{"title":"共同开展游民健康研究:反馈意见。","authors":"Aude Mondeilh, Lisbeth Spanjers, Gilles Brabant, Frédérique Quirino Chaves, Stéphane Lévêque, Laurent El Ghozi, Christine Castor, Erwan Autès-Tréand, Stéphanie Vandentorren","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Travelers have poorer health than the general population due to more precarious living conditions. In France, there are no epidemiological studies on Travelers, accentuating their invisibility in public health policy and planning. Discrimination against them, their distrust of the state and institutions, and their non-prioritization of health were the reasons for a participatory research project on Travelers’ health status. This research was carried out collaboratively by researchers, decision-makers, associations, and volunteer Travelers in Nouvelle-Aquitaine.</p><p><strong>Purpose of research: </strong>In this article we aim to share the challenges and benefits of the co-construction of this research.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The approach allowed the specific and sometimes divergent expectations of the stakeholders to be expressed and taken into consideration. It required a period of mutual acculturation, which resulted in a high level of participation in the study (74 percent), the acquisition of knowledge and skills, and the identification of points of contention. This participatory approach led to a better appropriation of the study and a greater awareness of health issues among the respondents, particularly thanks to the co-construction of the questionnaire and the communication tools.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This approach highlights the need to involve stakeholders in the governance of the research project from the very beginning. The approach was all the more crucial as it involved socially excluded people, and aims to avoid the possibility of excluding them further in the production of knowledge that concerns them.</p>","PeriodicalId":49575,"journal":{"name":"Sante Publique","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Co-construction d’une étude sur la santé des Gens du voyage : retours d’expériences.\",\"authors\":\"Aude Mondeilh, Lisbeth Spanjers, Gilles Brabant, Frédérique Quirino Chaves, Stéphane Lévêque, Laurent El Ghozi, Christine Castor, Erwan Autès-Tréand, Stéphanie Vandentorren\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Travelers have poorer health than the general population due to more precarious living conditions. In France, there are no epidemiological studies on Travelers, accentuating their invisibility in public health policy and planning. Discrimination against them, their distrust of the state and institutions, and their non-prioritization of health were the reasons for a participatory research project on Travelers’ health status. This research was carried out collaboratively by researchers, decision-makers, associations, and volunteer Travelers in Nouvelle-Aquitaine.</p><p><strong>Purpose of research: </strong>In this article we aim to share the challenges and benefits of the co-construction of this research.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The approach allowed the specific and sometimes divergent expectations of the stakeholders to be expressed and taken into consideration. It required a period of mutual acculturation, which resulted in a high level of participation in the study (74 percent), the acquisition of knowledge and skills, and the identification of points of contention. This participatory approach led to a better appropriation of the study and a greater awareness of health issues among the respondents, particularly thanks to the co-construction of the questionnaire and the communication tools.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This approach highlights the need to involve stakeholders in the governance of the research project from the very beginning. The approach was all the more crucial as it involved socially excluded people, and aims to avoid the possibility of excluding them further in the production of knowledge that concerns them.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49575,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Sante Publique\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Sante Publique\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sante Publique","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
Co-construction d’une étude sur la santé des Gens du voyage : retours d’expériences.
Introduction: Travelers have poorer health than the general population due to more precarious living conditions. In France, there are no epidemiological studies on Travelers, accentuating their invisibility in public health policy and planning. Discrimination against them, their distrust of the state and institutions, and their non-prioritization of health were the reasons for a participatory research project on Travelers’ health status. This research was carried out collaboratively by researchers, decision-makers, associations, and volunteer Travelers in Nouvelle-Aquitaine.
Purpose of research: In this article we aim to share the challenges and benefits of the co-construction of this research.
Results: The approach allowed the specific and sometimes divergent expectations of the stakeholders to be expressed and taken into consideration. It required a period of mutual acculturation, which resulted in a high level of participation in the study (74 percent), the acquisition of knowledge and skills, and the identification of points of contention. This participatory approach led to a better appropriation of the study and a greater awareness of health issues among the respondents, particularly thanks to the co-construction of the questionnaire and the communication tools.
Conclusions: This approach highlights the need to involve stakeholders in the governance of the research project from the very beginning. The approach was all the more crucial as it involved socially excluded people, and aims to avoid the possibility of excluding them further in the production of knowledge that concerns them.
期刊介绍:
La revue Santé Publique s’adresse à l’ensemble des acteurs de santé publique qu’ils soient décideurs,
professionnels de santé, acteurs de terrain, chercheurs, enseignants ou formateurs, etc. Elle publie
des travaux de recherche, des évaluations, des analyses d’action, des réflexions sur des interventions
de santé, des opinions, relevant des champs de la santé publique et de l’analyse des services de
soins, des sciences sociales et de l’action sociale.
Santé publique est une revue à comité de lecture, multidisciplinaire et généraliste, qui publie sur
l’ensemble des thèmes de la santé publique parmi lesquels : accès et recours aux soins, déterminants
et inégalités sociales de santé, prévention, éducation pour la santé, promotion de la santé,
organisation des soins, environnement, formation des professionnels de santé, nutrition, politiques
de santé, pratiques professionnelles, qualité des soins, gestion des risques sanitaires, représentation
et santé perçue, santé scolaire, santé et travail, systèmes de santé, systèmes d’information, veille
sanitaire, déterminants de la consommation de soins, organisation et économie des différents
secteurs de production de soins (hôpital, médicament, etc.), évaluation médico-économique
d’activités de soins ou de prévention et de programmes de santé, planification des ressources,
politiques de régulation et de financement, etc