Divergence between CBCT and Optical Scans for Soft Tissue Analysis and Cephalometry in Facial Imaging: A cross-sectional study on healthy adults

Background

Facial soft tissue analysis is becoming increasingly emphasized in orthodontic diagnosis and treatment planning. While traditional cephalometry primarily focuses on hard tissues, recent non-invasive imaging techniques offer the potential to comprehensively evaluate three-dimensional (3D) facial soft tissues. The aim of the study was to establish the geometrical 3D and cephalometric divergence between Cone Beam Computed Tomography (CBCT) derived images and scanned soft tissues. Crucial for enhancing orthodontic diagnosis, minimizing patient exposure to ionizing radiation and providing facial cephalometric parameters.

Material and methods

A cross-sectional study was conducted from January 2020 to May 2023. CBCT and 3D facial scans were obtained simultaneously using a specialized imaging system. Reproducible landmark points were selected for both cephalometric and soft tissue analysis. Angular and linear measurements were recorded, and correlations between CT and facial scans were statistically assessed.

Results

Comparisons between 10 CBCT-derived and 10 facial scan-based soft tissue representations resulted into 1.8 mm mean root median square (RMS). Angular measurements, such as ANB, right gonial angle, and left gonial angle, exhibited a 0.9° of difference with their respective soft tissue variables. In contrast, linear measurements of total anterior facial height showed a lower correlation coefficient, equal to 0.51. The correlation between soft tissues and underlying hard tissues was more pronounced for gonial angles.

Conclusion

Facial soft tissue analysis using either 3D facial scans or CBCT-derived offers similar results for orthodontic diagnosis and treatment planning. These findings support the use of non-invasive diagnostic tools in orthodontics, although further investigations are needed to comprehensively understand the complexity of hard and soft tissue relationships.