揭示反馈隐藏信息测试在协同犯罪侦查中的功效

IF 2.2 3区 心理学 Q3 NEUROSCIENCES Brain and Cognition Pub Date : 2024-02-14 DOI:10.1016/j.bandc.2024.106140
Jinbin Zheng, Nan Yang, Chenxiao Zhu, Yinqi Shen, Yunzi Xie, Yunzhe Ren, Jixia Wu
{"title":"揭示反馈隐藏信息测试在协同犯罪侦查中的功效","authors":"Jinbin Zheng,&nbsp;Nan Yang,&nbsp;Chenxiao Zhu,&nbsp;Yinqi Shen,&nbsp;Yunzi Xie,&nbsp;Yunzhe Ren,&nbsp;Jixia Wu","doi":"10.1016/j.bandc.2024.106140","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Collaborative crime poses severe social hazards. In collaborative crime scenarios, previous studies have indicated that perpetrators’ collaborative encoding can impair the detection efficiency of P300-based complex trial protocols due to the collaborative encoding deficit. The feedback concealed information test (fCIT), a unique variation of the concealed information test, provides participants with feedback on how well they conceal information from memory. The fCIT, which has proven to be highly efficient, detects concealed information using recognition P300 along with feedback-related event-related potentials, and reflects the subject’s motivation to conceal. However, no studies have examined the fCIT’s effectiveness in identifying collaborative criminals. We propose that the fCIT’s efficiency persists in cases of collaborative crime and test this hypothesis using a sample of 48 participants. The participants in the collaborative groups were instructed to have hushed conversations about theft to simulate the collaborative crime process. Subsequently, they completed the fCIT. The findings indicate a significant decline in recognition P300′s detection efficiency when participants committed crimes collaboratively. Nevertheless, the detection efficiency of feedback P300 and feedback-related negativity remained high. This study’s outcomes illustrate the capacity of the fCIT to detect perpetrators involved in collaborative crime.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":55331,"journal":{"name":"Brain and Cognition","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Unveiling the efficacy of the feedback concealed information test in collaborative crime detection\",\"authors\":\"Jinbin Zheng,&nbsp;Nan Yang,&nbsp;Chenxiao Zhu,&nbsp;Yinqi Shen,&nbsp;Yunzi Xie,&nbsp;Yunzhe Ren,&nbsp;Jixia Wu\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.bandc.2024.106140\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Collaborative crime poses severe social hazards. In collaborative crime scenarios, previous studies have indicated that perpetrators’ collaborative encoding can impair the detection efficiency of P300-based complex trial protocols due to the collaborative encoding deficit. The feedback concealed information test (fCIT), a unique variation of the concealed information test, provides participants with feedback on how well they conceal information from memory. The fCIT, which has proven to be highly efficient, detects concealed information using recognition P300 along with feedback-related event-related potentials, and reflects the subject’s motivation to conceal. However, no studies have examined the fCIT’s effectiveness in identifying collaborative criminals. We propose that the fCIT’s efficiency persists in cases of collaborative crime and test this hypothesis using a sample of 48 participants. The participants in the collaborative groups were instructed to have hushed conversations about theft to simulate the collaborative crime process. Subsequently, they completed the fCIT. The findings indicate a significant decline in recognition P300′s detection efficiency when participants committed crimes collaboratively. Nevertheless, the detection efficiency of feedback P300 and feedback-related negativity remained high. This study’s outcomes illustrate the capacity of the fCIT to detect perpetrators involved in collaborative crime.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":55331,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Brain and Cognition\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-02-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Brain and Cognition\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0278262624000174\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"NEUROSCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Brain and Cognition","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0278262624000174","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

协同犯罪具有严重的社会危害性。以往的研究表明,在协同犯罪场景中,由于协同编码缺陷,犯罪者的协同编码会影响基于P300的复杂试验方案的检测效率。反馈隐藏信息测试(fCIT)是隐藏信息测试的一种独特变体,它能向参与者反馈他们从记忆中隐藏信息的程度。事实证明,fCIT 具有很高的效率,它利用识别 P300 和反馈相关事件电位来检测隐藏信息,并反映受试者隐藏信息的动机。然而,还没有研究考察过 fCIT 在识别协同罪犯方面的有效性。我们认为 fCIT 在协同犯罪案件中依然有效,并使用 48 名参与者的样本对这一假设进行了验证。合作小组的参与者被要求就盗窃问题进行低声交谈,以模拟合作犯罪过程。随后,他们完成了 fCIT。研究结果表明,当参与者合作犯罪时,识别 P300′的检测效率明显下降。然而,反馈 P300 和反馈相关负性的检测效率仍然很高。本研究的结果说明了 fCIT 检测参与合作犯罪的罪犯的能力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Unveiling the efficacy of the feedback concealed information test in collaborative crime detection

Collaborative crime poses severe social hazards. In collaborative crime scenarios, previous studies have indicated that perpetrators’ collaborative encoding can impair the detection efficiency of P300-based complex trial protocols due to the collaborative encoding deficit. The feedback concealed information test (fCIT), a unique variation of the concealed information test, provides participants with feedback on how well they conceal information from memory. The fCIT, which has proven to be highly efficient, detects concealed information using recognition P300 along with feedback-related event-related potentials, and reflects the subject’s motivation to conceal. However, no studies have examined the fCIT’s effectiveness in identifying collaborative criminals. We propose that the fCIT’s efficiency persists in cases of collaborative crime and test this hypothesis using a sample of 48 participants. The participants in the collaborative groups were instructed to have hushed conversations about theft to simulate the collaborative crime process. Subsequently, they completed the fCIT. The findings indicate a significant decline in recognition P300′s detection efficiency when participants committed crimes collaboratively. Nevertheless, the detection efficiency of feedback P300 and feedback-related negativity remained high. This study’s outcomes illustrate the capacity of the fCIT to detect perpetrators involved in collaborative crime.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Brain and Cognition
Brain and Cognition 医学-神经科学
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
46
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: Brain and Cognition is a forum for the integration of the neurosciences and cognitive sciences. B&C publishes peer-reviewed research articles, theoretical papers, case histories that address important theoretical issues, and historical articles into the interaction between cognitive function and brain processes. The focus is on rigorous studies of an empirical or theoretical nature and which make an original contribution to our knowledge about the involvement of the nervous system in cognition. Coverage includes, but is not limited to memory, learning, emotion, perception, movement, music or praxis in relationship to brain structure or function. Published articles will typically address issues relating some aspect of cognitive function to its neurological substrates with clear theoretical import, formulating new hypotheses or refuting previously established hypotheses. Clinical papers are welcome if they raise issues of theoretical importance or concern and shed light on the interaction between brain function and cognitive function. We welcome review articles that clearly contribute a new perspective or integration, beyond summarizing the literature in the field; authors of review articles should make explicit where the contribution lies. We also welcome proposals for special issues on aspects of the relation between cognition and the structure and function of the nervous system. Such proposals can be made directly to the Editor-in-Chief from individuals interested in being guest editors for such collections.
期刊最新文献
Exploring spontaneous brain activity changes in high-altitude smokers: Insights from ALFF/fALFF analysis Relationship between punishment sensitivity and risk-taking propensity Connectome-based prediction modeling of cognitive control using functional and structural connectivity The relationship between structural properties of frontal cortical regions and response inhibition in 6–14-year-old children Unlike overt movement, motor imagery cannot update internal models
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1