创伤后应激障碍患者的高强度间歇训练:随机对照试验

IF 2.3 3区 医学 Q2 PSYCHIATRY Mental Health and Physical Activity Pub Date : 2024-02-05 DOI:10.1016/j.mhpa.2024.100579
Nikola Schoofs , Anima Pieper , Kristina Meyer , Sarah Herrmann , Annabell Jäger , Felix Wülfing , Maximilian Grummt , Bernd Wolfarth , Andreas Ströhle , Kathlen Priebe
{"title":"创伤后应激障碍患者的高强度间歇训练:随机对照试验","authors":"Nikola Schoofs ,&nbsp;Anima Pieper ,&nbsp;Kristina Meyer ,&nbsp;Sarah Herrmann ,&nbsp;Annabell Jäger ,&nbsp;Felix Wülfing ,&nbsp;Maximilian Grummt ,&nbsp;Bernd Wolfarth ,&nbsp;Andreas Ströhle ,&nbsp;Kathlen Priebe","doi":"10.1016/j.mhpa.2024.100579","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Exercise interventions have become more important in the treatment of mental disorders. High-intensity interval training (HIIT) has achieved promising results in the treatment of different mental disorders, like depression or panic disorder. To our knowledge, no study investigated the efficacy of HIIT as a sole treatment in a sample of individuals with fully diagnosed PTSD.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>40 participants with PTSD were randomized to either HIIT or a control group (low intensity training, LIT). They underwent a 12-day training period. The primary outcome were PTSD symptoms as assessed by the Clinician-Administered PTSD Scale (CAPS). Secondary outcome were self-reported posttraumatic, depressive and dissociative symptoms and overall psychological distress assessed at baseline, post treatment (one week after training) and follow up (six weeks post treatment). We used linear mixed models to assess the differential effects of the two trainings on clinical symptoms.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>In both HIIT and LIT group, clinician- and self-rated PTSD symptom severity as well as depressive and dissociative symptoms and overall psychological distress decreased significantly from baseline to follow up with medium effect sizes related to PTSD symptomatology (Cohen’s d = 0.76, p &lt; .001) and small effect sizes related to depressive (Cohen’s d = 0.45, p &lt; .001), dissociative symptoms (Cohen’s d = 0.42, p &lt; .001) and overall psychological distress (Cohen’s d = 0.43, p &lt; .001). There were no differences in symptom change between groups.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>In our pilot study, HITT did not seem to be superior to LIT in a sample of individuals with PTSD.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":51589,"journal":{"name":"Mental Health and Physical Activity","volume":"26 ","pages":"Article 100579"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"High-intensity interval training in individuals with posttraumatic stress disorder: A randomized controlled pilot trial\",\"authors\":\"Nikola Schoofs ,&nbsp;Anima Pieper ,&nbsp;Kristina Meyer ,&nbsp;Sarah Herrmann ,&nbsp;Annabell Jäger ,&nbsp;Felix Wülfing ,&nbsp;Maximilian Grummt ,&nbsp;Bernd Wolfarth ,&nbsp;Andreas Ströhle ,&nbsp;Kathlen Priebe\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.mhpa.2024.100579\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Exercise interventions have become more important in the treatment of mental disorders. High-intensity interval training (HIIT) has achieved promising results in the treatment of different mental disorders, like depression or panic disorder. To our knowledge, no study investigated the efficacy of HIIT as a sole treatment in a sample of individuals with fully diagnosed PTSD.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>40 participants with PTSD were randomized to either HIIT or a control group (low intensity training, LIT). They underwent a 12-day training period. The primary outcome were PTSD symptoms as assessed by the Clinician-Administered PTSD Scale (CAPS). Secondary outcome were self-reported posttraumatic, depressive and dissociative symptoms and overall psychological distress assessed at baseline, post treatment (one week after training) and follow up (six weeks post treatment). We used linear mixed models to assess the differential effects of the two trainings on clinical symptoms.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>In both HIIT and LIT group, clinician- and self-rated PTSD symptom severity as well as depressive and dissociative symptoms and overall psychological distress decreased significantly from baseline to follow up with medium effect sizes related to PTSD symptomatology (Cohen’s d = 0.76, p &lt; .001) and small effect sizes related to depressive (Cohen’s d = 0.45, p &lt; .001), dissociative symptoms (Cohen’s d = 0.42, p &lt; .001) and overall psychological distress (Cohen’s d = 0.43, p &lt; .001). There were no differences in symptom change between groups.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>In our pilot study, HITT did not seem to be superior to LIT in a sample of individuals with PTSD.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51589,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Mental Health and Physical Activity\",\"volume\":\"26 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100579\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-02-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Mental Health and Physical Activity\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1755296624000048\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHIATRY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Mental Health and Physical Activity","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1755296624000048","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景运动干预在精神障碍的治疗中变得越来越重要。高强度间歇训练(HIIT)在治疗不同的精神障碍(如抑郁症或恐慌症)方面取得了可喜的成果。据我们所知,还没有一项研究调查了高强度间歇训练作为唯一治疗方法对完全确诊的创伤后应激障碍患者的疗效。他们接受了为期 12 天的训练。主要结果是由临床医师管理的创伤后应激障碍量表(CAPS)评估的创伤后应激障碍症状。次要结果是在基线、治疗后(训练后一周)和随访(治疗后六周)评估的自我报告的创伤后症状、抑郁症状和分离症状以及总体心理困扰。我们使用线性混合模型来评估两种训练对临床症状的不同影响。结果在 HIIT 和 LIT 组中,临床医生和自我评定的创伤后应激障碍症状严重程度、抑郁和分离症状以及总体心理压力从基线到随访均显著下降,与创伤后应激障碍症状相关的效应大小为中等(Cohen's d = 0.76,p <.001),与抑郁症状(Cohen's d = 0.45,p <.001)、分离症状(Cohen's d = 0.42,p <.001)和总体心理困扰(Cohen's d = 0.43,p <.001)相关的小效应量。结论在我们的试点研究中,在创伤后应激障碍患者样本中,HITT 似乎并不优于 LIT。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
High-intensity interval training in individuals with posttraumatic stress disorder: A randomized controlled pilot trial

Background

Exercise interventions have become more important in the treatment of mental disorders. High-intensity interval training (HIIT) has achieved promising results in the treatment of different mental disorders, like depression or panic disorder. To our knowledge, no study investigated the efficacy of HIIT as a sole treatment in a sample of individuals with fully diagnosed PTSD.

Methods

40 participants with PTSD were randomized to either HIIT or a control group (low intensity training, LIT). They underwent a 12-day training period. The primary outcome were PTSD symptoms as assessed by the Clinician-Administered PTSD Scale (CAPS). Secondary outcome were self-reported posttraumatic, depressive and dissociative symptoms and overall psychological distress assessed at baseline, post treatment (one week after training) and follow up (six weeks post treatment). We used linear mixed models to assess the differential effects of the two trainings on clinical symptoms.

Results

In both HIIT and LIT group, clinician- and self-rated PTSD symptom severity as well as depressive and dissociative symptoms and overall psychological distress decreased significantly from baseline to follow up with medium effect sizes related to PTSD symptomatology (Cohen’s d = 0.76, p < .001) and small effect sizes related to depressive (Cohen’s d = 0.45, p < .001), dissociative symptoms (Cohen’s d = 0.42, p < .001) and overall psychological distress (Cohen’s d = 0.43, p < .001). There were no differences in symptom change between groups.

Conclusion

In our pilot study, HITT did not seem to be superior to LIT in a sample of individuals with PTSD.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.70
自引率
6.40%
发文量
43
审稿时长
32 days
期刊介绍: The aims of Mental Health and Physical Activity will be: (1) to foster the inter-disciplinary development and understanding of the mental health and physical activity field; (2) to develop research designs and methods to advance our understanding; (3) to promote the publication of high quality research on the effects of physical activity (interventions and a single session) on a wide range of dimensions of mental health and psychological well-being (eg, depression, anxiety and stress responses, mood, cognitive functioning and neurological disorders, such as dementia, self-esteem and related constructs, psychological aspects of quality of life among people with physical and mental illness, sleep, addictive disorders, eating disorders), from both efficacy and effectiveness trials;
期刊最新文献
Editorial Board Identification of relevant mental health indicators for European community-based health enhancing physical activity initiatives: An adapted Delphi study Linking social determinants of health to mental health, movement behaviors, and cognitive function among U.S. youth Acute effect of different types of moderate intensity physical exercise on affective response and mood state in individuals with substance use disorder Running toward substance use recovery: Does delay discounting mediate the relationship between physical activity and quality of life?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1