治疗腹膜后肿瘤的经皮微波消融术

IF 5.6 Q1 ONCOLOGY Radiology. Imaging cancer Pub Date : 2024-03-01 DOI:10.1148/rycan.230080
Annika E Rossebo, Annie M Zlevor, Emily A Knott, Lu Mao, Allison B Couillard, Timothy J Ziemlewicz, J Louis Hinshaw, E Jason Abel, Meghan G Lubner, Erica M Knavel Koepsel, Shane A Wells, Lindsay M Stratchko, Paul F Laeseke, Fred T Lee
{"title":"治疗腹膜后肿瘤的经皮微波消融术","authors":"Annika E Rossebo, Annie M Zlevor, Emily A Knott, Lu Mao, Allison B Couillard, Timothy J Ziemlewicz, J Louis Hinshaw, E Jason Abel, Meghan G Lubner, Erica M Knavel Koepsel, Shane A Wells, Lindsay M Stratchko, Paul F Laeseke, Fred T Lee","doi":"10.1148/rycan.230080","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Purpose To determine if microwave ablation (MWA) of retroperitoneal tumors can safely provide high rates of local tumor control. Materials and Methods This retrospective study included 19 patients (median age, 65 years [range = 46-78 years]; 13 [68.4%] men and six [31.6%] women) with 29 retroperitoneal tumors treated over 22 MWA procedures. Hydrodissection (0.9% saline with 2% iohexol) was injected in 17 of 22 (77.3%) procedures to protect nontarget anatomy. The primary outcomes evaluated were local tumor progression (LTP) and complication rates. Oncologic outcomes, including overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), and treatment-free interval (TFI), were examined as secondary outcome measures. Results Median follow-up was 18 months (range = 0.5-113). Hydrodissection was successful in displacing nontarget anatomy in 16 of 17 (94.1%) procedures. The LTP rate was 3.4% (one of 29; 95% CI: 0.1, 17.8) per tumor and 5.3% (one of 19; 95% CI: 0.1, 26.0) per patient. The overall complication rate per patient was 15.8% (three of 19), including two minor complications and one major complication. The OS rate at 1, 2, and 3 years was 81.8%, 81.8%, and 72.7%, respectively, with a median OS estimated at greater than 7 years. There was no evidence of a difference in OS (<i>P</i> = .34) and PFS (<i>P</i> = .56) between patients with renal cell carcinoma (six of 19 [31.6%]) versus other tumors (13 of 19 [68.4%]) and patients treated with no evidence of disease (15 of 22 [68.2%]) versus patients with residual tumors (seven of 22 [31.8%]). Median TFI was 18 months (range = 0.5-108). Conclusion Treatment of retroperitoneal tumors with MWA combined with hydrodissection provided high rates of local control, prolonged systemic therapy-free intervals, and few serious complications. <b>Keywords:</b> Ablation Techniques (ie, Radiofrequency, Thermal, Chemical), Retroperitoneum, Microwave Ablation, Hydrodissection © RSNA, 2024.</p>","PeriodicalId":20786,"journal":{"name":"Radiology. Imaging cancer","volume":"6 2","pages":"e230080"},"PeriodicalIF":5.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10988338/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Percutaneous Microwave Ablation for Treatment of Retroperitoneal Tumors.\",\"authors\":\"Annika E Rossebo, Annie M Zlevor, Emily A Knott, Lu Mao, Allison B Couillard, Timothy J Ziemlewicz, J Louis Hinshaw, E Jason Abel, Meghan G Lubner, Erica M Knavel Koepsel, Shane A Wells, Lindsay M Stratchko, Paul F Laeseke, Fred T Lee\",\"doi\":\"10.1148/rycan.230080\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Purpose To determine if microwave ablation (MWA) of retroperitoneal tumors can safely provide high rates of local tumor control. Materials and Methods This retrospective study included 19 patients (median age, 65 years [range = 46-78 years]; 13 [68.4%] men and six [31.6%] women) with 29 retroperitoneal tumors treated over 22 MWA procedures. Hydrodissection (0.9% saline with 2% iohexol) was injected in 17 of 22 (77.3%) procedures to protect nontarget anatomy. The primary outcomes evaluated were local tumor progression (LTP) and complication rates. Oncologic outcomes, including overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), and treatment-free interval (TFI), were examined as secondary outcome measures. Results Median follow-up was 18 months (range = 0.5-113). Hydrodissection was successful in displacing nontarget anatomy in 16 of 17 (94.1%) procedures. The LTP rate was 3.4% (one of 29; 95% CI: 0.1, 17.8) per tumor and 5.3% (one of 19; 95% CI: 0.1, 26.0) per patient. The overall complication rate per patient was 15.8% (three of 19), including two minor complications and one major complication. The OS rate at 1, 2, and 3 years was 81.8%, 81.8%, and 72.7%, respectively, with a median OS estimated at greater than 7 years. There was no evidence of a difference in OS (<i>P</i> = .34) and PFS (<i>P</i> = .56) between patients with renal cell carcinoma (six of 19 [31.6%]) versus other tumors (13 of 19 [68.4%]) and patients treated with no evidence of disease (15 of 22 [68.2%]) versus patients with residual tumors (seven of 22 [31.8%]). Median TFI was 18 months (range = 0.5-108). Conclusion Treatment of retroperitoneal tumors with MWA combined with hydrodissection provided high rates of local control, prolonged systemic therapy-free intervals, and few serious complications. <b>Keywords:</b> Ablation Techniques (ie, Radiofrequency, Thermal, Chemical), Retroperitoneum, Microwave Ablation, Hydrodissection © RSNA, 2024.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":20786,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Radiology. Imaging cancer\",\"volume\":\"6 2\",\"pages\":\"e230080\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10988338/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Radiology. Imaging cancer\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1148/rycan.230080\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Radiology. Imaging cancer","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1148/rycan.230080","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的 确定腹膜后肿瘤的微波消融 (MWA) 是否能安全地提供较高的局部肿瘤控制率。材料和方法 这项回顾性研究纳入了 19 名患者(中位年龄 65 岁 [范围 = 46-78 岁];13 名 [68.4%] 男性和 6 名 [31.6%] 女性),他们患有 29 例腹膜后肿瘤,接受了 22 次微波消融术治疗。在 22 例手术中,有 17 例(77.3%)注射了水切割液(0.9% 生理盐水加 2% 碘海醇),以保护非目标解剖结构。评估的主要结果是局部肿瘤进展(LTP)和并发症发生率。肿瘤学结果,包括总生存期(OS)、无进展生存期(PFS)和无治疗间隔期(TFI),则作为次要结果进行评估。结果 中位随访时间为 18 个月(范围 = 0.5-113)。在 17 例手术中,有 16 例(94.1%)的水切割成功移除了非目标解剖结构。每个肿瘤的 LTP 率为 3.4%(29 例中有 1 例;95% CI:0.1, 17.8),每个患者的 LTP 率为 5.3%(19 例中有 1 例;95% CI:0.1, 26.0)。每位患者的总并发症发生率为 15.8%(19 例中有 3 例),包括 2 例轻微并发症和 1 例严重并发症。1年、2年和3年的OS率分别为81.8%、81.8%和72.7%,中位OS估计超过7年。没有证据表明,肾细胞癌患者(19 例中的 6 例 [31.6%])与其他肿瘤患者(19 例中的 13 例 [68.4%])、无疾病证据患者(22 例中的 15 例 [68.2%])与残留肿瘤患者(22 例中的 7 例 [31.8%])之间的 OS(P = .34)和 PFS(P = .56)存在差异。中位 TFI 为 18 个月(范围 = 0.5-108)。结论 采用MWA联合水动力切除术治疗腹膜后肿瘤,局部控制率高,无系统治疗间隔时间长,严重并发症少。关键词消融技术(即射频、热、化学)、腹膜后、微波消融、水切割 © RSNA, 2024.
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Percutaneous Microwave Ablation for Treatment of Retroperitoneal Tumors.

Purpose To determine if microwave ablation (MWA) of retroperitoneal tumors can safely provide high rates of local tumor control. Materials and Methods This retrospective study included 19 patients (median age, 65 years [range = 46-78 years]; 13 [68.4%] men and six [31.6%] women) with 29 retroperitoneal tumors treated over 22 MWA procedures. Hydrodissection (0.9% saline with 2% iohexol) was injected in 17 of 22 (77.3%) procedures to protect nontarget anatomy. The primary outcomes evaluated were local tumor progression (LTP) and complication rates. Oncologic outcomes, including overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), and treatment-free interval (TFI), were examined as secondary outcome measures. Results Median follow-up was 18 months (range = 0.5-113). Hydrodissection was successful in displacing nontarget anatomy in 16 of 17 (94.1%) procedures. The LTP rate was 3.4% (one of 29; 95% CI: 0.1, 17.8) per tumor and 5.3% (one of 19; 95% CI: 0.1, 26.0) per patient. The overall complication rate per patient was 15.8% (three of 19), including two minor complications and one major complication. The OS rate at 1, 2, and 3 years was 81.8%, 81.8%, and 72.7%, respectively, with a median OS estimated at greater than 7 years. There was no evidence of a difference in OS (P = .34) and PFS (P = .56) between patients with renal cell carcinoma (six of 19 [31.6%]) versus other tumors (13 of 19 [68.4%]) and patients treated with no evidence of disease (15 of 22 [68.2%]) versus patients with residual tumors (seven of 22 [31.8%]). Median TFI was 18 months (range = 0.5-108). Conclusion Treatment of retroperitoneal tumors with MWA combined with hydrodissection provided high rates of local control, prolonged systemic therapy-free intervals, and few serious complications. Keywords: Ablation Techniques (ie, Radiofrequency, Thermal, Chemical), Retroperitoneum, Microwave Ablation, Hydrodissection © RSNA, 2024.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.00
自引率
2.30%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Multifrequency MR Elastography for Tumor Stiffness Outperforms Conventional Imaging and Clinical Variables in Determining Lymphovascular Space Invasion in Endometrial Cancer. Assessing the Value of 68Ga-FAPI PET/CT in Gastric Mucinous Adenocarcinoma or Signet Ring Cell Carcinoma. External Validation of a Previously Developed Deep Learning-based Prostate Lesion Detection Algorithm on Paired External and In-House Biparametric MRI Scans. Mathematical 3D Liver Model for Surgical versus Ablative Therapy Treatment Planning for Colorectal Liver Metastases: Recommendations from the COLLISION and COLDFIRE Trial Expert Panels. A New Acquisition Protocol for Optimized Dynamic Susceptibility Perfusion Imaging of Brain Tumors.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1