大面积肩袖撕裂的手术治疗:随机对照试验的网络荟萃分析。

IF 6.3 1区 医学 Q1 DERMATOLOGY Burns & Trauma Pub Date : 2024-02-09 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.1093/burnst/tkad052
Hongfu Jin, Zhenhan Deng, Jianfeng Sun, Djandan Tadum Arthur Vithran, Wenfeng Xiao, Yusheng Li
{"title":"大面积肩袖撕裂的手术治疗:随机对照试验的网络荟萃分析。","authors":"Hongfu Jin, Zhenhan Deng, Jianfeng Sun, Djandan Tadum Arthur Vithran, Wenfeng Xiao, Yusheng Li","doi":"10.1093/burnst/tkad052","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Multiple surgical strategies have been developed for treating massive rotator cuff tears (mRCTs). However, there is still no consensus on the best surgical option for mRCTs. Through a network meta-analysis, we aimed to comprehensively and systematically analyse the evidence in randomized controlled trials to help clinicians make evidence-based clinical decisions for patients with mRCTs.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Our study was a network meta-analysis of the surgical management of mRCTs (PROSPERO Registration ID: CRD42023397971). We searched PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane and Web of Science for randomized controlled trials that examined the efficacy of surgical management for mRCTs up to 3 November 2022. A three-step method was employed for the study process. Study selection, data extraction and risk of bias evaluation were conducted by two independent reviewers. R software (version 4.2.1) and Stata (version 15.1) were used for the data analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>From 10,633 publications, we included 15 randomized controlled trials (996 participants) for the quantitative analysis. In terms of both long-term and short-term surgical effects, there were no statistically significant differences among surgical interventions such as patch-augmented rotator cuff repair (RCR), RCR with platelet-rich plasma, arthroscopic decompression, bridging reconstruction, arthroscopic RCR with platelet-leukocyte membrane, open RCR, mini-open RCR, arthroscopic debridement, superior capsular reconstruction, arthroscopic suture-spanning augmented repair, subacromial balloon spacer and latissimus dorsi tendon transfer. Based on algorithms, the probability ranking suggests that patch augmentation is the most highly ranked surgical intervention for achieving better short-term surgical outcomes. Furthermore, arthroscopic-associated mini-open RCR was ranked as the highest surgical intervention for achieving better long-term surgical effects.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Based on the available data from the included studies, similar surgical efficacies were observed among the reported intervention measures for mRCTs. The patch augmentation technique was found to potentially achieve better short-term surgical outcomes, which is consistent with previous reports. However, the best surgical interventions for achieving long-term surgical effects remain unknown. More high-quality research is needed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of these interventions and to guide clinical practice.</p>","PeriodicalId":9553,"journal":{"name":"Burns & Trauma","volume":"12 ","pages":"tkad052"},"PeriodicalIF":6.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10858639/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Surgical management for massive rotator cuff tears: a network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.\",\"authors\":\"Hongfu Jin, Zhenhan Deng, Jianfeng Sun, Djandan Tadum Arthur Vithran, Wenfeng Xiao, Yusheng Li\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/burnst/tkad052\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Multiple surgical strategies have been developed for treating massive rotator cuff tears (mRCTs). However, there is still no consensus on the best surgical option for mRCTs. Through a network meta-analysis, we aimed to comprehensively and systematically analyse the evidence in randomized controlled trials to help clinicians make evidence-based clinical decisions for patients with mRCTs.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Our study was a network meta-analysis of the surgical management of mRCTs (PROSPERO Registration ID: CRD42023397971). We searched PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane and Web of Science for randomized controlled trials that examined the efficacy of surgical management for mRCTs up to 3 November 2022. A three-step method was employed for the study process. Study selection, data extraction and risk of bias evaluation were conducted by two independent reviewers. R software (version 4.2.1) and Stata (version 15.1) were used for the data analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>From 10,633 publications, we included 15 randomized controlled trials (996 participants) for the quantitative analysis. In terms of both long-term and short-term surgical effects, there were no statistically significant differences among surgical interventions such as patch-augmented rotator cuff repair (RCR), RCR with platelet-rich plasma, arthroscopic decompression, bridging reconstruction, arthroscopic RCR with platelet-leukocyte membrane, open RCR, mini-open RCR, arthroscopic debridement, superior capsular reconstruction, arthroscopic suture-spanning augmented repair, subacromial balloon spacer and latissimus dorsi tendon transfer. Based on algorithms, the probability ranking suggests that patch augmentation is the most highly ranked surgical intervention for achieving better short-term surgical outcomes. Furthermore, arthroscopic-associated mini-open RCR was ranked as the highest surgical intervention for achieving better long-term surgical effects.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Based on the available data from the included studies, similar surgical efficacies were observed among the reported intervention measures for mRCTs. The patch augmentation technique was found to potentially achieve better short-term surgical outcomes, which is consistent with previous reports. However, the best surgical interventions for achieving long-term surgical effects remain unknown. More high-quality research is needed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of these interventions and to guide clinical practice.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9553,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Burns & Trauma\",\"volume\":\"12 \",\"pages\":\"tkad052\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-02-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10858639/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Burns & Trauma\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/burnst/tkad052\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"DERMATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Burns & Trauma","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/burnst/tkad052","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DERMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:目前已开发出多种手术策略来治疗大面积肩袖撕裂(mRCTs)。然而,关于治疗大块肩袖撕裂的最佳手术方案仍未达成共识。通过网络荟萃分析,我们旨在全面系统地分析随机对照试验中的证据,帮助临床医生为大块肩袖撕裂患者做出循证临床决策:我们的研究是一项关于 mRCTs 手术治疗的网络荟萃分析(PROSPERO 注册编号:CRD42023397971)。我们在 PubMed、EMBASE、Cochrane 和 Web of Science 上检索了截至 2022 年 11 月 3 日的研究 mRCT 手术治疗疗效的随机对照试验。研究过程采用了三步法。研究选择、数据提取和偏倚风险评估由两名独立审稿人进行。数据分析使用 R 软件(4.2.1 版)和 Stata(15.1 版):从 10,633 篇文献中,我们纳入了 15 项随机对照试验(996 名参与者)进行定量分析。在长期和短期手术效果方面,补片增强型肩袖修复术(RCR)、富血小板血浆增强型肩袖修复术、关节镜减压术、桥接重建术、关节镜下血小板白细胞膜增强型肩袖修复术、开放式肩袖修复术、小开放式肩袖修复术、关节镜下清创术、上囊重建术、关节镜下缝合跨度增强型修复术、肩峰下球囊垫片和背阔肌腱转移术等手术干预措施之间的差异无统计学意义。根据算法得出的概率排名表明,补片增强术是实现更好的短期手术效果排名最靠前的手术干预措施。此外,关节镜相关小开刀 RCR 被评为获得更好长期手术效果的最高手术干预措施:结论:根据所纳入研究的可用数据,在所报告的 mRCT 干预措施中观察到了相似的手术效果。研究发现,补片增量技术可能取得更好的短期手术效果,这与之前的报告一致。然而,实现长期手术效果的最佳手术干预措施仍是未知数。需要更多高质量的研究来评估这些干预措施的有效性和安全性,并指导临床实践。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Surgical management for massive rotator cuff tears: a network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Background: Multiple surgical strategies have been developed for treating massive rotator cuff tears (mRCTs). However, there is still no consensus on the best surgical option for mRCTs. Through a network meta-analysis, we aimed to comprehensively and systematically analyse the evidence in randomized controlled trials to help clinicians make evidence-based clinical decisions for patients with mRCTs.

Methods: Our study was a network meta-analysis of the surgical management of mRCTs (PROSPERO Registration ID: CRD42023397971). We searched PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane and Web of Science for randomized controlled trials that examined the efficacy of surgical management for mRCTs up to 3 November 2022. A three-step method was employed for the study process. Study selection, data extraction and risk of bias evaluation were conducted by two independent reviewers. R software (version 4.2.1) and Stata (version 15.1) were used for the data analysis.

Results: From 10,633 publications, we included 15 randomized controlled trials (996 participants) for the quantitative analysis. In terms of both long-term and short-term surgical effects, there were no statistically significant differences among surgical interventions such as patch-augmented rotator cuff repair (RCR), RCR with platelet-rich plasma, arthroscopic decompression, bridging reconstruction, arthroscopic RCR with platelet-leukocyte membrane, open RCR, mini-open RCR, arthroscopic debridement, superior capsular reconstruction, arthroscopic suture-spanning augmented repair, subacromial balloon spacer and latissimus dorsi tendon transfer. Based on algorithms, the probability ranking suggests that patch augmentation is the most highly ranked surgical intervention for achieving better short-term surgical outcomes. Furthermore, arthroscopic-associated mini-open RCR was ranked as the highest surgical intervention for achieving better long-term surgical effects.

Conclusions: Based on the available data from the included studies, similar surgical efficacies were observed among the reported intervention measures for mRCTs. The patch augmentation technique was found to potentially achieve better short-term surgical outcomes, which is consistent with previous reports. However, the best surgical interventions for achieving long-term surgical effects remain unknown. More high-quality research is needed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of these interventions and to guide clinical practice.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Burns & Trauma
Burns & Trauma 医学-皮肤病学
CiteScore
8.40
自引率
9.40%
发文量
186
审稿时长
6 weeks
期刊介绍: The first open access journal in the field of burns and trauma injury in the Asia-Pacific region, Burns & Trauma publishes the latest developments in basic, clinical and translational research in the field. With a special focus on prevention, clinical treatment and basic research, the journal welcomes submissions in various aspects of biomaterials, tissue engineering, stem cells, critical care, immunobiology, skin transplantation, and the prevention and regeneration of burns and trauma injuries. With an expert Editorial Board and a team of dedicated scientific editors, the journal enjoys a large readership and is supported by Southwest Hospital, which covers authors'' article processing charges.
期刊最新文献
SportSync health: revolutionizing patient care in sports medicine through integrated follow-up technologies. Dexmedetomidine regulates exosomal miR-29b-3p from macrophages and alleviates septic myocardial injury by promoting autophagy in cardiomyocytes via targeting glycogen synthase kinase 3β. Polylactic acid-based dressing with oxygen generation and enzyme-like activity for accelerating both light-driven biofilm elimination and wound healing Single-cell sequencing technology in skin wound healing Consensus on the prevention and repair of titanium mesh exposed wound after cranioplasty (2024 edition).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1