在开腹脐疝修补术中使用双侧直肠鞘膜阻断术

IF 2.6 2区 医学 Q2 ANESTHESIOLOGY Pain physician Pub Date : 2024-02-01
Yuanyuan Wang, Mingying Li, Zhenyuan Wang, Wei Liu
{"title":"在开腹脐疝修补术中使用双侧直肠鞘膜阻断术","authors":"Yuanyuan Wang, Mingying Li, Zhenyuan Wang, Wei Liu","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>In recent years, the rectus sheath block (RSB) has become increasingly prevalent in laparoscopic surgery. However, there is currently no definitive research on its use in the open repair of umbilical hernias with cirrhotic ascites.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>In this study, we assessed the safety and clinical efficacy of ultrasound-guided (US-guided) bilateral RSBs in open umbilical hernia repair for patients diagnosed with cirrhotic ascites.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>Seventy-two patients diagnosed with umbilical hernias that presented with cirrhotic ascites and who were admitted to our hospital were randomly divided into 2 groups. These categories were labeled the RSB group (Group R) and the local infiltration group (Group L); we used US-guided RSBs in Group R and local infiltration in Group L.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>The clinical outcomes of the patients in each group were compared to one another. Heart rate (HR), systolic blood pressure (SBP), and diastolic blood pressure (DBP) were recorded at various time points in both groups.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Measurements of the patients' outcomes were taken before anesthesia (T0), at the beginning of surgery (T1), at the time of the separation of the hernia sac (T2), at the end of surgery (T3), 6 hours postoperatively (T4), and 24 hours postoperatively (T5). On the Visual Analog Scale (VAS), pain scores at rest (T1-T3) and during activity (T4-T5) were recorded, as were the incidence of perioperative remedial analgesia and adverse effects.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Compared to T0, both groups' HR was significantly higher at T1-T3 (P < 0.05). The SBP and DBP were also significantly higher (P < 0.05). At T1-T3, the HR of Group R was significantly slower than that of Group L (P < 0.05), and at T4-T5, the VAS score for activity in Group R was significantly lower than that of Group L (P < 0.05). Group R had a significantly lower incidence of intraoperative remedial analgesia and postoperative nausea and vomiting than did Group L (P < 0.05). Neither group required postoperative remedial analgesia, and no patient experienced adverse reactions during the perioperative period.</p><p><strong>Limitations: </strong>This study has limitations in its sample size, lack of blood ammonia levels, and absence of data on patient satisfaction, necessitating future studies to address these issues.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>US-guided RSBs are an efficient method of anesthesia for open umbilical hernia repair in patients diagnosed with cirrhosis. This technique not only provides precise anesthesia and appropriate analgesia but also results in a low incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting.</p>","PeriodicalId":19841,"journal":{"name":"Pain physician","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Use of Bilateral Rectus Sheath Blocks in Open Umbilical Hernia Repair.\",\"authors\":\"Yuanyuan Wang, Mingying Li, Zhenyuan Wang, Wei Liu\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>In recent years, the rectus sheath block (RSB) has become increasingly prevalent in laparoscopic surgery. However, there is currently no definitive research on its use in the open repair of umbilical hernias with cirrhotic ascites.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>In this study, we assessed the safety and clinical efficacy of ultrasound-guided (US-guided) bilateral RSBs in open umbilical hernia repair for patients diagnosed with cirrhotic ascites.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>Seventy-two patients diagnosed with umbilical hernias that presented with cirrhotic ascites and who were admitted to our hospital were randomly divided into 2 groups. These categories were labeled the RSB group (Group R) and the local infiltration group (Group L); we used US-guided RSBs in Group R and local infiltration in Group L.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>The clinical outcomes of the patients in each group were compared to one another. Heart rate (HR), systolic blood pressure (SBP), and diastolic blood pressure (DBP) were recorded at various time points in both groups.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Measurements of the patients' outcomes were taken before anesthesia (T0), at the beginning of surgery (T1), at the time of the separation of the hernia sac (T2), at the end of surgery (T3), 6 hours postoperatively (T4), and 24 hours postoperatively (T5). On the Visual Analog Scale (VAS), pain scores at rest (T1-T3) and during activity (T4-T5) were recorded, as were the incidence of perioperative remedial analgesia and adverse effects.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Compared to T0, both groups' HR was significantly higher at T1-T3 (P < 0.05). The SBP and DBP were also significantly higher (P < 0.05). At T1-T3, the HR of Group R was significantly slower than that of Group L (P < 0.05), and at T4-T5, the VAS score for activity in Group R was significantly lower than that of Group L (P < 0.05). Group R had a significantly lower incidence of intraoperative remedial analgesia and postoperative nausea and vomiting than did Group L (P < 0.05). Neither group required postoperative remedial analgesia, and no patient experienced adverse reactions during the perioperative period.</p><p><strong>Limitations: </strong>This study has limitations in its sample size, lack of blood ammonia levels, and absence of data on patient satisfaction, necessitating future studies to address these issues.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>US-guided RSBs are an efficient method of anesthesia for open umbilical hernia repair in patients diagnosed with cirrhosis. This technique not only provides precise anesthesia and appropriate analgesia but also results in a low incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19841,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Pain physician\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Pain physician\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ANESTHESIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pain physician","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:近年来,直肠鞘阻断术(RSB)在腹腔镜手术中越来越普遍。然而,目前还没有关于其在肝硬化腹水脐疝开腹修补术中应用的确切研究:在这项研究中,我们评估了超声引导(US-guided)双侧 RSB 在肝硬化腹水患者开腹脐疝修补术中的安全性和临床疗效:研究设计:本院收治的 72 名确诊为脐疝并伴有肝硬化腹水的患者被随机分为两组。R 组采用 US 引导的 RSB,L 组采用局部浸润:对各组患者的临床结果进行比较。记录两组患者不同时间点的心率(HR)、收缩压(SBP)和舒张压(DBP):方法:分别在麻醉前(T0)、手术开始时(T1)、疝囊分离时(T2)、手术结束时(T3)、术后 6 小时(T4)和术后 24 小时(T5)测量患者的结果。用视觉模拟量表(VAS)记录了休息时(T1-T3)和活动时(T4-T5)的疼痛评分,以及围手术期补救镇痛和不良反应的发生率:与 T0 相比,两组患者在 T1-T3 时的心率均明显升高(P < 0.05)。SBP和DBP也明显升高(P < 0.05)。在 T1-T3 期,R 组的心率明显慢于 L 组(P < 0.05);在 T4-T5 期,R 组的活动量 VAS 评分明显低于 L 组(P < 0.05)。R 组术中补救镇痛和术后恶心呕吐的发生率明显低于 L 组(P < 0.05)。两组患者都不需要术后补救镇痛,围手术期也没有出现不良反应:本研究在样本量、缺乏血氨水平和患者满意度数据方面存在局限性,有必要在今后的研究中解决这些问题:结论: US引导下的RSB是对肝硬化患者进行开放性脐疝修补术的一种有效麻醉方法。这项技术不仅能提供精确的麻醉和适当的镇痛,而且术后恶心和呕吐的发生率也很低。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Use of Bilateral Rectus Sheath Blocks in Open Umbilical Hernia Repair.

Background: In recent years, the rectus sheath block (RSB) has become increasingly prevalent in laparoscopic surgery. However, there is currently no definitive research on its use in the open repair of umbilical hernias with cirrhotic ascites.

Objective: In this study, we assessed the safety and clinical efficacy of ultrasound-guided (US-guided) bilateral RSBs in open umbilical hernia repair for patients diagnosed with cirrhotic ascites.

Study design: Seventy-two patients diagnosed with umbilical hernias that presented with cirrhotic ascites and who were admitted to our hospital were randomly divided into 2 groups. These categories were labeled the RSB group (Group R) and the local infiltration group (Group L); we used US-guided RSBs in Group R and local infiltration in Group L.

Setting: The clinical outcomes of the patients in each group were compared to one another. Heart rate (HR), systolic blood pressure (SBP), and diastolic blood pressure (DBP) were recorded at various time points in both groups.

Methods: Measurements of the patients' outcomes were taken before anesthesia (T0), at the beginning of surgery (T1), at the time of the separation of the hernia sac (T2), at the end of surgery (T3), 6 hours postoperatively (T4), and 24 hours postoperatively (T5). On the Visual Analog Scale (VAS), pain scores at rest (T1-T3) and during activity (T4-T5) were recorded, as were the incidence of perioperative remedial analgesia and adverse effects.

Results: Compared to T0, both groups' HR was significantly higher at T1-T3 (P < 0.05). The SBP and DBP were also significantly higher (P < 0.05). At T1-T3, the HR of Group R was significantly slower than that of Group L (P < 0.05), and at T4-T5, the VAS score for activity in Group R was significantly lower than that of Group L (P < 0.05). Group R had a significantly lower incidence of intraoperative remedial analgesia and postoperative nausea and vomiting than did Group L (P < 0.05). Neither group required postoperative remedial analgesia, and no patient experienced adverse reactions during the perioperative period.

Limitations: This study has limitations in its sample size, lack of blood ammonia levels, and absence of data on patient satisfaction, necessitating future studies to address these issues.

Conclusion: US-guided RSBs are an efficient method of anesthesia for open umbilical hernia repair in patients diagnosed with cirrhosis. This technique not only provides precise anesthesia and appropriate analgesia but also results in a low incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Pain physician
Pain physician CLINICAL NEUROLOGY-CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
CiteScore
6.00
自引率
21.60%
发文量
234
期刊介绍: Pain Physician Journal is the official publication of the American Society of Interventional Pain Physicians (ASIPP). The open access journal is published 6 times a year. Pain Physician Journal is a peer-reviewed, multi-disciplinary, open access journal written by and directed to an audience of interventional pain physicians, clinicians and basic scientists with an interest in interventional pain management and pain medicine. Pain Physician Journal presents the latest studies, research, and information vital to those in the emerging specialty of interventional pain management – and critical to the people they serve.
期刊最新文献
Delineating the Hurtful, Engaging, Emotive, and Directive (HEED) Dimensions of Pain. Characterization for Clinical Relevance. Effectiveness Analysis of Awake Computed Tomography-Guided Double-Needle Percutaneous Radiofrequency Thermocoagulation for the Treatment of Glossopharyngeal Neuralgia. Efficacy Analysis of Temporary Spinal Cord Stimulation in the Treatment of Refractory Postherpetic Neuralgia. Erector Spinae Plane Block Provided Comparable Analgesia as Thoracic Paravertebral Block Post Pediatric Nuss Procedure for Pectus Excavatum: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Extended vs. Traditional Operating Table in C-Arm-Guided Percutaneous Balloon Compression of the Gasserian Ganglion for Trigeminal Neuralgia: A Prospective Study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1