Gabriella Mayumi Tanaka, Lucas Melo Neves, Cristiane Maria Gonçalves, Guilherme Araújo Rasquinho, Thais Reimberg, Rosemeire de Oliveira, Anderson Fortunato de Lima, Saulo Gil
{"title":"肌肉参数能否预测焦虑和抑郁症状?","authors":"Gabriella Mayumi Tanaka, Lucas Melo Neves, Cristiane Maria Gonçalves, Guilherme Araújo Rasquinho, Thais Reimberg, Rosemeire de Oliveira, Anderson Fortunato de Lima, Saulo Gil","doi":"10.1177/10547738241232022","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Major depressive disorder and anxiety disorders are among the major public health issues. Therefore, identifying predictors of symptoms of depression and anxiety holds fundamental importance to avoid the aggravation of these conditions. Muscle strength and function (e.g., handgrip strength and timed-stands test) are widely recognized predictors of health outcomes; however, their association with symptoms of depression and anxiety is still not completely understood. This study investigated the associations between handgrip strength and timed-stands test scores with symptoms of depression and anxiety. In addition, we examined whether individuals exhibiting greater strength levels demonstrate reduced symptoms of anxiety and depression compared to those with lower levels of strength. This is a community-based, cross-sectional study. Participants were recruited through social media and underwent a semi-structured interview to record sociodemographic characteristics, comorbidities, use of tobacco and medication, and symptoms of anxiety (Beck's Anxiety Inventory [BAI]) and depression (Beck's Depressive Inventory [BDI]). Subsequently, anthropometric characteristics, handgrip strength, and functionality (i.e., timed-stands test) were assessed. In all, 216 individuals were evaluated. The adjusted regression model showed an inverse association between handgrip strength and anxiety (β = -0.22; 95% CI [-0.38, -0.07]; <i>R</i><sup>2</sup> = 0.07, <i>p</i> = .005) and depression symptoms (β = -0.25; 95% CI [-0.42, -0.07]; <i>R</i><sup>2</sup> = 0.05, <i>p</i> = .006). Similarly, timed-stands test scores were associated with anxiety (β = -0.33; 95% CI [-0.54, -0.13]; <i>R</i><sup>2</sup> = 0.09, <i>p</i> = .002) and depression (β = -0.32; 95% CI [-0.56, -0.09]; <i>R</i><sup>2</sup> = 0.06, <i>p</i> = .008). Furthermore, the low-strength group showed higher values on the BAI (9.5 vs. 5.9 arbitrary units; <i>p</i> = .0008) and BDI than the high-strength group (10.8 vs. 7.9 arbitrary units; <i>p</i> = .0214). When individuals were stratified by the timed-stands test, the low timed-stands group demonstrated higher values on the BAI (9.9 vs. 5.5 arbitrary units; <i>p</i> = .0030) and BDI than the high timed-stands group (11.2 vs. 7.5 arbitrary units; <i>p</i> < .0001). The results highlight muscular parameters as significant predictors associated with anxiety and depression symptoms.</p>","PeriodicalId":50677,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Nursing Research","volume":" ","pages":"181-188"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Can Muscular Parameters Predict Symptoms of Anxiety and Depression?\",\"authors\":\"Gabriella Mayumi Tanaka, Lucas Melo Neves, Cristiane Maria Gonçalves, Guilherme Araújo Rasquinho, Thais Reimberg, Rosemeire de Oliveira, Anderson Fortunato de Lima, Saulo Gil\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/10547738241232022\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Major depressive disorder and anxiety disorders are among the major public health issues. Therefore, identifying predictors of symptoms of depression and anxiety holds fundamental importance to avoid the aggravation of these conditions. Muscle strength and function (e.g., handgrip strength and timed-stands test) are widely recognized predictors of health outcomes; however, their association with symptoms of depression and anxiety is still not completely understood. This study investigated the associations between handgrip strength and timed-stands test scores with symptoms of depression and anxiety. In addition, we examined whether individuals exhibiting greater strength levels demonstrate reduced symptoms of anxiety and depression compared to those with lower levels of strength. This is a community-based, cross-sectional study. Participants were recruited through social media and underwent a semi-structured interview to record sociodemographic characteristics, comorbidities, use of tobacco and medication, and symptoms of anxiety (Beck's Anxiety Inventory [BAI]) and depression (Beck's Depressive Inventory [BDI]). Subsequently, anthropometric characteristics, handgrip strength, and functionality (i.e., timed-stands test) were assessed. In all, 216 individuals were evaluated. The adjusted regression model showed an inverse association between handgrip strength and anxiety (β = -0.22; 95% CI [-0.38, -0.07]; <i>R</i><sup>2</sup> = 0.07, <i>p</i> = .005) and depression symptoms (β = -0.25; 95% CI [-0.42, -0.07]; <i>R</i><sup>2</sup> = 0.05, <i>p</i> = .006). Similarly, timed-stands test scores were associated with anxiety (β = -0.33; 95% CI [-0.54, -0.13]; <i>R</i><sup>2</sup> = 0.09, <i>p</i> = .002) and depression (β = -0.32; 95% CI [-0.56, -0.09]; <i>R</i><sup>2</sup> = 0.06, <i>p</i> = .008). Furthermore, the low-strength group showed higher values on the BAI (9.5 vs. 5.9 arbitrary units; <i>p</i> = .0008) and BDI than the high-strength group (10.8 vs. 7.9 arbitrary units; <i>p</i> = .0214). When individuals were stratified by the timed-stands test, the low timed-stands group demonstrated higher values on the BAI (9.9 vs. 5.5 arbitrary units; <i>p</i> = .0030) and BDI than the high timed-stands group (11.2 vs. 7.5 arbitrary units; <i>p</i> < .0001). The results highlight muscular parameters as significant predictors associated with anxiety and depression symptoms.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50677,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical Nursing Research\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"181-188\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical Nursing Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/10547738241232022\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/2/13 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"NURSING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Nursing Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10547738241232022","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/2/13 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
重度抑郁症和焦虑症是主要的公共卫生问题之一。因此,确定抑郁症和焦虑症症状的预测因素对于避免这些疾病的恶化至关重要。肌肉力量和功能(如手握力和定时站立测试)是公认的健康状况预测指标,但它们与抑郁症和焦虑症症状之间的关系仍未完全明了。本研究调查了手握力和定时站立测试得分与抑郁和焦虑症状之间的关系。此外,我们还研究了与力量水平较低的人相比,力量水平较高的人是否会减少焦虑和抑郁症状。这是一项基于社区的横断面研究。我们通过社交媒体招募参与者,并对他们进行了半结构化访谈,以记录他们的社会人口学特征、合并症、吸烟和用药情况、焦虑症状(贝克焦虑量表 [BAI])和抑郁症状(贝克抑郁量表 [BDI])。随后,还对人体测量特征、握力和功能(即定时站立测试)进行了评估。总共对 216 人进行了评估。调整后的回归模型显示,手握力与焦虑(β = -0.22;95% CI [-0.38,-0.07];R2 = 0.07,p = .005)和抑郁症状(β = -0.25;95% CI [-0.42,-0.07];R2 = 0.05,p = .006)呈负相关。同样,定时站立测试得分与焦虑(β = -0.33;95% CI [-0.54,-0.13];R2 = 0.09,p = .002)和抑郁(β = -0.32;95% CI [-0.56,-0.09];R2 = 0.06,p = .008)相关。此外,低强度组的 BAI 值(9.5 对 5.9 任意单位;p = 0.0008)和 BDI 值(10.8 对 7.9 任意单位;p = 0.0214)高于高强度组。按定时站立测试对个体进行分层时,低定时站立组的 BAI 值(9.9 vs. 5.5 任意单位;p = .0030)和 BDI 值均高于高定时站立组(11.2 vs. 7.5 任意单位;p = .0030)。
Can Muscular Parameters Predict Symptoms of Anxiety and Depression?
Major depressive disorder and anxiety disorders are among the major public health issues. Therefore, identifying predictors of symptoms of depression and anxiety holds fundamental importance to avoid the aggravation of these conditions. Muscle strength and function (e.g., handgrip strength and timed-stands test) are widely recognized predictors of health outcomes; however, their association with symptoms of depression and anxiety is still not completely understood. This study investigated the associations between handgrip strength and timed-stands test scores with symptoms of depression and anxiety. In addition, we examined whether individuals exhibiting greater strength levels demonstrate reduced symptoms of anxiety and depression compared to those with lower levels of strength. This is a community-based, cross-sectional study. Participants were recruited through social media and underwent a semi-structured interview to record sociodemographic characteristics, comorbidities, use of tobacco and medication, and symptoms of anxiety (Beck's Anxiety Inventory [BAI]) and depression (Beck's Depressive Inventory [BDI]). Subsequently, anthropometric characteristics, handgrip strength, and functionality (i.e., timed-stands test) were assessed. In all, 216 individuals were evaluated. The adjusted regression model showed an inverse association between handgrip strength and anxiety (β = -0.22; 95% CI [-0.38, -0.07]; R2 = 0.07, p = .005) and depression symptoms (β = -0.25; 95% CI [-0.42, -0.07]; R2 = 0.05, p = .006). Similarly, timed-stands test scores were associated with anxiety (β = -0.33; 95% CI [-0.54, -0.13]; R2 = 0.09, p = .002) and depression (β = -0.32; 95% CI [-0.56, -0.09]; R2 = 0.06, p = .008). Furthermore, the low-strength group showed higher values on the BAI (9.5 vs. 5.9 arbitrary units; p = .0008) and BDI than the high-strength group (10.8 vs. 7.9 arbitrary units; p = .0214). When individuals were stratified by the timed-stands test, the low timed-stands group demonstrated higher values on the BAI (9.9 vs. 5.5 arbitrary units; p = .0030) and BDI than the high timed-stands group (11.2 vs. 7.5 arbitrary units; p < .0001). The results highlight muscular parameters as significant predictors associated with anxiety and depression symptoms.
期刊介绍:
Clinical Nursing Research (CNR) is a peer-reviewed quarterly journal that addresses issues of clinical research that are meaningful to practicing nurses, providing an international forum to encourage discussion among clinical practitioners, enhance clinical practice by pinpointing potential clinical applications of the latest scholarly research, and disseminate research findings of particular interest to practicing nurses. This journal is a member of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE).