Lauren Gonzales, Lauren E Kois, Francis Mandracchia, Ashley Dhillon, Alexandra Purcell
{"title":"社区成员对 \"严重精神病 \"的态度和理解:混合方法研究。","authors":"Lauren Gonzales, Lauren E Kois, Francis Mandracchia, Ashley Dhillon, Alexandra Purcell","doi":"10.1037/prj0000598","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>\"Serious mental illness\" (SMI) is a priority population within mental health treatment and policy. However, there is no standard operational definition across research, clinical, and policy contexts. The use of the label has also not been evaluated regarding its association with stigma among the general public. This mixed-method study compared community members' stigma toward \"SMI\" with other psychiatric labels and examined community understanding and perceptions of the SMI label.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Two hundred forty-six participants recruited via Prolific read randomly manipulated vignettes describing an individual diagnosed with depression, schizophrenia, or \"SMI\" and completed measures of stigma and qualitative questions regarding familiarity, understanding, and perceived utility of SMI. Quantitative analyses evaluated stigma across vignettes, and qualitative analyses identified common themes across responses.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Stigma was relatively high across vignettes, with more negative views reported toward SMI and schizophrenia compared with depression. Quantitative differences in stigma by vignette were not significant after controlling for participants' age and gender. Qualitative responses were split regarding the perceived utility of the SMI term, with noted concerns including its broadness and potential for stigma. Most participants described functional impairment or disability as characteristic of \"SMI,\" and approximately 70% associated schizophrenia and psychotic disorders with \"SMI\" compared with 45% for depression.</p><p><strong>Conclusions and implications for practice: </strong>Person-level factors were more strongly associated with stigma than psychiatric labels. However, our sample described concerns that the SMI term is vague and may exacerbate stigma. Community education and antistigma efforts should move beyond diagnostic labels in characterizing mental illness to facilitate change in attitudes. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":47875,"journal":{"name":"Psychiatric Rehabilitation Journal","volume":" ","pages":"150-156"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Community member attitudes and understanding of \\\"serious mental illness\\\": A mixed-method study.\",\"authors\":\"Lauren Gonzales, Lauren E Kois, Francis Mandracchia, Ashley Dhillon, Alexandra Purcell\",\"doi\":\"10.1037/prj0000598\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>\\\"Serious mental illness\\\" (SMI) is a priority population within mental health treatment and policy. However, there is no standard operational definition across research, clinical, and policy contexts. The use of the label has also not been evaluated regarding its association with stigma among the general public. This mixed-method study compared community members' stigma toward \\\"SMI\\\" with other psychiatric labels and examined community understanding and perceptions of the SMI label.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Two hundred forty-six participants recruited via Prolific read randomly manipulated vignettes describing an individual diagnosed with depression, schizophrenia, or \\\"SMI\\\" and completed measures of stigma and qualitative questions regarding familiarity, understanding, and perceived utility of SMI. Quantitative analyses evaluated stigma across vignettes, and qualitative analyses identified common themes across responses.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Stigma was relatively high across vignettes, with more negative views reported toward SMI and schizophrenia compared with depression. Quantitative differences in stigma by vignette were not significant after controlling for participants' age and gender. Qualitative responses were split regarding the perceived utility of the SMI term, with noted concerns including its broadness and potential for stigma. Most participants described functional impairment or disability as characteristic of \\\"SMI,\\\" and approximately 70% associated schizophrenia and psychotic disorders with \\\"SMI\\\" compared with 45% for depression.</p><p><strong>Conclusions and implications for practice: </strong>Person-level factors were more strongly associated with stigma than psychiatric labels. However, our sample described concerns that the SMI term is vague and may exacerbate stigma. Community education and antistigma efforts should move beyond diagnostic labels in characterizing mental illness to facilitate change in attitudes. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47875,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Psychiatric Rehabilitation Journal\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"150-156\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Psychiatric Rehabilitation Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1037/prj0000598\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/2/15 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHIATRY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychiatric Rehabilitation Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1037/prj0000598","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/2/15 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Community member attitudes and understanding of "serious mental illness": A mixed-method study.
Objective: "Serious mental illness" (SMI) is a priority population within mental health treatment and policy. However, there is no standard operational definition across research, clinical, and policy contexts. The use of the label has also not been evaluated regarding its association with stigma among the general public. This mixed-method study compared community members' stigma toward "SMI" with other psychiatric labels and examined community understanding and perceptions of the SMI label.
Method: Two hundred forty-six participants recruited via Prolific read randomly manipulated vignettes describing an individual diagnosed with depression, schizophrenia, or "SMI" and completed measures of stigma and qualitative questions regarding familiarity, understanding, and perceived utility of SMI. Quantitative analyses evaluated stigma across vignettes, and qualitative analyses identified common themes across responses.
Results: Stigma was relatively high across vignettes, with more negative views reported toward SMI and schizophrenia compared with depression. Quantitative differences in stigma by vignette were not significant after controlling for participants' age and gender. Qualitative responses were split regarding the perceived utility of the SMI term, with noted concerns including its broadness and potential for stigma. Most participants described functional impairment or disability as characteristic of "SMI," and approximately 70% associated schizophrenia and psychotic disorders with "SMI" compared with 45% for depression.
Conclusions and implications for practice: Person-level factors were more strongly associated with stigma than psychiatric labels. However, our sample described concerns that the SMI term is vague and may exacerbate stigma. Community education and antistigma efforts should move beyond diagnostic labels in characterizing mental illness to facilitate change in attitudes. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).
期刊介绍:
The Psychiatric Rehabilitation Journal is sponsored by the Center for Psychiatric Rehabilitation, at Boston University"s Sargent College of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences and by the US Psychiatric Rehabilitation Association (USPRA) . The mission of the Psychiatric Rehabilitation Journal is to promote the development of new knowledge related to psychiatric rehabilitation and recovery of persons with serious mental illnesses.