肿瘤放射治疗剂量预测方法综述

Xiaoyan Kui , Fang Liu , Min Yang , Hao Wang , Canwei Liu , Dan Huang , Qinsong Li , Liming Chen , Beiji Zou
{"title":"肿瘤放射治疗剂量预测方法综述","authors":"Xiaoyan Kui ,&nbsp;Fang Liu ,&nbsp;Min Yang ,&nbsp;Hao Wang ,&nbsp;Canwei Liu ,&nbsp;Dan Huang ,&nbsp;Qinsong Li ,&nbsp;Liming Chen ,&nbsp;Beiji Zou","doi":"10.1016/j.metrad.2024.100057","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Radiation therapy (RT) is currently the main clinical treatment of tumors. Before treatment initiation, precise delineation of the planned target volume (PTV) and organs at risk (OAR) is essential. This segmentation, together with the dose prediction algorithm, aids in the calculation and evaluation of the dose distribution, and ultimately in the refinement of the treatment plan. To provide a comprehensive view of the current landscape of research on dose prediction methods, we meticulously collected and summarized papers published between 2017 and 2023. First, we present our rigorous literature search approach, providing a statistical analysis of the pooled papers and an elaborate overview of the evaluation metrics that are commonly and consistently employed in this domain. Then, we focus on a detailed survey of the evolutionary trajectories of dose prediction methods. This comprehensive investigation covers a spectrum ranging from traditional Knowledge-Based Planning (KBP) methods to emerging deep learning-based methods, which include input improvement methods, U-Net-based methods, GAN-based methods, and other deep learning-based methods. Throughout this exposition, we have carefully outlined the strengths and limitations inherent in these various approaches. Finally, we conclude with a summary of the primary challenges facing the field and propose several prospective research directions to effectively address them.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100921,"journal":{"name":"Meta-Radiology","volume":"2 1","pages":"Article 100057"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2950162824000109/pdfft?md5=b26103cae7579c82e85c8f643bf9ffc3&pid=1-s2.0-S2950162824000109-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A review of dose prediction methods for tumor radiation therapy\",\"authors\":\"Xiaoyan Kui ,&nbsp;Fang Liu ,&nbsp;Min Yang ,&nbsp;Hao Wang ,&nbsp;Canwei Liu ,&nbsp;Dan Huang ,&nbsp;Qinsong Li ,&nbsp;Liming Chen ,&nbsp;Beiji Zou\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.metrad.2024.100057\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Radiation therapy (RT) is currently the main clinical treatment of tumors. Before treatment initiation, precise delineation of the planned target volume (PTV) and organs at risk (OAR) is essential. This segmentation, together with the dose prediction algorithm, aids in the calculation and evaluation of the dose distribution, and ultimately in the refinement of the treatment plan. To provide a comprehensive view of the current landscape of research on dose prediction methods, we meticulously collected and summarized papers published between 2017 and 2023. First, we present our rigorous literature search approach, providing a statistical analysis of the pooled papers and an elaborate overview of the evaluation metrics that are commonly and consistently employed in this domain. Then, we focus on a detailed survey of the evolutionary trajectories of dose prediction methods. This comprehensive investigation covers a spectrum ranging from traditional Knowledge-Based Planning (KBP) methods to emerging deep learning-based methods, which include input improvement methods, U-Net-based methods, GAN-based methods, and other deep learning-based methods. Throughout this exposition, we have carefully outlined the strengths and limitations inherent in these various approaches. Finally, we conclude with a summary of the primary challenges facing the field and propose several prospective research directions to effectively address them.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":100921,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Meta-Radiology\",\"volume\":\"2 1\",\"pages\":\"Article 100057\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2950162824000109/pdfft?md5=b26103cae7579c82e85c8f643bf9ffc3&pid=1-s2.0-S2950162824000109-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Meta-Radiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2950162824000109\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Meta-Radiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2950162824000109","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

放射治疗(RT)是目前临床上治疗肿瘤的主要方法。在开始治疗前,精确划分计划靶区(PTV)和危险器官(OAR)至关重要。这种分割和剂量预测算法有助于剂量分布的计算和评估,最终有助于治疗计划的完善。为了全面了解当前剂量预测方法的研究情况,我们精心收集并总结了 2017 年至 2023 年间发表的论文。首先,我们介绍了严谨的文献检索方法,对汇集的论文进行了统计分析,并详细概述了该领域常用且一贯采用的评价指标。然后,我们重点对剂量预测方法的演变轨迹进行了详细调查。这一全面调查涵盖了从传统的基于知识的规划(KBP)方法到新兴的基于深度学习的方法,其中包括输入改进方法、基于 U-Net 的方法、基于 GAN 的方法以及其他基于深度学习的方法。在整个论述过程中,我们仔细概述了这些不同方法固有的优势和局限性。最后,我们总结了该领域面临的主要挑战,并提出了几个有效解决这些挑战的前瞻性研究方向。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
A review of dose prediction methods for tumor radiation therapy

Radiation therapy (RT) is currently the main clinical treatment of tumors. Before treatment initiation, precise delineation of the planned target volume (PTV) and organs at risk (OAR) is essential. This segmentation, together with the dose prediction algorithm, aids in the calculation and evaluation of the dose distribution, and ultimately in the refinement of the treatment plan. To provide a comprehensive view of the current landscape of research on dose prediction methods, we meticulously collected and summarized papers published between 2017 and 2023. First, we present our rigorous literature search approach, providing a statistical analysis of the pooled papers and an elaborate overview of the evaluation metrics that are commonly and consistently employed in this domain. Then, we focus on a detailed survey of the evolutionary trajectories of dose prediction methods. This comprehensive investigation covers a spectrum ranging from traditional Knowledge-Based Planning (KBP) methods to emerging deep learning-based methods, which include input improvement methods, U-Net-based methods, GAN-based methods, and other deep learning-based methods. Throughout this exposition, we have carefully outlined the strengths and limitations inherent in these various approaches. Finally, we conclude with a summary of the primary challenges facing the field and propose several prospective research directions to effectively address them.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Advancements in the application of deep learning for coronary artery calcification Rethinking the studies of diagnostic biomarkers for mental disorders One scan, multiple insights: A review of AI-Driven biomarker imaging and composite measure detection in lung cancer screening A systematic evaluation of GPT-4V's multimodal capability for chest X-ray image analysis Integrating AI in college education: Positive yet mixed experiences with ChatGPT
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1