实时磁共振成像中颞下颌关节分析的地标识别可靠性。

IF 2.4 2区 医学 Q2 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE Head & Face Medicine Pub Date : 2024-02-17 DOI:10.1186/s13005-024-00411-7
Jérémy Mouchoux, Philipp Meyer-Marcotty, Florian Sojka, Peter Dechent, Daniela Klenke, Bernhard Wiechens, Anja Quast
{"title":"实时磁共振成像中颞下颌关节分析的地标识别可靠性。","authors":"Jérémy Mouchoux, Philipp Meyer-Marcotty, Florian Sojka, Peter Dechent, Daniela Klenke, Bernhard Wiechens, Anja Quast","doi":"10.1186/s13005-024-00411-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Real-time magnetic resonance imaging (rtMRI) is essential for diagnosing and comprehending temporomandibular joint (TMJ) movements. Current methods for tracking and analysis require manual landmark placement on each acquisition frame. Therefore, our study aimed to assess the inter- and intra-rater reliability of placing cephalometric landmarks in frames from a dynamic real-time TMJ MRI.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>Four real-time MRIs of the right TMJ were taken during mandibular movement at ten frames per second. Seven dentists identified ten landmarks on two frames (intercuspal position-ICP-and maximum mouth opening-MMO) twice at a two-week interval, yielding 112 tracings. Six typical cephalometric measurements (angles and distances) were derived from these landmarks. The reliabilities of landmarks and measurements were evaluated using distance-based (dbICC), linear mixed effect model intraclass correlation (lmeICC), and standard ICC.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The average inter-rater reliability for the landmarks stood at 0.92 (dbICC) and 0.93 (lmeICC). The intra-rater reliability scores were 0.97 and 0.98. Over 80% of the landmarks showed an ICC greater than 0.98 (inter-rater) and over 0.99 (intra-rater). The lowest landmark ICC was observed for the orbitale and the oblique ridge of the mandibular ramus. However, the cephalometric angle and distance measurements derived from these landmarks showed only moderate to good reliability, whereas the reliability in the frames with ICP was better than those with MMO. Measurements performed in the ICP frame were more reliable than measurements in the MMO frame.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>While dentists reliably localize isolated landmarks in real-time MRIs, the cephalometric measurements derived from them remain inconsistent. The better results in ICP than MMO are probably due to a more familiar jaw position. The higher error rate of the TMJ measurements in MMO could be associated with a lack of training in real-time MRI analysis in dentistry.</p>","PeriodicalId":12994,"journal":{"name":"Head & Face Medicine","volume":"20 1","pages":"10"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10874088/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Reliability of landmark identification for analysis of the temporomandibular joint in real-time MRI.\",\"authors\":\"Jérémy Mouchoux, Philipp Meyer-Marcotty, Florian Sojka, Peter Dechent, Daniela Klenke, Bernhard Wiechens, Anja Quast\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s13005-024-00411-7\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Real-time magnetic resonance imaging (rtMRI) is essential for diagnosing and comprehending temporomandibular joint (TMJ) movements. Current methods for tracking and analysis require manual landmark placement on each acquisition frame. Therefore, our study aimed to assess the inter- and intra-rater reliability of placing cephalometric landmarks in frames from a dynamic real-time TMJ MRI.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>Four real-time MRIs of the right TMJ were taken during mandibular movement at ten frames per second. Seven dentists identified ten landmarks on two frames (intercuspal position-ICP-and maximum mouth opening-MMO) twice at a two-week interval, yielding 112 tracings. Six typical cephalometric measurements (angles and distances) were derived from these landmarks. The reliabilities of landmarks and measurements were evaluated using distance-based (dbICC), linear mixed effect model intraclass correlation (lmeICC), and standard ICC.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The average inter-rater reliability for the landmarks stood at 0.92 (dbICC) and 0.93 (lmeICC). The intra-rater reliability scores were 0.97 and 0.98. Over 80% of the landmarks showed an ICC greater than 0.98 (inter-rater) and over 0.99 (intra-rater). The lowest landmark ICC was observed for the orbitale and the oblique ridge of the mandibular ramus. However, the cephalometric angle and distance measurements derived from these landmarks showed only moderate to good reliability, whereas the reliability in the frames with ICP was better than those with MMO. Measurements performed in the ICP frame were more reliable than measurements in the MMO frame.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>While dentists reliably localize isolated landmarks in real-time MRIs, the cephalometric measurements derived from them remain inconsistent. The better results in ICP than MMO are probably due to a more familiar jaw position. The higher error rate of the TMJ measurements in MMO could be associated with a lack of training in real-time MRI analysis in dentistry.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12994,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Head & Face Medicine\",\"volume\":\"20 1\",\"pages\":\"10\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-02-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10874088/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Head & Face Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13005-024-00411-7\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Head & Face Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13005-024-00411-7","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:实时磁共振成像(rtMRI)对于诊断和理解颞下颌关节(TMJ)运动至关重要。目前的跟踪和分析方法需要在每个采集帧上手动放置地标。因此,我们的研究旨在评估在动态实时颞下颌关节 MRI 图像帧中放置头颅测量标志物的评分者之间和评分者内部的可靠性:在下颌运动过程中以每秒十帧的速度拍摄了四张右侧颞下颌关节的实时 MRI 图像。七位牙医在两幅图像(趾间位置-ICP 和最大张口度-MMO)上识别了十个地标,每隔两周识别两次,共获得 112 个轨迹。根据这些地标得出了六种典型的头颅测量方法(角度和距离)。采用距离法(dbICC)、线性混合效应模型类内相关法(lmeICC)和标准 ICC 对地标和测量结果的可靠性进行了评估:地标的平均评分者间信度为 0.92(dbICC)和 0.93(lmeICC)。评分者内部信度分别为 0.97 和 0.98。超过 80% 的地标显示 ICC 大于 0.98(评分者之间)和 0.99(评分者内部)。眶骨和下颌骨斜嵴的地标 ICC 最低。然而,根据这些地标得出的头颅角度和距离测量值仅显示出中等至良好的可靠性,而在带有 ICP 的框架中的可靠性则优于带有 MMO 的框架。在 ICP 框架中进行的测量比在 MMO 框架中进行的测量更可靠:结论:虽然牙医能可靠地定位实时磁共振成像中的孤立地标,但由此得出的头形测量结果仍不一致。与 MMO 相比,ICP 的结果更好,这可能是因为下颌位置更熟悉。MMO 中颞下颌关节测量的错误率较高,这可能与牙科医生缺乏实时 MRI 分析培训有关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Reliability of landmark identification for analysis of the temporomandibular joint in real-time MRI.

Background: Real-time magnetic resonance imaging (rtMRI) is essential for diagnosing and comprehending temporomandibular joint (TMJ) movements. Current methods for tracking and analysis require manual landmark placement on each acquisition frame. Therefore, our study aimed to assess the inter- and intra-rater reliability of placing cephalometric landmarks in frames from a dynamic real-time TMJ MRI.

Material and methods: Four real-time MRIs of the right TMJ were taken during mandibular movement at ten frames per second. Seven dentists identified ten landmarks on two frames (intercuspal position-ICP-and maximum mouth opening-MMO) twice at a two-week interval, yielding 112 tracings. Six typical cephalometric measurements (angles and distances) were derived from these landmarks. The reliabilities of landmarks and measurements were evaluated using distance-based (dbICC), linear mixed effect model intraclass correlation (lmeICC), and standard ICC.

Results: The average inter-rater reliability for the landmarks stood at 0.92 (dbICC) and 0.93 (lmeICC). The intra-rater reliability scores were 0.97 and 0.98. Over 80% of the landmarks showed an ICC greater than 0.98 (inter-rater) and over 0.99 (intra-rater). The lowest landmark ICC was observed for the orbitale and the oblique ridge of the mandibular ramus. However, the cephalometric angle and distance measurements derived from these landmarks showed only moderate to good reliability, whereas the reliability in the frames with ICP was better than those with MMO. Measurements performed in the ICP frame were more reliable than measurements in the MMO frame.

Conclusion: While dentists reliably localize isolated landmarks in real-time MRIs, the cephalometric measurements derived from them remain inconsistent. The better results in ICP than MMO are probably due to a more familiar jaw position. The higher error rate of the TMJ measurements in MMO could be associated with a lack of training in real-time MRI analysis in dentistry.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Head & Face Medicine
Head & Face Medicine DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE-
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
3.30%
发文量
32
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Head & Face Medicine is a multidisciplinary open access journal that publishes basic and clinical research concerning all aspects of cranial, facial and oral conditions. The journal covers all aspects of cranial, facial and oral diseases and their management. It has been designed as a multidisciplinary journal for clinicians and researchers involved in the diagnostic and therapeutic aspects of diseases which affect the human head and face. The journal is wide-ranging, covering the development, aetiology, epidemiology and therapy of head and face diseases to the basic science that underlies these diseases. Management of head and face diseases includes all aspects of surgical and non-surgical treatments including psychopharmacological therapies.
期刊最新文献
Development of a machine learning-based predictive model for maxillary sinus cysts and exploration of clustering patterns. Influence of acidic solutions on surface roughness of polished and glazed CAD-CAM restorative materials. The effects of restorative material and connector cross-section area on the stress distribution of fixed partial denture: a finite element analysis. Schneiderian membrane perforation repair using a crosslinked collagen membrane: a retrospective cohort study. Temporomandibular disorder prevalence in malocclusion patients: a meta-analysis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1