土耳其种植体支持单冠和牙齿支持固定牙科修复体的成本效益分析》(Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Implant-Supported Single Crown and Tooth-Supported Fixed Dental Prostheses in Türkiye.

IF 1.4 Q3 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES Value in health regional issues Pub Date : 2024-02-09 DOI:10.1016/j.vhri.2024.01.001
Lütfiye Tekpınar PhD , Vahit Yiğit PhD
{"title":"土耳其种植体支持单冠和牙齿支持固定牙科修复体的成本效益分析》(Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Implant-Supported Single Crown and Tooth-Supported Fixed Dental Prostheses in Türkiye.","authors":"Lütfiye Tekpınar PhD ,&nbsp;Vahit Yiğit PhD","doi":"10.1016/j.vhri.2024.01.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><p>The most cost-effective option for replacing lost teeth is not evident because there is a dearth of evidence-based information on implant-supported single crowns versus tooth-supported fixed dental prostheses. This study conducted the analysis of cost-effectiveness of implant-supported single crown and tooth-supported fixed dental prostheses from a social perspective in Türkiye.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Costs were calculated in the analysis from a social perspective for 2021. Costs and quality-adjusted prosthesis year (QAPY) values were computed over a 20-year period in the study using the Markov model. The computed values were discounted by 5%. The results are presented as the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio. To assess the impact of uncertainty on cost-effectiveness analyses, a tornado diagram and Monte Carlo simulations were created.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Throughout the 20-year time horizon, tooth-supported fixed dental prostheses cost $985.58 cumulatively, whereas implant-supported single crown cost $2161.64 (US $1 = 9.22 ₺ as of 15 October 2021). The calculated incremental cost-effectiveness ratio is 1.333 per QAPY. Compared with the implant-supported single crown tooth-supported fixed dental prostheses, it offers a QAPY of 0.882 over a 20-year period, while costing an additional $1176.06.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>These results suggest that the implant-supported single crown provided higher QAPY value but was costlier. When the research’s findings are compared with the literature, it becomes clear that Türkiye has lower dental care expenses than most other nations.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":23497,"journal":{"name":"Value in health regional issues","volume":"42 ","pages":"Pages 11-17"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Implant-Supported Single Crown and Tooth-Supported Fixed Dental Prostheses in Türkiye\",\"authors\":\"Lütfiye Tekpınar PhD ,&nbsp;Vahit Yiğit PhD\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.vhri.2024.01.001\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><p>The most cost-effective option for replacing lost teeth is not evident because there is a dearth of evidence-based information on implant-supported single crowns versus tooth-supported fixed dental prostheses. This study conducted the analysis of cost-effectiveness of implant-supported single crown and tooth-supported fixed dental prostheses from a social perspective in Türkiye.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Costs were calculated in the analysis from a social perspective for 2021. Costs and quality-adjusted prosthesis year (QAPY) values were computed over a 20-year period in the study using the Markov model. The computed values were discounted by 5%. The results are presented as the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio. To assess the impact of uncertainty on cost-effectiveness analyses, a tornado diagram and Monte Carlo simulations were created.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Throughout the 20-year time horizon, tooth-supported fixed dental prostheses cost $985.58 cumulatively, whereas implant-supported single crown cost $2161.64 (US $1 = 9.22 ₺ as of 15 October 2021). The calculated incremental cost-effectiveness ratio is 1.333 per QAPY. Compared with the implant-supported single crown tooth-supported fixed dental prostheses, it offers a QAPY of 0.882 over a 20-year period, while costing an additional $1176.06.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>These results suggest that the implant-supported single crown provided higher QAPY value but was costlier. When the research’s findings are compared with the literature, it becomes clear that Türkiye has lower dental care expenses than most other nations.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23497,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Value in health regional issues\",\"volume\":\"42 \",\"pages\":\"Pages 11-17\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-02-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Value in health regional issues\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2212109924000062\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Value in health regional issues","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2212109924000062","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:由于缺乏有关种植体支持单冠与牙齿支持固定义齿的循证信息,因此替代脱落牙齿最具成本效益的方案并不明显。本研究从社会角度对土耳其种植体支持单冠和牙齿支持固定义齿的成本效益进行了分析:从社会角度分析计算了 2021 年的成本。研究中使用马尔可夫模型计算了 20 年内的成本和质量调整修复年 (QAPY) 值。计算值的贴现率为 5%。计算结果以增量成本效益比表示。为了评估不确定性对成本效益分析的影响,我们绘制了龙卷风图并进行了蒙特卡罗模拟:在 20 年的时间跨度内,牙齿支持的固定义齿累计成本为 985.58 美元,而种植体支持的单个牙冠成本为 2161.64 美元(截至 2021 年 10 月 15 日,1 美元 = 9.22 ₺)。计算得出的增量成本效益比为 1.333/QAPY。与种植体支持的单冠牙支持固定义齿相比,20 年内的 QAPY 为 0.882,而成本却增加了 1176.06 美元:这些结果表明,种植体支持单冠的 QAPY 值更高,但成本更高。如果将研究结果与文献进行比较,就会发现土耳其的牙科保健费用低于其他大多数国家。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Implant-Supported Single Crown and Tooth-Supported Fixed Dental Prostheses in Türkiye

Objectives

The most cost-effective option for replacing lost teeth is not evident because there is a dearth of evidence-based information on implant-supported single crowns versus tooth-supported fixed dental prostheses. This study conducted the analysis of cost-effectiveness of implant-supported single crown and tooth-supported fixed dental prostheses from a social perspective in Türkiye.

Methods

Costs were calculated in the analysis from a social perspective for 2021. Costs and quality-adjusted prosthesis year (QAPY) values were computed over a 20-year period in the study using the Markov model. The computed values were discounted by 5%. The results are presented as the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio. To assess the impact of uncertainty on cost-effectiveness analyses, a tornado diagram and Monte Carlo simulations were created.

Results

Throughout the 20-year time horizon, tooth-supported fixed dental prostheses cost $985.58 cumulatively, whereas implant-supported single crown cost $2161.64 (US $1 = 9.22 ₺ as of 15 October 2021). The calculated incremental cost-effectiveness ratio is 1.333 per QAPY. Compared with the implant-supported single crown tooth-supported fixed dental prostheses, it offers a QAPY of 0.882 over a 20-year period, while costing an additional $1176.06.

Conclusions

These results suggest that the implant-supported single crown provided higher QAPY value but was costlier. When the research’s findings are compared with the literature, it becomes clear that Türkiye has lower dental care expenses than most other nations.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Value in health regional issues
Value in health regional issues Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics-Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
5.00%
发文量
127
期刊最新文献
Cost-Effectiveness of Mineralocorticoid Receptor Antagonists in Ischemic and Nonischemic Heart Failure With Reduced Ejection Fraction: Perspective From a Universal Healthcare System Valuing an Index of Sanitation-Related Quality of Life in Urban Mozambique: A Discrete Choice Experiment Effects of Reimbursement Add-On Policies on Trastuzumab and Bevacizumab Biosimilar Adoption in a Japanese Oncology Setting Life With Cystic Fibrosis: The Socioeconomic Impact on Patients and Their Caregivers Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Pharmacological Treatment With Insulin and Insulin Analogs for Type 1 and Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus in Colombia
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1