发声蛙和非发声蛙的听觉灵敏度和鼓膜中耳

IF 2.5 2区 医学 Q1 AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY Hearing Research Pub Date : 2024-02-05 DOI:10.1016/j.heares.2024.108970
Longhui Zhao , Meihua Zhang , Yuanyu Qin , Tongliang Wang , Xiaofei Zhai , Jianguo Cui , Jichao Wang
{"title":"发声蛙和非发声蛙的听觉灵敏度和鼓膜中耳","authors":"Longhui Zhao ,&nbsp;Meihua Zhang ,&nbsp;Yuanyu Qin ,&nbsp;Tongliang Wang ,&nbsp;Xiaofei Zhai ,&nbsp;Jianguo Cui ,&nbsp;Jichao Wang","doi":"10.1016/j.heares.2024.108970","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The tympanic middle ear is important for anuran hearing on land. However, many species have partly or entirely lost their tympanic apparatus. Previous studies have compared hearing sensitivities in species that possess and lack tympanic membranes capable of sound production and acoustic communication. However, little is known about how these hearing abilities are comparable to those of mutant species. Here, we compared the eardrum and middle ear anatomies of two sympatric sibling species from a noisy stream habitat, namely the “non-vocal” Hainan torrent frog (<em>Amolops hainanensis</em>) and the “vocal” little torrent frog (<em>Amolops torrentis</em>), the latter of which is capable of acoustic communication. Our results showed that the relative (to head size) eardrum diameter of <em>A. hainanensis</em> was smaller than that of <em>A. torrentis</em>, although the absolute size was not smaller. Unlike <em>A. torrentis</em>, the tympanic membrane area of <em>A. hainanensis</em> was not clearly differentiated from the surrounding skin. The middle ear, however, was well-developed in both species. We measured the auditory brainstem responses (ABRs) of <em>A. hainanensis</em> and compared the ABR thresholds and latencies to those previously obtained for <em>A. torrentis</em>. Our results suggested that these two species exhibited significant differences in hearing sensitivity. <em>A. hainanensis</em> (smaller relative eardrum, nonvocal) had higher ABR thresholds and longer initial response times than <em>A. torrentis</em> (larger relative eardrum, vocal) at lower frequencies. Neurophysiological responses from the brain were obtained for tone pips between 800 Hz and 7,000 Hz, with peak sensitivities found at 3,000 Hz (73 dB SPL) for <em>A. hainanensis</em>, and at 1,800 Hz (61 dB SPL) for <em>A. torrentis</em>. Our results suggest that the non-vocal <em>A. hainanensis</em> has lower hearing sensitivity than its vocal sister species (i.e., <em>A. torrentis</em>), which may be related to differences in tympanic or inner ear structure and morphology.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":12881,"journal":{"name":"Hearing Research","volume":"444 ","pages":"Article 108970"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Auditory sensitivity and tympanic middle ear in a vocal and a non-vocal frog\",\"authors\":\"Longhui Zhao ,&nbsp;Meihua Zhang ,&nbsp;Yuanyu Qin ,&nbsp;Tongliang Wang ,&nbsp;Xiaofei Zhai ,&nbsp;Jianguo Cui ,&nbsp;Jichao Wang\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.heares.2024.108970\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>The tympanic middle ear is important for anuran hearing on land. However, many species have partly or entirely lost their tympanic apparatus. Previous studies have compared hearing sensitivities in species that possess and lack tympanic membranes capable of sound production and acoustic communication. However, little is known about how these hearing abilities are comparable to those of mutant species. Here, we compared the eardrum and middle ear anatomies of two sympatric sibling species from a noisy stream habitat, namely the “non-vocal” Hainan torrent frog (<em>Amolops hainanensis</em>) and the “vocal” little torrent frog (<em>Amolops torrentis</em>), the latter of which is capable of acoustic communication. Our results showed that the relative (to head size) eardrum diameter of <em>A. hainanensis</em> was smaller than that of <em>A. torrentis</em>, although the absolute size was not smaller. Unlike <em>A. torrentis</em>, the tympanic membrane area of <em>A. hainanensis</em> was not clearly differentiated from the surrounding skin. The middle ear, however, was well-developed in both species. We measured the auditory brainstem responses (ABRs) of <em>A. hainanensis</em> and compared the ABR thresholds and latencies to those previously obtained for <em>A. torrentis</em>. Our results suggested that these two species exhibited significant differences in hearing sensitivity. <em>A. hainanensis</em> (smaller relative eardrum, nonvocal) had higher ABR thresholds and longer initial response times than <em>A. torrentis</em> (larger relative eardrum, vocal) at lower frequencies. Neurophysiological responses from the brain were obtained for tone pips between 800 Hz and 7,000 Hz, with peak sensitivities found at 3,000 Hz (73 dB SPL) for <em>A. hainanensis</em>, and at 1,800 Hz (61 dB SPL) for <em>A. torrentis</em>. Our results suggest that the non-vocal <em>A. hainanensis</em> has lower hearing sensitivity than its vocal sister species (i.e., <em>A. torrentis</em>), which may be related to differences in tympanic or inner ear structure and morphology.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12881,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Hearing Research\",\"volume\":\"444 \",\"pages\":\"Article 108970\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-02-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Hearing Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378595524000236\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Hearing Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378595524000236","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

鼓膜中耳对于有尾目动物在陆地上的听力非常重要。然而,许多物种已经部分或完全丧失了鼓膜。以前的研究曾比较过拥有和缺乏鼓膜的物种的听觉灵敏度,它们都能发出声音和进行声学交流。然而,人们对这些听觉能力与突变物种的听觉能力之间的可比性知之甚少。在这里,我们比较了两个来自嘈杂溪流栖息地的同胞物种,即 "不发声 "的海南激流蛙(Amolops hainanensis)和 "发声 "的小激流蛙(Amolops torrentis)的鼓膜和中耳解剖结构。我们的研究结果表明,海南蛙的耳膜直径(相对于头部大小)小于激流蛙,但绝对值并不小。与山洪蛙不同,海南蛙的鼓膜区域与周围皮肤没有明显区别。不过,这两个物种的中耳都很发达。我们测量了海南蛙的听觉脑干反应(ABRs),并将其ABR阈值和潜伏期与之前获得的激流蛙的ABR阈值和潜伏期进行了比较。我们的结果表明,这两个物种在听觉灵敏度方面存在显著差异。在较低频率下,海南蛙(相对鼓膜较小、不发声)比激流蛙(相对鼓膜较大、发声)具有更高的 ABR 阈值和更长的初始反应时间。在 800 Hz 到 7,000 Hz 之间的音调中,海南蛙的大脑神经生理反应达到峰值灵敏度,为 3,000 Hz(73 dB SPL),而洪流蛙则为 1,800 Hz(61 dB SPL)。我们的研究结果表明,不发声的海南蛙的听觉灵敏度低于其发声的姊妹物种(即激流蛙),这可能与鼓膜或内耳结构和形态的差异有关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Auditory sensitivity and tympanic middle ear in a vocal and a non-vocal frog

The tympanic middle ear is important for anuran hearing on land. However, many species have partly or entirely lost their tympanic apparatus. Previous studies have compared hearing sensitivities in species that possess and lack tympanic membranes capable of sound production and acoustic communication. However, little is known about how these hearing abilities are comparable to those of mutant species. Here, we compared the eardrum and middle ear anatomies of two sympatric sibling species from a noisy stream habitat, namely the “non-vocal” Hainan torrent frog (Amolops hainanensis) and the “vocal” little torrent frog (Amolops torrentis), the latter of which is capable of acoustic communication. Our results showed that the relative (to head size) eardrum diameter of A. hainanensis was smaller than that of A. torrentis, although the absolute size was not smaller. Unlike A. torrentis, the tympanic membrane area of A. hainanensis was not clearly differentiated from the surrounding skin. The middle ear, however, was well-developed in both species. We measured the auditory brainstem responses (ABRs) of A. hainanensis and compared the ABR thresholds and latencies to those previously obtained for A. torrentis. Our results suggested that these two species exhibited significant differences in hearing sensitivity. A. hainanensis (smaller relative eardrum, nonvocal) had higher ABR thresholds and longer initial response times than A. torrentis (larger relative eardrum, vocal) at lower frequencies. Neurophysiological responses from the brain were obtained for tone pips between 800 Hz and 7,000 Hz, with peak sensitivities found at 3,000 Hz (73 dB SPL) for A. hainanensis, and at 1,800 Hz (61 dB SPL) for A. torrentis. Our results suggest that the non-vocal A. hainanensis has lower hearing sensitivity than its vocal sister species (i.e., A. torrentis), which may be related to differences in tympanic or inner ear structure and morphology.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Hearing Research
Hearing Research 医学-耳鼻喉科学
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
14.30%
发文量
163
审稿时长
75 days
期刊介绍: The aim of the journal is to provide a forum for papers concerned with basic peripheral and central auditory mechanisms. Emphasis is on experimental and clinical studies, but theoretical and methodological papers will also be considered. The journal publishes original research papers, review and mini- review articles, rapid communications, method/protocol and perspective articles. Papers submitted should deal with auditory anatomy, physiology, psychophysics, imaging, modeling and behavioural studies in animals and humans, as well as hearing aids and cochlear implants. Papers dealing with the vestibular system are also considered for publication. Papers on comparative aspects of hearing and on effects of drugs and environmental contaminants on hearing function will also be considered. Clinical papers will be accepted when they contribute to the understanding of normal and pathological hearing functions.
期刊最新文献
The therapeutic effect and underlying biochemical mechanism of methylprednisolone and D-methionine in “rescuing” noise-induced hearing loss in guinea pigs Silicone-based AC102-loaded cochlear implant coatings protect residual hearing in an animal model of cochlear implantation Impaired brainstem auditory evoked potentials after in utero exposure to high dose paracetamol exposure Sensory and affective dimensions in loudness perception: Insights from young adults Editorial Board
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1