Pub Date : 2025-03-27eCollection Date: 2025-01-01DOI: 10.1136/bmjmed-2025-001446
Natalie Halvorsen, Cesare Hassan, Loredana Correale, Nastazja Pilonis, Lise M Helsingen, Marco Spadaccini, Alessandro Repici, Farid Foroutan, Per Olav Vandvik, Shanaz Sultan, Magnus Løberg, Mette Kalager, Yuichi Mori, Michael Bretthauer
Abstract:
Objective: To estimate the benefits, burden, and harms of implementing computer aided detection (CADe) of polyps in colonoscopy of population based screening programmes for colorectal cancer.
Design: Microsimulation modelling study.
Setting: Cost effectiveness working package in the OperA (optimising colorectal cancer prevention through personalised treatment with artificial intelligence) project. A parallel guideline committee panel (BMJ Rapid recommendation) was consulted in defining the screening interventions and selection of outcome measures.
Population: Four cohorts of 100 000 European individuals aged 60-69 years.
Intervention: The intervention was one screening of colonoscopy and a screening of colonoscopy after faecal immunochemical test every other year with CADe. The comparison group had the same screening every other year without CADe.
Main outcome measures: Benefits (colorectal cancer incidence and death), burden (surveillance colonoscopies), and harms (colonoscopy related adverse events) over 10 years were measured. The certainty in each outcome was assessed by use of the GRADE (Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation) approach.
Results: For 100 000 individuals participating in colonoscopy screening, 824 (0.82%) were diagnosed with colorectal cancer within 10 years without CADe versus 713 (0.71%) with CADe (risk difference -0.11% (95% CI -0.43% to 0.21%)). For faecal immunochemical test screening colonoscopy, the risk was 5.82% (n=5820) without CADe versus 5.77% (n=5770) with CADe (difference -0.05% (-0.33% to 0.15%)). The risk of surveillance colonoscopy increased from 26.45% (n=26 453) to 32.82% (n=32 819) (difference 6.37% (5.8% to 6.9%)) for colonoscopy screening and from 52.26% (n=52 263) to 53.08% (n=53 082) (difference 0.82% (0.38% to 1.26%)) for faecal immunochemical test screening colonoscopy. No significant differences were noted in adverse events related to the colonoscopy between CADe and no CADe. The model estimates were sensitive to the assumed effects of screening on colorectal cancer risk and of CADe on adenoma detection rates. All outcomes were graded as low certainty.
Conclusion: With low certainty of evidence, adoption of CADe in population based screening provides small and uncertain clinical meaningful benefit, no incremental harms, and increased surveillance burden after screening.
{"title":"Benefits, burden, and harms of computer aided polyp detection with artificial intelligence in colorectal cancer screening: microsimulation modelling study.","authors":"Natalie Halvorsen, Cesare Hassan, Loredana Correale, Nastazja Pilonis, Lise M Helsingen, Marco Spadaccini, Alessandro Repici, Farid Foroutan, Per Olav Vandvik, Shanaz Sultan, Magnus Løberg, Mette Kalager, Yuichi Mori, Michael Bretthauer","doi":"10.1136/bmjmed-2025-001446","DOIUrl":"10.1136/bmjmed-2025-001446","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Abstract: </strong></p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To estimate the benefits, burden, and harms of implementing computer aided detection (CADe) of polyps in colonoscopy of population based screening programmes for colorectal cancer.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Microsimulation modelling study.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Cost effectiveness working package in the OperA (optimising colorectal cancer prevention through personalised treatment with artificial intelligence) project. A parallel guideline committee panel (BMJ Rapid recommendation) was consulted in defining the screening interventions and selection of outcome measures.</p><p><strong>Population: </strong>Four cohorts of 100 000 European individuals aged 60-69 years.</p><p><strong>Intervention: </strong>The intervention was one screening of colonoscopy and a screening of colonoscopy after faecal immunochemical test every other year with CADe. The comparison group had the same screening every other year without CADe.</p><p><strong>Main outcome measures: </strong>Benefits (colorectal cancer incidence and death), burden (surveillance colonoscopies), and harms (colonoscopy related adverse events) over 10 years were measured. The certainty in each outcome was assessed by use of the GRADE (Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation) approach.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>For 100 000 individuals participating in colonoscopy screening, 824 (0.82%) were diagnosed with colorectal cancer within 10 years without CADe versus 713 (0.71%) with CADe (risk difference -0.11% (95% CI -0.43% to 0.21%)). For faecal immunochemical test screening colonoscopy, the risk was 5.82% (n=5820) without CADe versus 5.77% (n=5770) with CADe (difference -0.05% (-0.33% to 0.15%)). The risk of surveillance colonoscopy increased from 26.45% (n=26 453) to 32.82% (n=32 819) (difference 6.37% (5.8% to 6.9%)) for colonoscopy screening and from 52.26% (n=52 263) to 53.08% (n=53 082) (difference 0.82% (0.38% to 1.26%)) for faecal immunochemical test screening colonoscopy. No significant differences were noted in adverse events related to the colonoscopy between CADe and no CADe. The model estimates were sensitive to the assumed effects of screening on colorectal cancer risk and of CADe on adenoma detection rates. All outcomes were graded as low certainty.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>With low certainty of evidence, adoption of CADe in population based screening provides small and uncertain clinical meaningful benefit, no incremental harms, and increased surveillance burden after screening.</p>","PeriodicalId":72433,"journal":{"name":"BMJ medicine","volume":"4 1","pages":"e001446"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2025-03-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11955961/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143756136","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-03-25eCollection Date: 2025-01-01DOI: 10.1136/bmjmed-2025-001431
Jay Karri, Ryan S D'Souza, Steven P Cohen
{"title":"Between promise and peril: role of suzetrigine as a non-opioid analgesic.","authors":"Jay Karri, Ryan S D'Souza, Steven P Cohen","doi":"10.1136/bmjmed-2025-001431","DOIUrl":"10.1136/bmjmed-2025-001431","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":72433,"journal":{"name":"BMJ medicine","volume":"4 1","pages":"e001431"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2025-03-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11948347/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143733453","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-03-21eCollection Date: 2025-01-01DOI: 10.1136/bmjmed-2024-000909
Veronica Davila-Batista, Vivian Viallon, Emma Fontvieille, Anna Jansana, Mirjam Kohls, Nicola P Bondonno, Anne Tjønneland, Christina C Dahm, Christian S Antoniussen, Verena Katzke, Rashmita Bajrachaya, Matthias B Schulze, Claudia Agnoli, Fulvio Ricceri, Salvatore Panico, Raul Zamora-Ros, Miguel Rodriguez-Barranco, Pilar Amiano, Maria-Dolores Chirlaque, Conchi Moreno-Iribas, Keren Papier, Konstantinos K Tsilidis, Dagfinn Aune, Marc J Gunter, Elisabete Weiderpass, Mazda Jenab, Pietro Ferrari, Heinz Freisling
Abstract:
Objective: To examine separate and joint associations between pre-existing cardiometabolic comorbidities and all cause and cause specific mortality in adults with cancer.
Design: Multinational cohort study.
Setting: Seven European countries from the European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition (EPIC) study, 1 January 1992 to 31 December 2013.
Participants: 26 987 participants (54% women) who developed a first primary cancer. 2113 had a history of type 2 diabetes, 1529 had a history of cardiovascular disease, and 531 had a history of both, at the time of diagnosis of cancer.
Main outcome measures: Hazard ratios (95% confidence intervals, CIs) for associations between pre-existing cardiometabolic comorbidities and all cause and cause specific mortality in adults with cancer, estimated with multivariable Cox regression models. Associations were also estimated by groups of five year relative survival of cancer (survival ≤40%, 40-80%, and ≥80%) according to Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) statistics, and for the most common site specific cancers.
Results: At the time of diagnosis of cancer, 84.5% (n=22 814) of participants had no history of a cardiometabolic disease, 7.8% (n=2113) had a history of type 2 diabetes, 5.7% (n=1529) had a history of cardiovascular disease, and 2.0% (n=531) had a history of both cardiovascular disease and type 2 diabetes. 12 782 deaths (10 492 cancer deaths) occurred over a mean follow-up period of 7.2 years. After multivariable adjustments, pre-existing comorbidities were positively associated with all cause mortality, with hazard ratios 1.25 (95% CI 1.17 to 1.34), 1.30 (1.21 to 1.39), and 1.60 (1.42 to 1.80) for participants with type 2 diabetes, cardiovascular disease, or both, respectively, compared with participants with no cardiometabolic comorbidity. Corresponding hazard ratios for cancer specific mortality were 1.13 (95% CI 1.05 to 1.22), 1.13 (1.04 to 1.23), and 1.33 (1.16 to 1.53), respectively. Associations for all cause mortality were stronger among participants with cancers with a five year relative survival ≥80%. In a subsample, duration of type 2 diabetes (Pinteraction=0.73) or cardiovascular disease (Pinteraction=0.24), categorised as <5 years or ≥5 years, did not modify associations between these comorbidities and all cause mortality.
Conclusions: In this study, cardiovascular disease or type 2 diabetes, or a combination of both, before a diagnosis of cancer, was associated with increased mortality (all cause mortality, and cancer and cardiovascular disease specific mortality). These findings support a direct role of cardiometabolic comorbidities on the prognosis of cancer.
{"title":"Associations between cardiometabolic comorbidities and mortality in adults with cancer: multinational cohort study.","authors":"Veronica Davila-Batista, Vivian Viallon, Emma Fontvieille, Anna Jansana, Mirjam Kohls, Nicola P Bondonno, Anne Tjønneland, Christina C Dahm, Christian S Antoniussen, Verena Katzke, Rashmita Bajrachaya, Matthias B Schulze, Claudia Agnoli, Fulvio Ricceri, Salvatore Panico, Raul Zamora-Ros, Miguel Rodriguez-Barranco, Pilar Amiano, Maria-Dolores Chirlaque, Conchi Moreno-Iribas, Keren Papier, Konstantinos K Tsilidis, Dagfinn Aune, Marc J Gunter, Elisabete Weiderpass, Mazda Jenab, Pietro Ferrari, Heinz Freisling","doi":"10.1136/bmjmed-2024-000909","DOIUrl":"10.1136/bmjmed-2024-000909","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Abstract: </strong></p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To examine separate and joint associations between pre-existing cardiometabolic comorbidities and all cause and cause specific mortality in adults with cancer.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Multinational cohort study.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Seven European countries from the European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition (EPIC) study, 1 January 1992 to 31 December 2013.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>26 987 participants (54% women) who developed a first primary cancer. 2113 had a history of type 2 diabetes, 1529 had a history of cardiovascular disease, and 531 had a history of both, at the time of diagnosis of cancer.</p><p><strong>Main outcome measures: </strong>Hazard ratios (95% confidence intervals, CIs) for associations between pre-existing cardiometabolic comorbidities and all cause and cause specific mortality in adults with cancer, estimated with multivariable Cox regression models. Associations were also estimated by groups of five year relative survival of cancer (survival ≤40%, 40-80%, and ≥80%) according to Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) statistics, and for the most common site specific cancers.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>At the time of diagnosis of cancer, 84.5% (n=22 814) of participants had no history of a cardiometabolic disease, 7.8% (n=2113) had a history of type 2 diabetes, 5.7% (n=1529) had a history of cardiovascular disease, and 2.0% (n=531) had a history of both cardiovascular disease and type 2 diabetes. 12 782 deaths (10 492 cancer deaths) occurred over a mean follow-up period of 7.2 years. After multivariable adjustments, pre-existing comorbidities were positively associated with all cause mortality, with hazard ratios 1.25 (95% CI 1.17 to 1.34), 1.30 (1.21 to 1.39), and 1.60 (1.42 to 1.80) for participants with type 2 diabetes, cardiovascular disease, or both, respectively, compared with participants with no cardiometabolic comorbidity. Corresponding hazard ratios for cancer specific mortality were 1.13 (95% CI 1.05 to 1.22), 1.13 (1.04 to 1.23), and 1.33 (1.16 to 1.53), respectively. Associations for all cause mortality were stronger among participants with cancers with a five year relative survival ≥80%. In a subsample, duration of type 2 diabetes (P<sub>interaction</sub>=0.73) or cardiovascular disease (P<sub>interaction</sub>=0.24), categorised as <5 years or ≥5 years, did not modify associations between these comorbidities and all cause mortality.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In this study, cardiovascular disease or type 2 diabetes, or a combination of both, before a diagnosis of cancer, was associated with increased mortality (all cause mortality, and cancer and cardiovascular disease specific mortality). These findings support a direct role of cardiometabolic comorbidities on the prognosis of cancer.</p>","PeriodicalId":72433,"journal":{"name":"BMJ medicine","volume":"4 1","pages":"e000909"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2025-03-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11948348/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143733450","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-02-22eCollection Date: 2025-01-01DOI: 10.1136/bmjmed-2024-001125
Nelsan Pourhadi, Janet Janbek, Christiane Gasse, Thomas Munk Laursen, Amani Meaidi, Christina Jensen-Dahm, Gunhild Waldemar
Objective: To assess the association between cumulative use of anticholinergic bladder drugs and risk of all cause dementia compared with non-use and use of the β3 agonist bladder drug, mirabegron.
Design: Danish nationwide active comparator study.
Setting: National Danish registries, 1 January 2000 to 31 December 2022.
Participants: 1 29 254 individuals with dementia were matched by age and sex to 646 270 controls without dementia, identified from a cohort of 2.26 million individuals aged 60-75 years between 2000 and 2022 with no previous dementia. Two separate nested case-control populations were studied: the general population and an active comparator population of 58 242 new users of bladder drugs (2198 developed dementia and were matched to 10 990 controls). Information on medication use was based on filled prescriptions and defined daily doses.
Main outcome measures: Conditional logistic regression provided incidence rate ratios for associations between anticholinergic bladder drugs and dementia compared with non-use and mirabegron use adjusted for educational level, cardiovascular disease, diabetes, hypertension, dyslipidaemia, and Charlson Comorbidity Index.
Results: Compared with non-use, ever use of anticholinergic bladder drugs was associated with an increased risk of dementia, with an incidence rate ratio of 1.44 (95% confidence interval (CI) 1.40 to 1.48). The incidence rate ratio increased with increasing cumulative drug use, from 1.31 (95% CI 1.27 to 1.36) for 1-90 defined daily doses to 1.68 (1.59 to 1.76) for >365 defined daily doses. Compared with non-use, all types of anticholinergic bladder drugs were associated with increased incidence rate ratios for dementia: tolterodine 1.43 (95% CI 1.38 to 1.49), solifenacin 1.37 (1.29 to 1.46), trospium 1.52 (1.37 to 1.67), and fesoterodine 1.48 (1.26 to 1.74). The increased risk of dementia with use of anticholinergic bladder drugs was not seen when compared directly with the use of the β3 agonist mirabegron (incidence rate ratio 0.82, 95% CI 0.74 to 0.92), irrespective of the type of anticholinergic drug.
Conclusions: In this study, all types of anticholinergic bladder drugs were associated with an increased risk of dementia compared with non-use, but not when applying the active comparator of the β3 agonist bladder drug mirabegron. These findings highlight the relevance of using an active comparator. Future research should evaluate the risk of cognitive impairment and dementia for both types of bladder drugs.
{"title":"Bladder drugs and risk of dementia: Danish nationwide active comparator study.","authors":"Nelsan Pourhadi, Janet Janbek, Christiane Gasse, Thomas Munk Laursen, Amani Meaidi, Christina Jensen-Dahm, Gunhild Waldemar","doi":"10.1136/bmjmed-2024-001125","DOIUrl":"10.1136/bmjmed-2024-001125","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To assess the association between cumulative use of anticholinergic bladder drugs and risk of all cause dementia compared with non-use and use of the β3 agonist bladder drug, mirabegron.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Danish nationwide active comparator study.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>National Danish registries, 1 January 2000 to 31 December 2022.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>1 29 254 individuals with dementia were matched by age and sex to 646 270 controls without dementia, identified from a cohort of 2.26 million individuals aged 60-75 years between 2000 and 2022 with no previous dementia. Two separate nested case-control populations were studied: the general population and an active comparator population of 58 242 new users of bladder drugs (2198 developed dementia and were matched to 10 990 controls). Information on medication use was based on filled prescriptions and defined daily doses.</p><p><strong>Main outcome measures: </strong>Conditional logistic regression provided incidence rate ratios for associations between anticholinergic bladder drugs and dementia compared with non-use and mirabegron use adjusted for educational level, cardiovascular disease, diabetes, hypertension, dyslipidaemia, and Charlson Comorbidity Index.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Compared with non-use, ever use of anticholinergic bladder drugs was associated with an increased risk of dementia, with an incidence rate ratio of 1.44 (95% confidence interval (CI) 1.40 to 1.48). The incidence rate ratio increased with increasing cumulative drug use, from 1.31 (95% CI 1.27 to 1.36) for 1-90 defined daily doses to 1.68 (1.59 to 1.76) for >365 defined daily doses. Compared with non-use, all types of anticholinergic bladder drugs were associated with increased incidence rate ratios for dementia: tolterodine 1.43 (95% CI 1.38 to 1.49), solifenacin 1.37 (1.29 to 1.46), trospium 1.52 (1.37 to 1.67), and fesoterodine 1.48 (1.26 to 1.74). The increased risk of dementia with use of anticholinergic bladder drugs was not seen when compared directly with the use of the β3 agonist mirabegron (incidence rate ratio 0.82, 95% CI 0.74 to 0.92), irrespective of the type of anticholinergic drug.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In this study, all types of anticholinergic bladder drugs were associated with an increased risk of dementia compared with non-use, but not when applying the active comparator of the β3 agonist bladder drug mirabegron. These findings highlight the relevance of using an active comparator. Future research should evaluate the risk of cognitive impairment and dementia for both types of bladder drugs.</p>","PeriodicalId":72433,"journal":{"name":"BMJ medicine","volume":"4 1","pages":"e001125"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2025-02-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11880786/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143569041","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-01-31eCollection Date: 2025-01-01DOI: 10.1136/bmjmed-2024-001068
Monica Busse, Philip Pallmann, Muhammad Riaz, Claire Potter, Fiona J Leggat, Shaun Harris, Andrea Jane Longman, Rachel Lowe, Adrian Edwards, Aloysius Niroshan Siriwardena, Nick Sevdalis, Jackie McRae, Jessica Fish, Bernadette Sewell, Fiona Jones
<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate the effectiveness of Listen, a self-management support intervention, for people living with long covid who were not in hospital.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Pragmatic, multicentre, parallel group, randomised controlled trial.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Twenty four sites in England and Wales.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>Identified from long covid clinic waiting lists, word of mouth, and adverts/social media self-referred to the trial, 554 adults with long covid were randomised to receive either the Listen trial intervention or NHS usual care.</p><p><strong>Interventions: </strong>The Listen intervention involved up to six one-to-one personalised sessions with trained healthcare practitioners and an accompanying handbook co-designed by people with lived experience and health professionals. Usual NHS care was variable, ranging from no access, access to mobile applications and resources, and to specialist long covid clinics.</p><p><strong>Main outcome measures: </strong>The primary outcome was the Oxford participation and activities questionnaire (Ox-PAQ) routine activities scale score at three months assessed in the intention-to-treat population. Secondary outcomes included Ox-PAQ emotional wellbeing and social engagement scale scores, the Short Form-12 (SF-12) health survey, the fatigue impact scale, and the generalised self-efficacy scale at three months. The EuroQol five-dimension five-level (EQ-5D-5L) assessed health utility. Serious adverse events were recorded.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Between 27 May 2022 and 15 September 2023, 554 people with long covid (mean age 50 (standard deviation 12.3) years; 394 (72.4%) women) were randomly assigned. At three months, participants assigned to the intervention group reported small non-significant improvements in the primary outcome of capacity for daily activities as assessed by Ox-PAQ routine activities scale score (adjusted mean difference -2.68 (95% confidence interval (CI) -5.38 to 0.02), P=0.052) compared with usual NHS care. For the secondary outcomes, people receiving the intervention also reported significant improvements in mental health (Ox-PAQ emotional wellbeing -5.29 (95% CI -8.37 to -2.20), P=0.001; SF-12 2.36 (95% CI 0.77 to 3.96), P=0.004), reductions in fatigue (fatigue impact score -7.93 (95% CI -11.97 to -3.88), P<0.001), and increases in self-efficacy (generalised self-efficacy scale 2.63 (95% CI 1.50 to 3.75), P<0.001). No differences were found in social engagement (-2.07 (95% CI -5.36 to 1.22), P=0.218) or SF-12 physical health (0.32 (95% CI -0.93 to 1.57), P=0.612). No intervention related serious adverse events were reported.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The personalised self-management support intervention of the Listen trial resulted in non-significant short term improvements in routine activities when compared with usual care. Improvements in emotional wellbeing, fatigue, quality of life, and self-effica
{"title":"Effectiveness of a personalised self-management intervention for people living with long covid (Listen trial): pragmatic, multicentre, parallel group, randomised controlled trial.","authors":"Monica Busse, Philip Pallmann, Muhammad Riaz, Claire Potter, Fiona J Leggat, Shaun Harris, Andrea Jane Longman, Rachel Lowe, Adrian Edwards, Aloysius Niroshan Siriwardena, Nick Sevdalis, Jackie McRae, Jessica Fish, Bernadette Sewell, Fiona Jones","doi":"10.1136/bmjmed-2024-001068","DOIUrl":"10.1136/bmjmed-2024-001068","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate the effectiveness of Listen, a self-management support intervention, for people living with long covid who were not in hospital.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Pragmatic, multicentre, parallel group, randomised controlled trial.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Twenty four sites in England and Wales.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>Identified from long covid clinic waiting lists, word of mouth, and adverts/social media self-referred to the trial, 554 adults with long covid were randomised to receive either the Listen trial intervention or NHS usual care.</p><p><strong>Interventions: </strong>The Listen intervention involved up to six one-to-one personalised sessions with trained healthcare practitioners and an accompanying handbook co-designed by people with lived experience and health professionals. Usual NHS care was variable, ranging from no access, access to mobile applications and resources, and to specialist long covid clinics.</p><p><strong>Main outcome measures: </strong>The primary outcome was the Oxford participation and activities questionnaire (Ox-PAQ) routine activities scale score at three months assessed in the intention-to-treat population. Secondary outcomes included Ox-PAQ emotional wellbeing and social engagement scale scores, the Short Form-12 (SF-12) health survey, the fatigue impact scale, and the generalised self-efficacy scale at three months. The EuroQol five-dimension five-level (EQ-5D-5L) assessed health utility. Serious adverse events were recorded.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Between 27 May 2022 and 15 September 2023, 554 people with long covid (mean age 50 (standard deviation 12.3) years; 394 (72.4%) women) were randomly assigned. At three months, participants assigned to the intervention group reported small non-significant improvements in the primary outcome of capacity for daily activities as assessed by Ox-PAQ routine activities scale score (adjusted mean difference -2.68 (95% confidence interval (CI) -5.38 to 0.02), P=0.052) compared with usual NHS care. For the secondary outcomes, people receiving the intervention also reported significant improvements in mental health (Ox-PAQ emotional wellbeing -5.29 (95% CI -8.37 to -2.20), P=0.001; SF-12 2.36 (95% CI 0.77 to 3.96), P=0.004), reductions in fatigue (fatigue impact score -7.93 (95% CI -11.97 to -3.88), P<0.001), and increases in self-efficacy (generalised self-efficacy scale 2.63 (95% CI 1.50 to 3.75), P<0.001). No differences were found in social engagement (-2.07 (95% CI -5.36 to 1.22), P=0.218) or SF-12 physical health (0.32 (95% CI -0.93 to 1.57), P=0.612). No intervention related serious adverse events were reported.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The personalised self-management support intervention of the Listen trial resulted in non-significant short term improvements in routine activities when compared with usual care. Improvements in emotional wellbeing, fatigue, quality of life, and self-effica","PeriodicalId":72433,"journal":{"name":"BMJ medicine","volume":"4 1","pages":"e001068"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2025-01-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11881025/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143569045","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-01-31eCollection Date: 2025-01-01DOI: 10.1136/bmjmed-2025-001366
Manoj Sivan, Darren Charles C Greenwood, Tracey Smith
{"title":"Long covid as a long term condition.","authors":"Manoj Sivan, Darren Charles C Greenwood, Tracey Smith","doi":"10.1136/bmjmed-2025-001366","DOIUrl":"10.1136/bmjmed-2025-001366","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":72433,"journal":{"name":"BMJ medicine","volume":"4 1","pages":"e001366"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2025-01-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11792270/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143191291","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-01-11eCollection Date: 2025-01-01DOI: 10.1136/bmjmed-2024-000958
Martin R Turner, Alexander G Thompson, Charlotte E Teunissen
{"title":"Blood level of neurofilament light chain as a biomarker for neurological disorders.","authors":"Martin R Turner, Alexander G Thompson, Charlotte E Teunissen","doi":"10.1136/bmjmed-2024-000958","DOIUrl":"10.1136/bmjmed-2024-000958","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":72433,"journal":{"name":"BMJ medicine","volume":"4 1","pages":"e000958"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2025-01-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11749884/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143026072","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-12-05eCollection Date: 2024-01-01DOI: 10.1136/bmjmed-2023-000696
Freja C M Kirsebom, Nick Andrews, Anna A Mensah, Julia Stowe, Shamez Ladhani, Mary Ramsay, Jamie Lopez Bernal, Helen Julia Campbell
<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To estimate real world vaccine effectiveness against symptomatic disease and hospital admission with the delta and omicron variants of the SARS-CoV-2 virus in pregnant individuals, and to estimate the protection conferred by previous infection and maternal vaccination in their infants.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Test negative case-control study.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Community and hospital testing for covid-19, in England, 26 April 2021 to 9 January 2022 (delta variant period) and 29 November 2021 to 31 March 2022 (omicron variant period). Testing data were linked to Hospital Episode Statistics and Maternal Services Data Set (for data on pregnant individuals and infants), National Immunisation Management System (for covid-19 vaccinations), and Secondary Uses Service (for hospital admissions).</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>35 206 negative and 16 693 positive eligible test results in the delta variant period from pregnant individuals with symptoms of infection, aged 16-55 years, whose pregnancy ended in 2021, and 5974 negative and 4715 positive eligible test results in the omicron variant period. For infants born in 2021, 23 053 negative and 2924 positive eligible test results in the delta variant period and 13 908 negative and 5669 positive test results from infants in the omicron period.</p><p><strong>Main outcome measures: </strong>Vaccine effectiveness against symptomatic disease and hospital admission with the delta and omicron variants of the SARS-CoV-2 virus in pregnant women. Also, effectiveness of maternal vaccination and the protection conferred by previous infection in mothers in preventing symptomatic disease and hospital admission in their infants in the first six months of life. Symptomatic SARS-CoV-2 infection was confirmed by a positive polymerase chain reaction test result.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Vaccine effectiveness against symptomatic disease (delta and omicron infection) and against hospital admission (delta infection only) in pregnant individuals was high, as seen in the general population. A booster dose of vaccine gave sustained protection, with no evidence of waning up to 15 weeks after vaccination. Vaccine effectiveness against symptomatic disease peaked at 98.4% (95% confidence interval (CI) 88.4% to 99.8%) and 80.1% (73.8% to 84.9%) against the delta and omicron variants, respectively, after the booster dose of vaccine. Vaccine effectiveness after a two dose primary schedule against hospital admission with delta infection peaked at 92.7% (95% CI 79.9% to 97.4%) in pregnant individuals. Maternal vaccination during and after pregnancy also provided sustained protection from symptomatic disease and hospital admission after delta and omicron infection in infants aged up to six months, with the highest protection seen when maternal vaccination occurred during later pregnancy. The effectiveness of two maternal doses when the last dose was given in the third trimester
{"title":"Vaccine effectiveness against mild and severe covid-19 in pregnant individuals and their infants in England: test negative case-control study.","authors":"Freja C M Kirsebom, Nick Andrews, Anna A Mensah, Julia Stowe, Shamez Ladhani, Mary Ramsay, Jamie Lopez Bernal, Helen Julia Campbell","doi":"10.1136/bmjmed-2023-000696","DOIUrl":"10.1136/bmjmed-2023-000696","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To estimate real world vaccine effectiveness against symptomatic disease and hospital admission with the delta and omicron variants of the SARS-CoV-2 virus in pregnant individuals, and to estimate the protection conferred by previous infection and maternal vaccination in their infants.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Test negative case-control study.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Community and hospital testing for covid-19, in England, 26 April 2021 to 9 January 2022 (delta variant period) and 29 November 2021 to 31 March 2022 (omicron variant period). Testing data were linked to Hospital Episode Statistics and Maternal Services Data Set (for data on pregnant individuals and infants), National Immunisation Management System (for covid-19 vaccinations), and Secondary Uses Service (for hospital admissions).</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>35 206 negative and 16 693 positive eligible test results in the delta variant period from pregnant individuals with symptoms of infection, aged 16-55 years, whose pregnancy ended in 2021, and 5974 negative and 4715 positive eligible test results in the omicron variant period. For infants born in 2021, 23 053 negative and 2924 positive eligible test results in the delta variant period and 13 908 negative and 5669 positive test results from infants in the omicron period.</p><p><strong>Main outcome measures: </strong>Vaccine effectiveness against symptomatic disease and hospital admission with the delta and omicron variants of the SARS-CoV-2 virus in pregnant women. Also, effectiveness of maternal vaccination and the protection conferred by previous infection in mothers in preventing symptomatic disease and hospital admission in their infants in the first six months of life. Symptomatic SARS-CoV-2 infection was confirmed by a positive polymerase chain reaction test result.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Vaccine effectiveness against symptomatic disease (delta and omicron infection) and against hospital admission (delta infection only) in pregnant individuals was high, as seen in the general population. A booster dose of vaccine gave sustained protection, with no evidence of waning up to 15 weeks after vaccination. Vaccine effectiveness against symptomatic disease peaked at 98.4% (95% confidence interval (CI) 88.4% to 99.8%) and 80.1% (73.8% to 84.9%) against the delta and omicron variants, respectively, after the booster dose of vaccine. Vaccine effectiveness after a two dose primary schedule against hospital admission with delta infection peaked at 92.7% (95% CI 79.9% to 97.4%) in pregnant individuals. Maternal vaccination during and after pregnancy also provided sustained protection from symptomatic disease and hospital admission after delta and omicron infection in infants aged up to six months, with the highest protection seen when maternal vaccination occurred during later pregnancy. The effectiveness of two maternal doses when the last dose was given in the third trimester","PeriodicalId":72433,"journal":{"name":"BMJ medicine","volume":"3 1","pages":"e000696"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-12-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11789471/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143123139","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-11-27eCollection Date: 2024-01-01DOI: 10.1136/bmjmed-2024-000995
Isobel Masson Francis Todd, Maria Christine Magnus, Lars Henning Pedersen, David Burgner, Jessica Eden Miller
<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To compare the risk of hospital admissions with infections and infections not in hospital in children born by caesarean section with children born by vaginal birth.</p><p><strong>Data sources: </strong>Medline, Embase, and PubMed were searched with no restriction on start date up to 12 February 2024.</p><p><strong>Study selection: </strong>Observational studies were included that reported the association between caesarean section and vaginal birth in relation to the risk of infections (both those that lead to hospital admission and those that do not) up to 18 years of age. Studies were excluded if they were not representative of a general population or if they focused on congenital, neonatal, or vertically acquired infections. No restrictions were made for language, publication date, or setting.</p><p><strong>Review methods: </strong>Findings for hospital admissions with infection were synthesised by meta-analyses of specific infection outcomes and type of caesarean birth (emergency <i>v</i> elective) and findings for other infections (ie, infection episodes reported by parents and primary care visits) by direction of effect. Risk of bias was assessed using the ROBINS-E tool and the overall certainty of evidence through the GRADE framework.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>31 eligible studies of over 10 million children were included. Findings were from population-based birth cohorts and registry data linkage studies in high income countries. Cohort sizes ranged from 288 to 7.2 million and follow up age was from one to 18 years. Outcomes included overall and specific clinical categories of infection. From studies of overall admission to hospital with infection, the proportion of children admitted ranged between 9-29% across exposure groups. In random-effects meta-analyses combining hazard ratios, children delivered by caesarean section had an increased rate of hospital admission with infections overall and in three common clinical infection categories: (1) overall admissions to hospital with infection (emergency caesarean section: n=6 study populations, hazard ratio 1.10 (95% confidence interval 1.06 to 1.14), <math><mi>τ</mi></math> <sup>2</sup>=0.0009, I<sup>2</sup>=96%; elective caesarean section: n=7, 1.12 (1.09 to 1.15), <math><mi>τ</mi></math> <sup>2</sup>=0.0006, I<sup>2</sup>=88%); (2) admission to hospital for upper respiratory infections (emergency caesarean section: n=7, 1.11 (1.09 to 1.13), <math><mi>τ</mi></math> <sup>2</sup>=0.0003, I<sup>2</sup>=73%; elective caesarean section: n=7, 1.16 (1.12 to 1.20), <math><mi>τ</mi></math> <sup>2</sup>=0.0012, I<sup>2</sup>=89%); (3) admission to hospital for lower respiratory infections (emergency caesarean section: n=8, 1.09 (1.06 to 1.12), <math><mi>τ</mi></math> <sup>2</sup>=0.0010, I<sup>2</sup>=88%; elective caesarean section: n=8, 1.13 (1.10 to 1.16), <math><mi>τ</mi></math> <sup>2</sup>=0.0009, I<sup>2</sup>=84%); (4) admission to hospital for gastrointesti
{"title":"Caesarean section and risk of infection in offspring: systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies.","authors":"Isobel Masson Francis Todd, Maria Christine Magnus, Lars Henning Pedersen, David Burgner, Jessica Eden Miller","doi":"10.1136/bmjmed-2024-000995","DOIUrl":"10.1136/bmjmed-2024-000995","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To compare the risk of hospital admissions with infections and infections not in hospital in children born by caesarean section with children born by vaginal birth.</p><p><strong>Data sources: </strong>Medline, Embase, and PubMed were searched with no restriction on start date up to 12 February 2024.</p><p><strong>Study selection: </strong>Observational studies were included that reported the association between caesarean section and vaginal birth in relation to the risk of infections (both those that lead to hospital admission and those that do not) up to 18 years of age. Studies were excluded if they were not representative of a general population or if they focused on congenital, neonatal, or vertically acquired infections. No restrictions were made for language, publication date, or setting.</p><p><strong>Review methods: </strong>Findings for hospital admissions with infection were synthesised by meta-analyses of specific infection outcomes and type of caesarean birth (emergency <i>v</i> elective) and findings for other infections (ie, infection episodes reported by parents and primary care visits) by direction of effect. Risk of bias was assessed using the ROBINS-E tool and the overall certainty of evidence through the GRADE framework.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>31 eligible studies of over 10 million children were included. Findings were from population-based birth cohorts and registry data linkage studies in high income countries. Cohort sizes ranged from 288 to 7.2 million and follow up age was from one to 18 years. Outcomes included overall and specific clinical categories of infection. From studies of overall admission to hospital with infection, the proportion of children admitted ranged between 9-29% across exposure groups. In random-effects meta-analyses combining hazard ratios, children delivered by caesarean section had an increased rate of hospital admission with infections overall and in three common clinical infection categories: (1) overall admissions to hospital with infection (emergency caesarean section: n=6 study populations, hazard ratio 1.10 (95% confidence interval 1.06 to 1.14), <math><mi>τ</mi></math> <sup>2</sup>=0.0009, I<sup>2</sup>=96%; elective caesarean section: n=7, 1.12 (1.09 to 1.15), <math><mi>τ</mi></math> <sup>2</sup>=0.0006, I<sup>2</sup>=88%); (2) admission to hospital for upper respiratory infections (emergency caesarean section: n=7, 1.11 (1.09 to 1.13), <math><mi>τ</mi></math> <sup>2</sup>=0.0003, I<sup>2</sup>=73%; elective caesarean section: n=7, 1.16 (1.12 to 1.20), <math><mi>τ</mi></math> <sup>2</sup>=0.0012, I<sup>2</sup>=89%); (3) admission to hospital for lower respiratory infections (emergency caesarean section: n=8, 1.09 (1.06 to 1.12), <math><mi>τ</mi></math> <sup>2</sup>=0.0010, I<sup>2</sup>=88%; elective caesarean section: n=8, 1.13 (1.10 to 1.16), <math><mi>τ</mi></math> <sup>2</sup>=0.0009, I<sup>2</sup>=84%); (4) admission to hospital for gastrointesti","PeriodicalId":72433,"journal":{"name":"BMJ medicine","volume":"3 1","pages":"e000995"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-11-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11603743/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142752553","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Objective: To estimate the effectiveness of vaccination with a monovalent covid-19 mRNA vaccine containing the omicron XBB.1.5 subvariant against severe covid-19 disease in Denmark, Finland, and Sweden.
Design: Target trial emulation based on registry data.
Setting: Denmark, Finland, and Sweden, 1 October 2023 to 21 April 2024.
Participants: Source population of 3 898 264 individuals eligible for vaccination with the XBB.1.5 containing covid-19 mRNA vaccine at the start of the study on 1 October 2023. Study cohort comprised 1 876 282 recipients of an XBB.1.5 containing vaccine during the study period matched with 1 876 282 non-recipients. Individuals were aged ≥65 years (mean age 75.4 years, standard deviation 7.4 years) and had received at least four doses of a previous covid-19 vaccine.
Main outcome measures: Cumulative incidences of hospital admissions and deaths related to covid-19 in a follow-up period of 24 weeks after immunisation (defined as one week after vaccination) in recipients of an XBB.1.5 containing covid-19 mRNA vaccine and matched non-recipients. Cumulative incidences were used to calculate comparative vaccine effectiveness (1-risk ratio) and risk differences.
Results: The associated comparative vaccine effectiveness was 57.9% (95% confidence interval (CI) 49.9% to 65.8%) against hospital admission for covid-19 (1085 v 2635 events) and 75.2% (70.6% to 79.9%) against deaths related to covid-19 disease (348 v 1458 events) after 24 weeks of follow-up. This result corresponded to 154.7 (95% CI 78.3 to 231.0) hospital admissions for covid-19 and 120.3 (110.5 to 130.2) deaths prevented per 100 000 individuals who were vaccinated with an XBB.1.5 containing vaccine. The associated comparative vaccine effectiveness was similar irrespective of sex, age group (65-74 v ≥75 years), number of doses of previous covid-19 vaccines, subgroup of co-administered seasonal influenza vaccines, and period of when either the omicron XBB or BA.2.86 sublineage was predominant. Although the observed reduction in risk was highest during the first weeks after vaccination, comparative vaccine effectiveness was well maintained after 24 weeks of follow-up.
Conclusions: In this study, in adults aged ≥65 years, vaccination with a monovalent XBB.1.5 containing covid-19 mRNA vaccine was associated with reduced rates of hospital admissions for covid-19 and deaths related to covid-19, during the autumn and winter of 2023-24 in Denmark, Finland, and Sweden.
{"title":"Comparative effectiveness of monovalent XBB.1.5 containing covid-19 mRNA vaccines in Denmark, Finland, and Sweden: target trial emulation based on registry data.","authors":"Niklas Worm Andersson, Emilia Myrup Thiesson, Nicklas Pihlström, Jori Perälä, Kristýna Faksová, Mie Agermose Gram, Eero Poukka, Tuija Leino, Rickard Ljung, Anders Hviid","doi":"10.1136/bmjmed-2024-001074","DOIUrl":"10.1136/bmjmed-2024-001074","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Abstract: </strong></p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To estimate the effectiveness of vaccination with a monovalent covid-19 mRNA vaccine containing the omicron XBB.1.5 subvariant against severe covid-19 disease in Denmark, Finland, and Sweden.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Target trial emulation based on registry data.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Denmark, Finland, and Sweden, 1 October 2023 to 21 April 2024.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>Source population of 3 898 264 individuals eligible for vaccination with the XBB.1.5 containing covid-19 mRNA vaccine at the start of the study on 1 October 2023. Study cohort comprised 1 876 282 recipients of an XBB.1.5 containing vaccine during the study period matched with 1 876 282 non-recipients. Individuals were aged ≥65 years (mean age 75.4 years, standard deviation 7.4 years) and had received at least four doses of a previous covid-19 vaccine.</p><p><strong>Main outcome measures: </strong>Cumulative incidences of hospital admissions and deaths related to covid-19 in a follow-up period of 24 weeks after immunisation (defined as one week after vaccination) in recipients of an XBB.1.5 containing covid-19 mRNA vaccine and matched non-recipients. Cumulative incidences were used to calculate comparative vaccine effectiveness (1-risk ratio) and risk differences.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The associated comparative vaccine effectiveness was 57.9% (95% confidence interval (CI) 49.9% to 65.8%) against hospital admission for covid-19 (1085 <i>v</i> 2635 events) and 75.2% (70.6% to 79.9%) against deaths related to covid-19 disease (348 <i>v</i> 1458 events) after 24 weeks of follow-up. This result corresponded to 154.7 (95% CI 78.3 to 231.0) hospital admissions for covid-19 and 120.3 (110.5 to 130.2) deaths prevented per 100 000 individuals who were vaccinated with an XBB.1.5 containing vaccine. The associated comparative vaccine effectiveness was similar irrespective of sex, age group (65-74 <i>v</i> ≥75 years), number of doses of previous covid-19 vaccines, subgroup of co-administered seasonal influenza vaccines, and period of when either the omicron XBB or BA.2.86 sublineage was predominant. Although the observed reduction in risk was highest during the first weeks after vaccination, comparative vaccine effectiveness was well maintained after 24 weeks of follow-up.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In this study, in adults aged ≥65 years, vaccination with a monovalent XBB.1.5 containing covid-19 mRNA vaccine was associated with reduced rates of hospital admissions for covid-19 and deaths related to covid-19, during the autumn and winter of 2023-24 in Denmark, Finland, and Sweden.</p>","PeriodicalId":72433,"journal":{"name":"BMJ medicine","volume":"3 1","pages":"e001074"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-11-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11789462/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143123031","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}