评估皮下导管更换对以开放式和自动胰岛素输送模式接受胰岛素泵治疗的 1 型糖尿病患者血糖控制的影响。

IF 5.7 2区 医学 Q1 ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM Diabetes technology & therapeutics Pub Date : 2024-07-01 Epub Date: 2024-03-07 DOI:10.1089/dia.2023.0568
Jean-Baptiste Julla, Pauline Jacquemier, Elisabeth Bonnemaison, Guy Fagherazzi, Hélène Hanaire, Pauline Bellicar Schaepelynck, Mihaela Mihaileanu, Eric Renard, Yves Reznik, Jean-Pierre Riveline
{"title":"评估皮下导管更换对以开放式和自动胰岛素输送模式接受胰岛素泵治疗的 1 型糖尿病患者血糖控制的影响。","authors":"Jean-Baptiste Julla, Pauline Jacquemier, Elisabeth Bonnemaison, Guy Fagherazzi, Hélène Hanaire, Pauline Bellicar Schaepelynck, Mihaela Mihaileanu, Eric Renard, Yves Reznik, Jean-Pierre Riveline","doi":"10.1089/dia.2023.0568","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b><i>Introduction:</i></b> Most continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion (CSII) catheters (KT) are changed every 3 days. This study aims at evaluating whether KT changes impact glucose control while under open-loop (OL) or automated insulin delivery (AID) modes. <b><i>Methods:</i></b> We included patients with type 1 diabetes who used Tandem t:slim x2 insulin pump and Dexcom G6 glucose sensor for 20 days in OL, then as AID. CSII and sensor glucose data in OL and for the past 20 days of 3-month AID were retrospectively analyzed. The percentage of time spent with sensor glucose above 180 mg/dL (%TAR180) was compared between the calendar day of KT change (D0), the next day (D1), and 2 days later (D2). Values were adjusted for age, gender, body mass index (BMI), hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) at inclusion, and %TAR180 for the 2 h before KT change. <b><i>Results:</i></b> A total of 1636 KT changes were analyzed in 134 patients: 72 women (54%), age: 35.6 ± 15.7 years, BMI: 25.2 ± 4.7 kg/m<sup>2</sup>, and HbA1c: 7.5 ± 0.8%. %TAR180 in the 2 h before the KT change was 51.3 ± 37.0% in OL and 33.2 ± 30.0% in AID mode. In OL, significant absolute increases of %TAR180 at D0 versus D1 (+6.9%; <i>P</i> < 0.0001) or versus D2 (+6.8%; <i>P</i> < 0.0001) were observed. In AID, significant absolute increases of %TA180R at D0 versus D1 (+4.8%; <i>P</i> < 0.0001) or versus D2 (+4.2%; <i>P</i> < 0.0001) were also observed. <b><i>Conclusion:</i></b> This study shows an increase in time spent in hyperglycemia on the day of the KT change both in OL and AID modes. This additional information should be taken into account to improve current AID algorithms. <b><i>ClinicalTrials.gov:</i></b> NCT04939766.</p>","PeriodicalId":11159,"journal":{"name":"Diabetes technology & therapeutics","volume":" ","pages":"442-448"},"PeriodicalIF":5.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Assessment of the Impact of Subcutaneous Catheter Change on Glucose Control in Patients with Type 1 Diabetes Treated by Insulin Pump in Open- and Closed-Loop Modes.\",\"authors\":\"Jean-Baptiste Julla, Pauline Jacquemier, Elisabeth Bonnemaison, Guy Fagherazzi, Hélène Hanaire, Pauline Bellicar Schaepelynck, Mihaela Mihaileanu, Eric Renard, Yves Reznik, Jean-Pierre Riveline\",\"doi\":\"10.1089/dia.2023.0568\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b><i>Introduction:</i></b> Most continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion (CSII) catheters (KT) are changed every 3 days. This study aims at evaluating whether KT changes impact glucose control while under open-loop (OL) or automated insulin delivery (AID) modes. <b><i>Methods:</i></b> We included patients with type 1 diabetes who used Tandem t:slim x2 insulin pump and Dexcom G6 glucose sensor for 20 days in OL, then as AID. CSII and sensor glucose data in OL and for the past 20 days of 3-month AID were retrospectively analyzed. The percentage of time spent with sensor glucose above 180 mg/dL (%TAR180) was compared between the calendar day of KT change (D0), the next day (D1), and 2 days later (D2). Values were adjusted for age, gender, body mass index (BMI), hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) at inclusion, and %TAR180 for the 2 h before KT change. <b><i>Results:</i></b> A total of 1636 KT changes were analyzed in 134 patients: 72 women (54%), age: 35.6 ± 15.7 years, BMI: 25.2 ± 4.7 kg/m<sup>2</sup>, and HbA1c: 7.5 ± 0.8%. %TAR180 in the 2 h before the KT change was 51.3 ± 37.0% in OL and 33.2 ± 30.0% in AID mode. In OL, significant absolute increases of %TAR180 at D0 versus D1 (+6.9%; <i>P</i> < 0.0001) or versus D2 (+6.8%; <i>P</i> < 0.0001) were observed. In AID, significant absolute increases of %TA180R at D0 versus D1 (+4.8%; <i>P</i> < 0.0001) or versus D2 (+4.2%; <i>P</i> < 0.0001) were also observed. <b><i>Conclusion:</i></b> This study shows an increase in time spent in hyperglycemia on the day of the KT change both in OL and AID modes. This additional information should be taken into account to improve current AID algorithms. <b><i>ClinicalTrials.gov:</i></b> NCT04939766.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11159,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Diabetes technology & therapeutics\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"442-448\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Diabetes technology & therapeutics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1089/dia.2023.0568\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/3/7 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Diabetes technology & therapeutics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1089/dia.2023.0568","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/3/7 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

导言 大多数连续皮下胰岛素输注(CSII)导管(KT)每 3 天更换一次。本研究旨在评估在开环(OL)或自动胰岛素输送(AID)模式下更换 KT 是否会影响血糖控制。方法 我们纳入了使用 Tandem t:slim x2 胰岛素泵和 Dexcom G6 血糖传感器的 1 型糖尿病(T1D)患者,他们在 OL 模式下使用了 20 天,然后又在 AID 模式下使用了 20 天。我们对 OL 和为期 3 个月的 AID 最后 20 天的 CSII 和传感器血糖数据进行了回顾性分析。比较了 KT 变化日历日(D0)、第二天(D1)和两天后(D2)传感器血糖超过 180 mg/dL 的时间百分比(%TAR180)。这些数值已根据年龄、性别、体重指数 (BMI)、纳入时的 HbA1c 和 KT 变化前 2 小时的 TAR180% 进行了调整。结果 对 134 名患者的 1636 次 KT 变化进行了分析:72名女性(54%),年龄:35.6±15.7岁,体重指数:25.2±4.7 kg/m²,血红蛋白A1c:7.5±0.8%。在更换 KT 前 2 小时,OL 和 AID 模式的 TAR180 百分比分别为 51.3±37.0%和 33.2±30.0%。在 OL 中,D0 与 D1 相比,%TAR180 有明显增加(+6.9%;p
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Assessment of the Impact of Subcutaneous Catheter Change on Glucose Control in Patients with Type 1 Diabetes Treated by Insulin Pump in Open- and Closed-Loop Modes.

Introduction: Most continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion (CSII) catheters (KT) are changed every 3 days. This study aims at evaluating whether KT changes impact glucose control while under open-loop (OL) or automated insulin delivery (AID) modes. Methods: We included patients with type 1 diabetes who used Tandem t:slim x2 insulin pump and Dexcom G6 glucose sensor for 20 days in OL, then as AID. CSII and sensor glucose data in OL and for the past 20 days of 3-month AID were retrospectively analyzed. The percentage of time spent with sensor glucose above 180 mg/dL (%TAR180) was compared between the calendar day of KT change (D0), the next day (D1), and 2 days later (D2). Values were adjusted for age, gender, body mass index (BMI), hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) at inclusion, and %TAR180 for the 2 h before KT change. Results: A total of 1636 KT changes were analyzed in 134 patients: 72 women (54%), age: 35.6 ± 15.7 years, BMI: 25.2 ± 4.7 kg/m2, and HbA1c: 7.5 ± 0.8%. %TAR180 in the 2 h before the KT change was 51.3 ± 37.0% in OL and 33.2 ± 30.0% in AID mode. In OL, significant absolute increases of %TAR180 at D0 versus D1 (+6.9%; P < 0.0001) or versus D2 (+6.8%; P < 0.0001) were observed. In AID, significant absolute increases of %TA180R at D0 versus D1 (+4.8%; P < 0.0001) or versus D2 (+4.2%; P < 0.0001) were also observed. Conclusion: This study shows an increase in time spent in hyperglycemia on the day of the KT change both in OL and AID modes. This additional information should be taken into account to improve current AID algorithms. ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT04939766.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Diabetes technology & therapeutics
Diabetes technology & therapeutics 医学-内分泌学与代谢
CiteScore
10.60
自引率
14.80%
发文量
145
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Diabetes Technology & Therapeutics is the only peer-reviewed journal providing healthcare professionals with information on new devices, drugs, drug delivery systems, and software for managing patients with diabetes. This leading international journal delivers practical information and comprehensive coverage of cutting-edge technologies and therapeutics in the field, and each issue highlights new pharmacological and device developments to optimize patient care.
期刊最新文献
A Telehealth Program Using Continuous Glucose Monitoring and a Connected Insulin Pen Cap in Nursing Homes for Older Adults with Insulin-Treated Diabetes: The Trescasas Study. Comment on Preechasuk et al: Switching from Intermittently-Scanned Continuous Glucose Monitoring to Real-Time Continuous Glucose Monitoring with a Predictive Urgent Low Soon Alert Reduces Exposure to Hypoglycemia. The Impact of Public Policy on Equitable Access to Technology for Children and Youth Living with Type 1 Diabetes in British Columbia, Canada. Randomized, Crossover Trial of Control-IQ Technology with a Lower Treatment Range and a Modified Meal Bolus Module in Adults, Adolescents, Children, and Preschoolers with Varying Levels of Baseline Glycemic Control. Impact of Continuous Glucose Monitoring Versus Blood Glucose Monitoring to Support a Carbohydrate-Restricted Nutrition Intervention in People with Type 2 Diabetes.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1