青光眼患者的社会心理因素与激活的关系。

IF 2.8 Q1 OPHTHALMOLOGY Ophthalmology. Glaucoma Pub Date : 2024-07-01 DOI:10.1016/j.ogla.2024.01.008
{"title":"青光眼患者的社会心理因素与激活的关系。","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.ogla.2024.01.008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>To investigate the association of psychosocial factors with health self-management behaviors and beliefs among patients with primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG).</p></div><div><h3>Design</h3><p>Prospective cross-sectional cohort study.</p></div><div><h3>Participants</h3><p>Patients (n = 202) with mild, moderate, or advanced bilateral POAG.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Patients (N = 1164) were identified from electronic medical records at a single academic medical center. Letters soliciting participation were mailed to 591 randomly selected potential participants. Psychometric measures and a social determinants of health questionnaire were administered by phone to 202 study participants.</p></div><div><h3>Main Outcome Measures</h3><p>The National Eye Institute Visual Function Questionnaire-8 (NEI-VFQ), the Multidimensional Health Locus of Control (MHLC), the Perceived Medical Condition Self-Management Scale-4, the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ), the Patient Activation Measure-13 (PAM), a health literacy question, and a social determinants of health questionnaire.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>For each increase in level of POAG severity, there was a decrease in mean NEI-VFQ score (<em>P</em> &lt; 0.001). For each unit increase in NEI-VFQ item 1, self-rated vision, mean PAM score increased (<em>R</em><sup>2</sup> = 5.3%; <em>P</em> = 0.001; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.077–0.276). For each unit increase in “Internal” on the MHLC, mean PAM score increased (<em>R</em><sup>2</sup> = 19.3%; 95% CI, 0.649–1.166; <em>P</em> &lt; 0.001). For each unit increase in “Doctors” on the MHLC, mean PAM score increased (<em>R</em><sup>2</sup> = 11.0%; 95% CI, 1.555–3.606; <em>P</em> &lt; 0.001). For each unit increase in “Chance” on the MHLC, mean PAM score decreased (<em>R</em><sup>2</sup> = 2.6%; 95% CI, −0.664 to −0.051; <em>P</em> = 0.023). On multivariate analysis, adjusting for age, sex and race, for each unit increase in PHQ, mean PAM score decreased (95% CI, 0.061–1.35; <em>P</em> = 0.032); for each unit increase in MHLC “Doctors”, mean PAM score increased (95% CI, −1.448 to 3.453; <em>P</em> &lt; 0.001); for each unit increase in MHLC “Internal”, mean PAM score increased (95% CI, 0.639–1.137; <em>P</em> &lt; 0.001); for each unit increase in MHLC “Chance”, mean PAM score decreased (95% CI, −0.685 to −0.098; <em>P</em> = 0.009).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>We identified modifiable behavioral factors that could increase patients’ self-perceived ability and confidence to manage their own eye care. Locus of control (MHLC), level of depression (PHQ), and self-rated functional vision (NEI-VFQ) were each associated with patient behaviors, attitudes, and beliefs needed for health self-management (activation, assessed by the PAM) and may be important determinants of adherence behaviors. Targeting change in patients’ care beliefs and behaviors may improve activation and treatment outcomes.</p></div><div><h3>Financial Disclosure(s)</h3><p>Proprietary or commercial disclosure may be found in the Footnotes and Disclosures at the end of this article.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":19519,"journal":{"name":"Ophthalmology. Glaucoma","volume":"7 4","pages":"Pages 410-417"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Association of Psychosocial Factors with Activation Among Patients with Glaucoma\",\"authors\":\"\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ogla.2024.01.008\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>To investigate the association of psychosocial factors with health self-management behaviors and beliefs among patients with primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG).</p></div><div><h3>Design</h3><p>Prospective cross-sectional cohort study.</p></div><div><h3>Participants</h3><p>Patients (n = 202) with mild, moderate, or advanced bilateral POAG.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Patients (N = 1164) were identified from electronic medical records at a single academic medical center. Letters soliciting participation were mailed to 591 randomly selected potential participants. Psychometric measures and a social determinants of health questionnaire were administered by phone to 202 study participants.</p></div><div><h3>Main Outcome Measures</h3><p>The National Eye Institute Visual Function Questionnaire-8 (NEI-VFQ), the Multidimensional Health Locus of Control (MHLC), the Perceived Medical Condition Self-Management Scale-4, the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ), the Patient Activation Measure-13 (PAM), a health literacy question, and a social determinants of health questionnaire.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>For each increase in level of POAG severity, there was a decrease in mean NEI-VFQ score (<em>P</em> &lt; 0.001). For each unit increase in NEI-VFQ item 1, self-rated vision, mean PAM score increased (<em>R</em><sup>2</sup> = 5.3%; <em>P</em> = 0.001; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.077–0.276). For each unit increase in “Internal” on the MHLC, mean PAM score increased (<em>R</em><sup>2</sup> = 19.3%; 95% CI, 0.649–1.166; <em>P</em> &lt; 0.001). For each unit increase in “Doctors” on the MHLC, mean PAM score increased (<em>R</em><sup>2</sup> = 11.0%; 95% CI, 1.555–3.606; <em>P</em> &lt; 0.001). For each unit increase in “Chance” on the MHLC, mean PAM score decreased (<em>R</em><sup>2</sup> = 2.6%; 95% CI, −0.664 to −0.051; <em>P</em> = 0.023). On multivariate analysis, adjusting for age, sex and race, for each unit increase in PHQ, mean PAM score decreased (95% CI, 0.061–1.35; <em>P</em> = 0.032); for each unit increase in MHLC “Doctors”, mean PAM score increased (95% CI, −1.448 to 3.453; <em>P</em> &lt; 0.001); for each unit increase in MHLC “Internal”, mean PAM score increased (95% CI, 0.639–1.137; <em>P</em> &lt; 0.001); for each unit increase in MHLC “Chance”, mean PAM score decreased (95% CI, −0.685 to −0.098; <em>P</em> = 0.009).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>We identified modifiable behavioral factors that could increase patients’ self-perceived ability and confidence to manage their own eye care. Locus of control (MHLC), level of depression (PHQ), and self-rated functional vision (NEI-VFQ) were each associated with patient behaviors, attitudes, and beliefs needed for health self-management (activation, assessed by the PAM) and may be important determinants of adherence behaviors. Targeting change in patients’ care beliefs and behaviors may improve activation and treatment outcomes.</p></div><div><h3>Financial Disclosure(s)</h3><p>Proprietary or commercial disclosure may be found in the Footnotes and Disclosures at the end of this article.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19519,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Ophthalmology. Glaucoma\",\"volume\":\"7 4\",\"pages\":\"Pages 410-417\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Ophthalmology. Glaucoma\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2589419624000279\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"OPHTHALMOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ophthalmology. Glaucoma","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2589419624000279","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的调查心理社会因素与POAG患者的健康自我管理行为和信念之间的关系:前瞻性横断面队列研究:轻度、中度或晚期双侧POAG患者(n=202):从一家学术医疗中心的电子病历中确定患者(n=1,164)。向随机抽取的 591 名潜在参与者邮寄了邀请信。通过电话对 202 名研究参与者进行了心理测量和健康决定因素问卷调查:主要结果测量:NEI VFQ-8(NEI-VFQ)、多维健康自控力(MHLC)、感知医疗状况自我管理量表-4(PMCSMS)、患者健康问卷-9(PHQ)、患者激活测量-13(PAM)、健康素养和健康决定因素问卷:POAG 严重程度每增加一个单位,NEI-VFQ 平均得分就会下降(p2=5.3%,p=0.001;95% CI= [0.077, 0.276])。MHLC 的 "内部 "每增加一个单位,PAM 平均得分就会增加(R2=19.3%,95% CI= [.649,1.166];p2=11.0%,95% CI= [1.555,3.606];p2=2.6%,95% CI= [-0.664,-0.051],p=0.023)。在调整年龄、性别和种族的多变量分析中,PHQ 每增加一个单位,PAM 平均得分就会下降(95% CI= [0.061,1.35],P=0.032);MHLC "医生 "每增加一个单位,PAM 平均得分就会上升(95% CI= [-1.448,3.453],P=0.023):我们发现了一些可改变的行为因素,这些因素可以提高患者自我感觉管理眼科护理的能力和信心。控制感(MHLC)、抑郁程度(PHQ)和自评功能性视力(NEI-VFQ)分别与患者自我管理健康所需的行为、态度和信念(激活,由 PAM 评估)相关,并且可能是坚持治疗行为的重要决定因素。有针对性地改变患者的护理信念和行为可能会改善激活和治疗效果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Association of Psychosocial Factors with Activation Among Patients with Glaucoma

Objective

To investigate the association of psychosocial factors with health self-management behaviors and beliefs among patients with primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG).

Design

Prospective cross-sectional cohort study.

Participants

Patients (n = 202) with mild, moderate, or advanced bilateral POAG.

Methods

Patients (N = 1164) were identified from electronic medical records at a single academic medical center. Letters soliciting participation were mailed to 591 randomly selected potential participants. Psychometric measures and a social determinants of health questionnaire were administered by phone to 202 study participants.

Main Outcome Measures

The National Eye Institute Visual Function Questionnaire-8 (NEI-VFQ), the Multidimensional Health Locus of Control (MHLC), the Perceived Medical Condition Self-Management Scale-4, the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ), the Patient Activation Measure-13 (PAM), a health literacy question, and a social determinants of health questionnaire.

Results

For each increase in level of POAG severity, there was a decrease in mean NEI-VFQ score (P < 0.001). For each unit increase in NEI-VFQ item 1, self-rated vision, mean PAM score increased (R2 = 5.3%; P = 0.001; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.077–0.276). For each unit increase in “Internal” on the MHLC, mean PAM score increased (R2 = 19.3%; 95% CI, 0.649–1.166; P < 0.001). For each unit increase in “Doctors” on the MHLC, mean PAM score increased (R2 = 11.0%; 95% CI, 1.555–3.606; P < 0.001). For each unit increase in “Chance” on the MHLC, mean PAM score decreased (R2 = 2.6%; 95% CI, −0.664 to −0.051; P = 0.023). On multivariate analysis, adjusting for age, sex and race, for each unit increase in PHQ, mean PAM score decreased (95% CI, 0.061–1.35; P = 0.032); for each unit increase in MHLC “Doctors”, mean PAM score increased (95% CI, −1.448 to 3.453; P < 0.001); for each unit increase in MHLC “Internal”, mean PAM score increased (95% CI, 0.639–1.137; P < 0.001); for each unit increase in MHLC “Chance”, mean PAM score decreased (95% CI, −0.685 to −0.098; P = 0.009).

Conclusions

We identified modifiable behavioral factors that could increase patients’ self-perceived ability and confidence to manage their own eye care. Locus of control (MHLC), level of depression (PHQ), and self-rated functional vision (NEI-VFQ) were each associated with patient behaviors, attitudes, and beliefs needed for health self-management (activation, assessed by the PAM) and may be important determinants of adherence behaviors. Targeting change in patients’ care beliefs and behaviors may improve activation and treatment outcomes.

Financial Disclosure(s)

Proprietary or commercial disclosure may be found in the Footnotes and Disclosures at the end of this article.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Ophthalmology. Glaucoma
Ophthalmology. Glaucoma OPHTHALMOLOGY-
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
6.90%
发文量
140
审稿时长
46 days
期刊最新文献
Reply Editorial Board Contents Posterior Capsular Pigment Deposition in a Case of Pigmentary Glaucoma Iridoschisis: The Shredded Iris
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1