定义小动物败血症。

IF 1.1 3区 农林科学 Q3 VETERINARY SCIENCES Journal of veterinary emergency and critical care Pub Date : 2024-02-13 DOI:10.1111/vec.13359
Stefano Cortellini DVM, MVetMed, DACVECC, DECVECC, Amy E. DeClue DVM, MSc, DACVIM, Massimo Giunti DVM, DECVECC, Robert Goggs BVSc, PhD, DACVECC, DECVECC, Kate Hopper DVM, PhD, DACVECC, Julie M. Menard DVM DACVECC, Rodrigo C. Rabelo DVM, DSc, Elizabeth A. Rozanski DVM, DACVECC, Claire R. Sharp DVM, DACVECC, Deborah C. Silverstein DVM, DACVECC, Virginia Sinnott-Stutzman DVM, DACVECC, Giacomo Stanzani DVM, MVetMed, DACVECC, DECVECC
{"title":"定义小动物败血症。","authors":"Stefano Cortellini DVM, MVetMed, DACVECC, DECVECC,&nbsp;Amy E. DeClue DVM, MSc, DACVIM,&nbsp;Massimo Giunti DVM, DECVECC,&nbsp;Robert Goggs BVSc, PhD, DACVECC, DECVECC,&nbsp;Kate Hopper DVM, PhD, DACVECC,&nbsp;Julie M. Menard DVM DACVECC,&nbsp;Rodrigo C. Rabelo DVM, DSc,&nbsp;Elizabeth A. Rozanski DVM, DACVECC,&nbsp;Claire R. Sharp DVM, DACVECC,&nbsp;Deborah C. Silverstein DVM, DACVECC,&nbsp;Virginia Sinnott-Stutzman DVM, DACVECC,&nbsp;Giacomo Stanzani DVM, MVetMed, DACVECC, DECVECC","doi":"10.1111/vec.13359","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Objective</h3>\n \n <p>To discuss the definitions of sepsis in human and veterinary medicine.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Design</h3>\n \n <p>International, multicenter position statement on the need for consensus definitions of sepsis in veterinary medicine.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Setting</h3>\n \n <p>Veterinary private practice and university teaching hospitals.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Animals</h3>\n \n <p>Dogs and cats.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Interventions</h3>\n \n <p>None.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Measurements and Main Results</h3>\n \n <p>Sepsis is a life-threatening condition associated with the body's response to an infection. In human medicine, sepsis has been defined by consensus on 3 occasions, most recently in 2016. In veterinary medicine, there is little uniformity in how sepsis is defined and no consensus on how to identify it clinically. Most publications rely on modified criteria derived from the 1991 and 2001 human consensus definitions. There is a divergence between the human and veterinary descriptions of sepsis and no consensus on how to diagnose the syndrome. This impedes research, hampers the translation of pathophysiology insights to the clinic, and limits our abilities to optimize patient care. It may be time to formally define sepsis in veterinary medicine to help the field move forward. In this narrative review, we present a synopsis of prior attempts to define sepsis in human and veterinary medicine, discuss developments in our understanding, and highlight some criticisms and shortcomings of existing schemes.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>This review is intended to serve as the foundation of current efforts to establish a consensus definition for sepsis in small animals and ultimately generate evidence-based criteria for its recognition in veterinary clinical practice.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":17603,"journal":{"name":"Journal of veterinary emergency and critical care","volume":"34 2","pages":"97-109"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/vec.13359","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Defining sepsis in small animals\",\"authors\":\"Stefano Cortellini DVM, MVetMed, DACVECC, DECVECC,&nbsp;Amy E. DeClue DVM, MSc, DACVIM,&nbsp;Massimo Giunti DVM, DECVECC,&nbsp;Robert Goggs BVSc, PhD, DACVECC, DECVECC,&nbsp;Kate Hopper DVM, PhD, DACVECC,&nbsp;Julie M. Menard DVM DACVECC,&nbsp;Rodrigo C. Rabelo DVM, DSc,&nbsp;Elizabeth A. Rozanski DVM, DACVECC,&nbsp;Claire R. Sharp DVM, DACVECC,&nbsp;Deborah C. Silverstein DVM, DACVECC,&nbsp;Virginia Sinnott-Stutzman DVM, DACVECC,&nbsp;Giacomo Stanzani DVM, MVetMed, DACVECC, DECVECC\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/vec.13359\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Objective</h3>\\n \\n <p>To discuss the definitions of sepsis in human and veterinary medicine.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Design</h3>\\n \\n <p>International, multicenter position statement on the need for consensus definitions of sepsis in veterinary medicine.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Setting</h3>\\n \\n <p>Veterinary private practice and university teaching hospitals.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Animals</h3>\\n \\n <p>Dogs and cats.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Interventions</h3>\\n \\n <p>None.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Measurements and Main Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>Sepsis is a life-threatening condition associated with the body's response to an infection. In human medicine, sepsis has been defined by consensus on 3 occasions, most recently in 2016. In veterinary medicine, there is little uniformity in how sepsis is defined and no consensus on how to identify it clinically. Most publications rely on modified criteria derived from the 1991 and 2001 human consensus definitions. There is a divergence between the human and veterinary descriptions of sepsis and no consensus on how to diagnose the syndrome. This impedes research, hampers the translation of pathophysiology insights to the clinic, and limits our abilities to optimize patient care. It may be time to formally define sepsis in veterinary medicine to help the field move forward. In this narrative review, we present a synopsis of prior attempts to define sepsis in human and veterinary medicine, discuss developments in our understanding, and highlight some criticisms and shortcomings of existing schemes.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\\n \\n <p>This review is intended to serve as the foundation of current efforts to establish a consensus definition for sepsis in small animals and ultimately generate evidence-based criteria for its recognition in veterinary clinical practice.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":17603,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of veterinary emergency and critical care\",\"volume\":\"34 2\",\"pages\":\"97-109\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-02-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/vec.13359\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of veterinary emergency and critical care\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/vec.13359\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"VETERINARY SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of veterinary emergency and critical care","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/vec.13359","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"VETERINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:讨论败血症在人类医学和兽医学中的定义:讨论人类医学和兽医学中败血症的定义:关于兽医学中败血症定义共识需求的国际多中心立场声明:动物:狗和猫:干预措施:无:测量和主要结果败血症是一种威胁生命的疾病,与机体对感染的反应有关。在人类医学中,脓毒症的定义已达成 3 次共识,最近一次是在 2016 年。在兽医学中,败血症的定义几乎没有统一性,如何在临床上识别败血症也未达成共识。大多数出版物都依赖于从 1991 年和 2001 年人类共识定义中得出的修订标准。人类和兽医对败血症的描述不尽相同,对如何诊断该综合征也没有达成共识。这阻碍了研究工作,妨碍了病理生理学研究成果向临床的转化,并限制了我们优化患者护理的能力。也许是时候正式定义兽医学中的败血症,以帮助该领域向前发展了。在这篇叙述性综述中,我们简要介绍了人类和兽类医学界以前尝试定义败血症的情况,讨论了我们对败血症认识的发展,并强调了现有方案的一些批评和不足之处:本综述旨在为当前确立小动物败血症的共识定义奠定基础,并最终为兽医临床实践中识别败血症制定循证标准。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Defining sepsis in small animals

Objective

To discuss the definitions of sepsis in human and veterinary medicine.

Design

International, multicenter position statement on the need for consensus definitions of sepsis in veterinary medicine.

Setting

Veterinary private practice and university teaching hospitals.

Animals

Dogs and cats.

Interventions

None.

Measurements and Main Results

Sepsis is a life-threatening condition associated with the body's response to an infection. In human medicine, sepsis has been defined by consensus on 3 occasions, most recently in 2016. In veterinary medicine, there is little uniformity in how sepsis is defined and no consensus on how to identify it clinically. Most publications rely on modified criteria derived from the 1991 and 2001 human consensus definitions. There is a divergence between the human and veterinary descriptions of sepsis and no consensus on how to diagnose the syndrome. This impedes research, hampers the translation of pathophysiology insights to the clinic, and limits our abilities to optimize patient care. It may be time to formally define sepsis in veterinary medicine to help the field move forward. In this narrative review, we present a synopsis of prior attempts to define sepsis in human and veterinary medicine, discuss developments in our understanding, and highlight some criticisms and shortcomings of existing schemes.

Conclusions

This review is intended to serve as the foundation of current efforts to establish a consensus definition for sepsis in small animals and ultimately generate evidence-based criteria for its recognition in veterinary clinical practice.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
15.40%
发文量
121
审稿时长
18-36 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Veterinary Emergency and Critical Care’s primary aim is to advance the international clinical standard of care for emergency/critical care patients of all species. The journal’s content is relevant to specialist and non-specialist veterinarians practicing emergency/critical care medicine. The journal achieves it aims by publishing descriptions of unique presentation or management; retrospective and prospective evaluations of prognosis, novel diagnosis, or therapy; translational basic science studies with clinical relevance; in depth reviews of pertinent topics; topical news and letters; and regular themed issues. The journal is the official publication of the Veterinary Emergency and Critical Care Society, the American College of Veterinary Emergency and Critical Care, the European Veterinary Emergency and Critical Care Society, and the European College of Veterinary Emergency and Critical Care. It is a bimonthly publication with international impact and adheres to currently accepted ethical standards.
期刊最新文献
Fabio Viganó Jennifer J. Devey Issue Information - Prelim AUTHOR INDEX Abstracts from the International Veterinary Emergency and Critical Care Symposium and the European Veterinary Emergency and Critical Care Annual Congress 2024
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1