基于风险相互依存的优化风险管理框架,以有效减少灾害风险

IF 2.6 Q3 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES Progress in Disaster Science Pub Date : 2024-01-01 DOI:10.1016/j.pdisas.2024.100313
Mojgan Safaeian , Ren Moses , Eren E. Ozguven , Maxim A. Dulebenets
{"title":"基于风险相互依存的优化风险管理框架,以有效减少灾害风险","authors":"Mojgan Safaeian ,&nbsp;Ren Moses ,&nbsp;Eren E. Ozguven ,&nbsp;Maxim A. Dulebenets","doi":"10.1016/j.pdisas.2024.100313","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Effective risk management is crucial in the field of disaster management to mitigate the impact of disasters. It involves proactive planning, resource allocation, and the implementation of response measures. By identifying and assessing risks, stakeholders can take preventive measures and establish contingency plans, fostering resilience, coordination, and efficient disaster response and recovery processes. In the context of globalization, organizations face numerous uncertainties and risks, necessitating the implementation of efficient risk management plans. While the conventional risk response analysis assumes independence among risks, in reality, they are interconnected. Therefore, evaluating risk interactions becomes vital in comprehensive risk management evaluations. This study proposes an innovative framework for disaster risk management based on a review of relevant literature, global project management standards, and the insights gained from previous studies dealing with disaster management projects. To identify appropriate risk response strategies, an optimization model is developed that incorporates a maximization utility function and directly captures potential risk interdependence. An exact optimization method and two metaheuristics are proposed to solve the developed optimization model for the selection of risk response strategies. A detailed assessment of the considered solution algorithms in terms of various performance indicators and sensitivity analysis of model parameters are conducted through a comparative study. This analysis provides valuable insights into the effectiveness and practical applicability of the proposed methodology. The outcomes of this study will benefit practitioners and policymakers involved in disaster management by improving their ability to make informed decisions and allocate resources effectively.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":52341,"journal":{"name":"Progress in Disaster Science","volume":"21 ","pages":"Article 100313"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590061724000036/pdfft?md5=eaccdc3538d0c017eeb3dc3a809c8012&pid=1-s2.0-S2590061724000036-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"An optimization-based risk management framework with risk interdependence for effective disaster risk reduction\",\"authors\":\"Mojgan Safaeian ,&nbsp;Ren Moses ,&nbsp;Eren E. Ozguven ,&nbsp;Maxim A. Dulebenets\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.pdisas.2024.100313\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Effective risk management is crucial in the field of disaster management to mitigate the impact of disasters. It involves proactive planning, resource allocation, and the implementation of response measures. By identifying and assessing risks, stakeholders can take preventive measures and establish contingency plans, fostering resilience, coordination, and efficient disaster response and recovery processes. In the context of globalization, organizations face numerous uncertainties and risks, necessitating the implementation of efficient risk management plans. While the conventional risk response analysis assumes independence among risks, in reality, they are interconnected. Therefore, evaluating risk interactions becomes vital in comprehensive risk management evaluations. This study proposes an innovative framework for disaster risk management based on a review of relevant literature, global project management standards, and the insights gained from previous studies dealing with disaster management projects. To identify appropriate risk response strategies, an optimization model is developed that incorporates a maximization utility function and directly captures potential risk interdependence. An exact optimization method and two metaheuristics are proposed to solve the developed optimization model for the selection of risk response strategies. A detailed assessment of the considered solution algorithms in terms of various performance indicators and sensitivity analysis of model parameters are conducted through a comparative study. This analysis provides valuable insights into the effectiveness and practical applicability of the proposed methodology. The outcomes of this study will benefit practitioners and policymakers involved in disaster management by improving their ability to make informed decisions and allocate resources effectively.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":52341,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Progress in Disaster Science\",\"volume\":\"21 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100313\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590061724000036/pdfft?md5=eaccdc3538d0c017eeb3dc3a809c8012&pid=1-s2.0-S2590061724000036-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Progress in Disaster Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590061724000036\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Progress in Disaster Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590061724000036","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

有效的风险管理对于灾害管理领域减轻灾害影响至关重要。它涉及积极主动的规划、资源分配和应对措施的实施。通过识别和评估风险,利益相关者可以采取预防措施,制定应急计划,提高抗灾能力,加强协调,提高救灾和灾后恢复工作的效率。在全球化背景下,各组织面临众多不确定因素和风险,因此必须实施高效的风险管理计划。传统的风险应对分析假定风险之间是独立的,但实际上,它们之间是相互关联的。因此,评估风险之间的相互作用在全面风险管理评估中变得至关重要。本研究基于对相关文献、全球项目管理标准的回顾,以及从以往灾害管理项目研究中获得的启示,提出了一个创新的灾害风险管理框架。为了确定适当的风险应对策略,本研究开发了一个优化模型,该模型包含最大化效用函数,并直接捕捉潜在的风险相互依赖性。提出了一种精确优化方法和两种元启发式方法来解决所开发的优化模型,以选择风险应对策略。通过比较研究,从各种性能指标和模型参数敏感性分析的角度对所考虑的求解算法进行了详细评估。这项分析为了解拟议方法的有效性和实际适用性提供了宝贵的见解。这项研究的成果将使参与灾害管理的从业人员和决策者受益,提高他们做出明智决策和有效分配资源的能力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
An optimization-based risk management framework with risk interdependence for effective disaster risk reduction

Effective risk management is crucial in the field of disaster management to mitigate the impact of disasters. It involves proactive planning, resource allocation, and the implementation of response measures. By identifying and assessing risks, stakeholders can take preventive measures and establish contingency plans, fostering resilience, coordination, and efficient disaster response and recovery processes. In the context of globalization, organizations face numerous uncertainties and risks, necessitating the implementation of efficient risk management plans. While the conventional risk response analysis assumes independence among risks, in reality, they are interconnected. Therefore, evaluating risk interactions becomes vital in comprehensive risk management evaluations. This study proposes an innovative framework for disaster risk management based on a review of relevant literature, global project management standards, and the insights gained from previous studies dealing with disaster management projects. To identify appropriate risk response strategies, an optimization model is developed that incorporates a maximization utility function and directly captures potential risk interdependence. An exact optimization method and two metaheuristics are proposed to solve the developed optimization model for the selection of risk response strategies. A detailed assessment of the considered solution algorithms in terms of various performance indicators and sensitivity analysis of model parameters are conducted through a comparative study. This analysis provides valuable insights into the effectiveness and practical applicability of the proposed methodology. The outcomes of this study will benefit practitioners and policymakers involved in disaster management by improving their ability to make informed decisions and allocate resources effectively.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Progress in Disaster Science
Progress in Disaster Science Social Sciences-Safety Research
CiteScore
14.60
自引率
3.20%
发文量
51
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊介绍: Progress in Disaster Science is a Gold Open Access journal focusing on integrating research and policy in disaster research, and publishes original research papers and invited viewpoint articles on disaster risk reduction; response; emergency management and recovery. A key part of the Journal's Publication output will see key experts invited to assess and comment on the current trends in disaster research, as well as highlight key papers.
期刊最新文献
Fire risk vulnerability and safety assessment of Farmgate area using fire risk index, Dhaka City and optimization of fire hydrant placement Small-grid urban flood prediction model using Twitter data and population GPS data - an example of the 2019 Nagano city flood Improving community understanding of cascading effects of critical infrastructure service failure: An experimental interactive learning process Climate-induced coastal occupational vulnerability and livelihood insecurity: Insights from coastal Bangladesh Morphological changes of river Bank Erosion and channel shifting assessment on Arial Khan River of Bangladesh using Landsat satellite time series images
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1