腹腔镜胆囊切除术的改良光学端口入口:我们的经验

Pravin Shinde, Aarsh Gajjar, Rajiv Karvande
{"title":"腹腔镜胆囊切除术的改良光学端口入口:我们的经验","authors":"Pravin Shinde, Aarsh Gajjar, Rajiv Karvande","doi":"10.5604/01.3001.0053.9350","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>&lt;b&gt;&lt;br&gt;Introduction:&lt;/b&gt; The four-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy is a recognized entity in the surgical management of gallstone disease. We report our experience and feasibility of optical port entry site modification.&lt;/br&gt; &lt;b&gt;&lt;br&gt;Material and Methods:&lt;/b&gt; To assess the feasibility and safety of laparoscopic cholecystectomy with a different port placement, we undertook a prospective study with 60 patients at Seth GSMC and KEM Hospital, India between Jan 2022 and July 2022. Our study offered the benefit of a flexible optical port entry site, using a 5 mm optical trocar instead of the conventional 10 mm trocar. A single surgeon did all the cases and definite criteria of simple cases of gallstone disease patterned on clinical and radiological grounds.&lt;/br&gt; &lt;b&gt;&lt;br&gt;Results:&lt;/b&gt; 60 cases of gallstone disease were subjected to the new technique of laparoscopic cholecystectomy over seven months. 39 cases were females and 21 were males. The age range of our patients was between 20 and 55 years with a median age of 39 years. Mean Body mass index 30 (range 25 - 37). The mean operative time was 30 min (range 15 - 45 min) and a follow-up period ranged from 10 to 14 months. No cases were converted to open. We did not encounter any untoward mishaps during surgery.&lt;/br&gt; &lt;b&gt;&lt;br&gt;Discussion:&lt;/b&gt; Our modification of the optical port placement and size received good results and patient satisfaction. Moreover, the placement of the port at a site further from the midline and umbilicus decreases the risk of development of trocar site incisional hernia.&lt;/br&gt.</p>","PeriodicalId":501107,"journal":{"name":"Polski przeglad chirurgiczny","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Modified optical port entry site for laparoscopic cholecystectomy: Our experience.\",\"authors\":\"Pravin Shinde, Aarsh Gajjar, Rajiv Karvande\",\"doi\":\"10.5604/01.3001.0053.9350\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>&lt;b&gt;&lt;br&gt;Introduction:&lt;/b&gt; The four-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy is a recognized entity in the surgical management of gallstone disease. We report our experience and feasibility of optical port entry site modification.&lt;/br&gt; &lt;b&gt;&lt;br&gt;Material and Methods:&lt;/b&gt; To assess the feasibility and safety of laparoscopic cholecystectomy with a different port placement, we undertook a prospective study with 60 patients at Seth GSMC and KEM Hospital, India between Jan 2022 and July 2022. Our study offered the benefit of a flexible optical port entry site, using a 5 mm optical trocar instead of the conventional 10 mm trocar. A single surgeon did all the cases and definite criteria of simple cases of gallstone disease patterned on clinical and radiological grounds.&lt;/br&gt; &lt;b&gt;&lt;br&gt;Results:&lt;/b&gt; 60 cases of gallstone disease were subjected to the new technique of laparoscopic cholecystectomy over seven months. 39 cases were females and 21 were males. The age range of our patients was between 20 and 55 years with a median age of 39 years. Mean Body mass index 30 (range 25 - 37). The mean operative time was 30 min (range 15 - 45 min) and a follow-up period ranged from 10 to 14 months. No cases were converted to open. We did not encounter any untoward mishaps during surgery.&lt;/br&gt; &lt;b&gt;&lt;br&gt;Discussion:&lt;/b&gt; Our modification of the optical port placement and size received good results and patient satisfaction. Moreover, the placement of the port at a site further from the midline and umbilicus decreases the risk of development of trocar site incisional hernia.&lt;/br&gt.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":501107,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Polski przeglad chirurgiczny\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-10-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Polski przeglad chirurgiczny\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5604/01.3001.0053.9350\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Polski przeglad chirurgiczny","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5604/01.3001.0053.9350","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

<b><br>引言:</b>四孔腹腔镜胆囊切除术是公认的胆石症外科治疗方法。</br><b><br>材料与方法:</b>为了评估使用不同端口位置进行腹腔镜胆囊切除术的可行性和安全性,我们在 2022 年 1 月至 2022 年 7 月期间在印度 Seth GSMC 和 KEM 医院对 60 名患者进行了前瞻性研究。我们的研究使用 5 毫米光学套管代替传统的 10 毫米套管,提供了灵活的光学端口进入部位的优势。所有病例均由一名外科医生完成,并根据临床和放射学依据制定了简单胆石症病例的明确标准。其中 39 例为女性,21 例为男性。患者年龄介于 20 岁至 55 岁之间,中位年龄为 39 岁。平均体重指数为 30(25 - 37)。平均手术时间为 30 分钟(15 - 45 分钟不等),随访时间为 10 - 14 个月不等。没有病例转为开腹手术。我们在手术过程中没有遇到任何意外事故。</br> <b><br>讨论:</b> 我们对光学端口位置和大小的修改取得了良好的效果,病人也很满意。此外,将光导口放置在离中线和脐部更远的位置可降低发生套管部位切口疝的风险。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Modified optical port entry site for laparoscopic cholecystectomy: Our experience.

<b><br>Introduction:</b> The four-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy is a recognized entity in the surgical management of gallstone disease. We report our experience and feasibility of optical port entry site modification.</br> <b><br>Material and Methods:</b> To assess the feasibility and safety of laparoscopic cholecystectomy with a different port placement, we undertook a prospective study with 60 patients at Seth GSMC and KEM Hospital, India between Jan 2022 and July 2022. Our study offered the benefit of a flexible optical port entry site, using a 5 mm optical trocar instead of the conventional 10 mm trocar. A single surgeon did all the cases and definite criteria of simple cases of gallstone disease patterned on clinical and radiological grounds.</br> <b><br>Results:</b> 60 cases of gallstone disease were subjected to the new technique of laparoscopic cholecystectomy over seven months. 39 cases were females and 21 were males. The age range of our patients was between 20 and 55 years with a median age of 39 years. Mean Body mass index 30 (range 25 - 37). The mean operative time was 30 min (range 15 - 45 min) and a follow-up period ranged from 10 to 14 months. No cases were converted to open. We did not encounter any untoward mishaps during surgery.</br> <b><br>Discussion:</b> Our modification of the optical port placement and size received good results and patient satisfaction. Moreover, the placement of the port at a site further from the midline and umbilicus decreases the risk of development of trocar site incisional hernia.</br>.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The influence of supportive therapy with a six-component myophlebotropic preparation on the reduction of symptoms in patients with symptoms of hemorrhoidal disease. Mental Health, and Eating Disorders in Patients After Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass Surgery (RYGB). Current approach to the management of preoperative iron deficiency anemia in colorectal cancer patients: a review of literature. Applicability of sodium butyrate preparations from a surgeon's and gastroenterologist's perspective. Gastro-entero-pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms (GEP-NENs) - Current literature review of diagnostics and therapy. What has changed in the management?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1