{"title":"工作资本量表的开发与验证。","authors":"Taewon Kim, Blake A Allan","doi":"10.1037/cou0000730","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Vocational psychologists have called for greater attention to different forms of capital, any resource or asset that confers profit and power, to better understand the vocational development process, particularly for those who lack resources and power. However, previous research has had several conceptual and measurement limitations, such as the use of less inclusive frameworks; a focus on more privileged populations; and the overuse of categorical, dummy coded, and objective measures. To address these limitations, the present study aimed to (a) develop an inclusive, subjective, continuous, and multidimensional work capital scale and (b) validate the new scale with representative samples of working adults and job seekers across two studies. We developed a 16-item four-factor Work Capital Scale that consists of Economic Work Capital, Human Work Capital, Social Work Capital, and Cultural Work Capital. Scores from the Work Capital Scale were invariant across household income, social class, gender, race, and employment status. We found that the correlational model fit best to the data and provided evidence for convergent and divergent validity by relating the subscales to subjective social class, objective socioeconomic indicators, and existing measures of capital. The present study advances theory and research in work capital and provides a tool for practitioners to use. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":48424,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Counseling Psychology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Development and validation of the Work Capital Scale.\",\"authors\":\"Taewon Kim, Blake A Allan\",\"doi\":\"10.1037/cou0000730\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Vocational psychologists have called for greater attention to different forms of capital, any resource or asset that confers profit and power, to better understand the vocational development process, particularly for those who lack resources and power. However, previous research has had several conceptual and measurement limitations, such as the use of less inclusive frameworks; a focus on more privileged populations; and the overuse of categorical, dummy coded, and objective measures. To address these limitations, the present study aimed to (a) develop an inclusive, subjective, continuous, and multidimensional work capital scale and (b) validate the new scale with representative samples of working adults and job seekers across two studies. We developed a 16-item four-factor Work Capital Scale that consists of Economic Work Capital, Human Work Capital, Social Work Capital, and Cultural Work Capital. Scores from the Work Capital Scale were invariant across household income, social class, gender, race, and employment status. We found that the correlational model fit best to the data and provided evidence for convergent and divergent validity by relating the subscales to subjective social class, objective socioeconomic indicators, and existing measures of capital. The present study advances theory and research in work capital and provides a tool for practitioners to use. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48424,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Counseling Psychology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Counseling Psychology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1037/cou0000730\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/2/15 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, APPLIED\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Counseling Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1037/cou0000730","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/2/15 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, APPLIED","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
职业心理学家呼吁更多地关注不同形式的资本,即任何能够带来利润和权力的资源或资产,以便更好地了解职业发展过程,尤其是那些缺乏资源和权力的人的职业发展过程。然而,以往的研究在概念和测量方面存在一些局限性,如使用包容性较差的框架;关注特权较多的人群;过度使用分类、虚拟编码和客观测量方法。为了解决这些局限性,本研究旨在:(a)开发一个具有包容性、主观性、连续性和多维度的工作资本量表;(b)在两项研究中对具有代表性的工作成人和求职者样本进行验证。我们开发了由 16 个项目组成的四因素工作资本量表,包括经济工作资本、人力工作资本、社会工作资本和文化工作资本。工作资本量表的得分在不同的家庭收入、社会阶层、性别、种族和就业状况下保持不变。我们发现,相关模型最适合数据,并通过将各分量表与主观社会阶层、客观社会经济指标和现有的资本衡量标准联系起来,提供了收敛有效性和发散有效性的证据。本研究推动了工作资本理论和研究的发展,并为从业人员提供了一种工具。(PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, 版权所有)。
Development and validation of the Work Capital Scale.
Vocational psychologists have called for greater attention to different forms of capital, any resource or asset that confers profit and power, to better understand the vocational development process, particularly for those who lack resources and power. However, previous research has had several conceptual and measurement limitations, such as the use of less inclusive frameworks; a focus on more privileged populations; and the overuse of categorical, dummy coded, and objective measures. To address these limitations, the present study aimed to (a) develop an inclusive, subjective, continuous, and multidimensional work capital scale and (b) validate the new scale with representative samples of working adults and job seekers across two studies. We developed a 16-item four-factor Work Capital Scale that consists of Economic Work Capital, Human Work Capital, Social Work Capital, and Cultural Work Capital. Scores from the Work Capital Scale were invariant across household income, social class, gender, race, and employment status. We found that the correlational model fit best to the data and provided evidence for convergent and divergent validity by relating the subscales to subjective social class, objective socioeconomic indicators, and existing measures of capital. The present study advances theory and research in work capital and provides a tool for practitioners to use. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Counseling Psychology® publishes empirical research in the areas of counseling activities (including assessment, interventions, consultation, supervision, training, prevention, and psychological education) career development and vocational psychology diversity and underrepresented populations in relation to counseling activities the development of new measures to be used in counseling activities professional issues in counseling psychology In addition, the Journal of Counseling Psychology considers reviews or theoretical contributions that have the potential for stimulating further research in counseling psychology, and conceptual or empirical contributions about methodological issues in counseling psychology research.