对特定任务手部运动学、肌肉和力量协同作用的综合分析

IF 5.3 2区 医学 Q1 ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL Biocybernetics and Biomedical Engineering Pub Date : 2024-01-01 DOI:10.1016/j.bbe.2024.01.006
Martina Lapresa, Virginia Corradini, Antonio Iacca, Francesco Scotto di Luzio, Loredana Zollo, Francesca Cordella
{"title":"对特定任务手部运动学、肌肉和力量协同作用的综合分析","authors":"Martina Lapresa,&nbsp;Virginia Corradini,&nbsp;Antonio Iacca,&nbsp;Francesco Scotto di Luzio,&nbsp;Loredana Zollo,&nbsp;Francesca Cordella","doi":"10.1016/j.bbe.2024.01.006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Synergies were demonstrated to exist in the kinematic, force and muscular domains, and their task-specificity and subject-specificity was also highlighted in literature. Despite that, no works have extracted synergies on specific grasp classes to analyze task-specific synergistic patterns. Moreover, only few studies focused on the combined analysis of kinematic, force and muscle synergies.</p><p>The aim of this work was to (i) identify the grasp classes on which to extract task-specific synergies; (ii) extract subject-specific and task-specific synergies in the three domains and (iii) calculate the similarity of the extracted synergies among subjects and define average generalized synergies.</p><p>8 subjects were recruited to perform 21 reach-to-grasp tasks and the kinematics, contact forces and muscular activation of the hand were acquired. A LDA classifier allowed distinguishing power and precision grasp classes with an average accuracy of 89% considering kinematic data alone and combined kinematic, muscle and force data. Subject and task-specific synergies were therefore extracted on these two classes. Kinematic and force synergies were distinctive for the two classes, and highly similar among subjects, thus suggesting the possibility of adopting generalized synergies to describe grasp strategies. Conversely, muscle synergies did not differ particularly for the two classes. The combined analysis of force and kinematic data suggested that the hand posture may be somehow modulated by the optimal distribution of contact forces to perform stable grasps. Simulations with a virtual hand confirmed that stability significantly increased when grasps were generated by activating combined kinematic and force synergies rather than kinematic synergies only.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":55381,"journal":{"name":"Biocybernetics and Biomedical Engineering","volume":"44 1","pages":"Pages 218-230"},"PeriodicalIF":5.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0208521624000068/pdfft?md5=4434ff398e6bc5dc4662763f930b4ef1&pid=1-s2.0-S0208521624000068-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A comprehensive analysis of task-specific hand kinematic, muscle and force synergies\",\"authors\":\"Martina Lapresa,&nbsp;Virginia Corradini,&nbsp;Antonio Iacca,&nbsp;Francesco Scotto di Luzio,&nbsp;Loredana Zollo,&nbsp;Francesca Cordella\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.bbe.2024.01.006\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Synergies were demonstrated to exist in the kinematic, force and muscular domains, and their task-specificity and subject-specificity was also highlighted in literature. Despite that, no works have extracted synergies on specific grasp classes to analyze task-specific synergistic patterns. Moreover, only few studies focused on the combined analysis of kinematic, force and muscle synergies.</p><p>The aim of this work was to (i) identify the grasp classes on which to extract task-specific synergies; (ii) extract subject-specific and task-specific synergies in the three domains and (iii) calculate the similarity of the extracted synergies among subjects and define average generalized synergies.</p><p>8 subjects were recruited to perform 21 reach-to-grasp tasks and the kinematics, contact forces and muscular activation of the hand were acquired. A LDA classifier allowed distinguishing power and precision grasp classes with an average accuracy of 89% considering kinematic data alone and combined kinematic, muscle and force data. Subject and task-specific synergies were therefore extracted on these two classes. Kinematic and force synergies were distinctive for the two classes, and highly similar among subjects, thus suggesting the possibility of adopting generalized synergies to describe grasp strategies. Conversely, muscle synergies did not differ particularly for the two classes. The combined analysis of force and kinematic data suggested that the hand posture may be somehow modulated by the optimal distribution of contact forces to perform stable grasps. Simulations with a virtual hand confirmed that stability significantly increased when grasps were generated by activating combined kinematic and force synergies rather than kinematic synergies only.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":55381,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Biocybernetics and Biomedical Engineering\",\"volume\":\"44 1\",\"pages\":\"Pages 218-230\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0208521624000068/pdfft?md5=4434ff398e6bc5dc4662763f930b4ef1&pid=1-s2.0-S0208521624000068-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Biocybernetics and Biomedical Engineering\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0208521624000068\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biocybernetics and Biomedical Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0208521624000068","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

协同作用被证明存在于运动学、力和肌肉领域,其任务特异性和主体特异性也在文献中得到了强调。尽管如此,还没有任何研究提取了特定抓握类别的协同作用,以分析特定任务的协同模式。这项工作的目的是:(i) 确定可提取特定任务协同作用的抓握类别;(ii) 在三个领域中提取特定对象和特定任务的协同作用;(iii) 计算提取的协同作用在受试者之间的相似性,并定义平均广义协同作用。通过 LDA 分类器,可以区分力量抓取和精确抓取两种类型,仅考虑运动学数据以及运动学、肌肉和力的综合数据,平均准确率为 89%。因此,针对这两个类别提取了特定对象和任务的协同作用。运动学和力的协同作用在这两个类别中各具特色,而且在不同的受试者之间高度相似,这表明可以采用通用的协同作用来描述抓握策略。相反,肌肉协同作用在两个类别中没有特别的差异。对力和运动学数据的综合分析表明,手的姿势可能在某种程度上受到接触力最佳分布的调节,从而实现稳定的抓握。用虚拟手进行的模拟证实,当通过激活运动学和力的协同作用而不是仅激活运动学协同作用来产生抓握时,稳定性会显著提高。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
A comprehensive analysis of task-specific hand kinematic, muscle and force synergies

Synergies were demonstrated to exist in the kinematic, force and muscular domains, and their task-specificity and subject-specificity was also highlighted in literature. Despite that, no works have extracted synergies on specific grasp classes to analyze task-specific synergistic patterns. Moreover, only few studies focused on the combined analysis of kinematic, force and muscle synergies.

The aim of this work was to (i) identify the grasp classes on which to extract task-specific synergies; (ii) extract subject-specific and task-specific synergies in the three domains and (iii) calculate the similarity of the extracted synergies among subjects and define average generalized synergies.

8 subjects were recruited to perform 21 reach-to-grasp tasks and the kinematics, contact forces and muscular activation of the hand were acquired. A LDA classifier allowed distinguishing power and precision grasp classes with an average accuracy of 89% considering kinematic data alone and combined kinematic, muscle and force data. Subject and task-specific synergies were therefore extracted on these two classes. Kinematic and force synergies were distinctive for the two classes, and highly similar among subjects, thus suggesting the possibility of adopting generalized synergies to describe grasp strategies. Conversely, muscle synergies did not differ particularly for the two classes. The combined analysis of force and kinematic data suggested that the hand posture may be somehow modulated by the optimal distribution of contact forces to perform stable grasps. Simulations with a virtual hand confirmed that stability significantly increased when grasps were generated by activating combined kinematic and force synergies rather than kinematic synergies only.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
16.50
自引率
6.20%
发文量
77
审稿时长
38 days
期刊介绍: Biocybernetics and Biomedical Engineering is a quarterly journal, founded in 1981, devoted to publishing the results of original, innovative and creative research investigations in the field of Biocybernetics and biomedical engineering, which bridges mathematical, physical, chemical and engineering methods and technology to analyse physiological processes in living organisms as well as to develop methods, devices and systems used in biology and medicine, mainly in medical diagnosis, monitoring systems and therapy. The Journal''s mission is to advance scientific discovery into new or improved standards of care, and promotion a wide-ranging exchange between science and its application to humans.
期刊最新文献
Automating synaptic plasticity analysis: A deep learning approach to segmenting hippocampal field potential signal Probabilistic and explainable modeling of Phase–Phase Cross-Frequency Coupling patterns in EEG. Application to dyslexia diagnosis Skin cancer diagnosis using NIR spectroscopy data of skin lesions in vivo using machine learning algorithms Profiled delivery of bicarbonate during weekly cycle of hemodialysis Lightweight beat score map method for electrocardiogram-based arrhythmia classification
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1