维生素 D 和 2 型糖尿病 (D2d) 研究中血糖测量的种族差异:随机试验的二次分析。

IF 3.7 2区 医学 Q2 ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM BMJ Open Diabetes Research & Care Pub Date : 2024-02-12 DOI:10.1136/bmjdrc-2023-003613
Erin S LeBlanc, Anastassios G Pittas, Jason Nelson, Ranee Chatterjee, Neda Rasouli, Mary K Rhee, Richard E Pratley, Cyrus V Desouza, Lisa M Neff, Anne M Peters, Samuel Dagogo-Jack, Daniel S Hsia
{"title":"维生素 D 和 2 型糖尿病 (D2d) 研究中血糖测量的种族差异:随机试验的二次分析。","authors":"Erin S LeBlanc, Anastassios G Pittas, Jason Nelson, Ranee Chatterjee, Neda Rasouli, Mary K Rhee, Richard E Pratley, Cyrus V Desouza, Lisa M Neff, Anne M Peters, Samuel Dagogo-Jack, Daniel S Hsia","doi":"10.1136/bmjdrc-2023-003613","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Understanding how race may influence the association between A1c and glycemia can improve diabetes screening. We sought to determine whether, for a given A1c level, glucose levels during an oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) differed by race.</p><p><strong>Research design and methods: </strong>From data collected at 22 US clinical sites, we conducted a cross-sectional study of concurrently measured A1c and OGTT and observational longitudinal follow-up of the subset with high-risk pre-diabetes. Numerical integration methods were used to calculate area under the glycemic curve (AUC<sub>glu</sub>) during OGTT and least squares regression model to estimate A1c for a given AUC<sub>glu</sub> by race, controlling for potential confounders.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>1016 black, 2658 white, and 193 Asian persons at risk of diabetes were included in cross-sectional analysis. Of these, 2154 with high-risk pre-diabetes were followed for 2.5 years. For a given A1c level, AUC<sub>glu</sub> was lower in black versus white participants. After adjustment for potential confounders, A1c levels for a given AUC<sub>glu</sub> quintile were 0.15-0.20 and 0.02-0.19 percentage points higher in black and Asian compared with white participants, respectively (p<0.05). In longitudinal analyses, black participants were more likely to be diagnosed with diabetes by A1c than white participants (28% vs 10%, respectively; p<0.01). Black and Asian participants were less likely to be diagnosed by fasting glucose than white participants (16% vs 15% vs 37%, respectively; p<0.05). Black participants with A1c levels in the lower-level quintiles had greater increase in A1c over time compared with white participants.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Use of additional testing beyond A1c to screen for diabetes may better stratify diabetes risk in the diverse US population.</p>","PeriodicalId":9151,"journal":{"name":"BMJ Open Diabetes Research & Care","volume":"12 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10862329/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Racial differences in measures of glycemia in the Vitamin D and Type 2 Diabetes (D2d) Study: a secondary analysis of a randomized trial.\",\"authors\":\"Erin S LeBlanc, Anastassios G Pittas, Jason Nelson, Ranee Chatterjee, Neda Rasouli, Mary K Rhee, Richard E Pratley, Cyrus V Desouza, Lisa M Neff, Anne M Peters, Samuel Dagogo-Jack, Daniel S Hsia\",\"doi\":\"10.1136/bmjdrc-2023-003613\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Understanding how race may influence the association between A1c and glycemia can improve diabetes screening. We sought to determine whether, for a given A1c level, glucose levels during an oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) differed by race.</p><p><strong>Research design and methods: </strong>From data collected at 22 US clinical sites, we conducted a cross-sectional study of concurrently measured A1c and OGTT and observational longitudinal follow-up of the subset with high-risk pre-diabetes. Numerical integration methods were used to calculate area under the glycemic curve (AUC<sub>glu</sub>) during OGTT and least squares regression model to estimate A1c for a given AUC<sub>glu</sub> by race, controlling for potential confounders.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>1016 black, 2658 white, and 193 Asian persons at risk of diabetes were included in cross-sectional analysis. Of these, 2154 with high-risk pre-diabetes were followed for 2.5 years. For a given A1c level, AUC<sub>glu</sub> was lower in black versus white participants. After adjustment for potential confounders, A1c levels for a given AUC<sub>glu</sub> quintile were 0.15-0.20 and 0.02-0.19 percentage points higher in black and Asian compared with white participants, respectively (p<0.05). In longitudinal analyses, black participants were more likely to be diagnosed with diabetes by A1c than white participants (28% vs 10%, respectively; p<0.01). Black and Asian participants were less likely to be diagnosed by fasting glucose than white participants (16% vs 15% vs 37%, respectively; p<0.05). Black participants with A1c levels in the lower-level quintiles had greater increase in A1c over time compared with white participants.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Use of additional testing beyond A1c to screen for diabetes may better stratify diabetes risk in the diverse US population.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9151,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BMJ Open Diabetes Research & Care\",\"volume\":\"12 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-02-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10862329/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BMJ Open Diabetes Research & Care\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjdrc-2023-003613\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMJ Open Diabetes Research & Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjdrc-2023-003613","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

导言:了解种族如何影响 A1c 与血糖之间的关联可以改善糖尿病筛查。我们试图确定在给定的 A1c 水平下,口服葡萄糖耐量试验(OGTT)中的血糖水平是否因种族而异:根据在美国 22 个临床机构收集的数据,我们对同时测量的 A1c 和 OGTT 进行了横断面研究,并对高风险糖尿病前期患者进行了观察性纵向跟踪。我们使用数值积分方法计算 OGTT 期间的血糖曲线下面积(AUCglu),并使用最小二乘法回归模型估算给定 AUCglu 下不同种族的 A1c,同时控制潜在的混杂因素:横断面分析纳入了 1016 名黑人、2658 名白人和 193 名亚裔糖尿病高危人群。其中,2154 名高风险糖尿病前期患者接受了为期 2.5 年的随访。在给定的 A1c 水平下,黑人参与者的 AUCglu 低于白人参与者。在对潜在的混杂因素进行调整后,黑人和亚裔参与者的给定 AUCglu 五分位数的 A1c 水平分别比白人参与者高 0.15-0.20 和 0.02-0.19 个百分点(p 结论:使用 A1c 以外的其他检测方法筛查糖尿病可能会更好地对美国不同人群的糖尿病风险进行分层。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Racial differences in measures of glycemia in the Vitamin D and Type 2 Diabetes (D2d) Study: a secondary analysis of a randomized trial.

Introduction: Understanding how race may influence the association between A1c and glycemia can improve diabetes screening. We sought to determine whether, for a given A1c level, glucose levels during an oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) differed by race.

Research design and methods: From data collected at 22 US clinical sites, we conducted a cross-sectional study of concurrently measured A1c and OGTT and observational longitudinal follow-up of the subset with high-risk pre-diabetes. Numerical integration methods were used to calculate area under the glycemic curve (AUCglu) during OGTT and least squares regression model to estimate A1c for a given AUCglu by race, controlling for potential confounders.

Results: 1016 black, 2658 white, and 193 Asian persons at risk of diabetes were included in cross-sectional analysis. Of these, 2154 with high-risk pre-diabetes were followed for 2.5 years. For a given A1c level, AUCglu was lower in black versus white participants. After adjustment for potential confounders, A1c levels for a given AUCglu quintile were 0.15-0.20 and 0.02-0.19 percentage points higher in black and Asian compared with white participants, respectively (p<0.05). In longitudinal analyses, black participants were more likely to be diagnosed with diabetes by A1c than white participants (28% vs 10%, respectively; p<0.01). Black and Asian participants were less likely to be diagnosed by fasting glucose than white participants (16% vs 15% vs 37%, respectively; p<0.05). Black participants with A1c levels in the lower-level quintiles had greater increase in A1c over time compared with white participants.

Conclusions: Use of additional testing beyond A1c to screen for diabetes may better stratify diabetes risk in the diverse US population.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
BMJ Open Diabetes Research & Care
BMJ Open Diabetes Research & Care Medicine-Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism
CiteScore
9.30
自引率
2.40%
发文量
123
审稿时长
18 weeks
期刊介绍: BMJ Open Diabetes Research & Care is an open access journal committed to publishing high-quality, basic and clinical research articles regarding type 1 and type 2 diabetes, and associated complications. Only original content will be accepted, and submissions are subject to rigorous peer review to ensure the publication of high-quality — and evidence-based — original research articles.
期刊最新文献
Association between RDW-SD and prognosis across glycemic status in patients with dilated cardiomyopathy. Widening the phenotypic spectrum caused by pathogenic PDX1 variants in individuals with neonatal diabetes. Identification of atypical pediatric diabetes mellitus cases using electronic medical records. Type 2 diabetes complications in ethnic minority compared with European host populations: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Effect of weight-maintaining ketogenic diet on glycemic control and insulin sensitivity in obese T2D subjects.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1