认知功能仍与深度痴呆症的功能障碍有关:阿尔茨海默病和路易体痴呆症。

IF 2.3 Q3 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Neurology. Clinical practice Pub Date : 2024-04-01 Epub Date: 2024-01-22 DOI:10.1212/CPJ.0000000000200262
Ihika Rampalli, Valory N Pavlik, Melissa M Yu, Jeffrey Bishop, Chi-Ying R Lin
{"title":"认知功能仍与深度痴呆症的功能障碍有关:阿尔茨海默病和路易体痴呆症。","authors":"Ihika Rampalli, Valory N Pavlik, Melissa M Yu, Jeffrey Bishop, Chi-Ying R Lin","doi":"10.1212/CPJ.0000000000200262","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objectives: </strong>The Baylor Profound Mental Status Examination (BPMSE) was developed to assess cognitive function in the profound stage of dementia. The Clinical Dementia Rating (CDR) scale has been widely used in measuring functional performance in dementia. We aimed to determine whether cognitive function is related to overall functional impairment in profound dementia.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We selected 864 patients with probable Alzheimer disease (AD) and 25 patients with possible dementia with Lewy Bodies (DLB) cases with profound dementia by Mini-Mental Status Examination or/and clinical global impression. We used BPMSE to measure cognitive function and the CDR sum-of-boxes (CDR-SB) score to determine overall functional status. We used Spearman rank order correlation to examine the univariate association between CDR-SB and BPMSE in the 2 diagnostic groups separately and multivariable regression analysis to investigate whether BPMSE remained associated with functional status after adjustment for age, sex, education, and <i>APOE</i> ε4 genotype. We expected to see an inverse correlation between BPMSE and CDR-SB scores based on the directionality of the rating scale scoring.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In both AD and DLB, total BPMSE scores had a significant inverse correlation with CDR-SB scores (AD: <i>r</i> = -0.453, <i>p</i> < 0.001; DLB: <i>r</i> = -0.489, <i>p</i> = 0.013). It is of interest that in DLB, the \"attention\" domain of BPMSE had the strongest association with CDR-SB (<i>r</i> = -0.700, <i>p</i> < 0.001) compared with other domains. The multivariable regression models showed that higher BPMSE scores (i.e., better cognitive function) remained significantly correlated with lower CDR-SB scores (i.e., better global function) in AD (CDR-SB: β = -0.340, <i>p</i> < 0.001), but the regression coefficient for BPMSE did not reach significance in the DLB model (CDR-SB: β = -0.298, <i>p</i> = 0.174).</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>In patients with AD and DLB who enter the profound dementia stage, cognitive function is associated with the severity of functional impairment. The lack of significance for DLB in multivariable regression could be due to small sample size because the correlation magnitude is similar to that in AD.</p>","PeriodicalId":19136,"journal":{"name":"Neurology. Clinical practice","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10846794/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Cognitive Function Remains Associated With Functional Impairment in Profound Dementia: Alzheimer Disease and Dementia With Lewy Bodies.\",\"authors\":\"Ihika Rampalli, Valory N Pavlik, Melissa M Yu, Jeffrey Bishop, Chi-Ying R Lin\",\"doi\":\"10.1212/CPJ.0000000000200262\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background and objectives: </strong>The Baylor Profound Mental Status Examination (BPMSE) was developed to assess cognitive function in the profound stage of dementia. The Clinical Dementia Rating (CDR) scale has been widely used in measuring functional performance in dementia. We aimed to determine whether cognitive function is related to overall functional impairment in profound dementia.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We selected 864 patients with probable Alzheimer disease (AD) and 25 patients with possible dementia with Lewy Bodies (DLB) cases with profound dementia by Mini-Mental Status Examination or/and clinical global impression. We used BPMSE to measure cognitive function and the CDR sum-of-boxes (CDR-SB) score to determine overall functional status. We used Spearman rank order correlation to examine the univariate association between CDR-SB and BPMSE in the 2 diagnostic groups separately and multivariable regression analysis to investigate whether BPMSE remained associated with functional status after adjustment for age, sex, education, and <i>APOE</i> ε4 genotype. We expected to see an inverse correlation between BPMSE and CDR-SB scores based on the directionality of the rating scale scoring.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In both AD and DLB, total BPMSE scores had a significant inverse correlation with CDR-SB scores (AD: <i>r</i> = -0.453, <i>p</i> < 0.001; DLB: <i>r</i> = -0.489, <i>p</i> = 0.013). It is of interest that in DLB, the \\\"attention\\\" domain of BPMSE had the strongest association with CDR-SB (<i>r</i> = -0.700, <i>p</i> < 0.001) compared with other domains. The multivariable regression models showed that higher BPMSE scores (i.e., better cognitive function) remained significantly correlated with lower CDR-SB scores (i.e., better global function) in AD (CDR-SB: β = -0.340, <i>p</i> < 0.001), but the regression coefficient for BPMSE did not reach significance in the DLB model (CDR-SB: β = -0.298, <i>p</i> = 0.174).</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>In patients with AD and DLB who enter the profound dementia stage, cognitive function is associated with the severity of functional impairment. The lack of significance for DLB in multivariable regression could be due to small sample size because the correlation magnitude is similar to that in AD.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19136,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Neurology. Clinical practice\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10846794/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Neurology. Clinical practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1212/CPJ.0000000000200262\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/1/22 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neurology. Clinical practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1212/CPJ.0000000000200262","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/22 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景和目的:贝勒深度精神状态检查(BPMSE)是为评估深度痴呆阶段的认知功能而开发的。临床痴呆评定量表(CDR)已被广泛用于测量痴呆症患者的功能表现。我们旨在确定认知功能是否与深度痴呆症患者的整体功能障碍有关:我们选择了864名可能患有阿尔茨海默病(AD)的患者和25名可能患有路易体痴呆(DLB)的患者,这些患者均通过迷你精神状态检查或/和临床总体印象检查发现患有深度痴呆。我们使用 BPMSE 测定认知功能,并使用 CDR 方框总和(CDR-SB)评分确定整体功能状态。我们使用斯皮尔曼秩序相关法分别检验了两个诊断组的 CDR-SB 和 BPMSE 之间的单变量相关性,并使用多变量回归分析法研究了在调整年龄、性别、教育程度和 APOE ε4 基因型后,BPMSE 是否仍与功能状态相关。根据评分量表评分的方向性,我们预计BPMSE与CDR-SB评分之间存在反相关关系:在AD和DLB中,BPMSE总分与CDR-SB得分呈显著的负相关(AD:r = -0.453,p < 0.001;DLB:r = -0.489,p = 0.013)。值得注意的是,在 DLB 中,与其他领域相比,BPMSE 的 "注意力 "领域与 CDR-SB 的相关性最强(r = -0.700,p < 0.001)。多变量回归模型显示,在AD患者中,较高的BPMSE得分(即较好的认知功能)仍与较低的CDR-SB得分(即较好的整体功能)显著相关(CDR-SB:β = -0.340,p < 0.001),但在DLB模型中,BPMSE的回归系数没有达到显著性(CDR-SB:β = -0.298,p = 0.174):在进入深度痴呆阶段的 AD 和 DLB 患者中,认知功能与功能障碍的严重程度相关。DLB在多变量回归中缺乏显著性可能是由于样本量较小,因为其相关程度与AD相似。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Cognitive Function Remains Associated With Functional Impairment in Profound Dementia: Alzheimer Disease and Dementia With Lewy Bodies.

Background and objectives: The Baylor Profound Mental Status Examination (BPMSE) was developed to assess cognitive function in the profound stage of dementia. The Clinical Dementia Rating (CDR) scale has been widely used in measuring functional performance in dementia. We aimed to determine whether cognitive function is related to overall functional impairment in profound dementia.

Methods: We selected 864 patients with probable Alzheimer disease (AD) and 25 patients with possible dementia with Lewy Bodies (DLB) cases with profound dementia by Mini-Mental Status Examination or/and clinical global impression. We used BPMSE to measure cognitive function and the CDR sum-of-boxes (CDR-SB) score to determine overall functional status. We used Spearman rank order correlation to examine the univariate association between CDR-SB and BPMSE in the 2 diagnostic groups separately and multivariable regression analysis to investigate whether BPMSE remained associated with functional status after adjustment for age, sex, education, and APOE ε4 genotype. We expected to see an inverse correlation between BPMSE and CDR-SB scores based on the directionality of the rating scale scoring.

Results: In both AD and DLB, total BPMSE scores had a significant inverse correlation with CDR-SB scores (AD: r = -0.453, p < 0.001; DLB: r = -0.489, p = 0.013). It is of interest that in DLB, the "attention" domain of BPMSE had the strongest association with CDR-SB (r = -0.700, p < 0.001) compared with other domains. The multivariable regression models showed that higher BPMSE scores (i.e., better cognitive function) remained significantly correlated with lower CDR-SB scores (i.e., better global function) in AD (CDR-SB: β = -0.340, p < 0.001), but the regression coefficient for BPMSE did not reach significance in the DLB model (CDR-SB: β = -0.298, p = 0.174).

Discussion: In patients with AD and DLB who enter the profound dementia stage, cognitive function is associated with the severity of functional impairment. The lack of significance for DLB in multivariable regression could be due to small sample size because the correlation magnitude is similar to that in AD.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Neurology. Clinical practice
Neurology. Clinical practice CLINICAL NEUROLOGY-
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
77
期刊介绍: Neurology® Genetics is an online open access journal publishing peer-reviewed reports in the field of neurogenetics. The journal publishes original articles in all areas of neurogenetics including rare and common genetic variations, genotype-phenotype correlations, outlier phenotypes as a result of mutations in known disease genes, and genetic variations with a putative link to diseases. Articles include studies reporting on genetic disease risk, pharmacogenomics, and results of gene-based clinical trials (viral, ASO, etc.). Genetically engineered model systems are not a primary focus of Neurology® Genetics, but studies using model systems for treatment trials, including well-powered studies reporting negative results, are welcome.
期刊最新文献
An Interprofessional Team for Disease-Modifying Therapy in Alzheimer Disease Implementation. Virtual Compared With In-Person Neurologic Examination Study. A General Neurologist's Practical Diagnostic Algorithm for Atypical Parkinsonian Disorders: A Consensus Statement. Access to Care and Health-Related Quality of Life in Multiple Sclerosis. Antiseizure Medication Withdrawal, Risk of Epilepsy, and Longterm EEG Trends in Acute Symptomatic Seizures or Epileptic EEG Patterns.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1