基于患者数据的质量控制方法的实际应用:以钾为例。

Yan Zhang, Hua-Li Wang, Ye-Hong Xie, Da-Hai He, Chao-Qiong Zhou, Li-Rui Kong
{"title":"基于患者数据的质量控制方法的实际应用:以钾为例。","authors":"Yan Zhang, Hua-Li Wang, Ye-Hong Xie, Da-Hai He, Chao-Qiong Zhou, Li-Rui Kong","doi":"10.11613/BM.2024.010901","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Internal quality control (IQC) is a core pillar of laboratory quality control strategies. Internal quality control commercial materials lack the same characteristics as patient samples and IQC contributes to the costs of laboratory testing. Patient data-based quality control (PDB-QC) may be a valuable supplement to IQC; the smaller the biological variation, the stronger the ability to detect errors. Using the potassium concentration in serum as an example study compared error detection effectiveness between PDB-QC and IQC.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Serum potassium concentrations were measured by using an indirect ion-selective electrode method. For the training database, 23,772 patient-generated data and 366 IQC data from April 2022 to September 2022 were used; 15,351 patient-generated data and 246 IQC data from October 2022 to January 2023 were used as the testing database. For both PDB-QC and IQC, average values and standard deviations were calculated, and z-score charts were plotted for comparison purposes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Five systematic and three random errors were detected using IQC. Nine systematic errors but no random errors were detected in PDB-QC. The PDB-QC showed systematic error warnings earlier than the IQC.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The daily average value of patient-generated data was superior to IQC in terms of the efficiency and timeliness of detecting systematic errors but inferior to IQC in detecting random errors.</p>","PeriodicalId":94370,"journal":{"name":"Biochemia medica","volume":"34 1","pages":"010901"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10864027/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Practical application of the patient data-based quality control method: the potassium example.\",\"authors\":\"Yan Zhang, Hua-Li Wang, Ye-Hong Xie, Da-Hai He, Chao-Qiong Zhou, Li-Rui Kong\",\"doi\":\"10.11613/BM.2024.010901\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Internal quality control (IQC) is a core pillar of laboratory quality control strategies. Internal quality control commercial materials lack the same characteristics as patient samples and IQC contributes to the costs of laboratory testing. Patient data-based quality control (PDB-QC) may be a valuable supplement to IQC; the smaller the biological variation, the stronger the ability to detect errors. Using the potassium concentration in serum as an example study compared error detection effectiveness between PDB-QC and IQC.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Serum potassium concentrations were measured by using an indirect ion-selective electrode method. For the training database, 23,772 patient-generated data and 366 IQC data from April 2022 to September 2022 were used; 15,351 patient-generated data and 246 IQC data from October 2022 to January 2023 were used as the testing database. For both PDB-QC and IQC, average values and standard deviations were calculated, and z-score charts were plotted for comparison purposes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Five systematic and three random errors were detected using IQC. Nine systematic errors but no random errors were detected in PDB-QC. The PDB-QC showed systematic error warnings earlier than the IQC.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The daily average value of patient-generated data was superior to IQC in terms of the efficiency and timeliness of detecting systematic errors but inferior to IQC in detecting random errors.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":94370,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Biochemia medica\",\"volume\":\"34 1\",\"pages\":\"010901\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-02-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10864027/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Biochemia medica\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.11613/BM.2024.010901\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biochemia medica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.11613/BM.2024.010901","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

简介:内部质量控制(IQC)是实验室质量控制战略的核心支柱:内部质量控制(IQC)是实验室质量控制战略的核心支柱。内部质量控制的商业材料缺乏与患者样本相同的特性,因此 IQC 增加了实验室检测的成本。基于患者数据的质量控制(PDB-QC)可能是 IQC 的重要补充;生物变异越小,发现错误的能力就越强。研究以血清中的钾浓度为例,比较了 PDB-QC 和 IQC 的错误检测效果:使用间接离子选择电极法测定血清钾浓度。在训练数据库中,使用了 2022 年 4 月至 2022 年 9 月的 23772 个患者生成的数据和 366 个 IQC 数据;在测试数据库中,使用了 2022 年 10 月至 2023 年 1 月的 15351 个患者生成的数据和 246 个 IQC 数据。计算了PDB-QC和IQC的平均值和标准偏差,并绘制了z-分数图进行比较:结果:使用 IQC 检测出了 5 个系统误差和 3 个随机误差。PDB-QC 检测出 9 个系统误差,但没有随机误差。PDB-QC 比 IQC 更早显示出系统误差警告:患者生成数据的日平均值在检测系统性错误的效率和及时性方面优于 IQC,但在检测随机错误方面则逊于 IQC。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Practical application of the patient data-based quality control method: the potassium example.

Introduction: Internal quality control (IQC) is a core pillar of laboratory quality control strategies. Internal quality control commercial materials lack the same characteristics as patient samples and IQC contributes to the costs of laboratory testing. Patient data-based quality control (PDB-QC) may be a valuable supplement to IQC; the smaller the biological variation, the stronger the ability to detect errors. Using the potassium concentration in serum as an example study compared error detection effectiveness between PDB-QC and IQC.

Materials and methods: Serum potassium concentrations were measured by using an indirect ion-selective electrode method. For the training database, 23,772 patient-generated data and 366 IQC data from April 2022 to September 2022 were used; 15,351 patient-generated data and 246 IQC data from October 2022 to January 2023 were used as the testing database. For both PDB-QC and IQC, average values and standard deviations were calculated, and z-score charts were plotted for comparison purposes.

Results: Five systematic and three random errors were detected using IQC. Nine systematic errors but no random errors were detected in PDB-QC. The PDB-QC showed systematic error warnings earlier than the IQC.

Conclusions: The daily average value of patient-generated data was superior to IQC in terms of the efficiency and timeliness of detecting systematic errors but inferior to IQC in detecting random errors.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Are we ready to integrate advanced artificial intelligence models in clinical laboratory? Implementation of new Westgard rules suggested by the Westgard Advisor software for five immunological parameters. Levothyroxine therapy reduces endocan and total cholesterol concentrations in patients with subclinical hypothyroidism. Red blood cell agglutination caused by ceftriaxone and its effect on erythrocyte parameters: a case report. Serum progastrin-releasing peptide in pneumonia, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and early-stage primary lung cancers.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1