我们为什么被困在医院?学习障碍者/自闭症患者离开 "长期住院 "医院的障碍:一项混合方法研究。

Jon Glasby, Robin Miller, Anne-Marie Glasby, Rebecca Ince, Frederick Konteh
{"title":"我们为什么被困在医院?学习障碍者/自闭症患者离开 \"长期住院 \"医院的障碍:一项混合方法研究。","authors":"Jon Glasby, Robin Miller, Anne-Marie Glasby, Rebecca Ince, Frederick Konteh","doi":"10.3310/HBSH7124","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Transforming care so that people with learning disabilities and/or autistic people can receive support at home rather than in hospital settings is a key priority, but progress has been slow. Despite significant national debate, little previous research has engaged directly with people in hospital, their families or front-line staff to understand the issues from their perspectives.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This research seeks to better understand the experiences of people with learning disabilities and/or autistic people in long-stay hospital settings, their families and front-line staff - using this knowledge to create practice guides and training materials to support new understandings and ways of working.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Following a structured review of the literature, we sought to work with up to 10 people with learning disabilities and/or autistic people in three case-study sites (2021-22), supplementing this with interviews with family members and commissioners; interviews/focus groups with hospital staff, social workers, advocates and care providers; information from case files; and observations of multidisciplinary meetings.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Three 'long-stay' hospital settings in England.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>Twenty-seven people in hospital, together with families, health and social care staff and commissioners.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>• People in hospital report widespread frustration, feel that hospital environments are not conducive to getting/staying well, and face multiple barriers to leaving hospital. Without someone to fight for them, people struggle to overcome the inertia built into our current systems and processes. • Front-line staff are equally frustrated and describe a complex and seemingly dysfunctional system which they find almost impossible to navigate. • Hospital staff from different professional backgrounds do not have a shared sense of how many people really need to be in hospital or how many people could be cared for in different settings - suggesting that different definitions, world views and professional judgements might be at play. • Hospital staff are frustrated about what they see as the difficulty of discharging people into community services, while community services are equally frustrated about what they see as a risk-averse approach which they feel can lack an up-to-date knowledge of what is possible to achieve in the community. • Despite over a decade of policy attempts to resolve these issues, very significant barriers remain.</p><p><strong>Limitations: </strong>This research explored the experiences of a small number of people, but has done so in significant depth. The research was undertaken in secure settings, during COVID and in a difficult external policy and practice context, and so has had to be very flexible and empathetic in order to build relationships and make the research possible. Future research could helpfully consider the needs of people from black and minority ethnic communities, the extent to which the experiences of people on forensic pathways are similar to/different from other people's experiences (including perspectives from the criminal justice system), and what happens to people in the long term after they leave hospital.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Working to make the voices of people with learning disabilities and/or autistic people (as well as the staff who support them) centre stage is complex and sensitive. However, this lived experience/practice knowledge is a crucial resource if we are going to develop better policy and practice solutions in the longer term.</p><p><strong>Study registration: </strong>This study is registered at www.researchregistry.com (researchregistry6124).</p><p><strong>Funding: </strong>This award was funded by the National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR) Health and Social Care Delivery Research programme (NIHR award ref: NIHR130298) and is published in full in <i>Health and Social Care Delivery Research</i>; Vol. 12, No. 3. See the NIHR Funding and Awards website for further award information.</p>","PeriodicalId":73204,"journal":{"name":"Health and social care delivery research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"'Why are we stuck in hospital?' Barriers to people with learning disabilities/autistic people leaving 'long-stay' hospital: a mixed methods study.\",\"authors\":\"Jon Glasby, Robin Miller, Anne-Marie Glasby, Rebecca Ince, Frederick Konteh\",\"doi\":\"10.3310/HBSH7124\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Transforming care so that people with learning disabilities and/or autistic people can receive support at home rather than in hospital settings is a key priority, but progress has been slow. Despite significant national debate, little previous research has engaged directly with people in hospital, their families or front-line staff to understand the issues from their perspectives.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This research seeks to better understand the experiences of people with learning disabilities and/or autistic people in long-stay hospital settings, their families and front-line staff - using this knowledge to create practice guides and training materials to support new understandings and ways of working.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Following a structured review of the literature, we sought to work with up to 10 people with learning disabilities and/or autistic people in three case-study sites (2021-22), supplementing this with interviews with family members and commissioners; interviews/focus groups with hospital staff, social workers, advocates and care providers; information from case files; and observations of multidisciplinary meetings.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Three 'long-stay' hospital settings in England.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>Twenty-seven people in hospital, together with families, health and social care staff and commissioners.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>• People in hospital report widespread frustration, feel that hospital environments are not conducive to getting/staying well, and face multiple barriers to leaving hospital. Without someone to fight for them, people struggle to overcome the inertia built into our current systems and processes. • Front-line staff are equally frustrated and describe a complex and seemingly dysfunctional system which they find almost impossible to navigate. • Hospital staff from different professional backgrounds do not have a shared sense of how many people really need to be in hospital or how many people could be cared for in different settings - suggesting that different definitions, world views and professional judgements might be at play. • Hospital staff are frustrated about what they see as the difficulty of discharging people into community services, while community services are equally frustrated about what they see as a risk-averse approach which they feel can lack an up-to-date knowledge of what is possible to achieve in the community. • Despite over a decade of policy attempts to resolve these issues, very significant barriers remain.</p><p><strong>Limitations: </strong>This research explored the experiences of a small number of people, but has done so in significant depth. The research was undertaken in secure settings, during COVID and in a difficult external policy and practice context, and so has had to be very flexible and empathetic in order to build relationships and make the research possible. Future research could helpfully consider the needs of people from black and minority ethnic communities, the extent to which the experiences of people on forensic pathways are similar to/different from other people's experiences (including perspectives from the criminal justice system), and what happens to people in the long term after they leave hospital.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Working to make the voices of people with learning disabilities and/or autistic people (as well as the staff who support them) centre stage is complex and sensitive. However, this lived experience/practice knowledge is a crucial resource if we are going to develop better policy and practice solutions in the longer term.</p><p><strong>Study registration: </strong>This study is registered at www.researchregistry.com (researchregistry6124).</p><p><strong>Funding: </strong>This award was funded by the National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR) Health and Social Care Delivery Research programme (NIHR award ref: NIHR130298) and is published in full in <i>Health and Social Care Delivery Research</i>; Vol. 12, No. 3. See the NIHR Funding and Awards website for further award information.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":73204,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Health and social care delivery research\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Health and social care delivery research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3310/HBSH7124\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health and social care delivery research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3310/HBSH7124","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:转变护理方式,让学习障碍者和/或自闭症患者在家中而非医院环境中获得支持是一项重要的优先事项,但进展一直缓慢。尽管在全国范围内进行了大量讨论,但以前的研究很少直接与住院患者、其家人或一线员工接触,从他们的角度了解问题:本研究旨在更好地了解长期住院的学习障碍者和/或自闭症患者、他们的家人和一线员工的经历,并利用这些知识创建实践指南和培训材料,以支持新的理解和工作方式:设计:在对文献进行结构性审查后,我们试图在三个案例研究地点(2021-22 年)与多达 10 名学习障碍者和/或自闭症患者合作,并辅以对家庭成员和专员的访谈;对医院工作人员、社会工作者、辩护人和护理提供者的访谈/焦点小组;病例档案中的信息;以及对多学科会议的观察:地点:英格兰三家 "长期住院 "医院:27 名住院患者、家属、医疗和社会护理人员以及专员:- 结果:住院病人普遍感到沮丧,认为医院环境不利于他们康复或保持健康,并且在离开医院时面临多重障碍。如果没有人为他们争取,他们就很难克服现有系统和流程中的惰性。- 一线员工同样感到沮丧,他们描述了一个复杂且看似功能失调的系统,他们发现几乎无法驾驭这个系统。- 来自不同专业背景的医院员工对于到底有多少人需要住院,或者有多少人可以在不同的环境中得到照顾,并没有共同的认识--这表明不同的定义、世界观和专业判断可能在起作用。- 医院工作人员对他们所认为的将病人转入社区服务的困难感到沮丧,而社区服务机构也同样对他们所认为的规避风险的方法感到沮丧,他们认为这种方法可能缺乏对社区可能实现的目标的最新了解。- 尽管十多年来一直在政策上试图解决这些问题,但仍然存在非常大的障碍:本研究探讨了少数人的经历,但非常深入。研究是在安全的环境中、在 COVID 期间、在艰难的外部政策和实践背景下进行的,因此必须非常灵活和富有同情心,才能建立关系并使研究成为可能。未来的研究可以考虑黑人和少数民族群体的需求、法医治 疗过程中患者的经历在多大程度上与其他人的经历相似或不同(包括来自刑事司法系统的观点),以及患者出院后的长期情况:让学习障碍者和/或自闭症患者(以及支持他们的工作人员)的声音成为中心议题是一项复杂而敏感的工作。然而,如果我们要制定更好的长期政策和实践解决方案,这些生活经验/实践知识就是至关重要的资源:本研究注册于 www.researchregistry.com (researchregistry6124)。资助:本奖项由国家健康与护理研究所(NIHR)的健康与社会护理服务研究计划(NIHR奖项编号:NIHR130298)资助,全文发表于《健康与社会护理服务研究》第12卷第3期。更多奖项信息请参阅 NIHR Funding and Awards 网站。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
'Why are we stuck in hospital?' Barriers to people with learning disabilities/autistic people leaving 'long-stay' hospital: a mixed methods study.

Background: Transforming care so that people with learning disabilities and/or autistic people can receive support at home rather than in hospital settings is a key priority, but progress has been slow. Despite significant national debate, little previous research has engaged directly with people in hospital, their families or front-line staff to understand the issues from their perspectives.

Objectives: This research seeks to better understand the experiences of people with learning disabilities and/or autistic people in long-stay hospital settings, their families and front-line staff - using this knowledge to create practice guides and training materials to support new understandings and ways of working.

Design: Following a structured review of the literature, we sought to work with up to 10 people with learning disabilities and/or autistic people in three case-study sites (2021-22), supplementing this with interviews with family members and commissioners; interviews/focus groups with hospital staff, social workers, advocates and care providers; information from case files; and observations of multidisciplinary meetings.

Setting: Three 'long-stay' hospital settings in England.

Participants: Twenty-seven people in hospital, together with families, health and social care staff and commissioners.

Results: • People in hospital report widespread frustration, feel that hospital environments are not conducive to getting/staying well, and face multiple barriers to leaving hospital. Without someone to fight for them, people struggle to overcome the inertia built into our current systems and processes. • Front-line staff are equally frustrated and describe a complex and seemingly dysfunctional system which they find almost impossible to navigate. • Hospital staff from different professional backgrounds do not have a shared sense of how many people really need to be in hospital or how many people could be cared for in different settings - suggesting that different definitions, world views and professional judgements might be at play. • Hospital staff are frustrated about what they see as the difficulty of discharging people into community services, while community services are equally frustrated about what they see as a risk-averse approach which they feel can lack an up-to-date knowledge of what is possible to achieve in the community. • Despite over a decade of policy attempts to resolve these issues, very significant barriers remain.

Limitations: This research explored the experiences of a small number of people, but has done so in significant depth. The research was undertaken in secure settings, during COVID and in a difficult external policy and practice context, and so has had to be very flexible and empathetic in order to build relationships and make the research possible. Future research could helpfully consider the needs of people from black and minority ethnic communities, the extent to which the experiences of people on forensic pathways are similar to/different from other people's experiences (including perspectives from the criminal justice system), and what happens to people in the long term after they leave hospital.

Conclusions: Working to make the voices of people with learning disabilities and/or autistic people (as well as the staff who support them) centre stage is complex and sensitive. However, this lived experience/practice knowledge is a crucial resource if we are going to develop better policy and practice solutions in the longer term.

Study registration: This study is registered at www.researchregistry.com (researchregistry6124).

Funding: This award was funded by the National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR) Health and Social Care Delivery Research programme (NIHR award ref: NIHR130298) and is published in full in Health and Social Care Delivery Research; Vol. 12, No. 3. See the NIHR Funding and Awards website for further award information.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Causes and solutions to workplace psychological ill-health for nurses, midwives and paramedics: the Care Under Pressure 2 realist review. Relationship between staff and quality of care in care homes: StaRQ mixed methods study. Practices of falls risk assessment and prevention in acute hospital settings: a realist investigation. Safer and more efficient vital signs monitoring protocols to identify the deteriorating patients in the general hospital ward: an observational study. Reducing health inequalities through general practice: a realist review and action framework.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1