{"title":"小分子粘合剂和非粘合剂与 FMN 核糖开关的结合自由能图谱:全原子分子动力学","authors":"Junichi Higo, Gert-Jan Bekker, Narutoshi Kamiya, Ikuo Fukuda, Yoshifumi Fukunishi","doi":"10.2142/biophysico.bppb-v20.0047","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>A small and flexible molecule, ribocil A (non-binder) or B (binder), binds to the deep pocket of the aptamer domain of the FMN riboswitch, which is an RNA molecule. This binding was studied by mD-VcMD, which is a generalized-ensemble simulation method. Ribocil A and B are structurally similar because they are optical isomers to each other. In the initial conformation of simulation, the ligands and the aptamer were completely dissociated in explicit solvent. The aptamer-ribocil B binding was stronger than the aptamer-ribocil A binding, which agrees with experiments. The computed free-energy landscape for the aptamer-ribocil B binding was funnel-like, whereas that for the aptamer-ribocil A binding was rugged. When passing through the gate (named \"front gate\") of the binding pocket, each ligand interacted with bases of the riboswitch by non-native π-π stackings, and the stackings restrained the ligand's orientation to be advantageous to reach the binding site smoothly. When the ligands reached the binding site in the pocket, the non-native stackings were replaced by the native stackings. The ligand's orientation restriction is discussed referring to a selection mechanism reported in an earlier work on a drug-GPCR interaction. The present simulation showed another pathway leading the ligands to the binding site. The gate (\"rear gate\") for this pathway was located completely opposite to the front gate on the aptamer's surface. However, the approach from the rear gate required overcoming a free-energy barrier regarding ligand's rotation before reaching the binding site.</p>","PeriodicalId":101323,"journal":{"name":"Biophysics and physicobiology","volume":"20 4","pages":"e200047"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10853809/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Binding free-energy landscapes of small molecule binder and non-binder to FMN riboswitch: All-atom molecular dynamics.\",\"authors\":\"Junichi Higo, Gert-Jan Bekker, Narutoshi Kamiya, Ikuo Fukuda, Yoshifumi Fukunishi\",\"doi\":\"10.2142/biophysico.bppb-v20.0047\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>A small and flexible molecule, ribocil A (non-binder) or B (binder), binds to the deep pocket of the aptamer domain of the FMN riboswitch, which is an RNA molecule. This binding was studied by mD-VcMD, which is a generalized-ensemble simulation method. Ribocil A and B are structurally similar because they are optical isomers to each other. In the initial conformation of simulation, the ligands and the aptamer were completely dissociated in explicit solvent. The aptamer-ribocil B binding was stronger than the aptamer-ribocil A binding, which agrees with experiments. The computed free-energy landscape for the aptamer-ribocil B binding was funnel-like, whereas that for the aptamer-ribocil A binding was rugged. When passing through the gate (named \\\"front gate\\\") of the binding pocket, each ligand interacted with bases of the riboswitch by non-native π-π stackings, and the stackings restrained the ligand's orientation to be advantageous to reach the binding site smoothly. When the ligands reached the binding site in the pocket, the non-native stackings were replaced by the native stackings. The ligand's orientation restriction is discussed referring to a selection mechanism reported in an earlier work on a drug-GPCR interaction. The present simulation showed another pathway leading the ligands to the binding site. The gate (\\\"rear gate\\\") for this pathway was located completely opposite to the front gate on the aptamer's surface. However, the approach from the rear gate required overcoming a free-energy barrier regarding ligand's rotation before reaching the binding site.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":101323,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Biophysics and physicobiology\",\"volume\":\"20 4\",\"pages\":\"e200047\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-12-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10853809/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Biophysics and physicobiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2142/biophysico.bppb-v20.0047\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"BIOPHYSICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biophysics and physicobiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2142/biophysico.bppb-v20.0047","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"BIOPHYSICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
一种小而灵活的分子--ribocil A(非粘合剂)或 B(粘合剂)--与 FMN 核糖开关(一种 RNA 分子)的适配器结构域的深口袋结合。这种结合是通过 mD-VcMD 进行研究的,这是一种广义组合模拟方法。Ribocil A 和 B 在结构上非常相似,因为它们互为光学异构体。在模拟的初始构象中,配体和合体在显式溶剂中完全解离。Aptamer 与ribocil B 的结合力强于 Aptamer 与ribocil A 的结合力,这与实验结果一致。计算得出的合体-核苷酸 B 结合的自由能谱呈漏斗状,而合体-核苷酸 A 结合的自由能谱呈崎岖状。在通过结合口袋的大门(名为 "前门")时,每种配体都通过非原生的π-π堆叠与核糖开关的碱基相互作用,堆叠限制了配体的取向,使其有利于顺利到达结合位点。当配体到达口袋中的结合位点时,非原生堆积被原生堆积所取代。配体方向限制的讨论参考了早先关于药物-GPCR相互作用的研究中报道的一种选择机制。目前的模拟显示了配体通向结合位点的另一条途径。该路径的门("后门")与适配体表面的前门完全相反。然而,从后门进入需要克服配体旋转的自由能障碍,然后才能到达结合位点。
Binding free-energy landscapes of small molecule binder and non-binder to FMN riboswitch: All-atom molecular dynamics.
A small and flexible molecule, ribocil A (non-binder) or B (binder), binds to the deep pocket of the aptamer domain of the FMN riboswitch, which is an RNA molecule. This binding was studied by mD-VcMD, which is a generalized-ensemble simulation method. Ribocil A and B are structurally similar because they are optical isomers to each other. In the initial conformation of simulation, the ligands and the aptamer were completely dissociated in explicit solvent. The aptamer-ribocil B binding was stronger than the aptamer-ribocil A binding, which agrees with experiments. The computed free-energy landscape for the aptamer-ribocil B binding was funnel-like, whereas that for the aptamer-ribocil A binding was rugged. When passing through the gate (named "front gate") of the binding pocket, each ligand interacted with bases of the riboswitch by non-native π-π stackings, and the stackings restrained the ligand's orientation to be advantageous to reach the binding site smoothly. When the ligands reached the binding site in the pocket, the non-native stackings were replaced by the native stackings. The ligand's orientation restriction is discussed referring to a selection mechanism reported in an earlier work on a drug-GPCR interaction. The present simulation showed another pathway leading the ligands to the binding site. The gate ("rear gate") for this pathway was located completely opposite to the front gate on the aptamer's surface. However, the approach from the rear gate required overcoming a free-energy barrier regarding ligand's rotation before reaching the binding site.