英国肾脏护理中抑郁症的识别和管理:情绪地图研究的结果。

IF 1.5 4区 医学 Q3 NURSING Journal of renal care Pub Date : 2024-02-11 DOI:10.1111/jorc.12489
Joseph Chilcot PhD, Christina J. Pearce PhD, Natalie Hall MSc, Amanda D. Busby MSc, Janine Hawkins PhD, Balvinder Vraitch, Mandy Rathjen, Alexander Hamilton PhD, Amanda Bevin PGDip, Lucy Mackintosh MSc, Joanna L. Hudson PhD, David Wellsted PhD, Julia Jones PhD, Shivani Sharma PhD, Sam Norton PhD, Paula Ormandy PhD, Nick Palmer BSc, Ken Farrington MD
{"title":"英国肾脏护理中抑郁症的识别和管理:情绪地图研究的结果。","authors":"Joseph Chilcot PhD,&nbsp;Christina J. Pearce PhD,&nbsp;Natalie Hall MSc,&nbsp;Amanda D. Busby MSc,&nbsp;Janine Hawkins PhD,&nbsp;Balvinder Vraitch,&nbsp;Mandy Rathjen,&nbsp;Alexander Hamilton PhD,&nbsp;Amanda Bevin PGDip,&nbsp;Lucy Mackintosh MSc,&nbsp;Joanna L. Hudson PhD,&nbsp;David Wellsted PhD,&nbsp;Julia Jones PhD,&nbsp;Shivani Sharma PhD,&nbsp;Sam Norton PhD,&nbsp;Paula Ormandy PhD,&nbsp;Nick Palmer BSc,&nbsp;Ken Farrington MD","doi":"10.1111/jorc.12489","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>Depression is common in people with chronic kidney disease, yet little is known about how depression is identified and managed as part of routine kidney care.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Objectives</h3>\n \n <p>The primary objective was to survey all UK adult kidney centres to understand how depression is identified and managed. A secondary objective was to broadly describe the variability in psychosocial care.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Design</h3>\n \n <p>Online survey.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>The survey comprised of three sections: (1) general kidney care, (2) psychological provision and (3) social work provision.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>48/68 (71%) of centres responded to the general survey with 20 and 13 responses from psychological and social work module respectively. Only 31.4% reported having both in centre psychological and social work practitioners. Three centres reported no access to psychosocial provision. Of the 25 centres who reported on pathways, 36.0% reported having internal pathways for the identification and management of depression. Within services with psychological provision, screening for depression varied across modality/group (e.g., 7.1% in mild/moderate chronic kidney disease vs. 62.5% in kidney donors). Cognitive Behavioural Therapy and Acceptance and Commitment Therapy were the most common interventions offered. Most psychosocial services were aware of the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence guidelines for managing depression in long-term conditions (<i>n</i> = 18, 94.7%) yet few fully utilised (<i>n</i> = 6, 33.3%). Limited workforce capacity was evident.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>There is considerable variability in approaches taken to identify and treat depression across UK kidney services, with few services having specific pathways designed to detect and manage depression. Workforce capacity remains a significant issue.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":16947,"journal":{"name":"Journal of renal care","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/jorc.12489","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The identification and management of depression in UK Kidney Care: Results from the Mood Maps Study\",\"authors\":\"Joseph Chilcot PhD,&nbsp;Christina J. Pearce PhD,&nbsp;Natalie Hall MSc,&nbsp;Amanda D. Busby MSc,&nbsp;Janine Hawkins PhD,&nbsp;Balvinder Vraitch,&nbsp;Mandy Rathjen,&nbsp;Alexander Hamilton PhD,&nbsp;Amanda Bevin PGDip,&nbsp;Lucy Mackintosh MSc,&nbsp;Joanna L. Hudson PhD,&nbsp;David Wellsted PhD,&nbsp;Julia Jones PhD,&nbsp;Shivani Sharma PhD,&nbsp;Sam Norton PhD,&nbsp;Paula Ormandy PhD,&nbsp;Nick Palmer BSc,&nbsp;Ken Farrington MD\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/jorc.12489\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Background</h3>\\n \\n <p>Depression is common in people with chronic kidney disease, yet little is known about how depression is identified and managed as part of routine kidney care.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Objectives</h3>\\n \\n <p>The primary objective was to survey all UK adult kidney centres to understand how depression is identified and managed. A secondary objective was to broadly describe the variability in psychosocial care.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Design</h3>\\n \\n <p>Online survey.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>The survey comprised of three sections: (1) general kidney care, (2) psychological provision and (3) social work provision.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>48/68 (71%) of centres responded to the general survey with 20 and 13 responses from psychological and social work module respectively. Only 31.4% reported having both in centre psychological and social work practitioners. Three centres reported no access to psychosocial provision. Of the 25 centres who reported on pathways, 36.0% reported having internal pathways for the identification and management of depression. Within services with psychological provision, screening for depression varied across modality/group (e.g., 7.1% in mild/moderate chronic kidney disease vs. 62.5% in kidney donors). Cognitive Behavioural Therapy and Acceptance and Commitment Therapy were the most common interventions offered. Most psychosocial services were aware of the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence guidelines for managing depression in long-term conditions (<i>n</i> = 18, 94.7%) yet few fully utilised (<i>n</i> = 6, 33.3%). Limited workforce capacity was evident.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\\n \\n <p>There is considerable variability in approaches taken to identify and treat depression across UK kidney services, with few services having specific pathways designed to detect and manage depression. Workforce capacity remains a significant issue.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16947,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of renal care\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-02-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/jorc.12489\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of renal care\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jorc.12489\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"NURSING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of renal care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jorc.12489","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:抑郁症在慢性肾脏病患者中很常见:抑郁症在慢性肾脏病患者中很常见,但人们对如何在常规肾脏护理中识别和管理抑郁症却知之甚少:主要目标:调查英国所有成人肾脏中心,了解如何识别和管理抑郁症。次要目标是广泛描述社会心理护理的差异性:设计:在线调查:调查包括三个部分:(1) 一般肾脏护理;(2) 心理护理;(3) 社会工作护理:48/68(71%)的中心对一般调查做出了回应,其中心理和社会工作模块分别有 20 和 13 个回应。只有 31.4%的中心报告说,中心同时拥有心理和社会工作从业人员。有 3 个中心报告没有获得社会心理服务。在报告了治疗路径的 25 家中心中,36.0% 的中心报告称已制定了识别和管理抑郁症的内部路径。在提供心理服务的服务机构中,不同模式/组别的抑郁症筛查率各不相同(例如,轻度/中度慢性肾病患者的筛查率为 7.1%,而肾脏捐献者的筛查率为 62.5%)。认知行为疗法和接纳与承诺疗法是最常见的干预措施。大多数社会心理服务机构都了解美国国家健康与护理卓越研究所(National Institute for Health and Care Excellence)的长期抑郁症管理指南(18 家,94.7%),但很少有机构充分利用该指南(6 家,33.3%)。劳动力能力有限是显而易见的:结论:英国肾脏服务机构在识别和治疗抑郁症的方法上存在相当大的差异,很少有服务机构设计了专门的路径来检测和管理抑郁症。劳动力能力仍是一个重要问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The identification and management of depression in UK Kidney Care: Results from the Mood Maps Study

Background

Depression is common in people with chronic kidney disease, yet little is known about how depression is identified and managed as part of routine kidney care.

Objectives

The primary objective was to survey all UK adult kidney centres to understand how depression is identified and managed. A secondary objective was to broadly describe the variability in psychosocial care.

Design

Online survey.

Methods

The survey comprised of three sections: (1) general kidney care, (2) psychological provision and (3) social work provision.

Results

48/68 (71%) of centres responded to the general survey with 20 and 13 responses from psychological and social work module respectively. Only 31.4% reported having both in centre psychological and social work practitioners. Three centres reported no access to psychosocial provision. Of the 25 centres who reported on pathways, 36.0% reported having internal pathways for the identification and management of depression. Within services with psychological provision, screening for depression varied across modality/group (e.g., 7.1% in mild/moderate chronic kidney disease vs. 62.5% in kidney donors). Cognitive Behavioural Therapy and Acceptance and Commitment Therapy were the most common interventions offered. Most psychosocial services were aware of the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence guidelines for managing depression in long-term conditions (n = 18, 94.7%) yet few fully utilised (n = 6, 33.3%). Limited workforce capacity was evident.

Conclusions

There is considerable variability in approaches taken to identify and treat depression across UK kidney services, with few services having specific pathways designed to detect and manage depression. Workforce capacity remains a significant issue.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of renal care
Journal of renal care Nursing-Advanced and Specialized Nursing
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
5.30%
发文量
36
期刊介绍: The Journal of Renal Care (JORC), formally EDTNA/ERCA Journal, is the official publication of the European Dialysis and Transplant Nursing Association/European Renal Care Association (EDTNA/ERCA). The Journal of Renal Care is an international peer-reviewed journal for the multi-professional health care team caring for people with kidney disease and those who research this specialised area of health care. Kidney disease is a chronic illness with four basic treatments: haemodialysis, peritoneal dialysis conservative management and transplantation, which includes emptive transplantation, living donor & cadavaric transplantation. The continuous world-wide increase of people with chronic kidney disease (CKD) means that research and shared knowledge into the causes and treatment is vital to delay the progression of CKD and to improve treatments and the care given. The Journal of Renal Care is an important journal for all health-care professionals working in this and associated conditions, such as diabetes and cardio-vascular disease amongst others. It covers the trajectory of the disease from the first diagnosis to palliative care and includes acute renal injury. The Journal of Renal Care accepts that kidney disease affects not only the patients but also their families and significant others and provides a forum for both the psycho-social and physiological aspects of the disease.
期刊最新文献
Perspectives of Chinese nephrology nurses on discussing sexual dysfunction with patients receiving haemodialysis: A qualitative study Self-efficacy and home dialysis: An integrative review. Understanding nurses' perceptions of sexual health and function in people requiring haemodialysis. Issue Information: Journal of Renal Care 3/2024 Young adults with kidney failure lived experiences of kidney replacement therapy decision-making.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1