{"title":"骨内缺损再生中磷酸钙-聚乳酸-聚乙二醇移植物的临床和放射学评估:随机对照试验","authors":"Moitri Ojha, Deepika Pawar Chandrashekara Rao, Vishakante Gowda","doi":"10.5005/jp-journals-10024-3605","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>This study aims to evaluate the efficacy of calcium phosphate-poly(lactide-co-glycolide) composite graft in the regeneration of intrabony defects in chronic periodontitis patients over a period of 12 months.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>A total of 11 systemically healthy chronic periodontitis patients with 22 graftable sites were treated with calcium phosphate cement (CPC) bone graft (control group) and CPC-poly(lactic-co-glycolic acid)(PLGA) composite (test group) after flap reflection and debridement. Clinical parameters such as probing pocket depth (PPD) and clinical attachment level (CAL) were recorded at baseline and 3, 6, 9, and 12 months. Bone probing depth (BPD) and radiographic parameters such as defect depth (DD), changes in alveolar crest level (ALR), defect depth reduction (DDR), and percentage in defect depth reduction (PDDR) were calculated at baseline, and 6 and 12 months. The data were recorded and statistically analyzed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>On intragroup comparison, there was a significant improvement in all the parameters over a period of 1 year (clinically and radiographically). However, there was no statistically significant difference between the two groups in any of the parameters though there was a slightly higher bone fill noted in the test group.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Even though the CPC-PLGA composite bone graft showed a slight improvement in clinical and radiographic parameters as compared to the CPC graft, it was not statistically significant.</p><p><strong>Clinical significance: </strong>A major drawback of Calcium Phosphate cements as bone grafts is their poor degradability. The PLGA microspheres degrade to expose macropores and interconnected pores in the graft substrate which in turn would promote the ingrowth of osteoblasts. Also, this composite graft is mouldable, and resorbable and has been shown to snugly fit into the defects making them a suitable scaffold material. How to cite this article: Ojha M, Pawar Chandrashekara Rao D, Gowda V. Clinical and Radiographic Evaluation of Calcium Phosphate-Poly(lactide-co-glycolide) Graft in Regeneration of Intrabony Defects: Randomized Control Trial. J Contemp Dent Pract 2023;24(12):921-927.</p>","PeriodicalId":35792,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Contemporary Dental Practice","volume":"24 12","pages":"921-927"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Clinical and Radiographic Evaluation of Calcium Phosphate-Poly(lactide-co-glycolide) Graft in Regeneration of Intrabony Defects: Randomized Control Trial.\",\"authors\":\"Moitri Ojha, Deepika Pawar Chandrashekara Rao, Vishakante Gowda\",\"doi\":\"10.5005/jp-journals-10024-3605\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>This study aims to evaluate the efficacy of calcium phosphate-poly(lactide-co-glycolide) composite graft in the regeneration of intrabony defects in chronic periodontitis patients over a period of 12 months.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>A total of 11 systemically healthy chronic periodontitis patients with 22 graftable sites were treated with calcium phosphate cement (CPC) bone graft (control group) and CPC-poly(lactic-co-glycolic acid)(PLGA) composite (test group) after flap reflection and debridement. Clinical parameters such as probing pocket depth (PPD) and clinical attachment level (CAL) were recorded at baseline and 3, 6, 9, and 12 months. Bone probing depth (BPD) and radiographic parameters such as defect depth (DD), changes in alveolar crest level (ALR), defect depth reduction (DDR), and percentage in defect depth reduction (PDDR) were calculated at baseline, and 6 and 12 months. The data were recorded and statistically analyzed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>On intragroup comparison, there was a significant improvement in all the parameters over a period of 1 year (clinically and radiographically). However, there was no statistically significant difference between the two groups in any of the parameters though there was a slightly higher bone fill noted in the test group.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Even though the CPC-PLGA composite bone graft showed a slight improvement in clinical and radiographic parameters as compared to the CPC graft, it was not statistically significant.</p><p><strong>Clinical significance: </strong>A major drawback of Calcium Phosphate cements as bone grafts is their poor degradability. The PLGA microspheres degrade to expose macropores and interconnected pores in the graft substrate which in turn would promote the ingrowth of osteoblasts. Also, this composite graft is mouldable, and resorbable and has been shown to snugly fit into the defects making them a suitable scaffold material. How to cite this article: Ojha M, Pawar Chandrashekara Rao D, Gowda V. Clinical and Radiographic Evaluation of Calcium Phosphate-Poly(lactide-co-glycolide) Graft in Regeneration of Intrabony Defects: Randomized Control Trial. J Contemp Dent Pract 2023;24(12):921-927.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":35792,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Contemporary Dental Practice\",\"volume\":\"24 12\",\"pages\":\"921-927\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Contemporary Dental Practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10024-3605\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Dentistry\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Contemporary Dental Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10024-3605","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Dentistry","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
目的:本研究旨在评估磷酸钙-聚(乳酸-聚乙二醇)复合植骨在慢性牙周炎患者骨内缺损再生中的疗效,为期12个月:共有11名全身健康的慢性牙周炎患者,22个可移植部位,在翻瓣反射和清创后,分别接受磷酸钙水泥(CPC)骨移植(对照组)和CPC-聚(乳酸-共聚乙二醇酸)(PLGA)复合材料(试验组)治疗。在基线期和 3、6、9、12 个月时记录探查袋深度(PPD)和临床附着水平(CAL)等临床参数。在基线、6个月和12个月时,计算骨探查深度(BPD)和放射学参数,如缺损深度(DD)、牙槽嵴水平变化(ALR)、缺损深度缩小(DDR)和缺损深度缩小百分比(PDDR)。结果:组内比较:在一年的时间里,所有参数都有显著改善(临床和影像学)。然而,尽管试验组的骨填充率稍高,但两组之间在任何参数上都没有统计学意义上的显著差异:结论:尽管与 CPC 相比,CPC-PLGA 复合骨移植在临床和放射学参数方面略有改善,但在统计学上并不显著:临床意义:磷酸钙水门汀作为骨移植材料的一个主要缺点是降解性差。PLGA 微球降解后会在移植物基质中暴露出大孔和相互连接的小孔,这反过来又会促进成骨细胞的生长。此外,这种复合移植物还具有可塑造性和可吸收性,并能与缺损部位紧密贴合,因此是一种合适的支架材料。本文引用方式Ojha M, Pawar Chandrashekara Rao D, Gowda V. 骨内缺损再生中磷酸钙-聚乳酸-聚乙二醇移植物的临床和放射学评估:随机对照试验。J Contemp Dent Pract 2023;24(12):921-927.
Clinical and Radiographic Evaluation of Calcium Phosphate-Poly(lactide-co-glycolide) Graft in Regeneration of Intrabony Defects: Randomized Control Trial.
Aim: This study aims to evaluate the efficacy of calcium phosphate-poly(lactide-co-glycolide) composite graft in the regeneration of intrabony defects in chronic periodontitis patients over a period of 12 months.
Materials and methods: A total of 11 systemically healthy chronic periodontitis patients with 22 graftable sites were treated with calcium phosphate cement (CPC) bone graft (control group) and CPC-poly(lactic-co-glycolic acid)(PLGA) composite (test group) after flap reflection and debridement. Clinical parameters such as probing pocket depth (PPD) and clinical attachment level (CAL) were recorded at baseline and 3, 6, 9, and 12 months. Bone probing depth (BPD) and radiographic parameters such as defect depth (DD), changes in alveolar crest level (ALR), defect depth reduction (DDR), and percentage in defect depth reduction (PDDR) were calculated at baseline, and 6 and 12 months. The data were recorded and statistically analyzed.
Results: On intragroup comparison, there was a significant improvement in all the parameters over a period of 1 year (clinically and radiographically). However, there was no statistically significant difference between the two groups in any of the parameters though there was a slightly higher bone fill noted in the test group.
Conclusion: Even though the CPC-PLGA composite bone graft showed a slight improvement in clinical and radiographic parameters as compared to the CPC graft, it was not statistically significant.
Clinical significance: A major drawback of Calcium Phosphate cements as bone grafts is their poor degradability. The PLGA microspheres degrade to expose macropores and interconnected pores in the graft substrate which in turn would promote the ingrowth of osteoblasts. Also, this composite graft is mouldable, and resorbable and has been shown to snugly fit into the defects making them a suitable scaffold material. How to cite this article: Ojha M, Pawar Chandrashekara Rao D, Gowda V. Clinical and Radiographic Evaluation of Calcium Phosphate-Poly(lactide-co-glycolide) Graft in Regeneration of Intrabony Defects: Randomized Control Trial. J Contemp Dent Pract 2023;24(12):921-927.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Contemporary Dental Practice (JCDP), is a peer-reviewed, open access MEDLINE indexed journal. The journal’s full text is available online at http://www.thejcdp.com. The journal allows free access (open access) to its contents. Articles with clinical relevance will be given preference for publication. The Journal publishes original research papers, review articles, rare and novel case reports, and clinical techniques. Manuscripts are invited from all specialties of dentistry i.e., conservative dentistry and endodontics, dentofacial orthopedics and orthodontics, oral medicine and radiology, oral pathology, oral surgery, orodental diseases, pediatric dentistry, implantology, periodontics, clinical aspects of public health dentistry, and prosthodontics.