氢氧化钙和姜酚混合物作为新型牙根感染封闭材料的有效性:随机临床试验。

IF 1.9 Q2 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE International Journal of Dentistry Pub Date : 2024-02-08 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.1155/2024/5528260
Fathi A Qasem, Salwa M Awad, Rizk A Elagamy
{"title":"氢氧化钙和姜酚混合物作为新型牙根感染封闭材料的有效性:随机临床试验。","authors":"Fathi A Qasem, Salwa M Awad, Rizk A Elagamy","doi":"10.1155/2024/5528260","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The tendency to use dental materials of plant origin is one of the prevailing trends in dentistry to reduce exposure to materials that could have some toxic impact in the long term.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate the efficacy of calcium hydroxide combined with gingerols (Ginge-Cal) as a novel obturation material for treating infected primary teeth and decreasing the recurrence of infection.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>The study was conducted on 30 lower primary molars with infected pulp for children aged 4-8 years. The sample was randomly divided into two groups depending on the tested obturation material: Ginge-Cal group and the Metapex group. The evaluation was done by different parameters clinically and radiographically at various intervals up to 12 months.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Based on chi-squared and McNamara's test with a 5% significance level, the clinical results indicated that Ginge-Cal group was more effective than the Metapex group in reducing or eliminating pain (<i>P</i>=0.467) after 1 week, sensitivity to percussion (<i>P</i>=0.090) at 3 months of follow-up, purulent swelling (<i>P</i>=0.444) at 6 and 9 months of follow-up, fistula, and tooth mobility. The radiographic results, based on the periapical and furcation area radiolucency at 12 months of follow-up, favored Ginge-Cal group over the Metapex group (<i>P</i>=0.683), (<i>P</i>=0.456), respectively. There were no statistically significant differences in pathological root resorption and periodontal space. The differences within the Ginge-Cal group were directly influenced by the time intervals in a statistically significant manner, ranging from (<i>P</i>=0.004) to (<i>P</i> < 0.001). The success percentage was 87.5% for Ginge-Cal group and 64.3% for Metapex group.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Ginge-Cal can be considered a promising material for treating the infected root canal when used as an obturation material for the infected root canal. This trial is registered with NCT05181813.</p>","PeriodicalId":13947,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Dentistry","volume":"2024 ","pages":"5528260"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10869195/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effectiveness of Calcium Hydroxide and Gingerols Mixture as a Novel Obturation Material for Infected Root in Primary Teeth: A Randomized Clinical Trial.\",\"authors\":\"Fathi A Qasem, Salwa M Awad, Rizk A Elagamy\",\"doi\":\"10.1155/2024/5528260\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The tendency to use dental materials of plant origin is one of the prevailing trends in dentistry to reduce exposure to materials that could have some toxic impact in the long term.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate the efficacy of calcium hydroxide combined with gingerols (Ginge-Cal) as a novel obturation material for treating infected primary teeth and decreasing the recurrence of infection.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>The study was conducted on 30 lower primary molars with infected pulp for children aged 4-8 years. The sample was randomly divided into two groups depending on the tested obturation material: Ginge-Cal group and the Metapex group. The evaluation was done by different parameters clinically and radiographically at various intervals up to 12 months.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Based on chi-squared and McNamara's test with a 5% significance level, the clinical results indicated that Ginge-Cal group was more effective than the Metapex group in reducing or eliminating pain (<i>P</i>=0.467) after 1 week, sensitivity to percussion (<i>P</i>=0.090) at 3 months of follow-up, purulent swelling (<i>P</i>=0.444) at 6 and 9 months of follow-up, fistula, and tooth mobility. The radiographic results, based on the periapical and furcation area radiolucency at 12 months of follow-up, favored Ginge-Cal group over the Metapex group (<i>P</i>=0.683), (<i>P</i>=0.456), respectively. There were no statistically significant differences in pathological root resorption and periodontal space. The differences within the Ginge-Cal group were directly influenced by the time intervals in a statistically significant manner, ranging from (<i>P</i>=0.004) to (<i>P</i> < 0.001). The success percentage was 87.5% for Ginge-Cal group and 64.3% for Metapex group.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Ginge-Cal can be considered a promising material for treating the infected root canal when used as an obturation material for the infected root canal. This trial is registered with NCT05181813.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":13947,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Dentistry\",\"volume\":\"2024 \",\"pages\":\"5528260\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-02-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10869195/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Dentistry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1155/2024/5528260\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Dentistry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1155/2024/5528260","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

导言:使用源自植物的牙科材料是牙科领域的主流趋势之一,其目的是减少接触可能长期产生毒性影响的材料:目的:评估氢氧化钙与姜酚(Ginge-Cal)作为新型封闭材料治疗感染性乳牙并减少感染复发的效果:研究对象是 30 颗牙髓感染的小学下磨牙,年龄在 4-8 岁之间。根据测试的封闭材料,样本被随机分为两组:Ginge-Cal组和Metapex组。每隔 12 个月通过临床和影像学的不同参数进行评估:根据卡方检验和麦克纳马拉检验(显著性水平为 5%),临床结果显示,Ginge-Cal 组在减轻或消除 1 周后的疼痛(P=0.467)、随访 3 个月时的叩诊敏感性(P=0.090)、随访 6 个月和 9 个月时的化脓性肿胀(P=0.444)、瘘管和牙齿活动度方面比 Metapex 组更有效。根据随访 12 个月时根尖周和毛囊区的放射线结果,Ginge-Cal 组优于 Metapex 组(P=0.683)和(P=0.456)。病理根吸收和牙周间隙的差异无统计学意义。Ginge-Cal组内的差异直接受时间间隔的影响,从(P=0.004)到(P < 0.001)均有统计学意义。Ginge-Cal组的成功率为87.5%,Metapex组为64.3%:结论:如果将 Ginge-Cal 用作感染根管的封固材料,可以认为它是治疗感染根管的一种很有前景的材料。该试验已在 NCT05181813 上注册。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Effectiveness of Calcium Hydroxide and Gingerols Mixture as a Novel Obturation Material for Infected Root in Primary Teeth: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Introduction: The tendency to use dental materials of plant origin is one of the prevailing trends in dentistry to reduce exposure to materials that could have some toxic impact in the long term.

Objective: To evaluate the efficacy of calcium hydroxide combined with gingerols (Ginge-Cal) as a novel obturation material for treating infected primary teeth and decreasing the recurrence of infection.

Materials and methods: The study was conducted on 30 lower primary molars with infected pulp for children aged 4-8 years. The sample was randomly divided into two groups depending on the tested obturation material: Ginge-Cal group and the Metapex group. The evaluation was done by different parameters clinically and radiographically at various intervals up to 12 months.

Results: Based on chi-squared and McNamara's test with a 5% significance level, the clinical results indicated that Ginge-Cal group was more effective than the Metapex group in reducing or eliminating pain (P=0.467) after 1 week, sensitivity to percussion (P=0.090) at 3 months of follow-up, purulent swelling (P=0.444) at 6 and 9 months of follow-up, fistula, and tooth mobility. The radiographic results, based on the periapical and furcation area radiolucency at 12 months of follow-up, favored Ginge-Cal group over the Metapex group (P=0.683), (P=0.456), respectively. There were no statistically significant differences in pathological root resorption and periodontal space. The differences within the Ginge-Cal group were directly influenced by the time intervals in a statistically significant manner, ranging from (P=0.004) to (P < 0.001). The success percentage was 87.5% for Ginge-Cal group and 64.3% for Metapex group.

Conclusions: Ginge-Cal can be considered a promising material for treating the infected root canal when used as an obturation material for the infected root canal. This trial is registered with NCT05181813.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
International Journal of Dentistry
International Journal of Dentistry DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE-
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
4.80%
发文量
219
审稿时长
20 weeks
期刊最新文献
Influence of Ceramic Material Type and Cement Shade on the Translucency of Lithium Disilicate Ceramic Veneers. Enhancing pH Modulation and Calcium Ions Release in External Resorption Artificial Defects: A Comparative Analysis of Ultrasonic Activation Effects on Ca(OH)2, MTA, and CEM Cement. Understanding Parental Emotions: Children's Dental Visits and the Separation Experience. Prevalence and Severity of Sleep Bruxism in Edentulous Patients: A Cross-Sectional Study. Elementary Teacher's Perception of Oral Health Education in a City of the Brazilian Amazon: A Cross-Sectional Study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1