推进电力系统向可再生能源一体化转型的投资行为建模框架

IF 5.8 Q2 ENERGY & FUELS Energy and climate change Pub Date : 2024-02-09 DOI:10.1016/j.egycc.2024.100127
Fengwei Hung , Ali Ghaffari , Y.C.Ethan Yang , Gavin Dillingham
{"title":"推进电力系统向可再生能源一体化转型的投资行为建模框架","authors":"Fengwei Hung ,&nbsp;Ali Ghaffari ,&nbsp;Y.C.Ethan Yang ,&nbsp;Gavin Dillingham","doi":"10.1016/j.egycc.2024.100127","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Financial incentives, such as carbon credits and feed-in tariffs, are effective policy tools to mobilize renewable energy investment for combating climate change. However, climate and policy uncertainties also induce substantial financial risks to power companies’ investments. A company may view renewable energy as an opportunity or a risky business depending on its perception of how renewable technologies and energy policies evolve. To explore how the diverse response from individual companies affects the power system's adoption of renewables, this study develops an agent-based modeling framework that includes renewable technology advancement, market conditions, and changes in incentive programs in the agents’ decision-making. Power companies (i.e., agents) are assumed profit-driven and have different risk attitudes toward climate and energy policy uncertainty. For illustration, we applied the method to the Texas power system as a case study where a group of agents are randomly generated to represent the power companies’ aggregated behaviors. Agents’ risk attitudes are inferred based on a survey, historical data, and model diagnosis. Results of future scenarios highlight renewable adoption prediction uncertainties and the need to develop holistic modeling approaches to facilitate energy policy and power system planning. This modeling framework creates a flexible representation of the power industry and serves as a building block of our vision toward holistic power system modeling and planning. We discuss future research directions that extend the framework through model coupling for system reliability assessment and improve agent representation regarding risk perception and market dynamics.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":72914,"journal":{"name":"Energy and climate change","volume":"5 ","pages":"Article 100127"},"PeriodicalIF":5.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"An investment behavioral modeling framework for advancing power system transformation toward renewable energy integration\",\"authors\":\"Fengwei Hung ,&nbsp;Ali Ghaffari ,&nbsp;Y.C.Ethan Yang ,&nbsp;Gavin Dillingham\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.egycc.2024.100127\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Financial incentives, such as carbon credits and feed-in tariffs, are effective policy tools to mobilize renewable energy investment for combating climate change. However, climate and policy uncertainties also induce substantial financial risks to power companies’ investments. A company may view renewable energy as an opportunity or a risky business depending on its perception of how renewable technologies and energy policies evolve. To explore how the diverse response from individual companies affects the power system's adoption of renewables, this study develops an agent-based modeling framework that includes renewable technology advancement, market conditions, and changes in incentive programs in the agents’ decision-making. Power companies (i.e., agents) are assumed profit-driven and have different risk attitudes toward climate and energy policy uncertainty. For illustration, we applied the method to the Texas power system as a case study where a group of agents are randomly generated to represent the power companies’ aggregated behaviors. Agents’ risk attitudes are inferred based on a survey, historical data, and model diagnosis. Results of future scenarios highlight renewable adoption prediction uncertainties and the need to develop holistic modeling approaches to facilitate energy policy and power system planning. This modeling framework creates a flexible representation of the power industry and serves as a building block of our vision toward holistic power system modeling and planning. We discuss future research directions that extend the framework through model coupling for system reliability assessment and improve agent representation regarding risk perception and market dynamics.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":72914,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Energy and climate change\",\"volume\":\"5 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100127\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-02-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Energy and climate change\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666278724000035\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ENERGY & FUELS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Energy and climate change","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666278724000035","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENERGY & FUELS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

碳信用额度和上网电价等财政激励措施是调动可再生能源投资以应对气候变化的有效政策工具。然而,气候和政策的不确定性也会给电力公司的投资带来巨大的财务风险。公司可能将可再生能源视为机遇,也可能将其视为风险,这取决于其对可再生技术和能源政策发展的看法。为了探索各个公司的不同反应如何影响电力系统对可再生能源的采用,本研究开发了一个基于代理的建模框架,将可再生技术的发展、市场条件和激励计划的变化纳入代理决策中。假设电力公司(即代理)以利润为导向,对气候和能源政策的不确定性持不同的风险态度。为了说明问题,我们将该方法应用于德克萨斯州的电力系统作为案例研究,随机生成一组代理来代表电力公司的综合行为。代理的风险态度是根据调查、历史数据和模型诊断推断出来的。未来情景的结果凸显了可再生能源采用预测的不确定性,以及开发整体建模方法以促进能源政策和电力系统规划的必要性。这一建模框架灵活地代表了电力行业,是我们实现电力系统整体建模和规划愿景的基石。我们讨论了未来的研究方向,即通过系统可靠性评估的模型耦合来扩展该框架,并改进有关风险感知和市场动态的代理表示。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
An investment behavioral modeling framework for advancing power system transformation toward renewable energy integration

Financial incentives, such as carbon credits and feed-in tariffs, are effective policy tools to mobilize renewable energy investment for combating climate change. However, climate and policy uncertainties also induce substantial financial risks to power companies’ investments. A company may view renewable energy as an opportunity or a risky business depending on its perception of how renewable technologies and energy policies evolve. To explore how the diverse response from individual companies affects the power system's adoption of renewables, this study develops an agent-based modeling framework that includes renewable technology advancement, market conditions, and changes in incentive programs in the agents’ decision-making. Power companies (i.e., agents) are assumed profit-driven and have different risk attitudes toward climate and energy policy uncertainty. For illustration, we applied the method to the Texas power system as a case study where a group of agents are randomly generated to represent the power companies’ aggregated behaviors. Agents’ risk attitudes are inferred based on a survey, historical data, and model diagnosis. Results of future scenarios highlight renewable adoption prediction uncertainties and the need to develop holistic modeling approaches to facilitate energy policy and power system planning. This modeling framework creates a flexible representation of the power industry and serves as a building block of our vision toward holistic power system modeling and planning. We discuss future research directions that extend the framework through model coupling for system reliability assessment and improve agent representation regarding risk perception and market dynamics.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Energy and climate change
Energy and climate change Global and Planetary Change, Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment, Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law
CiteScore
7.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Solar assisted generation of plasmonic silver photocatalyst for wastewater remediation and green hydrogen production Green hydrogen production via a photocatalyst-enabled optical fiber system: A promising route to net-zero emissions Stranded assets and compensation in oil and gas upstream projects: Conceptual and practical issues Welfare and inequality impacts of carbon pricing and compensation schemes on fuel poor households in Styria, Austria Perspectives of electrochemical and photocatalytic technologies for the water-energy nexus potential of water splitting of brines
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1