Mena Maher Nassif, Islam Mohamed Hussein Darahem, Ahmed Abdelmoneim Teaima, Mustafa Mohamed Mustafa, Mohamed Saad Hassab Allah, Samer Ahmed Ibrahim
{"title":"通过面部凹陷在内窥镜下暴露人工耳蜗圆窗的价值。","authors":"Mena Maher Nassif, Islam Mohamed Hussein Darahem, Ahmed Abdelmoneim Teaima, Mustafa Mohamed Mustafa, Mohamed Saad Hassab Allah, Samer Ahmed Ibrahim","doi":"10.1055/s-0043-1775811","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Introduction</b> Cochlear implantation has been considered as the best treatment in patients with severe to profound hearing loss unaidable with hearing aids. The main value of endoscope-assisted cochlear implantation is improved visibility of the RW <b>Objective</b> to assess the value of endoscopic assisted CI surgery via facial recess approach without elevating tympanic anulus. <b>Methods</b> This Prospective case series study non-randomized sample was performed on 50 patients with severe to profound hearing loss unaidable with hearing aids undergoing unilateral endoscopic assisted cochlear implant surgery with round window electrode insertion <b>Results</b> There were 23 male and 27 female patients. Most of the cases were children (41 cases). Of those 50 patients, 39 were prelingually hearing impaired. Four cases had various inner ear abnormalities. The standard mastoidectomy and Posterior Tympanotomy approach were used for all cases. Endoscopic identification of the RW through the PT enabled us to perform regular surgery in all cases. The current study concludes the difference between microscopic exposure and endoscopic exposure represented by Saint Tomas classification found that endoscopic exposure of round window classification is better represented by downgrading in the classification of round window exposure as type I 29(58%), type IIa 18(36%) type IIb 3 (6%) Non were type III by endoscopic exposure compared to microscopic exposure of round window is a type I 7(14%), type II 14(28%), type IIb 22(44%) and type III 7 (14%). <b>Conclusion</b> Endoscopy proved a great value in exposure and identification of RW in CI surgery through posterior tympanotomy approach.</p>","PeriodicalId":13731,"journal":{"name":"International Archives of Otorhinolaryngology","volume":"28 1","pages":"e107-e114"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10843911/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Value of Endoscopic Exposure of Round Window in Cochlear Implant via Facial Recess.\",\"authors\":\"Mena Maher Nassif, Islam Mohamed Hussein Darahem, Ahmed Abdelmoneim Teaima, Mustafa Mohamed Mustafa, Mohamed Saad Hassab Allah, Samer Ahmed Ibrahim\",\"doi\":\"10.1055/s-0043-1775811\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b>Introduction</b> Cochlear implantation has been considered as the best treatment in patients with severe to profound hearing loss unaidable with hearing aids. The main value of endoscope-assisted cochlear implantation is improved visibility of the RW <b>Objective</b> to assess the value of endoscopic assisted CI surgery via facial recess approach without elevating tympanic anulus. <b>Methods</b> This Prospective case series study non-randomized sample was performed on 50 patients with severe to profound hearing loss unaidable with hearing aids undergoing unilateral endoscopic assisted cochlear implant surgery with round window electrode insertion <b>Results</b> There were 23 male and 27 female patients. Most of the cases were children (41 cases). Of those 50 patients, 39 were prelingually hearing impaired. Four cases had various inner ear abnormalities. The standard mastoidectomy and Posterior Tympanotomy approach were used for all cases. Endoscopic identification of the RW through the PT enabled us to perform regular surgery in all cases. The current study concludes the difference between microscopic exposure and endoscopic exposure represented by Saint Tomas classification found that endoscopic exposure of round window classification is better represented by downgrading in the classification of round window exposure as type I 29(58%), type IIa 18(36%) type IIb 3 (6%) Non were type III by endoscopic exposure compared to microscopic exposure of round window is a type I 7(14%), type II 14(28%), type IIb 22(44%) and type III 7 (14%). <b>Conclusion</b> Endoscopy proved a great value in exposure and identification of RW in CI surgery through posterior tympanotomy approach.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":13731,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Archives of Otorhinolaryngology\",\"volume\":\"28 1\",\"pages\":\"e107-e114\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-02-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10843911/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Archives of Otorhinolaryngology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0043-1775811\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Archives of Otorhinolaryngology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0043-1775811","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
导言 人工耳蜗植入术一直被认为是无法使用助听器的重度到极重度听力损失患者的最佳治疗方法。内窥镜辅助人工耳蜗植入术的主要价值在于提高了人工耳蜗的可视性 目的 评估通过面部凹陷方法进行内窥镜辅助人工耳蜗植入手术的价值,而无需抬高鼓室。方法 对 50 名无法使用助听器的重度至极重度听力损失患者进行非随机抽样的前瞻性病例系列研究,这些患者接受了单侧内窥镜辅助人工耳蜗植入手术,并植入了圆窗电极。大多数病例为儿童(41 例)。在这 50 例患者中,39 例为舌前听力受损。4 例患者有各种内耳畸形。所有病例均采用标准乳突切除术和鼓室后切口法。内窥镜通过 PT 识别 RW 使我们能够对所有病例实施常规手术。目前的研究总结了以圣托马斯分类法为代表的显微镜下暴露和内窥镜下暴露之间的差异,发现内窥镜下暴露的圆窗分类法更好地代表了圆窗暴露的降级分类,即 I 型 29(58%)、IIa 型 18(36%)、IIb 型 3(6%),但内窥镜下暴露的圆窗与显微镜下暴露的圆窗相比,属于 III 型,即 I 型 7(14%)、II 型 14(28%)、IIb 型 22(44%)和 III 型 7(14%)。结论 在通过鼓室后切口进行的 CI 手术中,内窥镜在暴露和识别圆窗方面具有重要价值。
The Value of Endoscopic Exposure of Round Window in Cochlear Implant via Facial Recess.
Introduction Cochlear implantation has been considered as the best treatment in patients with severe to profound hearing loss unaidable with hearing aids. The main value of endoscope-assisted cochlear implantation is improved visibility of the RW Objective to assess the value of endoscopic assisted CI surgery via facial recess approach without elevating tympanic anulus. Methods This Prospective case series study non-randomized sample was performed on 50 patients with severe to profound hearing loss unaidable with hearing aids undergoing unilateral endoscopic assisted cochlear implant surgery with round window electrode insertion Results There were 23 male and 27 female patients. Most of the cases were children (41 cases). Of those 50 patients, 39 were prelingually hearing impaired. Four cases had various inner ear abnormalities. The standard mastoidectomy and Posterior Tympanotomy approach were used for all cases. Endoscopic identification of the RW through the PT enabled us to perform regular surgery in all cases. The current study concludes the difference between microscopic exposure and endoscopic exposure represented by Saint Tomas classification found that endoscopic exposure of round window classification is better represented by downgrading in the classification of round window exposure as type I 29(58%), type IIa 18(36%) type IIb 3 (6%) Non were type III by endoscopic exposure compared to microscopic exposure of round window is a type I 7(14%), type II 14(28%), type IIb 22(44%) and type III 7 (14%). Conclusion Endoscopy proved a great value in exposure and identification of RW in CI surgery through posterior tympanotomy approach.