探索约旦医学生和医务人员对安乐死的认识、态度和准备情况:一项多中心横断面研究

B. Alazab , J. Alazab , S. Beqaeen , S. Al-Beool , T. Hajahjeh , R. Rababaa , R. Ammouri , G. Al-Hudhud , N. Alkattan , A. Aqel , L. Alsharaeh
{"title":"探索约旦医学生和医务人员对安乐死的认识、态度和准备情况:一项多中心横断面研究","authors":"B. Alazab ,&nbsp;J. Alazab ,&nbsp;S. Beqaeen ,&nbsp;S. Al-Beool ,&nbsp;T. Hajahjeh ,&nbsp;R. Rababaa ,&nbsp;R. Ammouri ,&nbsp;G. Al-Hudhud ,&nbsp;N. Alkattan ,&nbsp;A. Aqel ,&nbsp;L. Alsharaeh","doi":"10.1016/j.jemep.2024.100970","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Euthanasia stands as an enduring and polarizing subject within medical ethics, the contentious nature of this topic emanates from the clash between a physician's duty to preserve life and alleviate suffering. This study provides valuable insights into the perspective of medical students and staff, examining their awareness levels, attitudes, and readiness regarding euthanasia. Notably, the research is framed within the unique context of the Middle East, challenging the predominantly Western influence on end-of-life decision studies. This study is the first of its kind to examine a Middle Eastern perspective on euthanasia, emphasizing its relevance and novelty. It highlights both the obstacles to its implementation and the rationales for endorsing it, while also pinpointing the significant factors linked to this complex subject.</p></div><div><h3>Method</h3><p>This multicenter cross-sectional study enrolled 646 individuals, including medical students and staff. The study encompassed all six medical facilities in the, as well as multiple hospitals across Jordan.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The median age of the study participants was 21 years old (21–22). The analysis showed that 30.3% of the participants expressed support for euthanasia. Designation was significantly associated with awareness and readiness. Religious activity was associated with attitude, while religion was associated with readiness. In this current study, participants displayed a pessimistic stance regarding euthanasia. The primary reasons for opposition included concerns about its potential misuse for personal gain, as well as the impact of religious or cultural beliefs.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>The present research significantly contributes to the global discourse on euthanasia, offering a comprehensive glimpse into how medical practitioners and students in Jordan navigate this intricate issue.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":37707,"journal":{"name":"Ethics, Medicine and Public Health","volume":"32 ","pages":"Article 100970"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Exploring awareness, attitudes, and readiness towards euthanasia among medical students and staff in Jordan: A multicenter cross-sectional study\",\"authors\":\"B. Alazab ,&nbsp;J. Alazab ,&nbsp;S. Beqaeen ,&nbsp;S. Al-Beool ,&nbsp;T. Hajahjeh ,&nbsp;R. Rababaa ,&nbsp;R. Ammouri ,&nbsp;G. Al-Hudhud ,&nbsp;N. Alkattan ,&nbsp;A. Aqel ,&nbsp;L. Alsharaeh\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jemep.2024.100970\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Euthanasia stands as an enduring and polarizing subject within medical ethics, the contentious nature of this topic emanates from the clash between a physician's duty to preserve life and alleviate suffering. This study provides valuable insights into the perspective of medical students and staff, examining their awareness levels, attitudes, and readiness regarding euthanasia. Notably, the research is framed within the unique context of the Middle East, challenging the predominantly Western influence on end-of-life decision studies. This study is the first of its kind to examine a Middle Eastern perspective on euthanasia, emphasizing its relevance and novelty. It highlights both the obstacles to its implementation and the rationales for endorsing it, while also pinpointing the significant factors linked to this complex subject.</p></div><div><h3>Method</h3><p>This multicenter cross-sectional study enrolled 646 individuals, including medical students and staff. The study encompassed all six medical facilities in the, as well as multiple hospitals across Jordan.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The median age of the study participants was 21 years old (21–22). The analysis showed that 30.3% of the participants expressed support for euthanasia. Designation was significantly associated with awareness and readiness. Religious activity was associated with attitude, while religion was associated with readiness. In this current study, participants displayed a pessimistic stance regarding euthanasia. The primary reasons for opposition included concerns about its potential misuse for personal gain, as well as the impact of religious or cultural beliefs.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>The present research significantly contributes to the global discourse on euthanasia, offering a comprehensive glimpse into how medical practitioners and students in Jordan navigate this intricate issue.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":37707,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Ethics, Medicine and Public Health\",\"volume\":\"32 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100970\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Ethics, Medicine and Public Health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352552524000057\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ethics, Medicine and Public Health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352552524000057","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景安乐死是医学伦理学中一个经久不衰、两极分化的话题,其争议性源于医生维护生命与减轻痛苦的职责之间的冲突。本研究从医学生和医务人员的角度出发,考察了他们对安乐死的认识水平、态度和准备程度,为我们提供了宝贵的见解。值得注意的是,这项研究是在中东地区的独特背景下进行的,挑战了临终决定研究中主要受西方影响的观点。本研究是首次从中东角度对安乐死进行研究,强调了安乐死的相关性和新颖性。研究强调了实施安乐死的障碍和赞同安乐死的理由,同时还指出了与这一复杂课题相关的重要因素。研究范围包括约旦的所有六家医疗机构以及约旦各地的多家医院。结果研究参与者的年龄中位数为 21 岁(21-22 岁)。分析表明,30.3% 的参与者表示支持安乐死。指定与认识和准备程度明显相关。宗教活动与态度有关,而宗教与准备程度有关。在本次研究中,参与者对安乐死持悲观态度。反对的主要原因包括担心安乐死可能被滥用于谋取私利,以及宗教或文化信仰的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Exploring awareness, attitudes, and readiness towards euthanasia among medical students and staff in Jordan: A multicenter cross-sectional study

Background

Euthanasia stands as an enduring and polarizing subject within medical ethics, the contentious nature of this topic emanates from the clash between a physician's duty to preserve life and alleviate suffering. This study provides valuable insights into the perspective of medical students and staff, examining their awareness levels, attitudes, and readiness regarding euthanasia. Notably, the research is framed within the unique context of the Middle East, challenging the predominantly Western influence on end-of-life decision studies. This study is the first of its kind to examine a Middle Eastern perspective on euthanasia, emphasizing its relevance and novelty. It highlights both the obstacles to its implementation and the rationales for endorsing it, while also pinpointing the significant factors linked to this complex subject.

Method

This multicenter cross-sectional study enrolled 646 individuals, including medical students and staff. The study encompassed all six medical facilities in the, as well as multiple hospitals across Jordan.

Results

The median age of the study participants was 21 years old (21–22). The analysis showed that 30.3% of the participants expressed support for euthanasia. Designation was significantly associated with awareness and readiness. Religious activity was associated with attitude, while religion was associated with readiness. In this current study, participants displayed a pessimistic stance regarding euthanasia. The primary reasons for opposition included concerns about its potential misuse for personal gain, as well as the impact of religious or cultural beliefs.

Conclusion

The present research significantly contributes to the global discourse on euthanasia, offering a comprehensive glimpse into how medical practitioners and students in Jordan navigate this intricate issue.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Ethics, Medicine and Public Health
Ethics, Medicine and Public Health Medicine-Health Policy
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
107
审稿时长
42 days
期刊介绍: This review aims to compare approaches to medical ethics and bioethics in two forms, Anglo-Saxon (Ethics, Medicine and Public Health) and French (Ethique, Médecine et Politiques Publiques). Thus, in their native languages, the authors will present research on the legitimacy of the practice and appreciation of the consequences of acts towards patients as compared to the limits acceptable by the community, as illustrated by the democratic debate.
期刊最新文献
No reward without responsibility: Focus on peer review reports The human body and the body elements—Conditions for their use in genetics under the French bioethics law and beyond A retrospective cohort study on lung cancer screening methods in Japan and the US The Kussmaul sign in Michelangelo Buonarroti (1475–1564) Ethical reflections on healthy aging
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1