慢性疼痛患者的疼痛变异性增加:疼痛灾难化的作用

IF 4 2区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Journal of Pain Pub Date : 2024-08-01 DOI:10.1016/j.jpain.2024.02.008
{"title":"慢性疼痛患者的疼痛变异性增加:疼痛灾难化的作用","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.jpain.2024.02.008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Pain is an inherently negative perceptual and affective experience that acts as a warning system to protect the body from injury<span><span> and illness. Pain unfolds over time and is influenced by myriad factors, making it highly dynamic. Despite this, statistical measures often treat any intraindividual variability in pain ratings as noise or error. This is consequential, especially for research on chronic pain, because pain variability is associated with greater pain severity and depression. Yet, differences in pain variability between patients with chronic pain and controls in response to </span>acute pain<span> has not been fully examined—and it is unknown if dispositional factors such as pain catastrophizing (negative cognitive-affective response to potential or actual pain in which attention cannot be diverted away from pain) relate to pain variability. In the current study, we recruited chronic-pain patients (N = 30) and pain-free controls (N = 22) to complete a 30-second thermal pain task where they continually rated a painful thermal stimulus. To quantify pain variability and capture potential dynamics, we used both a traditional intraindividual standard deviation (iSD) metric of variability and a novel derivatives approach. For both metrics, patients with chronic pain had higher variability in their pain ratings over time, and pain catastrophizing significantly mediated this relationship. This suggests patients with chronic pain experience pain stimuli differently over time, and pain catastrophizing may account for this differential experience.</span></span></p></div><div><h3>Perspective</h3><p>The present study demonstrates (using multiple variability metrics) that chronic pain patients show more variability when rating experimental pain stimuli, and that pain catastrophizing helps explain this differential experience. These results provide preliminary evidence that short-term pain variability could have utility as a clinical marker in pain assessment and treatment.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":51095,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Pain","volume":"25 8","pages":"Article 104494"},"PeriodicalIF":4.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Increased Pain Variability in Patients With Chronic Pain: A Role for Pain Catastrophizing\",\"authors\":\"\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jpain.2024.02.008\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Pain is an inherently negative perceptual and affective experience that acts as a warning system to protect the body from injury<span><span> and illness. Pain unfolds over time and is influenced by myriad factors, making it highly dynamic. Despite this, statistical measures often treat any intraindividual variability in pain ratings as noise or error. This is consequential, especially for research on chronic pain, because pain variability is associated with greater pain severity and depression. Yet, differences in pain variability between patients with chronic pain and controls in response to </span>acute pain<span> has not been fully examined—and it is unknown if dispositional factors such as pain catastrophizing (negative cognitive-affective response to potential or actual pain in which attention cannot be diverted away from pain) relate to pain variability. In the current study, we recruited chronic-pain patients (N = 30) and pain-free controls (N = 22) to complete a 30-second thermal pain task where they continually rated a painful thermal stimulus. To quantify pain variability and capture potential dynamics, we used both a traditional intraindividual standard deviation (iSD) metric of variability and a novel derivatives approach. For both metrics, patients with chronic pain had higher variability in their pain ratings over time, and pain catastrophizing significantly mediated this relationship. This suggests patients with chronic pain experience pain stimuli differently over time, and pain catastrophizing may account for this differential experience.</span></span></p></div><div><h3>Perspective</h3><p>The present study demonstrates (using multiple variability metrics) that chronic pain patients show more variability when rating experimental pain stimuli, and that pain catastrophizing helps explain this differential experience. These results provide preliminary evidence that short-term pain variability could have utility as a clinical marker in pain assessment and treatment.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51095,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Pain\",\"volume\":\"25 8\",\"pages\":\"Article 104494\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Pain\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1526590024003754\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Pain","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1526590024003754","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

疼痛是一种固有的负面感知和情感体验,是保护身体免受伤害和疾病的预警系统。疼痛会随着时间的推移而发展,并受到无数因素的影响,因此它是高度动态的。尽管如此,疼痛通常是以静态方式测量的,疼痛评级中的任何个体内部差异都被视为噪音或误差。这一点很重要,尤其是对慢性疼痛的研究而言,因为疼痛的可变性与疼痛的严重程度和抑郁程度有关。然而,慢性疼痛患者和对照组患者在应对急性疼痛时疼痛变异性的差异尚未得到充分研究--也不知道诸如疼痛灾难化(对潜在或实际疼痛的负面认知-情感反应,在这种反应中注意力无法从疼痛中转移)等处置因素是否与疼痛变异性有关。在当前的研究中,我们招募了慢性疼痛患者(30 人)和无痛对照组(22 人),让他们完成一项 30 秒的热痛任务,在这项任务中,他们会持续对疼痛的热刺激进行评分。为了量化疼痛的变异性并捕捉潜在的动态变化,我们使用了传统的个体标准偏差(iSD)指标和一种新型的导数方法。对于这两种指标,慢性疼痛患者的疼痛评分随着时间的推移具有更高的变异性,而疼痛灾难化在很大程度上调节了这种关系。这表明随着时间的推移,慢性疼痛患者对疼痛刺激的体验会有所不同,而疼痛灾难化可能是造成这种不同体验的原因。观点:本研究(使用多种可变性指标)证明,慢性疼痛患者在对实验性疼痛刺激进行评分时表现出更多的可变性,而疼痛灾难化有助于解释这种不同的体验。这些结果初步证明,短期疼痛变异性可作为疼痛评估和治疗的临床指标。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Increased Pain Variability in Patients With Chronic Pain: A Role for Pain Catastrophizing

Pain is an inherently negative perceptual and affective experience that acts as a warning system to protect the body from injury and illness. Pain unfolds over time and is influenced by myriad factors, making it highly dynamic. Despite this, statistical measures often treat any intraindividual variability in pain ratings as noise or error. This is consequential, especially for research on chronic pain, because pain variability is associated with greater pain severity and depression. Yet, differences in pain variability between patients with chronic pain and controls in response to acute pain has not been fully examined—and it is unknown if dispositional factors such as pain catastrophizing (negative cognitive-affective response to potential or actual pain in which attention cannot be diverted away from pain) relate to pain variability. In the current study, we recruited chronic-pain patients (N = 30) and pain-free controls (N = 22) to complete a 30-second thermal pain task where they continually rated a painful thermal stimulus. To quantify pain variability and capture potential dynamics, we used both a traditional intraindividual standard deviation (iSD) metric of variability and a novel derivatives approach. For both metrics, patients with chronic pain had higher variability in their pain ratings over time, and pain catastrophizing significantly mediated this relationship. This suggests patients with chronic pain experience pain stimuli differently over time, and pain catastrophizing may account for this differential experience.

Perspective

The present study demonstrates (using multiple variability metrics) that chronic pain patients show more variability when rating experimental pain stimuli, and that pain catastrophizing helps explain this differential experience. These results provide preliminary evidence that short-term pain variability could have utility as a clinical marker in pain assessment and treatment.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Pain
Journal of Pain 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
6.30
自引率
7.50%
发文量
441
审稿时长
42 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Pain publishes original articles related to all aspects of pain, including clinical and basic research, patient care, education, and health policy. Articles selected for publication in the Journal are most commonly reports of original clinical research or reports of original basic research. In addition, invited critical reviews, including meta analyses of drugs for pain management, invited commentaries on reviews, and exceptional case studies are published in the Journal. The mission of the Journal is to improve the care of patients in pain by providing a forum for clinical researchers, basic scientists, clinicians, and other health professionals to publish original research.
期刊最新文献
Contemporary media campaigns for musculoskeletal pain: A systematic review and meta-analysis with social marketing benchmarking. Chronic pain-induced functional and structural alterations in the brain: a multi-modal meta-analysis. Language Errors in Pain Medicine: An Umbrella Review. Within-person relationships between catastrophizing and pain intensity during a mind-body intervention to prevent persistent pain and disability after acute traumatic orthopedic injury Enhancing the trustworthiness of pain research: A call to action.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1