成角假体平台植入物的临床应用:回顾性研究

Anchalee Jennings-Lowe, Mehdi Valizadeh, Alethea Rea, Leticia Algarves Miranda
{"title":"成角假体平台植入物的临床应用:回顾性研究","authors":"Anchalee Jennings-Lowe, Mehdi Valizadeh, Alethea Rea, Leticia Algarves Miranda","doi":"10.11607/prd.6736","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This retrospective study reports on the survival of two-piece angulated prosthetic platform (APP) implants consecutively placed at a specialist periodontics clinic with a mean follow-up of 28.2 ± 15.6 months (range: 4.0 to 71.0). For 183 returning patients who received 239 implants, the survival rates at follow-up (up to 71 months) were 99.2% and 91.1% at the patient and implant levels, respectively. A majority of patients were nonsmokers and did not have diabetes, with a quarter having a history of treated periodontitis. Eighty percent of patients received a single APP implant. Of the implants, 63% supported a single crown, 28% a fixed partial denture, and 9% a fixed complete denture. Nearly all implants were placed either at tooth extraction or after complete bone healing, in approximately equal numbers. Of the implant sites, approximately 75% received bone grafting, with approximately 25% receiving adjunct soft tissue grafting. For 210 surviving and restored implants with satisfactory intraoral radiographs taken at the last recall (mean follow-up: 28.4 ± 15.5 months; range: 4.0 to 71.0 months), the mean radiographic bone levels were -0.70 ± 0.87 mm (range: -3.60 to 2.15 mm). The results demonstrated clinically successful use of this unique geometry implant for multiple applications with acceptable short- to medium-term clinical outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":94231,"journal":{"name":"The International journal of periodontics & restorative dentistry","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Clinical Application of Angulated Prosthetic Platform Implants: A Retrospective Study.\",\"authors\":\"Anchalee Jennings-Lowe, Mehdi Valizadeh, Alethea Rea, Leticia Algarves Miranda\",\"doi\":\"10.11607/prd.6736\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>This retrospective study reports on the survival of two-piece angulated prosthetic platform (APP) implants consecutively placed at a specialist periodontics clinic with a mean follow-up of 28.2 ± 15.6 months (range: 4.0 to 71.0). For 183 returning patients who received 239 implants, the survival rates at follow-up (up to 71 months) were 99.2% and 91.1% at the patient and implant levels, respectively. A majority of patients were nonsmokers and did not have diabetes, with a quarter having a history of treated periodontitis. Eighty percent of patients received a single APP implant. Of the implants, 63% supported a single crown, 28% a fixed partial denture, and 9% a fixed complete denture. Nearly all implants were placed either at tooth extraction or after complete bone healing, in approximately equal numbers. Of the implant sites, approximately 75% received bone grafting, with approximately 25% receiving adjunct soft tissue grafting. For 210 surviving and restored implants with satisfactory intraoral radiographs taken at the last recall (mean follow-up: 28.4 ± 15.5 months; range: 4.0 to 71.0 months), the mean radiographic bone levels were -0.70 ± 0.87 mm (range: -3.60 to 2.15 mm). The results demonstrated clinically successful use of this unique geometry implant for multiple applications with acceptable short- to medium-term clinical outcomes.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":94231,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The International journal of periodontics & restorative dentistry\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The International journal of periodontics & restorative dentistry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.11607/prd.6736\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The International journal of periodontics & restorative dentistry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.11607/prd.6736","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

这项回顾性研究报告了在一家牙周病专科医院连续植入的两件式成角修复平台(APP)种植体的存活率,平均随访时间为 28.2 ± 15.6 个月(4.0-71.0 个月)。在接受了 239 个种植体的 183 名召回患者中,患者和种植体的模型存活率分别为 99.2% 和 91.1%,随访时间长达 71 个月。大多数患者不吸烟、不罹患糖尿病,四分之一的患者有牙周炎治疗史。80%的患者接受了单颗APP种植体。63%的种植体支持单冠,28%支持固定局部义齿,9%支持固定全口义齿。几乎所有的种植体都是在拔牙时或牙槽骨完全愈合后植入的,两者数量大致相同。四分之三的人进行了辅助骨移植,四分之一的人进行了辅助软组织移植。210颗存活并修复的种植体在最后一次复诊时的口内X光片结果令人满意,平均随访时间为28.4±15.5个月(范围为4.0-71.0),平均X光片骨水平为-0.70±0.87毫米(范围为-3.60-+2.15)。结果表明,这种独特几何形状的种植体在临床上成功应用于多种领域,并取得了可接受的中短期临床效果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Clinical Application of Angulated Prosthetic Platform Implants: A Retrospective Study.

This retrospective study reports on the survival of two-piece angulated prosthetic platform (APP) implants consecutively placed at a specialist periodontics clinic with a mean follow-up of 28.2 ± 15.6 months (range: 4.0 to 71.0). For 183 returning patients who received 239 implants, the survival rates at follow-up (up to 71 months) were 99.2% and 91.1% at the patient and implant levels, respectively. A majority of patients were nonsmokers and did not have diabetes, with a quarter having a history of treated periodontitis. Eighty percent of patients received a single APP implant. Of the implants, 63% supported a single crown, 28% a fixed partial denture, and 9% a fixed complete denture. Nearly all implants were placed either at tooth extraction or after complete bone healing, in approximately equal numbers. Of the implant sites, approximately 75% received bone grafting, with approximately 25% receiving adjunct soft tissue grafting. For 210 surviving and restored implants with satisfactory intraoral radiographs taken at the last recall (mean follow-up: 28.4 ± 15.5 months; range: 4.0 to 71.0 months), the mean radiographic bone levels were -0.70 ± 0.87 mm (range: -3.60 to 2.15 mm). The results demonstrated clinically successful use of this unique geometry implant for multiple applications with acceptable short- to medium-term clinical outcomes.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Comparing Small Buccal Dehiscence Defects Treated with or without Guided Bone Regeneration. A Sub-Analysis of a RCT. Keratinized Tissue Grafting May Prevent Peri-implantitis: A Case Series. Partial-Full-Thickness Tunnel Technique and Supra-Crestal Sling Suture for Treatment of RT2 and RT3 Gingival Recessions: Technical Report with Two Cases. The Papilla Base CTG: A Novel Approach for Interdental Soft Tissue Reconstruction. Effect of Supportive Peri-implant Care After Treatment of Peri- Implant Diseases: A Systematic Review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1