颅内脑膜瘤手术术中运动诱发电位和躯体感觉诱发电位监测与否对术后效果的时间分析

Na Il Shin, Hye Jin Hong, Young Il Kim, Il Sup Kim, Jae Hoon Sung, Sang Won Lee, Seung Ho Yang
{"title":"颅内脑膜瘤手术术中运动诱发电位和躯体感觉诱发电位监测与否对术后效果的时间分析","authors":"Na Il Shin, Hye Jin Hong, Young Il Kim, Il Sup Kim, Jae Hoon Sung, Sang Won Lee, Seung Ho Yang","doi":"10.14791/btrt.2023.0050","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>This study aimed to retrospectively assess results of intracranial meningioma surgery with or without intraoperative neuromonitoring (IONM) in a single institution.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Two cohorts (a historical cohort and a monitoring cohort) were collected for the analysis. Before IONM was introduced, a total of 107 patients underwent intracranial meningioma operation without IONM from January 2000 to December 2008 by one neurosurgeon (historical cohort). After IONM was introduced, a total of 99 patients with intracranial meningioma were operated under IONM between November 2018 and February 2023 by two neurosurgeons (monitoring cohort). A retrospective comparison was made on the complications from meningioma surgery between the two groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In the monitoring cohort, warning signals of motor evoked potential (MEPs) or somatosensory evoked potential (SSEPs) were alarmed in 10 patients. Two of these 10 patients aborted the operation and eight of these 10 patients with warning signals underwent tumor resection. Of these eight patients, five showed postoperative morbidity. Five of 89 patients without warning signals developed neurological deficits. In the historical cohort, 14 of 107 patients showed postoperative morbidity or mortality.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Even after successful resection of intracranial meningiomas prior to the advent of IONM, integration of MEPs and SSEPs monitoring yielded valuable insights for surgical teams during operative procedures.</p>","PeriodicalId":72453,"journal":{"name":"Brain tumor research and treatment","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10864132/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Temporal Analysis of Postoperative Outcomes With or Without Intraoperative Motor Evoked Potentials and Somatosensory Evoked Potentials Monitoring for Intracranial Meningioma Surgery.\",\"authors\":\"Na Il Shin, Hye Jin Hong, Young Il Kim, Il Sup Kim, Jae Hoon Sung, Sang Won Lee, Seung Ho Yang\",\"doi\":\"10.14791/btrt.2023.0050\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>This study aimed to retrospectively assess results of intracranial meningioma surgery with or without intraoperative neuromonitoring (IONM) in a single institution.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Two cohorts (a historical cohort and a monitoring cohort) were collected for the analysis. Before IONM was introduced, a total of 107 patients underwent intracranial meningioma operation without IONM from January 2000 to December 2008 by one neurosurgeon (historical cohort). After IONM was introduced, a total of 99 patients with intracranial meningioma were operated under IONM between November 2018 and February 2023 by two neurosurgeons (monitoring cohort). A retrospective comparison was made on the complications from meningioma surgery between the two groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In the monitoring cohort, warning signals of motor evoked potential (MEPs) or somatosensory evoked potential (SSEPs) were alarmed in 10 patients. Two of these 10 patients aborted the operation and eight of these 10 patients with warning signals underwent tumor resection. Of these eight patients, five showed postoperative morbidity. Five of 89 patients without warning signals developed neurological deficits. In the historical cohort, 14 of 107 patients showed postoperative morbidity or mortality.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Even after successful resection of intracranial meningiomas prior to the advent of IONM, integration of MEPs and SSEPs monitoring yielded valuable insights for surgical teams during operative procedures.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":72453,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Brain tumor research and treatment\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10864132/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Brain tumor research and treatment\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.14791/btrt.2023.0050\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Brain tumor research and treatment","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14791/btrt.2023.0050","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:本研究旨在回顾性评估单个机构的颅内脑膜瘤手术中使用或不使用术中神经监测仪(IONM)的结果:本研究旨在回顾性评估一家医疗机构在进行颅内脑膜瘤手术时是否进行术中神经监测(IONM)的结果:分析收集了两个队列(历史队列和监测队列)。在引入IONM之前,从2000年1月至2008年12月,共有107名患者接受了颅内脑膜瘤手术,其中一名神经外科医生未使用IONM(历史队列)。引入IONM后,2018年11月至2023年2月期间,两名神经外科医生共为99名颅内脑膜瘤患者实施了IONM手术(监测队列)。对两组脑膜瘤手术并发症进行了回顾性比较:在监测队列中,有10名患者的运动诱发电位(MEPs)或体感诱发电位(SSEPs)发出警报信号。在这 10 名患者中,有 2 人放弃了手术,而在这 10 名发出警告信号的患者中,有 8 人接受了肿瘤切除手术。在这 8 名患者中,有 5 人出现了术后并发症。89 名无预警信号的患者中有 5 人出现了神经功能障碍。在历史队列中,107 例患者中有 14 例出现术后发病或死亡:结论:即使在 IONM 出现之前成功切除了颅内脑膜瘤,整合 MEPs 和 SSEPs 监测也能为手术团队在手术过程中提供有价值的见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Temporal Analysis of Postoperative Outcomes With or Without Intraoperative Motor Evoked Potentials and Somatosensory Evoked Potentials Monitoring for Intracranial Meningioma Surgery.

Background: This study aimed to retrospectively assess results of intracranial meningioma surgery with or without intraoperative neuromonitoring (IONM) in a single institution.

Methods: Two cohorts (a historical cohort and a monitoring cohort) were collected for the analysis. Before IONM was introduced, a total of 107 patients underwent intracranial meningioma operation without IONM from January 2000 to December 2008 by one neurosurgeon (historical cohort). After IONM was introduced, a total of 99 patients with intracranial meningioma were operated under IONM between November 2018 and February 2023 by two neurosurgeons (monitoring cohort). A retrospective comparison was made on the complications from meningioma surgery between the two groups.

Results: In the monitoring cohort, warning signals of motor evoked potential (MEPs) or somatosensory evoked potential (SSEPs) were alarmed in 10 patients. Two of these 10 patients aborted the operation and eight of these 10 patients with warning signals underwent tumor resection. Of these eight patients, five showed postoperative morbidity. Five of 89 patients without warning signals developed neurological deficits. In the historical cohort, 14 of 107 patients showed postoperative morbidity or mortality.

Conclusion: Even after successful resection of intracranial meningiomas prior to the advent of IONM, integration of MEPs and SSEPs monitoring yielded valuable insights for surgical teams during operative procedures.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
A Rare Case of Intracranial Growing Teratoma Syndrome in a Young Adult. Cerebrospinal Fluid Seeding Versus Inflammation in Setting of Ventriculoperitoneal Shunt as a Potential Cause for Distant Recurrence of Glioblastoma. Early High-Grade Transformation of IDH-Mutant Central Nervous System WHO Grade 2 Astrocytoma: A Case Report. Malignant Transformation of Meningioma With TERT Promoter Mutation: A Case Report. Supraorbital Approaches for Anterior Skull Base and Parasellar Lesions: Insights From a Single-Center Experience.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1