精神科急诊后护理的连续性与出院后随访出席率之间的关系

Ben Hoi-Ching Wong, Petrina Chu, Paul Calaminus, Cathy Lavelle, Rafik Refaat, Dennis Ougrin
{"title":"精神科急诊后护理的连续性与出院后随访出席率之间的关系","authors":"Ben Hoi-Ching Wong, Petrina Chu, Paul Calaminus, Cathy Lavelle, Rafik Refaat, Dennis Ougrin","doi":"10.1038/s44184-023-00052-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The number of accident and emergency (A&E) hospital attendances by young people aged 18 or under with a recorded diagnosis of a psychiatric condition more than tripled between 2010 and 2022. After discharge from the hospital, attendance at follow-up appointments in the community is critical to ensure the safety of young people and optimise the use of clinical resources. A retrospective cohort study was conducted to evaluate the association between follow-up attendance and the continuity of clinicians and clinical teams, using electronic clinical record data from East London NHS Foundation Trust (ELFT), between April 2019 and March 2022. Multi-level mixed effects logistic regression was performed to model the follow-up attendance odds based on whether the same or different clinician and clinical team offered the initial A&E and the community follow-up appointment or whether a crisis team was involved. 3134 A&E presentations by 2368 young people were identified within the study period. Following these presentations, 2091 follow-up appointments in the community were offered. The attendance rate increased by more than three times if the follow-up appointment was offered by the same clinician who saw the young person in A&E (odds ratio (OR) = 3.66; 95% CI 1.65–8.13). Whether the same clinical team provided the community follow-up appointment, or whether a crisis team was involved before discharge made no difference to the likelihood of follow-up attendance. The findings support the importance of the continuity of clinicians in the care of young people in crisis.","PeriodicalId":74321,"journal":{"name":"Npj mental health research","volume":" ","pages":"1-6"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.nature.com/articles/s44184-023-00052-9.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Association between continuity of care and attendance of post-discharge follow-up after psychiatric emergency presentation\",\"authors\":\"Ben Hoi-Ching Wong, Petrina Chu, Paul Calaminus, Cathy Lavelle, Rafik Refaat, Dennis Ougrin\",\"doi\":\"10.1038/s44184-023-00052-9\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The number of accident and emergency (A&E) hospital attendances by young people aged 18 or under with a recorded diagnosis of a psychiatric condition more than tripled between 2010 and 2022. After discharge from the hospital, attendance at follow-up appointments in the community is critical to ensure the safety of young people and optimise the use of clinical resources. A retrospective cohort study was conducted to evaluate the association between follow-up attendance and the continuity of clinicians and clinical teams, using electronic clinical record data from East London NHS Foundation Trust (ELFT), between April 2019 and March 2022. Multi-level mixed effects logistic regression was performed to model the follow-up attendance odds based on whether the same or different clinician and clinical team offered the initial A&E and the community follow-up appointment or whether a crisis team was involved. 3134 A&E presentations by 2368 young people were identified within the study period. Following these presentations, 2091 follow-up appointments in the community were offered. The attendance rate increased by more than three times if the follow-up appointment was offered by the same clinician who saw the young person in A&E (odds ratio (OR) = 3.66; 95% CI 1.65–8.13). Whether the same clinical team provided the community follow-up appointment, or whether a crisis team was involved before discharge made no difference to the likelihood of follow-up attendance. The findings support the importance of the continuity of clinicians in the care of young people in crisis.\",\"PeriodicalId\":74321,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Npj mental health research\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-6\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-02-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.nature.com/articles/s44184-023-00052-9.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Npj mental health research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.nature.com/articles/s44184-023-00052-9\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Npj mental health research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.nature.com/articles/s44184-023-00052-9","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在 2010 年至 2022 年期间,18 岁或以下、有精神病诊断记录的年轻人到医院看急诊(A&E)的人数增加了两倍多。出院后,在社区复诊对确保青少年的安全和优化临床资源的使用至关重要。我们利用东伦敦 NHS 基金会信托(ELFT)在 2019 年 4 月至 2022 年 3 月期间的电子临床记录数据,开展了一项回顾性队列研究,以评估复诊出席率与临床医生和临床团队连续性之间的关联。根据提供初次A&E和社区随访的临床医生和临床团队是否相同或不同,或是否涉及危机小组,对随访出席率进行了多层次混合效应逻辑回归建模。在研究期间,共有 2368 名青少年接受了 3134 次 A&E 检查。在出现这些情况后,共提供了 2091 次社区跟进预约。如果复诊预约是由在 A&E 中为年轻人看病的同一位临床医生提供的,那么就诊率会增加三倍以上(几率比(OR)= 3.66;95% CI 1.65-8.13)。是否由同一临床团队提供社区随访预约,或出院前是否有危机处理团队的参与,对参加随访的可能性没有影响。研究结果表明,临床医生在为处于危机中的青少年提供护理时必须保持连续性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Association between continuity of care and attendance of post-discharge follow-up after psychiatric emergency presentation
The number of accident and emergency (A&E) hospital attendances by young people aged 18 or under with a recorded diagnosis of a psychiatric condition more than tripled between 2010 and 2022. After discharge from the hospital, attendance at follow-up appointments in the community is critical to ensure the safety of young people and optimise the use of clinical resources. A retrospective cohort study was conducted to evaluate the association between follow-up attendance and the continuity of clinicians and clinical teams, using electronic clinical record data from East London NHS Foundation Trust (ELFT), between April 2019 and March 2022. Multi-level mixed effects logistic regression was performed to model the follow-up attendance odds based on whether the same or different clinician and clinical team offered the initial A&E and the community follow-up appointment or whether a crisis team was involved. 3134 A&E presentations by 2368 young people were identified within the study period. Following these presentations, 2091 follow-up appointments in the community were offered. The attendance rate increased by more than three times if the follow-up appointment was offered by the same clinician who saw the young person in A&E (odds ratio (OR) = 3.66; 95% CI 1.65–8.13). Whether the same clinical team provided the community follow-up appointment, or whether a crisis team was involved before discharge made no difference to the likelihood of follow-up attendance. The findings support the importance of the continuity of clinicians in the care of young people in crisis.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Early signs of long-term pain: prospective network profiles from late adolescence and lifelong follow-up. A qualitative analysis of the psychedelic mushroom come-up and come-down. Decoding substance use disorder severity from clinical notes using a large language model. Prediction of individual patient outcomes to psychotherapy vs medication for major depression. Author Correction: Sex differences in the association between repetitive negative thinking and neurofilament light.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1