Victoria L Bartlett, Harry Doernberg, Maryam Mooghali, Ravi Gupta, Joshua D Wallach, Kate Nyhan, Kai Chen, Joseph S Ross
{"title":"2012 年至 2021 年发表的有关气候变化对人类健康影响的研究:横断面研究。","authors":"Victoria L Bartlett, Harry Doernberg, Maryam Mooghali, Ravi Gupta, Joshua D Wallach, Kate Nyhan, Kai Chen, Joseph S Ross","doi":"10.1136/bmjmed-2023-000627","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To better understand the state of research on the effects of climate change on human health, including exposures, health conditions, populations, areas of the world studied, funding sources, and publication characteristics, with a focus on topics that are relevant for populations at risk.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Cross sectional study.</p><p><strong>Data sources: </strong>The National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences climate change and human health literature portal, a curated bibliographical database of global peer reviewed research and grey literature was searched. The database combines searches of multiple search engines including PubMed, Web of Science, and Google Scholar, and includes added-value expert tagging of climate change exposures and health impacts.</p><p><strong>Eligibility criteria: </strong>Inclusion criteria were peer reviewed, original research articles that investigated the health effects of climate change and were published in English from 2012 to 2021. After identification, a 10% random sample was selected to manually perform a detailed characterisation of research topics and publication information.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>10 325 original research articles were published between 2012 and 2021, and the number of articles increased by 23% annually. In a random sample of 1014 articles, several gaps were found in research topics that are particularly relevant to populations at risk, such as those in the global south (134 countries established through the United Nations Office for South-South Cooperation) (n=444; 43.8%), adults aged 65 years or older (n=195; 19.2%), and on topics related to human conflict and migration (n=25; 2.5%) and food and water quality and security (n=148; 14.6%). Additionally, fewer first authors were from the global south (n=349; 34.4%), which may partly explain why research focusing on these countries is disproportionally less.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Although the body of research on the health effects of climate change has grown substantially over the past decade, including those with a focus on the global south, a disproportionate focus continues to be on countries in the global north and less at risk populations. Governments are the largest source of funding for such research, and governments, particularly in the global north, need to re-orient their climate and health research funding to support researchers in the global south and to be more inclusive of issues that are relevant to the global south.</p>","PeriodicalId":72433,"journal":{"name":"BMJ medicine","volume":"3 1","pages":"e000627"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10862342/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Published research on the human health implications of climate change between 2012 and 2021: cross sectional study.\",\"authors\":\"Victoria L Bartlett, Harry Doernberg, Maryam Mooghali, Ravi Gupta, Joshua D Wallach, Kate Nyhan, Kai Chen, Joseph S Ross\",\"doi\":\"10.1136/bmjmed-2023-000627\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To better understand the state of research on the effects of climate change on human health, including exposures, health conditions, populations, areas of the world studied, funding sources, and publication characteristics, with a focus on topics that are relevant for populations at risk.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Cross sectional study.</p><p><strong>Data sources: </strong>The National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences climate change and human health literature portal, a curated bibliographical database of global peer reviewed research and grey literature was searched. The database combines searches of multiple search engines including PubMed, Web of Science, and Google Scholar, and includes added-value expert tagging of climate change exposures and health impacts.</p><p><strong>Eligibility criteria: </strong>Inclusion criteria were peer reviewed, original research articles that investigated the health effects of climate change and were published in English from 2012 to 2021. After identification, a 10% random sample was selected to manually perform a detailed characterisation of research topics and publication information.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>10 325 original research articles were published between 2012 and 2021, and the number of articles increased by 23% annually. In a random sample of 1014 articles, several gaps were found in research topics that are particularly relevant to populations at risk, such as those in the global south (134 countries established through the United Nations Office for South-South Cooperation) (n=444; 43.8%), adults aged 65 years or older (n=195; 19.2%), and on topics related to human conflict and migration (n=25; 2.5%) and food and water quality and security (n=148; 14.6%). Additionally, fewer first authors were from the global south (n=349; 34.4%), which may partly explain why research focusing on these countries is disproportionally less.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Although the body of research on the health effects of climate change has grown substantially over the past decade, including those with a focus on the global south, a disproportionate focus continues to be on countries in the global north and less at risk populations. Governments are the largest source of funding for such research, and governments, particularly in the global north, need to re-orient their climate and health research funding to support researchers in the global south and to be more inclusive of issues that are relevant to the global south.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":72433,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BMJ medicine\",\"volume\":\"3 1\",\"pages\":\"e000627\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-02-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10862342/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BMJ medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjmed-2023-000627\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMJ medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjmed-2023-000627","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
目标:更好地了解气候变化对人类健康影响的研究状况,包括暴露、健康状况、人群、世界研究地区、资金来源和出版特点,重点关注与高危人群相关的主题:设计:横断面研究:数据来源:对美国国家环境健康科学研究所气候变化与人类健康文献门户网站进行了搜索,该门户网站是一个经过编辑的全球同行评审研究和灰色文献书目数据库。该数据库综合了多个搜索引擎的搜索结果,包括PubMed、Web of Science和Google Scholar,还包括专家对气候变化暴露和健康影响的附加值标记:纳入标准是经同行评审的、调查气候变化对健康影响的原创性研究文章,这些文章在 2012 年至 2021 年期间以英文发表。经过识别后,随机抽取 10%的样本,以人工方式对研究主题和发表信息进行详细描述:结果:2012年至2021年间共发表了10 325篇原创研究文章,文章数量每年增长23%。在随机抽样的1014篇文章中,发现了一些与高危人群特别相关的研究课题存在差距,如全球南部(通过联合国南南合作办公室建立的134个国家)的高危人群(n=444;43.8%)、65岁或以上的成年人(n=195;19.2%),以及与人类冲突和移民(n=25;2.5%)和食品及水质与安全(n=148;14.6%)相关的课题。此外,来自全球南部的第一作者人数较少(n=349;34.4%),这可能部分解释了为什么关注这些国家的研究不成比例地较少:尽管在过去十年中,有关气候变化对健康影响的研究大幅增加,其中包括那些关注全球南部的研究,但不成比例的重点仍然是全球北部国家和风险较低的人群。各国政府是此类研究的最大资金来源,各国政府,特别是全球北方的政府,需要重新调整其气候和健康研究资金的方向,以支持全球南方的研究人员,并更多地考虑与全球南方相关的问题。
Published research on the human health implications of climate change between 2012 and 2021: cross sectional study.
Objective: To better understand the state of research on the effects of climate change on human health, including exposures, health conditions, populations, areas of the world studied, funding sources, and publication characteristics, with a focus on topics that are relevant for populations at risk.
Design: Cross sectional study.
Data sources: The National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences climate change and human health literature portal, a curated bibliographical database of global peer reviewed research and grey literature was searched. The database combines searches of multiple search engines including PubMed, Web of Science, and Google Scholar, and includes added-value expert tagging of climate change exposures and health impacts.
Eligibility criteria: Inclusion criteria were peer reviewed, original research articles that investigated the health effects of climate change and were published in English from 2012 to 2021. After identification, a 10% random sample was selected to manually perform a detailed characterisation of research topics and publication information.
Results: 10 325 original research articles were published between 2012 and 2021, and the number of articles increased by 23% annually. In a random sample of 1014 articles, several gaps were found in research topics that are particularly relevant to populations at risk, such as those in the global south (134 countries established through the United Nations Office for South-South Cooperation) (n=444; 43.8%), adults aged 65 years or older (n=195; 19.2%), and on topics related to human conflict and migration (n=25; 2.5%) and food and water quality and security (n=148; 14.6%). Additionally, fewer first authors were from the global south (n=349; 34.4%), which may partly explain why research focusing on these countries is disproportionally less.
Conclusions: Although the body of research on the health effects of climate change has grown substantially over the past decade, including those with a focus on the global south, a disproportionate focus continues to be on countries in the global north and less at risk populations. Governments are the largest source of funding for such research, and governments, particularly in the global north, need to re-orient their climate and health research funding to support researchers in the global south and to be more inclusive of issues that are relevant to the global south.