评估肩关节不稳定的频率、病因、方向和严重程度分类系统在物理治疗研究中的应用--范围界定综述

IF 2.2 3区 医学 Q1 REHABILITATION Physical Therapy in Sport Pub Date : 2024-02-08 DOI:10.1016/j.ptsp.2024.01.010
Rubén Fernández-Matías , Enrique Lluch-Girbés , Marcus Bateman , Néstor Requejo-Salinas
{"title":"评估肩关节不稳定的频率、病因、方向和严重程度分类系统在物理治疗研究中的应用--范围界定综述","authors":"Rubén Fernández-Matías ,&nbsp;Enrique Lluch-Girbés ,&nbsp;Marcus Bateman ,&nbsp;Néstor Requejo-Salinas","doi":"10.1016/j.ptsp.2024.01.010","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>The aim of this study is to review the implementation of the Frequency, Etiology, Direction, and Severity (FEDS) classification for shoulder instability by the physical therapy scientific community since its publication in 2011.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>A systematic search was conducted on January 10, 2024 in the MEDLINE, EMBASE, SPORTDiscus, Scopus, Web of Science, Cochrane, and SciELO databases, as well as Google Scholar. Studies investigating physical therapy interventions in people with shoulder instability, and reporting selection criteria for shoulder instability were considered eligible. A narrative synthesis was conducted.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Twenty-six studies were included. None reported using the FEDS classification as eligibility criteria for shoulder instability. Only 42% of the studies provided data of all four criteria of the FEDS classification. The most reported criterion was direction (92%), followed by etiology (85%), severity (65%), and frequency (58%). The most common reported descriptor for profiling shoulder instability was “dislocation” (83.3%), followed by “first-time” (66.7%), “anterior” (62.5%), and “traumatic” (59.1%). Regarding other instability classifications, only one study (4%) used the Thomas &amp; Matsen classification, and two (8%) the Stanmore classification.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>The FEDS classification system has not been embraced enough by the physical therapy scientific community since its publication in 2011.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":49698,"journal":{"name":"Physical Therapy in Sport","volume":"66 ","pages":"Pages 76-84"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1466853X24000221/pdfft?md5=1f1c31889d9c51a72ffeee5f5d889b3d&pid=1-s2.0-S1466853X24000221-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Assessing the use of the frequency, etiology, direction, and severity classification system for shoulder instability in physical therapy research – A scoping review\",\"authors\":\"Rubén Fernández-Matías ,&nbsp;Enrique Lluch-Girbés ,&nbsp;Marcus Bateman ,&nbsp;Néstor Requejo-Salinas\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ptsp.2024.01.010\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>The aim of this study is to review the implementation of the Frequency, Etiology, Direction, and Severity (FEDS) classification for shoulder instability by the physical therapy scientific community since its publication in 2011.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>A systematic search was conducted on January 10, 2024 in the MEDLINE, EMBASE, SPORTDiscus, Scopus, Web of Science, Cochrane, and SciELO databases, as well as Google Scholar. Studies investigating physical therapy interventions in people with shoulder instability, and reporting selection criteria for shoulder instability were considered eligible. A narrative synthesis was conducted.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Twenty-six studies were included. None reported using the FEDS classification as eligibility criteria for shoulder instability. Only 42% of the studies provided data of all four criteria of the FEDS classification. The most reported criterion was direction (92%), followed by etiology (85%), severity (65%), and frequency (58%). The most common reported descriptor for profiling shoulder instability was “dislocation” (83.3%), followed by “first-time” (66.7%), “anterior” (62.5%), and “traumatic” (59.1%). Regarding other instability classifications, only one study (4%) used the Thomas &amp; Matsen classification, and two (8%) the Stanmore classification.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>The FEDS classification system has not been embraced enough by the physical therapy scientific community since its publication in 2011.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49698,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Physical Therapy in Sport\",\"volume\":\"66 \",\"pages\":\"Pages 76-84\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-02-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1466853X24000221/pdfft?md5=1f1c31889d9c51a72ffeee5f5d889b3d&pid=1-s2.0-S1466853X24000221-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Physical Therapy in Sport\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1466853X24000221\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"REHABILITATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Physical Therapy in Sport","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1466853X24000221","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

方法 2024 年 1 月 10 日在 MEDLINE、EMBASE、SPORTDiscus、Scopus、Web of Science、Cochrane 和 SciELO 数据库以及 Google Scholar 中进行了系统检索。对肩关节不稳定患者的物理治疗干预措施进行调查并报告肩关节不稳定选择标准的研究被认为符合条件。结果共纳入 26 项研究。没有一项研究报告使用 FEDS 分类作为肩关节不稳定的资格标准。只有 42% 的研究提供了 FEDS 分类所有四项标准的数据。报告最多的标准是方向(92%),其次是病因(85%)、严重程度(65%)和频率(58%)。报告最多的肩关节不稳定描述是 "脱位"(83.3%),其次是 "首次"(66.7%)、"前位"(62.5%)和 "外伤"(59.1%)。关于其他不稳定性分类,只有一项研究(4%)使用了托马斯& 马森分类法,两项研究(8%)使用了斯坦莫尔分类法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Assessing the use of the frequency, etiology, direction, and severity classification system for shoulder instability in physical therapy research – A scoping review

Objective

The aim of this study is to review the implementation of the Frequency, Etiology, Direction, and Severity (FEDS) classification for shoulder instability by the physical therapy scientific community since its publication in 2011.

Methods

A systematic search was conducted on January 10, 2024 in the MEDLINE, EMBASE, SPORTDiscus, Scopus, Web of Science, Cochrane, and SciELO databases, as well as Google Scholar. Studies investigating physical therapy interventions in people with shoulder instability, and reporting selection criteria for shoulder instability were considered eligible. A narrative synthesis was conducted.

Results

Twenty-six studies were included. None reported using the FEDS classification as eligibility criteria for shoulder instability. Only 42% of the studies provided data of all four criteria of the FEDS classification. The most reported criterion was direction (92%), followed by etiology (85%), severity (65%), and frequency (58%). The most common reported descriptor for profiling shoulder instability was “dislocation” (83.3%), followed by “first-time” (66.7%), “anterior” (62.5%), and “traumatic” (59.1%). Regarding other instability classifications, only one study (4%) used the Thomas & Matsen classification, and two (8%) the Stanmore classification.

Conclusions

The FEDS classification system has not been embraced enough by the physical therapy scientific community since its publication in 2011.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Physical Therapy in Sport
Physical Therapy in Sport 医学-康复医学
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
8.30%
发文量
125
审稿时长
39 days
期刊介绍: Physical Therapy in Sport is an international peer-reviewed journal that provides a forum for the publication of research and clinical practice material relevant to the healthcare professions involved in sports and exercise medicine, and rehabilitation. The journal publishes material that is indispensable for day-to-day practice and continuing professional development. Physical Therapy in Sport covers topics dealing with the diagnosis, treatment, and prevention of injuries, as well as more general areas of sports and exercise medicine and related sports science. The journal publishes original research, case studies, reviews, masterclasses, papers on clinical approaches, and book reviews, as well as occasional reports from conferences. Papers are double-blind peer-reviewed by our international advisory board and other international experts, and submissions from a broad range of disciplines are actively encouraged.
期刊最新文献
Season changes in performance of upper limbs and trunk in para swimmers Changes in daily sedentary time, in adolescents with long-standing knee pain, during a management strategy including activity modification: An ancillary analysis of two clinical trials Incidence, severity, and risk factors for injuries in female trail runners – A retrospective cross-sectional study Optimising physiotherapist delivery fidelity of exercise and physical activity advice for achilles tendinopathy: A prospective repeated-measures observational study Progressive resistance training improves single-leg vertical jump after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: Non-randomized controlled trial study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1