{"title":"异质流体中的混合:流体性质变化研究","authors":"Mohammad Reza Daneshvar Garmroodi, Ida Karimfazli","doi":"10.1016/j.jnnfm.2024.105196","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>In the context of stirred tanks, “mixing” refers to the purposeful and controlled flow designed to minimize heterogeneity, such as variations in solute or additive concentration. Industries like food and polymer processing often encounter situations where fluid properties are closely tied to additive concentration. However, conventional engineering models of mixing, herein referred to as “homogeneous models”, typically assume that the influence of heterogeneous fluid properties on mixing dynamics is negligible. In these models, flow development is considered independent of mixing, and the fluid’s rheological properties and density are assumed to be uniform. This manuscript’s primary objective is to emphasize the potential for substantial inaccuracies in predicting mixing outcomes when the effects heterogeneous fluid properties are disregarded. We investigate the homogenization of an additive in a fluid-filled cylindrical tank stirred by an axisymmetric disk, where both fluid rheology and density are contingent on the additive concentration. We introduce and compare two models for predicting mixing development. The first model (model problem <span><math><mi>T</mi></math></span>) incorporates variations in fluid properties dependent on the additive concentration, while the second model (model problem <span><math><mi>M</mi></math></span>) simplifies the fluid properties to their average values. Our approach to modeling mixing centers on a concentration field governed by advection–diffusion. We illustrate that the mapping between the parameter spaces of the two model problems is far from one-to-one. For any given point in the parameter space of model problem <span><math><mi>M</mi></math></span>, three distinct parameter groups (buoyancy, Atwood number, and viscosity ratio) exhibit unconstrained variations within the corresponding subset of the parameter space of model problem <span><math><mi>T</mi></math></span>. As a concrete example, we investigate the impact of buoyancy on the evolution of velocity and additive concentration in model problem <span><math><mi>T</mi></math></span>. Our analysis characterizes the influence of buoyancy on the mixing rate by examining the asymptotic behavior of the concentration field. We find that the standard deviation of the concentration asymptotically converges to an exponential decay, with the intercept and decay rate diminishing as a power-law function of buoyancy. This underscores the significant effect that even slight variations in buoyancy can have on the mixing process. Finally, our results conclusively demonstrate that the recirculation zones, areas where fluid velocity is notable, in model problems <em>M</em> and <em>T</em> do not align. In model problem <span><math><mi>M</mi></math></span>, the well-mixed region and the recirculation zones closely coincide, but this alignment is not observed in model problem <span><math><mi>T</mi></math></span>. Collectively, our study provides a counterexample that challenges the hypothesis suggesting that the development of the well-mixed region, and the mixing rate within homogeneous models accurately represent the characteristics of mixing in real-world heterogeneous fluids.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":54782,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Non-Newtonian Fluid Mechanics","volume":"325 ","pages":"Article 105196"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Mixing in heterogeneous fluids: An examination of fluid property variations\",\"authors\":\"Mohammad Reza Daneshvar Garmroodi, Ida Karimfazli\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jnnfm.2024.105196\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>In the context of stirred tanks, “mixing” refers to the purposeful and controlled flow designed to minimize heterogeneity, such as variations in solute or additive concentration. Industries like food and polymer processing often encounter situations where fluid properties are closely tied to additive concentration. However, conventional engineering models of mixing, herein referred to as “homogeneous models”, typically assume that the influence of heterogeneous fluid properties on mixing dynamics is negligible. In these models, flow development is considered independent of mixing, and the fluid’s rheological properties and density are assumed to be uniform. This manuscript’s primary objective is to emphasize the potential for substantial inaccuracies in predicting mixing outcomes when the effects heterogeneous fluid properties are disregarded. We investigate the homogenization of an additive in a fluid-filled cylindrical tank stirred by an axisymmetric disk, where both fluid rheology and density are contingent on the additive concentration. We introduce and compare two models for predicting mixing development. The first model (model problem <span><math><mi>T</mi></math></span>) incorporates variations in fluid properties dependent on the additive concentration, while the second model (model problem <span><math><mi>M</mi></math></span>) simplifies the fluid properties to their average values. Our approach to modeling mixing centers on a concentration field governed by advection–diffusion. We illustrate that the mapping between the parameter spaces of the two model problems is far from one-to-one. For any given point in the parameter space of model problem <span><math><mi>M</mi></math></span>, three distinct parameter groups (buoyancy, Atwood number, and viscosity ratio) exhibit unconstrained variations within the corresponding subset of the parameter space of model problem <span><math><mi>T</mi></math></span>. As a concrete example, we investigate the impact of buoyancy on the evolution of velocity and additive concentration in model problem <span><math><mi>T</mi></math></span>. Our analysis characterizes the influence of buoyancy on the mixing rate by examining the asymptotic behavior of the concentration field. We find that the standard deviation of the concentration asymptotically converges to an exponential decay, with the intercept and decay rate diminishing as a power-law function of buoyancy. This underscores the significant effect that even slight variations in buoyancy can have on the mixing process. Finally, our results conclusively demonstrate that the recirculation zones, areas where fluid velocity is notable, in model problems <em>M</em> and <em>T</em> do not align. In model problem <span><math><mi>M</mi></math></span>, the well-mixed region and the recirculation zones closely coincide, but this alignment is not observed in model problem <span><math><mi>T</mi></math></span>. Collectively, our study provides a counterexample that challenges the hypothesis suggesting that the development of the well-mixed region, and the mixing rate within homogeneous models accurately represent the characteristics of mixing in real-world heterogeneous fluids.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54782,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Non-Newtonian Fluid Mechanics\",\"volume\":\"325 \",\"pages\":\"Article 105196\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-02-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Non-Newtonian Fluid Mechanics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0377025724000120\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MECHANICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Non-Newtonian Fluid Mechanics","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0377025724000120","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MECHANICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
在搅拌罐中,"混合 "是指有目的、有控制地流动,以尽量减少异质性,如溶质或添加剂浓度的变化。食品和聚合物加工等行业经常会遇到流体特性与添加剂浓度密切相关的情况。然而,传统的混合工程模型(此处称为 "均质模型")通常假定异质流体特性对混合动力学的影响可以忽略不计。在这些模型中,流动的发展被认为与混合无关,流体的流变特性和密度被认为是均匀的。本手稿的主要目的是强调,如果忽略异质流体特性的影响,在预测混合结果时可能会出现很大的误差。我们研究了添加剂在轴对称圆盘搅拌的充满流体的圆柱形罐中的均质化问题,在这种情况下,流体的流变性和密度都取决于添加剂的浓度。我们引入并比较了两种预测混合发展的模型。第一个模型(模型问题 T)包含了取决于添加剂浓度的流体特性变化,而第二个模型(模型问题 M)则将流体特性简化为其平均值。我们的混合建模方法以受平流扩散控制的浓度场为中心。我们说明,两个模型问题的参数空间之间的映射远非一一对应。对于模型问题 M 的参数空间中的任何给定点,三个不同的参数组(浮力、阿特伍德数和粘度比)在模型问题 T 的参数空间的相应子集内表现出无约束的变化。作为一个具体的例子,我们研究了浮力对模型问题 T 中速度和相加浓度演变的影响。我们发现,浓度的标准偏差渐近收敛于指数衰减,截距和衰减率随着浮力的幂律函数而减小。这突出表明,即使浮力发生微小变化,也会对混合过程产生重大影响。最后,我们的结果确凿地证明,模型问题 M 和 T 中的再循环区(流体速度显著的区域)并不一致。总之,我们的研究提供了一个反例,对均质模型中混合良好区域的发展和混合速率能准确代表真实世界异质流体混合特征的假设提出了质疑。
Mixing in heterogeneous fluids: An examination of fluid property variations
In the context of stirred tanks, “mixing” refers to the purposeful and controlled flow designed to minimize heterogeneity, such as variations in solute or additive concentration. Industries like food and polymer processing often encounter situations where fluid properties are closely tied to additive concentration. However, conventional engineering models of mixing, herein referred to as “homogeneous models”, typically assume that the influence of heterogeneous fluid properties on mixing dynamics is negligible. In these models, flow development is considered independent of mixing, and the fluid’s rheological properties and density are assumed to be uniform. This manuscript’s primary objective is to emphasize the potential for substantial inaccuracies in predicting mixing outcomes when the effects heterogeneous fluid properties are disregarded. We investigate the homogenization of an additive in a fluid-filled cylindrical tank stirred by an axisymmetric disk, where both fluid rheology and density are contingent on the additive concentration. We introduce and compare two models for predicting mixing development. The first model (model problem ) incorporates variations in fluid properties dependent on the additive concentration, while the second model (model problem ) simplifies the fluid properties to their average values. Our approach to modeling mixing centers on a concentration field governed by advection–diffusion. We illustrate that the mapping between the parameter spaces of the two model problems is far from one-to-one. For any given point in the parameter space of model problem , three distinct parameter groups (buoyancy, Atwood number, and viscosity ratio) exhibit unconstrained variations within the corresponding subset of the parameter space of model problem . As a concrete example, we investigate the impact of buoyancy on the evolution of velocity and additive concentration in model problem . Our analysis characterizes the influence of buoyancy on the mixing rate by examining the asymptotic behavior of the concentration field. We find that the standard deviation of the concentration asymptotically converges to an exponential decay, with the intercept and decay rate diminishing as a power-law function of buoyancy. This underscores the significant effect that even slight variations in buoyancy can have on the mixing process. Finally, our results conclusively demonstrate that the recirculation zones, areas where fluid velocity is notable, in model problems M and T do not align. In model problem , the well-mixed region and the recirculation zones closely coincide, but this alignment is not observed in model problem . Collectively, our study provides a counterexample that challenges the hypothesis suggesting that the development of the well-mixed region, and the mixing rate within homogeneous models accurately represent the characteristics of mixing in real-world heterogeneous fluids.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Non-Newtonian Fluid Mechanics publishes research on flowing soft matter systems. Submissions in all areas of flowing complex fluids are welcomed, including polymer melts and solutions, suspensions, colloids, surfactant solutions, biological fluids, gels, liquid crystals and granular materials. Flow problems relevant to microfluidics, lab-on-a-chip, nanofluidics, biological flows, geophysical flows, industrial processes and other applications are of interest.
Subjects considered suitable for the journal include the following (not necessarily in order of importance):
Theoretical, computational and experimental studies of naturally or technologically relevant flow problems where the non-Newtonian nature of the fluid is important in determining the character of the flow. We seek in particular studies that lend mechanistic insight into flow behavior in complex fluids or highlight flow phenomena unique to complex fluids. Examples include
Instabilities, unsteady and turbulent or chaotic flow characteristics in non-Newtonian fluids,
Multiphase flows involving complex fluids,
Problems involving transport phenomena such as heat and mass transfer and mixing, to the extent that the non-Newtonian flow behavior is central to the transport phenomena,
Novel flow situations that suggest the need for further theoretical study,
Practical situations of flow that are in need of systematic theoretical and experimental research. Such issues and developments commonly arise, for example, in the polymer processing, petroleum, pharmaceutical, biomedical and consumer product industries.