses. The journal is supported by a diverse team of international editors and peer reviewers, ensuring the publication of high-quality research with a strong focus on clinical relevance and the implications for psychopathology. "Comprehensive Psychiatry" encourages authors to present their research in an accessible manner, facilitating engagement with clinicians, policymakers, and the broader public. By embracing an open access policy, the journal aims to maximize the global impact of its content, making it readily available to a wide audience and fostering scientific collaboration and public awareness beyond the traditional academic community. This approach is designed to promote a more inclusive and informed dialogue on mental health, contributing to the overall progress in the field.
期刊最新文献
Adequacy of treatment in outpatients with obsessive-compulsive disorder A comparison of firefighter mental health education programs: A descriptive thematic analysis of firefighter experiences Acceptability, tolerability and safety of the BRIGhTMIND trial: Connectivity-guided intermittent theta-burst stimulation versus F3- repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation for treatment-resistant depression Exercise moderates longitudinal group psychopathology networks in individuals with eating disorders The deer mouse (Peromyscus maniculatus bairdii) as a model organism to explore the naturalistic psychobiological mechanisms contributing to compulsive-like rigidity: A narrative overview of advances and opportunities
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1