全身炎症、睡眠和心理因素决定了颈痛患者的康复轨迹。一项探索性研究。

IF 4 2区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Journal of Pain Pub Date : 2024-08-01 DOI:10.1016/j.jpain.2024.02.010
{"title":"全身炎症、睡眠和心理因素决定了颈痛患者的康复轨迹。一项探索性研究。","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.jpain.2024.02.010","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>We conducted an explorative prospective cohort study with 6 months follow-up to 1) identify different pain and disability trajectories following an episode of acute neck pain, and 2) assess whether neuroimmune/endocrine, psychological, behavioral, nociceptive processing, clinical outcome, demographic and management-related factors differ between these trajectories. Fifty people with acute neck pain (ie, within 2 weeks of onset) were included. At baseline, and at 2, 4, 6, 12, and 26 weeks follow-up, various neuroimmune/endocrine (eg, inflammatory cytokines and endocrine factors), psychological (eg, stress symptoms), behavioral (eg, sleep disturbances), nociceptive processing (eg, condition pain modulation), clinical outcome (eg, trauma), demographic factors (eg, age), and management-related factors (eg, treatment received) were assessed. Latent class models were performed to identify outcome trajectories for neck pain and disability. Linear mixed models or the Pearson chi-square test were used to evaluate differences in these factors between the trajectories at baseline and at each follow-up assessment and over the entire 6 months period. For pain, 3 trajectories were identified. The majority of patients were assigned to the “Moderate pain – Favourable recovery” trajectory (n = 25; 50%) with smaller proportions assigned to the “Severe pain – Favourable recovery” (n = 16; 32%) and the “Severe pain – Unfavourable recovery” (n = 9; 18%) trajectories. For disability, 2 trajectories were identified: “Mild disability – Favourable recovery” (n = 43; 82%) and “Severe disability – Unfavourable recovery” (n = 7; 18%). Ongoing systemic inflammation (increased high-sensitive C-reactive protein), sleep disturbances, and elevated psychological factors (such as depression, stress and anxiety symptoms) were mainly present in the unfavorable outcome trajectories compared to the favorable outcome trajectories.</p></div><div><h3>Perspective</h3><p>Using exploratory analyses, different recovery trajectories for acute neck pain were identified based on disability and pain intensity. These trajectories were influenced by systemic inflammation, sleep disturbances, and psychological factors.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":51095,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Pain","volume":"25 8","pages":"Article 104496"},"PeriodicalIF":4.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1526590024003778/pdfft?md5=d2eea7e7d0bcb91e46a1dad5b112db04&pid=1-s2.0-S1526590024003778-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Systemic Inflammation, Sleep, and Psychological Factors Determine Recovery Trajectories for People With Neck Pain: An Exploratory Study\",\"authors\":\"\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jpain.2024.02.010\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>We conducted an explorative prospective cohort study with 6 months follow-up to 1) identify different pain and disability trajectories following an episode of acute neck pain, and 2) assess whether neuroimmune/endocrine, psychological, behavioral, nociceptive processing, clinical outcome, demographic and management-related factors differ between these trajectories. Fifty people with acute neck pain (ie, within 2 weeks of onset) were included. At baseline, and at 2, 4, 6, 12, and 26 weeks follow-up, various neuroimmune/endocrine (eg, inflammatory cytokines and endocrine factors), psychological (eg, stress symptoms), behavioral (eg, sleep disturbances), nociceptive processing (eg, condition pain modulation), clinical outcome (eg, trauma), demographic factors (eg, age), and management-related factors (eg, treatment received) were assessed. Latent class models were performed to identify outcome trajectories for neck pain and disability. Linear mixed models or the Pearson chi-square test were used to evaluate differences in these factors between the trajectories at baseline and at each follow-up assessment and over the entire 6 months period. For pain, 3 trajectories were identified. The majority of patients were assigned to the “Moderate pain – Favourable recovery” trajectory (n = 25; 50%) with smaller proportions assigned to the “Severe pain – Favourable recovery” (n = 16; 32%) and the “Severe pain – Unfavourable recovery” (n = 9; 18%) trajectories. For disability, 2 trajectories were identified: “Mild disability – Favourable recovery” (n = 43; 82%) and “Severe disability – Unfavourable recovery” (n = 7; 18%). Ongoing systemic inflammation (increased high-sensitive C-reactive protein), sleep disturbances, and elevated psychological factors (such as depression, stress and anxiety symptoms) were mainly present in the unfavorable outcome trajectories compared to the favorable outcome trajectories.</p></div><div><h3>Perspective</h3><p>Using exploratory analyses, different recovery trajectories for acute neck pain were identified based on disability and pain intensity. These trajectories were influenced by systemic inflammation, sleep disturbances, and psychological factors.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51095,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Pain\",\"volume\":\"25 8\",\"pages\":\"Article 104496\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1526590024003778/pdfft?md5=d2eea7e7d0bcb91e46a1dad5b112db04&pid=1-s2.0-S1526590024003778-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Pain\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1526590024003778\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Pain","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1526590024003778","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

我们进行了一项为期六个月的探索性前瞻性队列研究,目的是:(1)确定急性颈痛发作后不同的疼痛和残疾轨迹;(2)评估这些轨迹之间的神经免疫/内分泌、心理、行为、痛觉处理、临床结果、人口统计学和管理相关因素是否存在差异。研究纳入了 50 名急性颈痛患者(即发病两周内)。在基线、2周、4周、6周、12周和26周的随访中,对各种神经免疫/内分泌(如炎症细胞因子和内分泌因子)、心理(如压力症状)、行为(如睡眠障碍)、痛觉处理(如条件性疼痛调节)、临床结果(如创伤)、人口统计学因素(如年龄)和管理相关因素(如接受的治疗)进行了评估。采用潜类模型来确定颈部疼痛和残疾的结果轨迹。线性混合模型或皮尔逊卡方检验用于评估基线和每次随访评估以及整个六个月期间这些轨迹之间的差异。在疼痛方面,确定了三种轨迹。大多数患者被归入 "中度疼痛--恢复良好 "轨迹(人数=25;50%),小部分患者被归入 "剧烈疼痛--恢复良好"(人数=16;32%)和 "剧烈疼痛--恢复不良"(人数=9;18%)轨迹。在残疾方面,确定了两种轨迹:轻度残疾--恢复良好"(人数=43;82%)和 "重度残疾--恢复不良"(人数=7;18%)。与有利的结果轨迹相比,不利的结果轨迹主要存在持续性全身炎症(hsCRP 升高)、睡眠障碍和心理因素升高(如抑郁、压力和焦虑症状)。观点:通过探索性分析,根据残疾程度和疼痛强度确定了急性颈痛的不同恢复轨迹。这些轨迹受到全身炎症、睡眠障碍和心理因素的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Systemic Inflammation, Sleep, and Psychological Factors Determine Recovery Trajectories for People With Neck Pain: An Exploratory Study

We conducted an explorative prospective cohort study with 6 months follow-up to 1) identify different pain and disability trajectories following an episode of acute neck pain, and 2) assess whether neuroimmune/endocrine, psychological, behavioral, nociceptive processing, clinical outcome, demographic and management-related factors differ between these trajectories. Fifty people with acute neck pain (ie, within 2 weeks of onset) were included. At baseline, and at 2, 4, 6, 12, and 26 weeks follow-up, various neuroimmune/endocrine (eg, inflammatory cytokines and endocrine factors), psychological (eg, stress symptoms), behavioral (eg, sleep disturbances), nociceptive processing (eg, condition pain modulation), clinical outcome (eg, trauma), demographic factors (eg, age), and management-related factors (eg, treatment received) were assessed. Latent class models were performed to identify outcome trajectories for neck pain and disability. Linear mixed models or the Pearson chi-square test were used to evaluate differences in these factors between the trajectories at baseline and at each follow-up assessment and over the entire 6 months period. For pain, 3 trajectories were identified. The majority of patients were assigned to the “Moderate pain – Favourable recovery” trajectory (n = 25; 50%) with smaller proportions assigned to the “Severe pain – Favourable recovery” (n = 16; 32%) and the “Severe pain – Unfavourable recovery” (n = 9; 18%) trajectories. For disability, 2 trajectories were identified: “Mild disability – Favourable recovery” (n = 43; 82%) and “Severe disability – Unfavourable recovery” (n = 7; 18%). Ongoing systemic inflammation (increased high-sensitive C-reactive protein), sleep disturbances, and elevated psychological factors (such as depression, stress and anxiety symptoms) were mainly present in the unfavorable outcome trajectories compared to the favorable outcome trajectories.

Perspective

Using exploratory analyses, different recovery trajectories for acute neck pain were identified based on disability and pain intensity. These trajectories were influenced by systemic inflammation, sleep disturbances, and psychological factors.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Pain
Journal of Pain 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
6.30
自引率
7.50%
发文量
441
审稿时长
42 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Pain publishes original articles related to all aspects of pain, including clinical and basic research, patient care, education, and health policy. Articles selected for publication in the Journal are most commonly reports of original clinical research or reports of original basic research. In addition, invited critical reviews, including meta analyses of drugs for pain management, invited commentaries on reviews, and exceptional case studies are published in the Journal. The mission of the Journal is to improve the care of patients in pain by providing a forum for clinical researchers, basic scientists, clinicians, and other health professionals to publish original research.
期刊最新文献
Contemporary media campaigns for musculoskeletal pain: A systematic review and meta-analysis with social marketing benchmarking. Chronic pain-induced functional and structural alterations in the brain: a multi-modal meta-analysis. Language Errors in Pain Medicine: An Umbrella Review. Within-person relationships between catastrophizing and pain intensity during a mind-body intervention to prevent persistent pain and disability after acute traumatic orthopedic injury Enhancing the trustworthiness of pain research: A call to action.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1